St. Peter the Apostle, imprisoned by Emperor Nero in Roman dungeon. A beautiful and touching depiction of the incarceration of the beloved Apostle during the last days of his life by the great Rembrandt.
Anonymous said...
Father meron po akong tanong na tanong din po nung nakausap kong member ng SDA...Si Peter po ang 1st Pope natin...meron po bang aktuwal na pag-a-appoint ng pumalit sa kanya galing mismo kay St. Peter? Paano po apili yug sumumod sa kanya? tnx po
August 23, 2010 9:24 PM
Fr. Abe, CRS said...
[Father meron po akong tanong na tanong din po nung nakausap kong member ng SDA...Si Peter po ang 1st Pope natin...meron po bang aktuwal na pag-a-appoint ng pumalit sa kanya galing mismo kay St. Peter? Paano po apili yug sumumod sa kanya? tnx po]
Dear Anonymous,
Ang pagpili sa Santo Papa ay hindi by appointment kundi by "ELECTION".
Ito ang pamamaraang ibinigay ni Apostol San Pedro sa Santa Iglesia nuong namatay ang isa sa mga Apostol na si Judas Iscariote:
Act 1:20 For it is written in the book of Psalms, Let his habitation be desolate, and let no man dwell therein: and his BISHOPRICK let another take. [King James Version]
DITO, IPINAHAYAG NI SAN PEDRO NA SI JUDAS, DAHIL KABILANG SIYA SA MGA APOSTLE, AY ISANG OBISPO NA NAGTATAGLAY NG OFFICE OF THE BISHOP O BISHOPRIC. AT KAPAG NAMATAY ANG ISANG OBISPO AY DAPAT ITONG MAPALITAN.
GANYAN DIN SI SAN PEDRO NUNG NAMATAY SIYA. ANG KANYANG BISHOPRIC AY IBINIGAY SA NAPILING KAHALILI NIYA. KAYA NGA ANG TAWAG SA SANTO PAPA AY 'THE SUCCESSOR OF PETER'.
Act 1:21 Sa mga taong ito nga na nangakisama sa atin sa buong panahon na ang Panginoong si Jesus ay pumapasok at lumalabas sa atin, [Ang Biblia]
ANG DAPAT PAGPILIIAN NG MAGIGING APOSTOL O SENIOR BISHOP AY OBISPO RIN O ISA SA MGA ELDERS NA KABILANG NA SA STA. IGLESIA.
KAYA KAPAG NAMATAY ANG SANTO PAPA ANG MGA ELDERS NG CHURCH... THE CARDINALS AY NATITIPON UPANG PUMILI NG KAHALILI NI SAN PEDRO.
Act 1:22 Magmula sa pagbautismo ni Juan, hanggang sa araw na siya'y tanggapin sa itaas mula sa atin, ay nararapat na ang isa sa mga ito'y maging saksi na kasama natin sa kaniyang pagkabuhay na maguli.
IBIG SABIHIN ANG OBISPO AY MAY MAHABANG EXPERIENCIA SA SIMBAHAN. MAY SAPAT NA KAALAMAN AT TIBAY NG PANANAMPALATAYA. AT MASIGASIG NA NAKAPAGPATUTUO KAY CRISTO.
Act 1:23 At kanilang ibinukod ang dalawa, si Jose na tinatawag na Barsabas, na pinamagatang Justo, at si Matias.
AMONG THE ELDERS OR CARDINALS AY IBINUBUKOD ANG MGA CANDIDATES FOR POPE AT SILA ANG PINAGPIPILIAN.
