Wednesday, November 25, 2009

KALABISAN BA SA PAGIGING TAGAPAMAGITAN NI CRISTO ANG PAMAMAGITAN NI MARIA? Response from Atty. Marwil Llasos

Mary the Mother of the Lord during Pentecost
Resilyn Bago said...

I wonder kung mapopost ang comment ko na ito. I commented many times in your blogs pero lahat di napublish. Will all due respect, I'd like to know if there is there anything wrong or you just don't like people to see?

Anyway, For there is one God, and one mediator between god and men, the man Jesus Christ. (I Tim 2:5)

Nakiisa o nakikibahagi lamang si Maria sa pagiging tagapamagitan....hindi ito nakakabawas o nakadaragdag man sa pagiging tagapamagitan ni Kristo? Bakit kailangan makibahagi ni Maria? Hindi ba sapat si Kristo?

Isa pa, tao lang si Maria. itinakda sa tao ang mamatay ng minsan at pagkatapos ay ang paghuhukom (Heb 9:27) Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face the judgment (Eccle 9:10) Whatever your hands find to do, do it with all your might, for in the grave, where you are going, THERE IS NEITHER WORKING NOR PLANNING NOR KNOWLEDGE NOR WISDOM.... Patay na si Maria, sa paniniwala nyo ba eh may malay siya sa mga nangyayari ngayon? pagkatapos ng pagkamatay ng tao, ang sunod ay ang paghuhukom..kaya paanong makakapamagitan si Maria eh wala nga siyang malay ngayon maging ang lahat ng mga santo nyo?

Sana naman mabasa din ng iba ang comment ko para mapagisipan din nila..

October 14, 2009 7:45 AM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

Ms. Bago [Ngunit Lumang Style]

Ang lahat ng comments mo ay ipinaskel ko. And hindi ko lang pinapaskel ay ang mga bastos at walang modong mensahe. Subalit ang iyong mga comento ay maayos naman at doktrina at biblical ang usapan. Kaya walang problema.

Hindi mo makikita dito ang mga una mong comento dahil hindi mo naman dito inilagay ang mga iyon. Dun ka pumunta sa pinag paskelan mo at makikita mo ang mga comments mo at ang mga sagot namin.

Ito rin ay aking sasagutin mamaya.

October 14, 2009 10:32 AM

Bro. Marwil N. Llasos said...

[I wonder kung mapopost ang comment ko na ito. I commented many times in your blogs pero lahat di napublish. Will all due respect, I'd like to know if there is there anything wrong or you just don't like people to see?]

Malisyosa ka. Palabintangin sa kapwa. Walang katutubong pag-ibig, palabintangin (2 Tim. 3:3).

[Anyway, For there is one God, and one mediator between god and men, the man Jesus Christ. (I Tim 2:5)]

Naipaliwanag na ang ibig sabihin ng talata. Ewan klo kung binasa mo talaga o hindi mo naintindihan. Ikaw ang may problema sa reading comprehension niyan.
[Nakiisa o nakikibahagi lamang si Maria sa pagiging tagapamagitan....hindi ito nakakabawas o nakadaragdag man sa pagiging tagapamagitan ni Kristo? Bakit kailangan makibahagi ni Maria? Hindi ba sapat si Kristo?]

SAGOT: Aba’y sapat na si Cristo. Pero hindi ang pagiging sapat ni Cristo ang isyu. Ang tanong ay NILOOB BA NI CRISTO NA MAKIISA O MAKIBAHAGI SA KANYA ANG KANYANG MGA LINGKOD (GAYA NI MARIA)? Aba’y opo. Bakit IAARAL at IUUTOS ni Apostol Pablo na MAMAGITAN tayo (1 Timoteo 2:1)? Di ba kalabisan din iyan sa pagiging SAPAT ng pamamagitan ni CRISTO?

Si Cristo ay hindi kuripot. Gusto niya tayong makasama at makabahagi. Tutol ka ba diyan?

[Isa pa, tao lang si Maria. itinakda sa tao ang mamatay ng minsan at pagkatapos ay ang paghuhukom (Heb 9:27) Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face the judgment (Eccle 9:10) Whatever your hands find to do, do it with all your might, for in the grave, where you are going, THERE IS NEITHER WORKING NOR PLANNING NOR KNOWLEDGE NOR WISDOM.... Patay na si Maria, sa paniniwala nyo ba eh may malay siya sa mga nangyayari ngayon? pagkatapos ng pagkamatay ng tao, ang sunod ay ang paghuhukom..kaya paanong makakapamagitan si Maria eh wala nga siyang malay ngayon maging ang lahat ng mga santo nyo?]

Opinion mo lang iyan. Eh kung ang tao ay walang malay pag namatay, sino ang nakausap ni Cristo sa Transfiguration, aber? Di ba sina Moises at Elias? Bakit sila nakausap ni Kristo?

Alam mo ginagawa mong sinungaling si Cristo niyan eh. NAMUMUSONG KA. Eh di ba sinabi NI Jesus sa mabuting magnanakaw, "TODAY YOU WILL BE WITH ME IN PARADISE" (Luke 23:43). Eh kung walang malay iyong magnanakaw, SINO ang makakasama ni Cristo sa Paraiso? SINO? SABIHIN MO KUNG SINO!

October 15, 2009 1:56 PM

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF WORSHIPPING GOD IN SPIRIT?

God's preferred worship in the Temple

The Worship of God in Heaven
Catholic Worship on Earth

Anonymous said...

Do you know what are the other signs of the anti Crist??????...

one of my example is those who redict the name Christ Given by the Father(Acts 4:11)...on which Christ's Sheep is also called...too much for none sence computation...i can calculate any name and make it equal to 666...the bible does not end in this numbers

onother example..."Herby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the FLESH is of God:And every spirit that fonfesseth not that jesus crhist is come in the flesh is not of God:and this is the spirit of anti-Christ..."(1 John 4:2-3)

The true worshippers of God worship Him in the spirit and tuth becase GOD is a SPIRIT thats whay we cant see him not even in images that represent him or his image...(actc 17:29)

Want more fathers of spirit?????

for personal massage:

email me at linuxack@yahoo.com

November 9, 2009 7:59 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

Too much for nonsense computation, ha. Thanks but no thanks. Because still you appear to be on league with the 666 computing agents.

WORSHIP GOD IN SPIRIT because GOD IS SPIRIT. How nice of you! Let me check on that...

What do you mean by Worshipping God in Spirit?

