THE FIRST ENGLISH BIBLE, 1539: The Byble in Englyshe : that is to saye, the content of all the holy scrypture, bothe of ye olde and newe testament, truly translated after the veryte of the Hebrue and Greke textes, by ye dylygent studye of dyverse excellent learned men, expert in the forsayde tonges. [London] : prynted by Rychard Grafton & Edward Whitchurch, 1539.
In 1539, Thomas Cranmer, the Archbishop of Canterbury, hired Myles Coverdale at the behest of Henry VIII to publish the "Great Bible" - so-called because of its impressive physical size. It was the first Bible in English to be authorised for public use, being distributed to every church and chained to the pulpit. [cf. http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.leeds.ac.uk/library/adopt-a-book/pics/bible.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.leeds.ac.uk/library/adopt-a-book/bible.htm&usg=__KqqYYrMDdTw2uGIiI0b3Lr4_sbw=&h=1084&w=730&sz=178&hl=en&start=83&um=1&tbnid=8IUEKgXrfhaOUM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=101&prev=/images%3Fq%3DBible%26ndsp%3D20%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4GGLL_enPH317PH317%26sa%3DN%26start%3D80%26um%3D1]
[The above picture and statement speaks a thousand words to me. First, the Protestants then were using Images for their Bible while their grandchildren now are so opposed to the use of Images. Second, it is stated that even Protestants Bible at those time where chained to the pulpit. So, it is not true that only the Catholic Church was using chains for the Bible during those times. The Protestants are guilty of the same evil that they are accusing agaisnt us. ----Fr. Abe, CRS]
This was published by BELIEVE Magazine, December 2008 - February 2009 edition. The magazine is published under the auspices of the Archdiocese of Manila. This was written for teenage students, hence the very simple tone
************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ****
Where did you get the Bible anyway?
When you have no time to defend the Catholic Church in detail, what should you say?
Carlos Antonio Palad
You have a friend who is a Born-Again Christian; well, not yet, perhaps, but she is attending Bible studies and services in a Born-Again or “nondenominational” church and is beginning to question your Catholic faith.
“Where is it in the Bible that we should pray to Mary?”
“Where is it in the Bible that we should have statues? Don’t these violate the Second Commandment?”
Ideally, any Catholic should know enough of the Bible in order to answer these basic questions. As St. Jerome said, “ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ,” and the Bible itself says “Always be prepared to make a defense to any one who calls you to account for the hope that is in you, yet do it with gentleness and reverence.” (1 Peter 3:15)
Hopefully, you would be able to say that we pray to Mary because she is the Mother of all who follow Christ (cf. John 19:26-27 and Revelations 12, esp. 12:17) – and can we not talk to our mother? You could also say that we have statues because having statues is not actually forbidden by the Ten Commandments. What the Lord forbids is the worship of statues as if these are real gods in addition to Him, the one true God. The Lord Himself ordered statues that represent His power and presence to be made (Exodus 37:7-9, Numbers 21:8-9). Catholic statues of the Virgin Mary, of angels and saints, and of the Lord Himself, are not gods, but are reminders of God’s presence.
However, there will come a time when answering these questions will become very repetitive and tiring. Before even coming to that point, it would be better to stop the vicious cycle by challenging the very basis of all these questions.
So, next time your friend asks you another question that begins: “Where is that in the Bible…”, respond with your own questions: “Why do you believe in the Bible anyway? Where did you get the Bible, and how do you know that the Bible is God’s Word?”
Look at your friend’s eyes widen in shock and surprise when you answer: “The only reason why you and I consider the Bible to be the Word of God is because the Catholic Church says so!”
That’s right! The Bible didn’t just fall from heaven, while a thundering voice from out of nowhere proclaimed “THIS IS GOD’S WORD!” The Bible as we know it – with 27 books in the New Testament and 46 (for Protestants, 39) books in the Old Testament – did not even exist in the time of Christ and of the Apostles.
What we now call the Bible came into its final form only in the 4th and 5th centuries A.D., when Church authorities sought to stop the proliferation of fake “Gospels” and “Epistles” and of the errors contained in these, by compiling a definite collection of books that can be considered as truly inspired by God and as containing the authentic teaching of Our Lord Jesus and His Apostles.
The complete story would take volumes to relate, but in a nutshell, here is how it went:
In 367, St. Athanasius of Alexandria – a great defender of the Divinity of Christ – wrote his “39th Festal Letter” in which he identified what books rightfully belong to the “New Testament.” He did this to protect his followers in Alexandria from believing in the various heresies and errors contained in bogus “holy books”. This was the first time that the “canon” or official list of books of the New Testament was identified. It gained immediate acceptance with most believers.