Act 1:24 At sila'y nagsipanalangin, at nagsipagsabi, Ikaw, Panginoon, na nakatataho ng mga puso ng lahat ng mga tao, ay ipakilala mo kung alin sa dalawang ito ang iyong hinirang,
KAYA TUWING ELECTION NG POPE ANG BUONG IGLESIA CATOLICA SA BUONG MUNDO AY TUMATAHIMIK AT NAGDADASAL PARA SA GABAY NG ESPIRITU SANTO. ANG MGA CARDINALS AY PUMAPASOK SA ISANG SIMBAHAN NA SARADO AT TAHIMIK UPANG WALANG ISTORBO SA KANILANG PAGDARASAL AT PAGPILI.
Act 1:25 Upang tanggapin ang katungkulan sa ministeriong ito at pagkaapostol na kinahulugan ni Judas, upang siya'y makaparoon sa kaniyang sariling kalalagyan.
ITO ANG DOCTRINA NG APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION. ANG PAGHALILI NG ISANG PINILI SA APOSTOLIC OFFICE IN THE CHURCH O PAGIGING OBISPO.
Act 1:26 At sila'y pinagsapalaran nila; at nagkapalad si Matias; at siya'y ibinilang sa labingisang apostol.
KAYA BY ELECTION NGA ANG SISTEMA. NUNG NAMATAY SI POPE JOHN PAUL THE GREAT, NA ELECT SI JOSEF CARDINAL RATZINGER NG ALEMANYA BILANG SANTO PAPA.
TULAD NI SIMON NA GINAWANG PEDRO ANG PAPA AY PUMIPILI NG BAGONG PANGALAN. PINILI NI CARDINAL RATZINGER NA TAWAGING "BENEDICTUS" IN LATIN O "BENITO" IN SPANISH. DAHIL SIYA ANG IKA-16 NA PAPA ANG MAY GANONG PANGALAN SIYA AY NAGING BENEDICT XVI.
August 24, 2010 3:01 PM
.jpg)
Taliwas naman ang gawain sa Iglesia ni Cristo (Manalo, 1914) sapagkat sa kanila ang humahalili sa namatay ng Punong Tagapamahala ay ang kanilang mga anak. Nang mamatay ang pekeng sugong si Felix Manalo, aba'y humalili si Erano Manalo. Nang matigok na si Erano, naupo naman sa puwesto si Eduardo Manalo. Ano yan, KAMAG-ANAK, INCORPORATED? Noong humalili si Erano, kunyari nahirang siya at hinalal ng ibang ministro. Ngayon, nang humalili si Eduardo, aba'y iba na. Wala akong nabasa sa Pasugo na siya ay nahalal. Automatic ang pagka-upo sa pwesto ng kanyang tatay. Bilang Deputy Executive Minister, kagyat na naluklok si Eduardo bilang Executive Minister. Wala atang ganito sa Biblia. Anupaman, bagong aral ito at bagong gawain. Nagbabago at nag-iiba ang mga mali-maling aral ng INC.
ReplyDeleteMagandang proposition ito:
ReplyDeletePatutunayan ko, sa pamamagitan ng Biblia at mga referencia, maging sa Pasugo, na labag sa Banal na Kasulatan ang pagkakaupo ni Eduardo V. Manalo bilang Punong Pangkalahatan ng Iglesia ni Cristo (Manalo, 1914).
Magandang pagdebatehan ito ng harapan.
HA, HA, HA... GARAPALANG PAGKAMKAM NG AUTORIDAD AT ARI-ARIARIAN NG IGLESIA ANG GINAWA NG MGA MANALO. TALAGANG YAN AY TALIWAS SA IPINAKITANG HALIMBAWA NI CRISTO AT NG MGA APOSTOLES. IBANG-IBA.
ReplyDeleteMAGANDANG DEBATE NGA IYAN BRO. MARS. HE, HE, HE... SANA KAGATIN.
ReplyDeleteAt kelan naman naging papa si Pedro? Idinamay ninyo si Pedro kayong mga katoliko kayo.
ReplyDeleteWAS PETER THE FIRST POPE?