You worship in a special Prayer House for God. Is that worship in Spirit? Is going to a house of prayer for worship, a form of worship in Spirit? Is staying inside your room worship in spirit? Is closing your eyes in prayer or maintaining them open throughout worship in Spirit? IS MOSES PRAYER OF 40 DAYS FASTING ON MT. SINAI FOR YOU NOT PRAYER IN SPIRIT? Imagine, he was on top of mountain and was fasting like the Catholics. He, he, he... AND WORSE, JESUS IMITATED MOSES FOR PRAYING ON THE MOUNT FOR THE SAME DAYS-FRAME WITH THE SAME FASTING METHOD. Is that disqualified for your worship in Spirit?

You are singing songs of praise to God. Is singing praises a worship in spirit or worship using the body's musical chords and man-made instruments? If it is worship in spirit why is there a need to use the voice, modulate it, to form a choir, to practice together, etc.?

Why is it that during your prayers your pastors and ministers speak words? Long and repetitious words. Is that prayer in Spirit? Why do Born Again and many Evangelicals continuesly shout: Amen, Alleluia, Praise the Lord during worship? Is that necessary for worship in spirit?

WHAT IS PRAYER IN THE SPIRIT?

Is the dancing and the singing and the loud music of the Born Again the real worship in Spirit?

Are the shoutings and the cryings of the Iglesia ni Manalo the genuine worship in Spirit?

Are the kneelings facing the Sun and the East for the Dating Daan faithful the true worship in Spirit?

Are the worships of Seventh Day Adventist ONLY on Saturdays the proper worship in Spirit? or worship of the Pharisees?

THESE ARE MY QUESTIONS. HOPE YOU WILL ANSWER THEM ONE BY ONE, PIECE BY PIECE. Because one friend of mine, belonging to the Born Again told me the same thing about Worship in Spirit. And do you know what is his role during their worships... GUITARIST. Ha, ha, ha... And not just any guitar for him, ELECTRIC GUITAR CONNECTED TO LOUD SPEAKERS. So, is that Worship in Spirit? He, he, he... Speaking of Hypocrisy.

GOD IS PURE SPIRIT... Yes or No: YESSSSS!!! IS MAN ALSO PURE SPIRIT? Yes or No: NOOOOOO!!! Oh, I'm glad that you know that you are not pure Spirit. Of course, you have a body it is proven by your bowels every morning.

GOD IS SPIRIT BUT MAN IS COMPOSED OF BODY AND SOUL. MAN IS AN EMBODIED SPIRIT.

Now, who is doing the worship GOD OR MAN? MAN!!!
THE HUMAN PERSON IS THE ONE WORSHIPPING GOD WHILE GOD IS THE OBJECT OF WORSHIP. Ah, so worship is an act of man or of angels who worship God in heaven.

Angels worship God spiritually in heaven because they are non corporeal, spiritual beings. BUT MAN IS WORSHIPPING GOD ON EARTH, IN SPIRIT, YES... BUT THROUGH HIS MATERIAL BODY. That is why we use our voice to praise God in songs, we spend time hearing the preachers and the music, we sit, stand, and kneel during worship. And we raise our hands, we even dance like David in honor of our God.

WORSHIP IN SPIRIT BECAUSE GOD IS SPIRIT IS ILLOGICAL. GOD DOES NOT WORSHIP ANYONE AND HE IS THE PUREST SPIRIT. In the lower level it is true for Angels but here on Earth, every act of worship we do is always mediated by our corporal reality.

I THINK THE SENDER OF THE MESSAGE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT... "Worship God in Spirit".

Worship of God in Spirit is TO LOVE GOD WITH ALL OUR HEART, WITH ALL OUR STRENGTH, WITH ALL OUR MIND, WITH ALL OUR SOUL... IN SHORT, WE MUST WORSHIP HIM TOTALLY WITH OUR WHOLE BEING - BODY AND SOUL, MATTER AND SPIRIT. No more no less.

To claim that worship in Spirit is rejecting graven images, it only shows that he is IGNORANT of the plan and designs of the HOLY TEMPLE OF GOD which Jesus called 'MY FATHER'S HOUSE'. The Book of Exodus and Deuteronomy, Kings and Chronicles and even Ezekiel, narrate that there are GRAVEN IMAGES IN THE TEMPLE.

If he is not aware, I advice him to check the topic: SACRED IMAGES in this Blog. Besides, if worship of God in Spirit means absence of material things for worship why did God command the use of Incense for the Temple? It was even given as a gift to the Child Jesus by one of the Wise Men from the East and the Angels in Heaven were seen by St. John in Book of Revelation offering Incense before the Throne of God.

November 25, 2009 5:36 PM

An ADD Inquires About Catholic Practice of Kneeling Before Graven Images

ARK OF THE COVENANT, replica
Anonymous said...

why do you kneel on graven images?

November 25, 2009 1:18 AM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

Because God ordered Moses and Solomon to make graven images to be put inside the Temple, the Altar, the Sanctuary, the Tabernacle and the Holy of Holies.

The Bible has presented a lot of passages describing the Temple designed by God as full of images of Cherubims, Flowers, Palms, Fruits, Bulls, Lions, etc. These are all images in the Temple of God. One of which and the most popular is the ARK OF THE COVENANT with two large graven images of Angels sculpted in wood and gold.

You can check my presentation on Sacred Images, in the topics listed on the right side of this blog.

Then Solomon KNELT in front of the Altar [1 Kings 8:54] while Joshua KNELT before the Ark of the Lord [Joshua 7:6].

ELI SORIANO IS TEACHING THAT THE ADD MEMBERS KNEEL BEFORE THE SUN. THEIR WORSHIP IS FACING THE EAST. NOW, WHERE CAN YOU FIND IN THE BIBLE THE TEACHING THAT THE BELIEVERS OF GOD MUST KNEEL FACING THE SUN? He, he, he.... Where? Chapter and Verse please. He, he, he...
If we will use your reasoning, the ADD members are PAGANS. They are worshipping THE SUN. They are doing exactly what the worshippers of the Sol Invictus before the coming of Christianity. He, he, he.... INTERESTING ISN'T IT?
November 25, 2009 9:17 AM

Monday, November 23, 2009

UPDATE ON CHURCH OF GOD INTERNATIONAL or ANG DATING DAAN SECT

Caesarea Philippi, the massive Rock formation before which the Lord Jesus promised St. Peter: "You are a rock and on this rock I will build my Church and the gate of hell shall not prevail against it."

