RODIMUS THE COWARD - IGNORANT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 'HO HUIOS' AND 'TO HUIO' IN GREEK

O HO, HO, HO... THE FAKE ROBOT WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS HURTING. HE,HE,HE... HA,HA,HA... AND IN EFFECT HE HAS REACHED THE SUMMIT OF STUPIDITY. IMAGINE, HE DARED TO GIVE US THE LINK FOR HIS CLAIM THAT IN GREEK MANUSCRIPTS JOHN 4:5 IS RENDERED 'HO HUIOS'. OF COURSE I IMMEDIATELY CHECKED AND WHAT I FOUND OUT IS THAT:

1. All Greek texts presented in Biblos.com RESEMBLES THE NOVUM TESTAMENTUM GRAECE OF NESTLE-ALAND. THEY DO NOT PRESENT 'HO HUIOS' AT ALL BUT 'TO HUIO'. For those who can read Greek please follow this link that Rodimus the Coward had given: http://scripturetext.com/john/4-5.htm

2. RODIMUS THE COWARD IS IGNORANT INDEED, CERTIFIED AND AUDITED IGNORANT, OF BASIC GREEK BECAUSE HE HAS DECEIVED HIMSELF THAT 'TW' MUST BE READ AS 'HO'... HO, HO, HO... NO, NO, NO!!!

The T in Greek is equivalent to our T

The W in Greek is equivalent to our O but in longer form because its Omega and not Omicron.

TW = TO and not as HO

What is HO in Greek? Well, our H as in H-orse is silent in the beginning of Greek words. Usually it is presented when the vowel is accompanied by a reverse apostrophe on top. Thus,

HO is written 'O as in 'O THEOS [pronounced as HO THEOS, THE GOD], 'O 'UIOS [pronounced as HO HUIOS, THE SON].

How about HUIOS? Well, how can 'UIW' be rendered as HUIOS when it is obvious that THE ENDING IS OMEGA or W = O and NOT SIGMA or S = S. The correct rendering is obviously 'HUIO'. IF IT IS 'HUIOS' IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN WRITTEN: 'UIOS. So this quote from Rodimus the Coward:

"He quotes the Nestle Aland Manuscript as his support. I don't know if he has amnesia or something but what is really the argument of his previous blog? His argument: The phrase "the son" does not exist in John 4:5. I argued that while the English Bibles does not render it as "the son", Greek Manuscripts do. If you will click here: http://scripturetext.com/john/4-5.htm Wescot and Hort, Textus Receptus, Byzantine text etc. all render it as ho huios (tw uiw)."

IS OUR SOLID EVIDENCE OF HIS IGNORANCE AND STUPIDITY... SOLID PROOF OF HIS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. LOOK AT ALL THE ENGLISH VERSIONS PRESENTED... BEHOLD, THEY AGREE WITH ATTY. LLASOS THAT THE CORRECT TRANSLATION IS 'HIS SON' AND NOT 'THE SON'. THE REASON WHY THEY ALL TRANSLATED IT THAT WAY IS DUE TO THE FACT THAT ALL THE GREEK TEXTS PRESENTED BELOW EVEN THE WESCOT AND HORT, TEXTUS RECEPTUS, BYZANTINE, ETC. ARE RENDERING IT 'TW HUIW' [TO HUIO] --- THEY ARE ALL 'TO HUIO' AND NOT 'HO HUIOS'. I CAN PROVE THAT BECAUSE I HAVE A PERSONAL COPY OF THE NESTLE-ALAND NOVUM TESTAMENTUM GRAECE AND SO FAR ALL THE GREEK TEXTS PRESENTED BY RODIMUS THE COWARD, CERTIFIED AND AUDITED LIAR, ARE GIVING THE SAME RENDERING AS THE NESTLE-ALAND. HERE IT IS:

NESTLE-ALAND John 4:5 ἔρχεται οὖν εις πόλιν της Σαμαρείας λεγομένην Συχαρ, πλησίον του χωρίου ὃ ἔδωκεν ᾿Ιακωβ ᾿Ιωσηφ τω υιω αυτου·

LOOK, LOOK, LOOK MY DEAR BROTHERS AND SISTERS AT THE NESTLE-ALAND TRANSLATION OF 'TO HUIO' AND COMPARE IT TO THE GREEK TEXTS BELOW... BEHOLD THE STUPIDITY, THE IGNORANCE AND THE DECEPTION OF RODIMUS THE COWARD.

AND MAY I ALSO REMIND THIS CERTIFIED AND AUDITED COWARD THAT HE ACCEPTED THE FACT THAT THE NESTLE-ALAND PRESENTED THE GREEK TEXT AS 'TO HUIO' DURING HIS EXCHANGE WITH ATTY. MARWIL LLASOS IN HIS BLOG. REMEMBER THIS:

Bro. Marwil N. Llasos said...

All you words return to you, Rodimus! Once a liar, always a liar. A liar who says he is not a liar and points to others as liars is the greatest liar. And that's you. Can you read Greek? Here's the Romanized form and see if there's anything there that says HO HUIOS:

“erchetai oun eis polin tEs samareias legomenEn suchar plEsion tou chOriou ho edOken iakOb [tO] iOsEph tO huiO autou.”

So where is HO HUIOS?

Rodimus is a liar in a denial stage.