No, because:
1. Peter was married, and popes cannot be married. In Matthew 8:14, 15 Jesus healed Peter's mother in law. "When Jesus was come into Peter's house, he saw his WIFE'S MOTHER laid, and sick of a fever." "Have we not power to lead about a sister, a WIFE, as well as ... Cephas (Peter)?" 1 Corinthians 9:5.
2. Peter would not allow men to bow down to him, as he forbad Cornelius in Acts 10:25, 26. "Cornelius met him, fell down at this feet, and worshipped him. Peter ... said stand up; I myself am a man." The pope likes men to bow down to him.
3. Peter rejected the "tradition from your fathers." (1 Peter 1:18), yet the Catholic church and popes base their teachings on man's traditions.
4. Peter wore no crown as the pope does.
5. Peter had no wealth as the pope has: "Peter said, silver and gold have I none ..." Acts 3:6. Peter never ACTED like a pope, never DRESSED like a pope, never SPOKE like a pope, and people never APPROACHED him as a pope.
6. Peter never took to himself the title "PONTIFIX MAXIMUS" as all the popes willingly accept, as seen by the initials P.M. after their names in the Vatican. This was a title of the pagan Roman Emperors from Juluis Caesar's time on. It means "Chief Bridge Maker between earth and heaven." This is a name of blasphemy for a man to take, and Peter never saw himself as such. Jesus Christ is the only Bridge Maker between earth and heaven. John 1:51.
Hindi nila pwede ipamahala ang Iglesia nila sa ibang Ministro.. Dapat kadugo.. hahaha.. sayang nga naman ang hirap ng Lolo Manalo kung iba ang mamamahala. Baka mapunta pa sa iba ang CENTRAL bank nila! hahaha sabi nung isang miyembro nila ganda daw ng central nila parang DISNEYLAND.. MEGANUN!! pero ang Gothic Architecture ginaya sa atin!! Walang originality.. Pati yung emblem ng Republic of the Philippine Government. Pati yung Masonic Symbol pati VICARIUS FILII DEI ng Sabadista pinagpu-pulot!! hays Manalo talaga! Panalo sa panggagaya!!
ReplyDeleteREPONSE TO EKS:
ReplyDelete[At kelan naman naging papa si Pedro? Idinamay ninyo si Pedro kayong mga katoliko kayo.]
HA, HA, HA... TALAGANG EKIS TALAGA ANG PAG-IISIP NITO.
ANG PAPA ANG PANGUHANING LIDER NA ITINALAGA NI CRISTO UPANG MAMAHALA SA SANTA IGLESIA. SI PEDRO AY NAGING PAPA NOONG IPAGKATIWALA SA KANYA NG PANGINOONG JESUCRISTO ANG MGA SUSI NG KAHARIAN NG LANGIT AT PAGKALOOBAN SIYA NG KAPANGYARIHANG TAGOS-TAGUSAN HANGGANG LANGIT:
Matthew 16:18-19 "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
ANG KAPANGYARIHANG IYAN AY HINDI PINAGKALOOB KAY FELIX MANALO, ELISEO SORIANO, KAY EDDIE VILLANUEVA, QUIBOLOY AT KUNG SINO-SINO PANG MGA PASTOR NA PAWANG MGA HUWAD ANG CREDEBILIDAD AT AUTORIDAD. KAY SAN PEDRO IPINAGKATIWALA ANG PANGANGALAGA SA MGA TUPA NI CRISTO:
Juan 21:15 Kaya't nang mangakapagpawing gutom sila, ay sinabi ni Jesus kay Simon Pedro, Simon, anak ni Juan, iniibig mo baga ako ng higit kay sa mga ito? Sinabi niya sa kaniya, Oo, Panginoon; nalalaman mo na kita'y iniibig. Sinabi niya sa kaniya, Pakanin mo ang aking mga kordero.
Juan 21:16 Sinabi niya sa kaniyang muli sa ikalawa, Simon anak ni Juan, Iniibig mo baga ako? Sinabi niya sa kaniya, Oo, Panginoon; nalalaman mo na kita'y iniibig. Sinabi niya sa kaniya, Alagaan mo ang aking mga tupa.