A neophyte Catholic Apologist named Beltran O.P. informed me the other day that Ang Dating Daan preacher Eli Soriano, who is now hiding somewhere for rape case of a male victim, lost his constant companion in debates and in public fora, Bro. Willy Santiago.
The viewers of ADD programs will easily remember Willy Santiago as the guy who has special talent in opening the Sacred Scriptures and read it for Soriano. It is noticeable that while Soriano was speaking and mentioning a Biblical passage, Bro. Willy was ahead of him in finding the chapter and the verse.
Now, Willy left Soriano due to, according to many in the web world, power struggle. Because as Soriano is getting older and is hampered by so many legal cases the one being groomed to be the successor in Soriano's throne is his favorite newphew, Daniel Razon. This is allegedly unacceptable to many followers, especially to the trained ministers like Willy because Razon is pre-occupied with many businesses and doesn't show extraordinary talents on Sacred Scriptures as well as public debates. He stresses that Razon never joined the public fora of ADD wherein Soriano or the ministers answer questions on the spot from the audience. And he never joined them in squaring it off with the pastors of opponent religions in public plazas. In short, Willy claims that Daniel Razon got no balls according to ADD criteria. That is a very drastic revelation... tantamout to pulling off the guy's pants down. Manny Pacquio will not accept that because that is below the belt. Don't you think so?
Anyway debating is very important for them. Because the sect prided itself on their claim that Soriano is undefeated in debates and that he can answer all questions. So, if ever the successor cannot perform the same then he will be an impotent duck undeserving of respect and loyalty of their seasoned debaters. So, Razon could be good for Peking Duck menu but they prefer one who debates. Imagine, Willy and the ministers are veteran in the battle of the streets and plazas, and suddenly nepotism is creeping in to take away the glory from them. Interesting indeed. He, he, he...
Now, to aggravate the situation few months ago Willy and his cohorts abandoned Soriano and are now appearing in another TV progam in IBC-13 to reveal, guess what, the erroneous doctrines and unchristian activities of Soriano. How kind of him to do that? But of course, Soriano is fuming mad and as a retaliation he issued a Fatwa... I mean Excommunication in a very Christian form worst than the Anathema Sit of the Council of Trent against the Protestants and heretics. Soriano preferred the Pauline language of: "Giving over to Satan". It means that he was entrusting Willy and his rebel companions to the devil.
Surely, Willy answered. He satirically responded that Eli Soriano could do that because he is on pact with the devil, otherwise how can he be sure that the devil will accept his entrustment. Very reasonable, isn't he? How can he turn over to Satan his beloved Willy and companions unless he has direct communication with the Angel of Darkness. Very revealing!
To complicate the matter Soriano made Jane Santiago, Willy's own wife, to appear on national TV to denounce her husband, narrate her ordeal from the so-called battering hand of Willy and his plans to wrist control of ADD from Soriano. How touching! Family matters when mixed with religion and faith always make a melodramic touch on any story. This one is no exception, even with Eli Soriano as its script writer and director. I am almost tempted to believe that the preferred theme song for the program should be Barbara Streissand's version of Send In The Clown with some touch of The Days We Were. Ha, ha, ha... Bro. Mars will love that.
Willy insists that his reasons to breakaway is purely doctrinal and not carnal in anyway. He listed a lot of doctrinal reasons but I will only point some of them:
1. Soriano's command that the members kneel in worship ONLY facing the Sun, according to Willy is unbiblical. Really? Ha, ha, ha... Where did Soriano get that doctrine? Guess who?
2. Soriano's claim that "MAY PUWIT ANG DIOS" [God has a Butt!]. O no, I already pointed out that there should be no below the belt. These two must be very malicious in their actions. Soriano speaks of Butt... very improper especially when applied to the Most High.
So, better for me to stop here. If you want to check their WORD WAR you can check the You Tubes. And if you want to read Willy's Blog [at least supportive of him], please check this: http://exegesis.weebly.com/index.html

Additional Inquiry on the Suffering of Jesus and the Immortality of God

Jesus, The Pantokrator... The All Powerful
Anonymous said...

Good day Father,

I learned a lot of things from this blog. Thank you very much for your generosity and zeal in sharing and proclaiming the Good News of Jesus Christ and his Church. I salute you for this.

Father, I want you to read and comment on this article I found about the suffering of Jesus. Here is the link: http://www.firstthings.com/article/2007/01/does-god-suffer-6

I need to be clarified on the human suffering of Jesus if his divinity also experienced the same.

Thank you and God bless

November 23, 2009 1:13 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

Dear Anonymous,

The term 'God died' or 'God suffered for us' is not invented by simple members of the Church but found in the Official Catechism of the Church and supported by Patristic writings.

However, it must be clarified that the term God in that phrase refers to THE INCARNATE SON OF GOD. It refers to Jesus who suffered and died for us. It does not point to God the Father and the Holy Spirit neither to the Godhead.

Now concerning your need to be clarified on the human suffering of Jesus if his DIVINITY ALSO EXPERIENCED THE SAME. Of course the Divinity didn't experience the same because the Godhead cannot suffer but the phrase 'God died' refers not to the Godhead but to the Person of Jesus Christ and the historical event of the Crucifixion. It happened when the Eternal Word took flesh.

There lies the mystery of our faith. God cannot die but by Incarnation God suffered and died for us on the Cross. The same mystery is expressed by Nativity. God cannot be born but the Mystery of Christmas proclaims that God was born by Mary in Bethlehem. In the same manner what was born was not the Godhead but the Person of the Incarnate Logos.

That article in First Thing magazine is obviously an answer to other contemporary theologians supporting the phrase 'God died'. Some of those theologians are named JOHN PAUL THE GREAT and JOSEF CARDINAL RATZINGER, to name a few.

The author advocates total absence of suffering on the part of God which is never denied by anyone. Now, the question is WHEN JESUS WAS HANGING ON THE CROSS WAS HE MAN ONLY OR GOD-MAN STILL? He, he, he... OF COURSE, THE ANSWER IS GOD-MAN. Because the union of Divinity and Humanity of Jesus was never separated. We simply give DISTINCTION [which is not a separation but simply pointing the difference] that suffering and death have their principle of operation from His Humanity while His redemptive act on the Cross has its principle of operation from His Divinity. But essentially speaking they are SUBSTANTIALLY UNITED.