In the years 393, the Council of Hippo made the first enumeration of all the 73 books (both Old and New Testament) that we Catholics now consider as comprising the Bible. This same list was affirmed 4 years later, in 397, in the Council of Carthage. A few years later, Saint Exuperius of Toulouse wrote to Pope St. Innocent I in a formal letter requesting the list of canonical books. The Pope replied in 405 A.D. with a letter confirming and reaffirming the canon given at Hippo and Carthage. Yet another Council in Carthage, in the year 419, reaffirmed the canon of the Bible given in previous Councils in Hippo and Carthage.
Now, some Born-Again Christians might complain: “But the Catholic Bible has a different Old Testament from the Old Testament that we use!” They’re right: the Catholic Old Testament has 46 books while the Protestant Old Testament has only 39 books.
There is an easy answer to this: the Catholic Old Testament is based upon the Greek Old Testament actually used in the time of Jesus Christ and accepted by all Christians for 1,500 years. The version of the Old Testament used by Protestants (including the “Born Again”), on the other hand, is based on a Hebrew version compiled several decades after Jesus lived and walked on the Earth. It was not accepted as the real Old Testament by any Christian until the founder of Protestantism, Martin Luther, did so in 1521. The differences between the Protestant and Catholic Old Testament also do not change the fact that Born Again Christians accept – without question – the Catholic New Testament.
So, next time someone tries to weaken your Catholic faith by using the Bible, remember: the Bible is a Catholic book.
Carlos Antonio Palad is an Associate of the Defensores Fidei Foundation, a group dedicated to teaching Catholics how to defend their faith. He is also part of the team behind the blog “Rorate Caeli” (http://rorate- caeli.blogspot. com)
.jpg)
Excellent read Fr. Abe. In addition to that I've heard from EWTN and from Catholic Apologist Michael Voris of St Michael's Media that the Jews decades after Jesus' death and resurrection decided to remove the 7 books in the Old Testament because they were being used by Christians to prove the divinity of Christ though these books were accepted by the Jews during Jesus Christ' time. Martin Luther on the other hand decided to remove those books because they prove the Church's doctrine of purgatory and many other beliefs which run counter to his new religion though the Jews did, and still do, believe in praying for the souls of the dead, even without the Maccabees as the official books of the Hebrew Old Testament. It is my fervent wish though that our priests especially here in the Philippines start defending our Church against all the attacks we are hearing from different denominations left and right that have weaken the faith of millions of Catholics. Surely, if we really love our Holy Mother Church, we would defend her from those seeking to destroy her right? I myself never heard this apologia from priests. It is by my own reading and watching of a lot of Catholic apologetic materials that I've learned about these. But we have to admit that out of one Catholic (like me) who's very interested in knowing the truths of his faith, there are millions of Catholics out there who are not interested with apologetics, or, who are interested but do not have the time or do have the materials. An example is our home, out of six adults here I'm the only one knowledgeble of the faith. We all have the faith but they don't know how to defend the faith. We have internet access and cable here but they don't use them to look for apologetics stuff coz their interests are entirely different. The same goes for millions of Catholics out there. Hence the only way really for most Catholics to know more about the faith is on Sundays when they faithfully go to Church, and the priests instruct the faithful about their faith. My feeling is that if this would have had been done this born-again and other sects wouldn't have been that successful. But it happened, so I hoped the Church does something about this to turn the tide. Christo et Ecclesiae
ReplyDeleteDefending the Church is loving the Church and loving the Church is loving her founder, Jesus Christ. Mabuhay ang Santa iglesia!! Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam!!!
ReplyDeleteDear Eric,
ReplyDeleteGrace and Peace!
Yes, that's very true. The Jews established the Canon of the Old Testament only after the death of Jesus and they rejected the Septuagint because the Apostles and the Christians were using and quoting it for their writings and preaching. Martin Luther in his effort to attack the Catholic Church favored the Old Testament of the Jewish Rabbi who were anti-Christ and persecutors of the Apostles. It's amazing isn't it? Luther also wanted to remove the Epistle of James but he was prevented by the other reformers.
We can see how that man has made a fool out of himself. Claiming Sola Scriptura yet he has very little respects on Scriptures.
Dear Diocese of Imus,
ReplyDeleteMABUHAY ANG SANTA IGLESIA, ANG KAISA-ISANG IGLESIANG ITINATAG NG PANGINOONG HESUKRISTO.