Juan 21:17 Sinabi niya sa kaniya sa ikatlo, Simon, anak ni Juan, Iniibig mo baga ako? Nalumbay si Pedro sapagka't sa kaniya'y sinabing makaitlo, Iniibig mo baga ako? At sinabi niya sa kaniya, Panginoon, nalalaman mo ang lahat ng mga bagay; nalalaman mo na kita'y iniibig. Sinabi sa kaniya ni Jesus, Pakanin mo ang aking mga tupa.
LETRA FOR LETRA... ANG KATUNGKULAN NG PAG-AALAGA AT PAGPAPAKAIN SA MGA TUPA AY IPINAGKALOOB KAY SAN PEDRO. HINDI KAY SORIANO, MANALO, VILLANUEVA, QUIBOLOY, ELLEN GOULD WHITE AT KUNG SINO-SINO PANG MGA IMPAKTO SA TABI-TABI.
[WAS PETER THE FIRST POPE?
No,]
YES. OF COURSE, HE IS. HE IS OUR FIRST POPE.
[WAS PETER THE FIRST POPE?
ReplyDeleteNo, because:]
YES, HE IS. THE PROOFS ARE GIVEN BY THE LORD JESUS HIMSELF.
[1. Peter was married,]
HA, HA, HA... THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST STUPID ARGUMENS AGAINST PETER'S PAPACY I'VE EVER ENCOUNTERED. PETER'S MARRIAGE PRIOR TO HIS ORDINATION AS ONE OF THE TWELVE IS NOT AN IMPEDIMENT FOR PAPACY. IN FACT, UNTIL NOW THERE ARE PREVIOUSLY MARRIED MEN WHO HAVE BECOME PRIESTS AND EVEN BISHOPS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. THE FACT THAT WE CONSIDER PETER AS THE FIRST POPE IS A PROOF THAT PRIOR MARRIAGE IS NOT AN IMPEDIMENT AGAINST BEING A POPE.
TUTUONG MAY ASAWA SI PEDRO SUBALIT INIWAN NIYA ANG KANYANG BUONG PAMILYA PARA KAY JESUS:
Luke 18:28-30 "Then Peter said, Lo, WE HAVE LEFT ALL, and followed thee. And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or WIFE, or CHILDREN, for the kingdom of God's sake, Who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting."
KITAM. INIWAN NILA PEDRO ANG LAHAT SA PAGSUNOD KAY CRISTO. AT SINABI NG PANGINOON NA ANG MAG-IWAN NG ASAWA, ANAK, MAGULANG, TAHANAN AY PAGPAPALAIN SA BUHAY NA ITO AT NG BUHAY NA WALANG HANGGAN.
KAYO BALIGTAD PARA KAYONG DEMONIO. GALIT NA GALIT KAYO KAPAG ANG MGA PARI NAMIN AY TUMUTULAD AT SUMUSUNOD SA YAPAK NI CRISTO NA HINDI NAG-ASAWA. TULAD NI PEDRO INIWAN NAMIN ANG AMING MGA MAGULANG AT TAHANAN AT ANG PAGKAKAROON NG ASAWA'T ANAK. YUNG DAPAT AY PAGPAPALA ANG KAKAMTIN AY MASAMA ANG BINIBIGAY NYO. ANG TURO NYO AY ARAL NG KASAMAAN.
[and popes cannot be married.]
HA, HA, HA... POPES CAN BE MARRIED LIKE PETER. BUT THEY MUST ALSO ABANDON EVERYTHING LIKE PETER. AND THEY DID. HA, HA, HA...
[In Matthew 8:14, 15 Jesus healed Peter's mother in law. "When Jesus was come into Peter's house, he saw his WIFE'S MOTHER laid, and sick of a fever."]