The position of the article and those that it answers are actually complementary to one another. That is why the Church sees no reason to sanction any of the two position. They are both efforts to explain and understand the mystery of the Incarnation of the Son of God and its relation to the Godhead or the very Being of God. One preserves the Immortality of God while the other proclaims the Love of God who came down to earth in sublime humility and died on the Cross.
May I also point out that it is nowhere stated in the First Things text that ONLY THE HUMAN NATURE OF CHRIST DIED. That phrase is unsupported by any of the official documents of the Church. It is the Person of Christ who died but not His human nature only even though the capacity of dying is rooted in his humanity. In Filipino, no theologian teaches that: ANG PAGKATAO LANG NI CRISTO ANG NAMATAY [Only the human nature of Christ died]. Instead, there are numerous statements of ANG PANGINOON AY NAMATAY PARA SA ATIN [The Lord died for us]. Of course the Lordship of Jesus didn't die, but since Jesus is LORD when he died it is proper to say that THE LORD DIED.
The Creedal formula is that: "I believe in Jesus Christ His Only Son, our Lord... He suffered, died and was buried." The one who died is a Person [He] = JESUS and not human nature only.
Even among us, we never say: "Only the human nature died". Imagine, the News Anchor declaring: "Ladies and Gentlemen, we want to inform you that THE HUMANITY OF MRS. AQUINO DIED early this morning." That is illogical and unacceptable. We say: "Mrs Aquino died". We refer to the person. Then if the person is King we say: THE KING DIED OF HEART ATTACK or THE PRIME MINISTER DIED OF ASSASINATION. We know that the Kingship or the Office of the Prime Minister didn't die but the person who is the King or Prime Minister.
Jesus is God and therefore since he died on the Cross it is correct to say that GOD DIED FOR US ON THE CROSS.

November 23, 2009 1:54 PM

THE MARK OF THE BEAST APPLIES MORE WITH FELIX MANALO AND ELLEN GOULD WHITE THAN WITH PAPACY

This is the photograph of the first ever book printed, the LATIN BIBLE of the Catholic Church. Because the inventor of the Printing Machine is a faithful Catholic, JOHANNES GUTTENBERG.


 
O ito ang katunayan na ang KAPAPAHAN ang siyang HAYOP na binabanggit sa Apokalipsis, O ito, tunghayan mo tanga! [O, here is the proof that the PAPACY is the BEAST mentioned in Apocalypse, O here, look at it stupid]




VICARIUS FILII DEI 

666, The Number of the Beast 


Well, these agents of the Beast and the other beasts are becoming bitter and bitter in their posts. He, he, he... They are so angry that that very insulting personal attacks are being employed. I decided to erase the others because it doesn't suit even their bestiality and animality, and preserved only the term 'tanga' which is pointed at me as 'stupid'. Since I do not claim great erudition I can accept the limitation of my intellect. And since this anonymous poster claim that I am such it is therefore presuppose that he is intelligent while I am not. Good for him... Let us see how intelligent he is.

Now, about VICARIUS FILII DEI = 666.

Once again, it is a proven fact that there is NO 'Vicarius Filii Dei' on the Tiara of the Pope. That lie was invented by the Seventh Day Adventists and used also by the Iglesia ni Manalo. Their researchers have admitted that there is indeed no such text written on the crown of the Pope yet their very intelligent puppies are parrotting it until now to deceive the Catholics to transfer to their newly founded religions.

It means they are swallowing their own INVENTION. This is the classic case of invented lies they drilled into their heads so that later on that lie got a semblance of truth on the liar. The deceivers are now enjoying the effect of their own lies and their lies made them pregnant with self-delusion, and self-delusion gave birth to self-deception.

Their level of intelligence is indeed proven to be very high. It is as high as a Giraffe and is proper for a very high Giraffe. I raise my glass to their renown intellectual capacity.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 




Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 


Obviously, this intelligent giraffe is not aware that the Servants of God also have mark, a seal on their FOREHEADS:

Rev 7:3 [KJV] 'Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have SEALED the SERVANTS OF OUR GOD in their FOREHEADS.'

Dream on, Catholic hater. Dream on. Mock me and show how intelligent you really are. Prove not my stupidity but most of all that of the Catholic Church. 

Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

 



This is more appropriate for the followers of Manalo and Ellen Gould White who used to count and to number their own followers. The INC even prohibits its followers to give charity to their non-members. They are so-exclusive. They believe that only their members will be saved.


Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. 



NAME OF A MAN OR IN TAGALOG 'TAO' [Human Person]. The beast is a human person. For example, Felix Y. Manalo or Ellen Gould White. These are names of human person.




Note that according to verse 17, there are three different characteristics that distinguish the beast: 



his mark (of authority) 


The INC and SDA also have authority. They are even more authoritarian. In INC only Manalos are serving as leaders while the SDA their worship is exclusive on Saturdays. So, before pointing at others please look at your own sala and dining room. He, he, he...




his name

 

Yes, name... NAME. His name like Felix Manalo, Iraneo Manalo, Eduardo Manalo. Or 'her' name... ELLEN GOULD WHITE. Very easy application isn't it? But, if you will refer it to the Pope what will you get? Nothing because it is not a name of a man or of a human person. Unless you will accuse the famous poet ALEXANDER POPE as the Anti-Christ. Not even the Popemobile can fit the description.



the number of his name (666).

 

It fits again because THE NAME OF FELIX Y. MANALO and IRANEO MANALO and ELLEN GOULD WHITE are proven to be equal to 666. Perfectly fitting to these modern day demons.




It might be argued by some that 666 must be applied to one man's name, and that this will then help identify him as the antichrist. I would offer the following verse to show that 666 need not apply solely to a man's name: 



Rev 19:16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.

 
It doesn't fit and your use of Rev 19:16 doesnt disprove the fact that the 666 is the name of the person. The verse that you quoted refers to Jesus as King of Kings and Lord of Lords. It doesn't state that Felix Manalo and Ellen Gould White are not the 666. Besides, this is your claim: "I would offer the following verse to show that the 666 NEED NOT apply solely to a man's name". Sorry for you, because THERE IS NO STATEMENT IN REV 19:16 THAT SHOWS 'The 666 need not apply solely to a man's name." Where is that in the text? None. He, he, he...

That is another hallucination once again.




The same Greek word translated as name (onoma: G3686) that appears in Revelation 13:17-18 is also used in chapter 19:16, so clearly the word can also apply to a title, and not just one man's name. Now, we are told that it takes a certain understanding and wisdom to discern just how this number is actually applied. Based on the fact that 666 can apply to a title, below are several words and phrases that have been put forth over the centuries as probable solutions to the enigma of 666. 



The problem with your position is this. Rev 19:16 does not refer to a title but to a Name. It means that the phrase KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS is a Name of the Lord God:

Exodus 15:3 [KJV] "The Lord is a warrior; THE LORD is HIs NAME."