So, for lying once again that HO HUIOS is in the Greek manuscript of John 4:5, Rodimus has proven to all and sundry that he is an ineterate liar!

Go get your Nestle Aland, Rodimus! Read John 4:5 and see your beloved HO HUIOS THERE. You are not just a liar but biblically illiterate as well!

So, when can you publicly debate me? I'm waiting.

You just wait and you'll have your Tertullian. Blunder? Don't celebrate yet....

March 12, 2009 7:47 AM

Rodimus said...

Granting that, but that's only one Manuscript. What about the other Greek Manuscripts? Talk about myopic.

UNFORTUNATELY FOR THIS CERTIFIED AND AUDITED COWARD THE OTHER GREEK TEXTS THAT HE PRESENTED AS EVIDENCES HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE SIMILAR TO THE NESTLE-ALAND. THUS, BOTH IN GREEK AND IN ENGLISH, ATTY. LLASOS IS CORRECT AND SCHOLARLY UPHELD.

BELOW ARE THE ENGLISH AND THE GREEK TEXTS CLAIMED BY THE MODERATING COWARD FROM THE BEREANS:

***********************************************************

New American Standard Bible (©1995) So He came to a city of Samaria called Sychar, near the parcel of ground that Jacob gave to his son Joseph;

***********

King James BibleThen cometh he to a city of Samaria, which is called Sychar, near to the parcel of ground that Jacob gave to his son Joseph.

***********

American King James VersionThen comes he to a city of Samaria, which is called Sychar, near to the parcel of ground that Jacob gave to his son Joseph.

************

American Standard VersionSo he cometh to a city of Samaria, called Sychar, near to the parcel of ground that Jacob gave to his son Joseph:

*************

Douay-Rheims BibleHe cometh therefore to a city of Samaria, which is called Sichar, near the land which Jacob gave to his son Joseph.

************

Darby Bible TranslationHe comes therefore to a city of Samaria called Sychar, near to the land which Jacob gave to his son Joseph.

************

English Revised VersionSo he cometh to a city of Samaria, called Sychar, near to the parcel of ground that Jacob gave to his son Joseph:

************

Webster's Bible TranslationThen he cometh to a city of Samaria, which is called Sychar, near to the parcel of ground, that Jacob gave to his son Joseph.

************

World English BibleSo he came to a city of Samaria, called Sychar, near the parcel of ground that Jacob gave to his son, Joseph.

************

Young's Literal TranslationHe cometh, therefore, to a city of Samaria, called Sychar, near to the place that Jacob gave to Joseph his son;

**************

ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 4:5 Greek NT: Tischendorf 8th Ed. with Diacriticsἔρχεται οὖν εἰς πόλιν τῆς Σαμαρίας λεγομένην Συχάρ, πλησίον τοῦ χωρίου ὃ ἔδωκεν Ἰακὼβ Ἰωσὴφ τῷ υἱῷ αὐτοῦ.

****************

ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 4:5 Greek NT: Greek Orthodox Churchἔρχεται οὖν εἰς πόλιν τῆς Σαμαρείας λεγομένην Συχὰρ, πλησίον τοῦ χωρίου ὃ ἔδωκεν Ἰακὼβ Ἰωσὴφ τῷ υἱῷ αὐτοῦ.

************

ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 4:5 Greek NT: Stephanus Textus Receptus (1550, with accents)ἔρχεται οὖν εἰς πόλιν τῆς Σαμαρείας λεγομένην Συχὰρ πλησίον τοῦ χωρίου ὃ ἔδωκεν Ἰακὼβ Ἰωσὴφ τῷ υἱῷ αὐτοῦ·

****************

ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 4:5 Greek NT: Westcott/Hort with Diacriticsἔρχεται οὖν εἰς πόλιν τῆς Σαμαρείας λεγομένην Συχὰρ πλησίον τοῦ χωρίου ὁ ἔδωκεν Ἰακώβ [τῷ] Ἰωσὴφ τῷ υἱῷ αὐτοῦ·

****************

ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 4:5 Greek NT: Tischendorf 8th Ed.ερχεται ουν εις πολιν της σαμαριας λεγομενην συχαρ πλησιον του χωριου ο εδωκεν ιακωβ ιωσηφ τω υιω αυτου

************

ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 4:5 Greek NT: Byzantine/Majority Text (2000)ερχεται ουν εις πολιν της σαμαρειας λεγομενην συχαρ πλησιον του χωριου ο εδωκεν ιακωβ ιωσηφ τω υιω αυτου

*************

ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 4:5 Greek NT: Textus Receptus (1550) ερχεται ουν εις πολιν της σαμαρειας λεγομενην συχαρ πλησιον του χωριου ο εδωκεν ιακωβ ιωσηφ τω υιω αυτου

*************

ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 4:5 Greek NT: Textus Receptus (1894)ερχεται ουν εις πολιν της σαμαρειας λεγομενην συχαρ πλησιον του χωριου ο εδωκεν ιακωβ ιωσηφ τω υιω αυτου

*************

ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 4:5 Greek NT: Westcott/Hortερχεται ουν εις πολιν της σαμαρειας λεγομενην συχαρ πλησιον του χωριου ο εδωκεν ιακωβ [τω] ιωσηφ τω υιω αυτου

*************************************************************

RODIMUS THE COWARD, RODIMUS THE LIAR, RODIMUS THE DECEIVER, RODIMUS THE GREAT PRETENDER!!!