THERE IS NO DOCTRINE IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH THAT DENIES PETER HAVING A MOTHER IN LAW.
["Have we not power to lead about a sister, a WIFE, as well as ... Cephas (Peter)?" 1 Corinthians 9:5.]
O YES, THE APOSTLES HAVE POWER TO LEAD A SISTER AND WIFE. BUT THE QUESTION IS DID THE APOSTLES REALLY GET MARRIED? NO. LIKE JESUS THEY REMAINED CELIBATE. HAVING A POWER OR AUTHORITY TO BRING A WIFE IS NOT A PROOF THAT THEY ARE MARRIED. BECAUSE I CAN SAY THE SAME. I HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE A WIFE. I HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO GET A WIFE, BUT I REFUSED IT FOR THE SAKE OF FOLLOWING AND IMITATING JESUS:
PAUL IS NOT MARRIED:
1 Corinthians 7:7 For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.
YOU SEE ST. PAUL IS NOT MARRIED AND HE WANTED OTHERS TO FOLLOW HIM.
1 Corinthians 7:8 I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I.
MALINAW, ST. PAUL IS NOT MARRIED AND HE WISHES THE UNMARRIED TO REMAIN AS HE IS. THE PRIESTS AND BISHOPS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH PERSONALLY DECIDED TO FOLLOW AND IMITATE ST. PAUL BECAUSE BY IMITATING HIM WE ARE IMITATING CHRIST:
1 Corinthians 11:1 Imitate me, then, just as I imitate Christ. [GOOD NEWS BIBLE]
2 Thessalonians 3:7 For yourselves know how ye ought to imitate us...
2 Thessalonians 3:9 ... to make ourselves an ensample unto you, that ye should imitate us.
THE PROBLEM WITH YOU IS THAT YOU ARE IMITATING PEOPLE WHO CAN'T CONTROL THEIR LIBIDO AND NOT THE LORD JESUS AND HIS HOLY APOSTLES.
WHERE CAN YOU FIND IN THE BIBLE THAT JOHN, ANDREW, PHILIP, BARTHOLOMEW, MATTHEW, JAMES, JUDE AND OTHERS WERE MARRIED? NONE.
HOW ABOUT LUKE, MARK, STEPHEN, BARNABAS, TIMOTHY AND TITUS WERE THEY MARRIED? NO.
HOW ABOUT JOHN THE BAPTIZER WAS HE MARRIED? NO.
HA, HA, HA... SO. OUR PRACTICE IS TRULY VERY VERY BIBLICAL.
[2. Peter would not allow men to bow down to him, as he forbad Cornelius in Acts 10:25, 26. "Cornelius met him, fell down at this feet, and worshipped him. Peter ... said stand up; I myself am a man." The pope likes men to bow down to him.]
ReplyDeletePLEASE STOP ACTING AS IF YOU ARE THE SPOKESPERSON OF THE POPE. YOU ARE NEITHER COMPETENT NOR QUALIFIED TO BE SO.
THE POPE NEVER TAUGHT THAT HE IS NOT A MAN SO LIKE PETER HE PROCLAIMS THAT HE TOO IS A MAN. THE REASON WHY CORNELIUS WAS REPRIMANDED BECAUSE HE WAS WORSHIPPING PETER.
WE ARE NOT WORSHIPPING THE POPE. BOWING IS NOT ONLY EXCLUSIVE TO GOD. WHERE IS IT STATED IN THE BIBLE THAT BOWING MUST ONLY BE GIVEN TO GOD AND NOT TO HUMAN PERSONS? THERE ARE A LOT OF PASSAGES IN THE BIBLE SHOWING THAT BOWING CAN BE GIVEN TO OUR FELLOW MEN:
2 Kings 1:13 "And he sent again a captain of the third fifty with his fifty. And the third captain of fifty went up, and came and FELL ON HIS KNEES BEFORE ELIJAH, and besought him, and said unto him, O MAN OF GOD, I pray thee, let my life, and the life of these fifty thy servants, be precious in thy sight."