The term Lord is a Name of God. The text itself supports our position. It is said a NAME written on His thigh, KING OF KINGS and LORD OF LORDS. So, the two are Names not Titles. The problem with you is that you are treating them as Titles. For human person, Kingship is a Title. Being King is a position and title for King Juan Carlos of Spain or for the King of Jordan or King Bhumibol of Thailand. But for God being KING is not a mere position and title it is His Name. He possess Kingship absolutely and perfectly. What is a Title for men is a Name for Christ our God... The Lord of All.

Thus Lord of Lord is a Name of God as well as King of Kings. There is no statement there that they are mere titles. They are Divine Names and Divine Attributes. So, THERE IS NO SCAPE FOR THE NAMES OF YOUR FOUNDERS, MANALO AND ELLEN G. WHITE.


GREEK 



The numeric equivalents of Greek letters can also be found in the Encyclopedia Britannica under "Languages of the World", Table 8. 



The ancient Greek word for "the Latin speaking man" is LATEINOS

 

O, you have found another invented tactic to discredit the Catholic Church ha. Let us see if it is effective.


The problem is that the Pope now is German speaking, the previous one is Polish speaking, the one before him were Italians... Ha, ha, ha... And I am Filipino speaking. Ha, ha, ha... 




L = 30 lambda
A = 1 alpha
T = 300 tau
E = 5 epsilon
I = 10 iota
N = 50 nu
O = 70 omicron
S = 200 sigma
------------

666 


BRAVO, YOUR CALCULATOR IS VERY EFFICIENT. He, he, he....




NOTE: Latin is the official language of the Roman Catholic Church. Church Documents are usually published first in Latin, and then translated from the Latin into other languages. The association of "Lateinos" with 666 was first suggested by IrenƦus (ca. 130-202 A.D.) who proposed in his Against Heresies that it might be the name of the fourth kingdom in Daniel 7:7. 


Latin is the language of the Roman Christians because it was the language of the people of Rome. So, I thought that you are SOLA SCRIPTURA now you are banking on the work of St. Irenaeus instead of the Bible and even distorting the work of Irenaeus just to feed your lies. He, he, he...


First, THE BIBLE DOESN'T SPEAK OF 666 AS PEOPLE, OR GROUP, OR CHURCH THAT SPEAKS LATIN AS ITS OFFICIAL LANGUAGE. If it is in the Bible then show me. Chapter and Verse please.

Second, Rev 13:18 DOES NOT MENTION OF LATEINOS BUT OF A NAME OF A MAN: PANGALAN NG TAO. So, your effort to cover the demonic identity of your founder by presenting a LANGUAGE is not effective at all. Better luck next time. SAPUL PA RIN SI MANALO AT SI ELLEN G. WHITE. He, he, he...

Third, Irenaeus also refers to a NAME not to LANGUAGE. This is clear in the text of the Wikipedia:






"Irenaeus is the first of the church fathers to consider the mystic number 666. While Irenaeus did propose some solutions of this numerical riddle, his interpretation was quite reserved. Thus, he cautiously states: "But knowing the sure number declared by Scripture, that is six hundred sixty and six, let them await, in the first place, the division of the kingdom into ten; then, in the next place, when these kings are reigning, and beginning to set their affairs in order, and advance their kingdom, [let them learn] to acknowledge that he who shall come claiming the kingdom for himself, and shall terrify those men of whom we have been speaking, have a name containing the aforesaid number, is truly the abomination of desolation."[44] Although Irenaeus did speculate upon three NAMES to symbolize this mystical number, namely Euanthas, Teitan and Lateinos, nevertheless he was content to believe that the Antichrist would arise some time in the future after the fall of Rome and then the meaning of the number would be revealed[45 Against Heresies Book 5 Chapter 30, sec. 3]"

Irenaeus clearly refers to NAMES, such as Euanthas, Teitan and Lateinos. Yet, you demonically distorted it to OFFICIAL LANGUAGE of the Catholic Church which is NOT LATEINOS BUT 'LATIN'. 


Are you blind? Don't you see the DIFFERENCE between LATIN and LATEINOS. Ha, ha, ha... Your effort is PATHETIC. In Tagalog, kahabag-habag at kalunos-lunos. Ha, ha, ha... Besides, Irenaeus is a Bishop and Martyr of the Catholic Faith. He is a French Bishop of the Catholic Church. Definitely he was not referring to the Catholic Church. Much more, THE NAME LATEINOS IS NOT LATIN BUT GREEK. Ha, ha, ha... Nakakaawa ang iyong katalinuhan. Is that what you've learned from Ellen Gould White and Felix Y. Manalo?


Then also Lateinos has the number six hundred and sixty-six; and it is a very probable [solution], this being the name of the last kingdom [of the four seen by Daniel]. For the Latins are they who at present bear rule: I will not, however, make any boast over this [coincidence]. 


Definitely it doesn't fit our Church... Its name is not Lateinos but THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. Your claim about the official language of the Church doesn't hold any water or crude oil, not even kerosene, because LATEINOS IS GREEK AND NOT LATIN and it doesn't refer to the Latin speaking Christians. Don't you know that the First complete translation of the Bible in one Language is in LATIN?

AGAIN, DREAM ON!!!

Sunday, November 22, 2009

The Uniqueness of Christ's Human Nature

This is My Body
Anonymous said...

Dear Father,

Thank you so mutch all the wesdom that you shared to me. I can gain a lot of knowledge regarding our Catholic Faith because of you Father my question is What is the defference beetwen the HUMA NATURE OF JESUS CHRIST and our life as a HUMAN BEING?

Tank you so mutch and GOD BLESS TO YOU .... November 21, 2009 7:19 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...
[What is the defference beetwen the HUMAN NATURE OF JESUS CHRIST and our life as a HUMAN BEING?]
The human nature of Christ is perfect and sinless because it is especially created by God for His Son's incarnation. While ours is affected by sin caused by Adam's disobedience to God. Thus, Jesus is one with us in all things but sin.

It is perfect which is similar but much better with the human nature of Adam before the Original Sin. It possesses perfect virtues and holiness. Thus, Jesus says that 'you have something more than Solomon and Jonah' in His presence.
The body of Jesus is not formed by the sexual union of man and woman but by the supernatural power of God. It was through the power of the Holy Spirit acting through the body of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
November 22, 2009 6:41 PM

IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HAVE SOMETHING TO BE PROUD OF? Question from an Iglesia ni Manalo

St. Peter Basilica, dome interior

Anonymous said...