HERE, THE CAPTAIN OF THE GUARD KNELT IN FRONT OF THE PROPHET ELIJAH. IN FILIPINO: " At ang ikatlong punong kawal ng lilimangpuin ay umahon, at naparoon at LUMUHOD SA HARAP ni Elias". BAKIT SIYA LUMUHOD SA HARAP NI ELIAS? KASI SI ELIAS IS A MAN OF GOD.
THE POPE IS A MAN OF GOD. HE IS OUR PROPHET AND UNIVERSAL PASTOR. IT IS THEREFORE REASONABLE THAT WE ACCORD HIM THE HONOR PROPER FOR A MAN OF GOD AS DONE IN THE BIBLE. ONLY THE BOWING PROPER FOR WORSHIP IS PROHIBITED.
THE KING COULD BE HONORED BY BOWING DOWN. IN 1 KINGS 1:23 THE PROPHET NATHAN BOWED DOWN BEFORE KING DAVID WITH HIS FACE ON THE GROUND.
MOTHERS COULD BE BOWED DOWN TOO. IN 1 KINGS 2:19 KING SOLOMON MET HIS MOTHER BATSHEBA BY RISING FROM HIS THRONE AND BOWED DOWN TO HER.
THE PROBLEM WITH ANTI-CATHOLICS ARE NOT SHOWING THE COMPLETE PICTURES. THEY ARE ONLY SHOWING ONE PART WHILE DECEIVING THE PEOPLE OF OTHER PASSAGES SHOWING THAT BOWING TO ANOTHER PERSON IS NOT EVIL. BOWING TO ANOTHER PERSON IS A VERY GOOD BIBLICAL HUMAN ACT.
[3. Peter rejected the "tradition from your fathers." (1 Peter 1:18), yet the Catholic church and popes base their teachings on man's traditions.]
ReplyDeleteLET US CHECK 1 PETER 1:18:
1 Peter 1:18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;
HA, HA, HA... THERE IS NO VIOLATION ON OUR PART BECAUSE IT IS ALSO THE TEACHING OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH THAT "WE WERE NOT REDEEMED WITH CORRUPTIBLE THINGS, AS SILVER AND GOLD, FROM VAIN CONVERSATION RECEIVED BY TRADITION FROM YOUR FATHERS."
VAIN CONVERSATION IS UNETHETICAL FOR CATHOLIC MORALITY AND DEFINITELY WE DO NOT RELY ON SILVER AND GOLD FOR SALVATION. THAT IS MORE PROPER FOR IGLESIA NI MANALO AND THE BORN AGAIN WHO ARE IMPOSING TITHES AS IF IT IS NECESSARY FOR SALVATION. THE REASON WHY WE DO NOT IMPOSE TEN PERCENT TITHES TO OUR MEMBERS BECAUSE IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR SALVATION.
BESIDES THE CATHOLIC DOCTRINE OF SACRED TRADITION IS NOT 'THE TRADITION OF YOUR FATHERS' BUT FROM "THE APOSTOLIC TRADITION" WHICH WE HAVE INHERITED FROM THE APOSTLES:
1 Corinthians 11:2 (New King James Version) "Now I praise you, brethren, that you remember me in all things and KEEP THE TRADITIONS just as I delivered them to you."
SEE, ST. PAUL GAVE TRADITIONS TO THE CORINTHIANS.
2 Thessalonians 2:15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and HOLD THE TRADITIONS which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
AGAIN, LOOK. THE APOSTLES TAUGHT THE THESSALONIANS TRADITIONS THAT THEY MUST HOLD ON TO.
2 Thessalonians 3:6 Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after THE TRADITION WHICH HE RECEIVED OF US.
HA, HA, HA... YOU SEE, THERE IS A TRADITION FROM THE APOSTLES. WE CALL IT APOSTOLIC TRADITION. THAT IS THE TRADITION WE ARE KEEPING NOT THE 'TRADITION OF YOUR FATHERS'. HE, HE, HE... BESIDES YOUR FATHERS ARE NOT OUR FATHERS. HA, HA, HA...
YOU ARE NOT SHOWING THESE VERSES TO FOOL YOUR MEMBERS EH.
[4. Peter wore no crown as the pope does.]
ReplyDeleteHA, HA, HA... WHAT A VERY STUPID REASONING. WHO TOLD YOU THAT POPES CANNOT BE POPES WHEN THEY DO NOT HAVE CROWN.
THE POPE IS STILL POPE WITHOUT A CROWN LIKE PETER. MANY POPES DIDN'T WEAR THE HOLY CROWN OR TIARA. AND THE MODERN POPES REFUSED TO WEAR THE TIARA SUCH AS POPE PAUL VI, JOHN PAUL I, JOHN PAUL THE GREAT AND BENEDICT XVI.
IF EVER THEY PREFERRED TO WEAR THE TIARA THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT BECAUSE THE TIARA IS BIBLICAL. IT IS A HOLY CROWN FOR THE MAN WHO SERVES WITH HIGHEST RANK IN THE TEMPLE OF GOD:
Exodus 28:40 At iyong igagawa ang mga anak ni Aaron ng mga kasuutan, at iyong igagawa sila ng mga pamigkis, at iyong igagawa sila ng MGA TIARA sa ikaluluwalhati at ikagaganda.
HA, HA, HA... KITA MO. MAY TIARA SA BIBLIA. HA, HA, HA... AT DIOS ANG NAGPAGAWA NITO HINDI KAMI. ANG DIOS ANG NAGPAGAWA NG TIARA. ALAM MO BA YON?
Exodus 29:9 At iyong bibigkisan sila ng mga pamigkis, si Aaron at ang kaniyang mga anak, at itatali mo ang MGA TIARA sa kanikaniyang ulo: at tatamuhin nila ang pagkasaserdote na pinakapalatuntunang palagi...
ANG TIARA AY PARA SA MGA PARI NG PANGINOON.
Levitico 8:13 At pinalapit ni Moises ang mga anak ni Aaron, at sila'y sinuutan ng mga kasuutan, at binigkisan ng mga pamigkis, at itinali sa kanilang ulo ang MGA TIARA; gaya ng iniutos ng Panginoon kay Moises.
HA, HA, HA... IMAGINE, UTOS NG DIOS ANG TIARA.
YUNG MGA PAPA NAMIN NA AYAW MAGSUOT NG TIARA AY MITER OR MITRE ANG GAMIT KAPAG NAGMIMISA. SA TAGALOG AY MITRA. GALING DIN ITO SA BIBLIA AT INIUTOS NG DIOS:
Exodus 28:4 And these are the garments which they shall make; a breastplate, and an ephod, and a robe, and a broidered coat, a MITRE, and a girdle: and they shall make holy garments for Aaron thy brother, and his sons, that he may minister unto me in the priest's office.
PANG PARI TALAGA YAN AYON SA UTOS NG DIOS. YANNG MITRA AY BAHAGI NG MGA HOLY GARMENTS... MGA BANAL NA KASUOTAN NG PARI NG DIOS. PALIBHASA E WALA KAYONG PARI. HA, HA, HA...
MERONG MITRE AND HOLY CROWN ANG AMING PAPA KASI GALING KAMI SA DIOS. KAYO MGA GALING SA DEMONIO KAYA WALA KAYONG TIARA, MITRA AT BANAL NA KORONA:
Exodus 29:6 And thou shalt put THE MITRE upon his head, and put THE HOLY CROWN upon the mitre.
Leviticus 8:9 And he put the mitre upon his head; also upon THE MITRE, even upon his forefront, did he put the golden plate, THE HOLY CROWN; as the LORD commanded Moses.