I really don't think you know what you are talking about. What you have written is nothing more but embellished personal opinions about the Church. Your fanciful words and phrases are not convincing at all. The Catholic Church have nothing to be proud of, so much history of corruption. Read up on the history alone of the Catholic Church and see why many catholics such as myself have converted to the Church of Christ.

November 22, 2009 5:02 AM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

[The Catholic Church have nothing to be proud of]

Really? The great civilizations of the West were achieved with the contributions of the Catholic Church:

1. Education: The earliest Universities in Europe were established by the Catholic Church. Until now, your New Era University is a piece of junk in comparison with Ateneo, La Salle and University of Sto. Tomas here in the Philippines. In U.S. alone the Jesuits have at least 21 Universities and Colleges.

2. In Charitable Works: Orphanages, Leprosarium and Home for the Aged were pioneered by the Catholic Church. Even the establishments of Hospitals were copied from the medical centers of charities formed by Catholic Saints who worked to serve the sick free of charge and using their personal resources.

3. In Science, there are many Catholic scientists yet there is no single scientist from the Manalos. Will you please name a Manolista scientist for me? I want to see if they will be at par with Newton, Descartes, Pasteur, Marconi, Volta and other Catholic Scientists.

4. In Arts, we produced the Michelangelo, Raphael and Da Vinci and countless more. The INC arts are piece of junk in comparison to Catholic Arts. The Vatican Museum houses one of the greatest collections of the greatest Obras and masterpieces in the world competing with Louvre of Paris, Metropolitan Museum of New York and the London Museum. What have you got? Illusions!!!

5. In Music, the Titans of Music such as Beethoven, Mozart, Bach were inspired by the Catholic Church. How about Vivaldi, Palestrina and others? That is why they composed Missa Cantata and Oratorios still being used for Catholic worship until now.

6. In Architecture, the designs of Hagia Sophia and our Basilicas and Cathedrals are unmatched by INC. Your so called Temple in Diliman cannot even match the beauty of the bodegas in Sistene Chapel.

Dream on Anonymous. The Manalos are the one who have nothing to be proud of. We have everything to be proud of.

Concerning corruption. All people, culture, nation, race and religion have been involved in corruption. No exception. There are corruption in INC too. No less than the Speech of Iraneo Manalo proves that. A recorded speech revealed by Soriano wherein Manalo was lambasting the INC pastors for their corrupt practices. Imagine that. Then, the Manalos are the real owners of all the money of your Church. Inherited from father to son... That is HEREDITARY CORRUPTION.

November 22, 2009 1:36 PM

Saturday, November 21, 2009

QUESTION ON THE HOLY TRINITY: THE COMMON ACTION OF THE THREE DIVINE PERSONS

The Holy Trinity
Anonymous said...

Dear Father,

Good day,Father is that true that in Divine Trinity is the act of one is the of all?( Father,Son and Holly Sperit)Is this DEFEDE or offecial teaching of the Roman Catholic Church.How would explain this?

Thank you and God bless us all....

November 20, 2009 7:45 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

In the Holy Trinity the act of one is the act of all because the three Divine Persons are having ONE BEING. So, Creation, Salvation and Sanctification are not exclusive of the Father alone or the Son alone or the Spirit alone but of all and each of them because they are One.

Thus, we can say that the Father created the world, yet in the Gospel of John it is stated that everything came into being through Christ, and the Psalmist speaks of the Creator Spirit. Each and all of them caused the creation of the world.

Jesus is the Redeemer and Savior but in the Old Testament the Father is also called the Savior, the Rock, the Shepherd of the people.

Having one Being they act as One. Yet the Church also states that there is a DISTINCTION in the action of each. The Father is not the Son, the Son is not the Father and the Holy Spirit is not the Father and the Son or vice versa. Jesus is the only one who incarnated but not the Father and the Holy Spirit. So, their is unity in being but there is DISTINCTION of operations or activities pertaining to each Person.
Distinction is not separation or division. The Catholic Church in dogmatic formulation states that they are ONE WITHOUT SEPARATION OR DIVISION BUT DISTINCT FROM ONE ANOTHER.

November 20, 2009 8:59 PM

Follow Up Question on Christology

Jesus Carrying the Cross
Dear Father,

Thank you so mutch to your answer regading my question about the two nature of Christ but I have a follo-up question,if the second person of the Devine Trenity felt pain and suffering and he was dying on the cross what happen to the first person and the Third Person of the Devine Thrinity also felt pain and suffering and die or not?

November 14, 2009 1:37 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

The Creed states that it is the Lord Jesus that suffered, died and was buried. Suffering and death are not attributed to the Person of the Father and the Holy Spirit. The First and the Third Person cannot experience pain and death because they didn't incarnate. So, physically speaking they didn't suffer and die.
However, the dogma of the Church also speaks of the deepest union of the Three Persons. They are so united with each other because they have One Being. Thus, the Father and the Holy Spirit was united in Christ during His Passion and Death by virtue of their one Divinity. How is that happening is beyond our knowledge because only the Spirit of God can fathom the depth of God [1 Cor 2:10]. That is a Mystery.

We know that the Father and the Spirit didn't suffer and die on the Cross. We also know that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are essentially united with one another. How can we conceive these two truth of faith is beyond our capacity.

November 14, 2009 1:55 PM

QUESTION ON CHRISTOLOGY FROM A READER

Christ the King in Eternal Glory
QUESTION:
Father I have only one question please answer me.When Jesus Christ dying on the Cruz his divine nature was also die or only the human nature dying on Cruz?

I'm Mr Donato Paras Potong Jr.I do hope that you can understand my question.

GOD BLESS TO YOU FATHER....
*********
ANSWER:
We all know that the Divinity of Jesus cannot die and will never die. Thus, it is wrong to claim that the Divinity of Jesus died.
Suffering and Death are possible in Jesus because of His human nature. But, the one dying is not humanity which is abstract but the person. Thus we do not say: "The humanity of Ninoy Aquino died" instead we say: "Ninoy Aquino died". Death is attributed to the person.
Since Jesus is God, we say that God died on the Cross but the statement is true by the very fact that the Lord is God, but it is not a declaration that His Divinity died. For example, the death of John F. Kennedy. The presidency was not killed but John Kennedy the person. But because he is the president then we can say that "The President died." But it doesn't mean that the Presidency died.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Somascan News: The Mother of Fr. Rafael Gomez Arias, CRS Passed Away

Dormition of Mary with St. John the Beloved venerating her body

MOURNING IN THE FAMILY

Mrs. Concepción Arias age 81, has died yesterday [17.11.2009]. Her is the mother of our Fr. Rafael Gómez Arias [ prafaelantonio@yahoo.es ] former Superior provincial of the Provincia Andina, of the Community of Centro San Jerónimo Miani (BogotÔ - Colombia).

The funeral liturgy will be celebrated tomorrow, on Wednesday, November 18, at 3:00 PM, in the Parish Church of the Centro San Jerónimo.

Friday, November 13, 2009

SOMASCAN SPIRITUALITY ON AUTHORITY AND OBEDIENCE

The Lord Jesus Commands the Apostles to Distribute Bread to the hungry crowd

RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE
By the Somascan Community of Aemilianum College Sorsogon City, Philippines – Southeast Asia V. Province
(Canonical Visitation of Fr. General Franco Moscone, CRS)

The Community of Aemilianum College spent one full week of special chapter every afternoon in order to read the entire document The Service of Authority and Obedience and based on which these answers and reflections were made. This is a product of sharing of each and every member of the community. However, this is already the synthesized form of what had been delivered during the meetings.

QUESTION #11: Which motivations of faith can help us in our religious obedience, and which human motivations can hinder it?

Response on Motivations of Faith:

We can be helped in our religious obedience if we will recognize the presence of God in the Church, the Congregation and the Authority given by God through them. Thus, we are sure to be on the orthodox faith if we are faithful to the Holy Father – the Pope and we are sure to be genuinely continuing the faith and mission of St. Jerome Emiliani if we are in communion with our General, Provincial, Local Superiors and with one another.

Our Obedience must not be blind. Thus, one of the proper motivations of a religious is openness to the Spirit active in the Church and in the Congregation and the Authority that God entrusted to each person called to lead. Like the People of God who were Obedient to Moses and even after the death of Moses the Authority of ‘The Seat of Moses’ continued to be effective. The same principle is effective for the See of Peter and for the Office of St. Jerome Emiliani.

As religious and Christians, we must constantly seek the Will of God, not only in the written rules and in the signs of the times but also in the practical decisions of the Superior. Obedience to him is following the Will of God.

The best examples of these are the examples of the Lord Jesus who obeyed the Father until death on the Cross, the Fiat of the Blessed Mother and the total submission to the Will of God made by our founder.

Response on Human Motivations:

Failure or Refusal to recognize the presence as well as the Authority of God in the Family, the Church, the Congregation and even in temporal authorities lead to chaos and divisions.

Selfishness is one of the factors that hinder the religious to obey and see Christ in others, especially in persons of authority. Another thing that motivates us away from the will of God is personal interest that is not attune to the Gospel values and not conformed to the norms of our Somascan Life.

Those who think highly of themselves because of high educational attainments or superiority of age in various circumstances are motivated contrary to the virtue of Obedience. Thus, humility of heart and mind is necessary. Even the Superiors and the leaders must obey and humble themselves and give good examples. None must work for self-glorification but for the glory of God.

QUESTION #12: How can the confreres and community help the superior to act in obedience to God?

The confreres and the community can help the superior to act in obedience to God by their openness and honesty. By openness the Superior is being enriched and empowered by the ideas and suggestions of the confreres while by honesty the Superior could see the real situations and therefore he will find it easier to discern, to decide and to act upon a given situation.

The confreres also must strive to truly obey and the superior must help the confreres by his good examples and manifest love for each member of his community.

The confreres must obey the Superior and by doing so must be convinced that they are doing the will of God. And, the Superior must also see the presence of God in his confreres – To serve the flock is to serve Christ; to obey the shepherd is to follow Christ.

The superior then must be looked upon as the representative of God. Having the representative on God, we must work collectively and must do things collaboratively. The religious must share joyfully their time, talents and ideas with the Superior. Active cooperation is necessary and imperative for a harmonious community life.

The confreres must not forget also the fact that even though we are called to collaborate and to decide collectively, final and definitive decisions belong to the superior.

QUESTION #13: Which are the standards of worldly mentality in promoting the dignity of the persons? And which are according to the Gospel?

In response the Community Members

The Worldly Mentalities:

Excessive Possession
Way of Life contrary to the Gospel and /or the Constitution
Improper motivations for High Educational Attainment
Improper use of the entrusted Positions or Power

The Gospel Mentalities:

A life of poverty and simplicity
A heart that is pure and chaste
Having an obedient mind
Respect of others
Understanding of others’ weaknesses
Sense of Encouragement
Forgiving attitude

QUESTION #14: Which are the roots of an effective dialogue in a religious community?

• Dialogue must be founded on Charity, not on pressures or threat.
• There must be openness and sincerity on both sides. There must be no hidden agenda and no mask covering the intentions of each.
• The Superior must be an agent of love while the religious must obey without any preconditions. A dialogue in Spirit of Faith and Love.
• The exchanges must be respectful. Shouting or raising of voices are not necessary because the message is better received in gentleness of speech.
• In dialogue we seek the best of the community and of mission, the welfare of the Church and of the Congregation. The focus must not be on the ‘self’ of either the religious or the superior.
• Understanding and patience are necessary for a meaningful dialogue.
• Both the superior and the confrere must have the courage to approach each other. Refusal to exert effort for a dialogue is hurting the relationships.

QUESTION #15: How must a Somascan Religious witness to the freedom?

Somascan Freedom is rooted in Christ who freely served the Father and the brethren by loving wholeheartedly until the end. And this freedom of Christ has NO LIMITS, NO BORDERLINE. Freedom then is to give ALL in service... to respond to the love of God who freely loved and served.

A Somascan Religious gives witness to freedom by living his vows “freely and voluntarily’ because we chose and professed this life “freely and voluntarily”. He must be a JOYFUL GIVER [cf. 2 Corinthians 9:7] of his time, talents, and his person for the good of the children, the poor and of the entire Church.

A Somascan is a witness to freedom when he LOVES his obedience, his assignments, his duties, the persons assigned to him and with him and gives his best in everything that he does. Those in school must love administrative and teaching duties, those in orphanages must love the orphans and the needy children and those in the parish must love pastoral activities. In all these, we must love our confreres living in the same community with us... seeing them as blessings.

We witness to freedom by being responsible:

• Living our Christian Life faithfully,
• Enjoying the opportunities to proclaim the Gospel,
• Loving the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Holy Eucharist,
• Enjoying living together with the community as a witness of charity.

We are free when we have the courage TO CHOOSE what is RIGHT rather than WRONG. By being New Man [cf. Ephesians 2:14-15] and not Man of the World like the St. Jerome Emiliani. Our good examples shall be like perfumes that will attract people to God.