HA, HA, HA... YUNG MGA PAPA NAMIN NA GUMAMIT NG TIARA AY GUMAMIT DIN NG MITRE KAYA MAY MITRE AND HOLY CROWN.
YAN ANG HIRAP SA INYO E. PATI MGA MABUBUTING BAGAY AY MINAMASAMA.
[5. Peter had no wealth as the pope has: "Peter said, silver and gold have I none ..." Acts 3:6. Peter never ACTED like a pope, never DRESSED like a pope, never SPOKE like a pope, and people never APPROACHED him as a pope.]
ReplyDeleteHA, HA, HA... THE POPE IS A POOR PERSON. HE HAS NO WIFE, NO CHILDREN AND NO PERSONAL PROPERTY. WHEN THE POPE DIES NOT A SINGLE PROPERTY SHALL BE INHERITED BY HIS FAMILY. EVERYTHING WILL REMAIN IN THE CHURCH CUSTODY AND WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE NEW POPE WHO IS NOT HIS SON OR GRANDSON.
IN OTHER RELIGIONS THE OWNERSHIP OF THEIR CHURCH PASSES FROM FATHER TO SON LIKE THE CASE OF THE MANALOS. ITS A FAMILY BUSINESS. IN ADD FROM ELI SORIANO TO HIS NEPHEW DANIEL RAZON. HA, HA, HA... THE BORN AGAIN FROM THE PASTOR TO HIS SON. HA, HA, HA...
[6. Peter never took to himself the title "PONTIFIX MAXIMUS" as all the popes willingly accept, as seen by the initials P.M. after their names in the Vatican.]
ReplyDeleteYOU ARE LYING HERE. THE OFFICIAL TITLE OF THE POPE IS NOT PONTIFEX MAXIMUS BUT SUMMUS PONTIFEX OR IN ENGLISH SUPREME PONTIFF NOT THE GREATEST PONTIFF.
THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO. THE PONTIFEX MAXIMUS IS THE TITLE OF THE PAGAN ROMAN EMPERORS WHO SERVED AS THE HIGH PRIESTS OF THE ROMAN GODS AND GODDESSES. THE TITLE SUPREME PONTIFF SIMPLY SHOWS THAT AMONG THE CHRISTIAN PRIESTS IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH THE POPE IS THE LEADER OR THE HIGHEST IN RANK.
[This was a title of the pagan Roman Emperors from Juluis Caesar's time on.]
THE PONTIFEX MAXIMUS IS PAGAN IN ORIGIN BUT THE SUMMUM PONTIFEX IS CHRISTIAN IN ORIGIN. DON'T CREATE HISTORICAL DISTORTION.
[It means "Chief Bridge Maker between earth and heaven."]
LIAR. PONTIFEX MAXIMUS MEANS THE GREATEST OR THE BEST PONTIFF.
[This is a name of blasphemy for a man to take, and Peter never saw himself as such. Jesus Christ is the only Bridge Maker between earth and heaven. John 1:51.]
JESUS IS THE ONLY MEDIATOR BETWEEN GOD AND MAN. THAT IS WHY WE DO NOT TEACH THAT THE POPE IS A MEDIATOR BETWEEN GOD AND MAN. WE CALL THE POPE VICAR OF CHRIST WHICH MEANS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF CHRIST AS PETER WAS AFTER THE ASCENSION OF THE LORD JESUS.
Bakit hindi nagco complain ang mga ministro ng INC sa pagsasalin sa anak ang pamumuno ng kanilang iglesya sa halip na pagpili ng mga puno?
ReplyDeleteSagot: Dahil mawawalan sila ng trabaho kung magco complain sila.
HA, HA, HA... MATALINONG BATA ITO. HA, HA, HA... GINAGAMIT ANG SINTIDO KUMON. HA, HA, HA... NICE ONE BRO. CARLDECS.
ReplyDelete