QUESTION #16,17,18: Which are the foundations of a fraternal community in Christ?

The First and Ultimate foundation of our Fraternal Life is of course CHRIST Himself: God is the Source of our Life, Unity, Charism and Mission. And this God is a OUR FATHER. Thus, communion is rooted in recognizing the Fatherhood of God and the fact that the Church and our Congregation is for us the Kingdom of God on Earth.

The foundation of our Christian Life is Christ who is the perfect image of the Father. Jesus manifested the Fatherhood of God. St. Jerome Emiliani on his part imitated Christ and therefore became a shining example of the Fatherhood of God shining on the face of Jesus.

The foundation guide, then of our fraternal communion are the Gospel and the Holy Eucharist, which are both crystallized in our Constitutions and Rules.

The foundation of our life is Charity-Love. If there is love there will be meaningful living together in the Community. Next is Obedience. If the religious obeys in love there will be harmony, respect and fraternal unity. There must be the spirit of sharing by which each have a common goal: the good of the community.

The religious must be bound by the common law of charity and of the constitution. Without a practical law there will be disorganization and therefore the Constitution must be upheld. The superior must be obeyed and is also the first to show example of obedience. The superior must unify the community by the witness of his actions.

The bond of unity of our Community must be the Holy Spirit and therefore docility to the Spirit must be enhanced by prayers and constant reflection of the Word of God as well as the writings of the founder. The community must be praying together, worshipping together and eating together.

Even though we are different persons with various talents and skills our unity is founded on our COMMON CALL which unites us with one another.

QUESTION #19: What is the meaning and value of “the spirituality of communion”? How can the members of a religious community become the sacraments of Jesus?

The Spirituality of Communion is the faith of the community that its binding force is Christ, as beautifully declared by St. Paul: “... striving to preserve the unity of the spirit through the bond of peace: one body and one spirit, as you were also called to the one hope of your call; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and is in all.” [Ephesians 4:3-6]. That is the best explanation of what Spirituality of Communion is.

It also means the spirit of being together, not just common activities and life, but also sincere acceptance of one another in Christ and having the same spirit in the sense that we build common aspirations and vision; and will work toward the same end in the same apostolate.

Concerning becoming Sacraments of Jesus

Sacrament is usually defined as a visible sign instituted by Christ in the Church to give grace necessary for Salvation.

Following that definition, each religious is called to be a visible sign of God’s grace for others. We must be seen as persons who bring Christ to our orphans, students, parishioners and one another. Then, our presence must be grace-filled like the Blessed Mother who is ‘Gratia Plena’ [cf. Luke 1:28]. Like Moses, our faces must shine with the presence of God [cf. Exodus 34:35] through our good examples and people must praise God because of our presence, as Elizabeth and John the Baptist did when they met the Virgin [cf. Luke 1:42-45].

As the sacraments instituted by Christ give grace necessary for Salvation the religious consecrated by God must bring people closer to Christ. Each Somascan must realize that his first and final mission is to save souls, all the rest is secondary. In everything that we do, we must bring the grace of God to others, bearing witness to the same spirit as St. Jerome did.

QUESTION #20 (a-b): How can the members of the community help the superior to listen and share? The one who does not speak cannot be listened to.

The religious members must take the initiative to speak to the superior. There is no room for shyness or indifference in the community. Openness must be developed and promoted and practiced by each member. This could be enhanced by regular scheduled dialogue with the superior as well as meetings or house chapters for formative and administrative purposes.

For the young religious who are having difficulty in opening up with the superior, the other members must help him overcome his timidity.

QUESTION #20 (c-d): Why oftentimes we experience difficulties to accomplish our duty to give contribution in sharing and evaluating?

A religious is having difficulty opening his ideas and his heart in dialogue or in community chapters if there is hidden activities and agenda. There is unwillingness to share if the goal of the person is to keep his activities hidden or exclusive, certain that the Superior and the Community will not approve of it.
Another reason is Fear of Failure.

Another reason is the cultural attitude of being reserved and shy to speak, or the emotional imbalance of fear of being rejected. As Fr. John Powell, S.J. wrote in his book: “Why am I afraid to tell you who I am? Because I am afraid that you may not like it.”

Others decided to remain silent because of the previous unpleasant experience. They were laughed at, insulted, shouted at and therefore they prefer to be silent. Or, their previous statements were distorted and were used against them later on so that they don’t want to be in the same ordeal.

The religious, however, are all given training to counter act all these difficulties. They are all given good education. They were given explanations on the spiritual and practical benefits of being open, there is no reason to stay in the darkness of fear and instead must live as children of God, sons of the resurrection [cf. Luke 20:36]. Let us bear in heart the exhortation of St. Paul:Let us then throw off the works of darkness and put on the armour of light... [Romans 13:12].

QUESTION #20 (e-f): Which are the motivations and the ways of an authentic discernment?

The motivations and the ways of an authentic discernment is to seek the Will of God. This is reflected by the very reason of Jesus’ Incarnation: TO DO THE WILL OF THE FATHER... I came down not to do my will but the will of Him Who sent Me [John 6:38]. St. John the Evangelist added that this is the food of Jesus, to do the will of the Father [cf. John 4:34]. This is so essential in the life of the Master so that even his Agony is to surrender to this Will: Abba, Father, all things are possible to You. Take this cup away from me, but not what I will but what You will [Mark 14:36].

The most perfect religious: The Blessed Virgin also did the same. Her Fiat is a perfect surrender to the Will of God [cf. Luke 1:38]. This is the real religious Consecration... this is the genuine ‘Servant’ of Christ and of His poor.

St. Jerome Emiliani found the will of God by his unending prayers and reflections and deep love of the Word of God. He listens to the promptings of the Holy Spirit and in effect he was able to see the Signs of the Times and act on them.

QUESTION #22: How can a real fraternal communitarian life be an integral part of our mission?

We must have a clear understanding of our missio ad intra [life inside the community] so that we can be ready and effective in our missio ad extra [apostolate outside]. We have To grow where we are so that we can give life where we are send. We must love our life, our rules and our community then we can give love to the children, the students and the people of God.

Prepared and Synthesized by:

Rev. Fr. Abe P. Arganiosa, CRS
Secretary
Approved by:
Rev. Fr. Lino O. Juta, CRS
Superior
House Members:
Rev. Fr. Augusto Dingal, CRS
Bro. Joseph Eugene Libut, CRS
Rev. Fr. Romeo Sabayton, CRS
Rev. Fr. Manny Cuizon, CRS
Bro. Federico Balsomo, CRS
Bro. Roland Manago, CRS