ANTI-CATHOLIC LIES AND DECEPTIONS IN QUOTING CATHOLIC BOOKS AND DOCUMENTS, Part 5 The Fallacious Citations of the Iglesia ni Manalo

The Holy Spirit descended on the Apostles and the Blessed Virgin Mary on Pentecost. Not a single Manalo was present there because they are filled not with the Holy Spirit but the other spirit. May the Spirit of Truth guide them to see the truth of their lies and deceptions.

Franciscus Carmelo said...

Good evening po Father. This is with regards to number 8. The book cited by the Manalistas is entitled "The Emerging Church, Part One" authored by Ronald J. Wilkins, page 29, quotation (from the said book): "...The apostles and early Christians did not experience Jesus as a God in human disguise or as God pretending to be human (this is one reason that the early church rejected fanciful and wildly imaginative accounts of Jesus' life). They experienced him as a human..."

From the same Pasugo issue:

Saan nagmula ang paniniwalang si cristo ay Diyos? Ang paniniwalang si Cristo ay Dios ay utay-utay na binalangkas ng Simbahang Katoliko sa paglipas ng mga taon. Ganito ang pahayag ng paring Jesuita na si Pedro Sevilla: "Ipinahayag ng isang dalubhasa na utay-utay na binalangkas ng Simbahan ang pananampalataya sa pagka-Diyos ni Jesus sa impluho ng mga ibang relihiyon." (At Nagsalita ang Diyos sa Pamamagitan ng Kanyang Anak, p. 181." Nang lumaganap ang Katolisismo sa mga bansang pagano ay saka lamang bumangon ang kaisipang si Jesus ay Dios: "It was when Christianity spread out into the pagan world that the idea of Jesus as Savior God emerged" (Powell, Davies, The Meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls, p. 90).

September 14, 2010 7:43 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

[Good evening po Father. This is with regards to number 8. The book cited by the Manalistas is entitled "The Emerging Church, Part One" authored by Ronald J. Wilkins, page 29, quotation (from the said book):]

THIS BOOK EVEN THOUGH IT IS WRITTEN BY A PRIEST IS NOT AN OFFICIAL BOOK OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. WE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BELIEVE AND UPHELD THE IDEAS OF THAT PRIEST, IF HE REALLY WROTE SUCH A THING. IT IS HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE BECAUSE INC ARE FAMOUS FOR DOCTORING QUOTATIONS FROM OUR SOURCES.

IF THEY WANT TO SEE THE REAL AND OFFICIAL TEACHING OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH THEY MUST QUOTE THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.

[ "...The apostles and early Christians did not experience Jesus as a God in human disguise or as God pretending to be human (this is one reason that the early church rejected fanciful and wildly imaginative accounts of Jesus' life).]

BECAUSE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE EARLY PEOPLE EXPERIENCED JESUS AS TRUE GOD AND TRUE MAN. THAT IS THE REAL EXPERIENCE OF THE CHRISTIANS WITH THE LORD JESUS. NO MORE NO LESS.

[ They experienced him as a human..."]

OF COURSE THEY EXPERIENCED HIM AS HUMAN BECAUSE JESUS IS TRUE GOD AND TRUE MAN. SO, THEY EXPERIENCED HIM AS HUMAN. BUT NOT AS 'HUMAN ONLY'. EVEN THEIR QUOTE FROM THE BOOK IS ALSO CUT SHORT. IT MEANS THEY ARE BEING DECEPTIVE AND SELECTIVE.

THE HERESY OF THE INC IS THAT JESUS IS "HUMAN ONLY". JESUS IS ALSO EXPERIENCED AS GOD AS WHEN HE ROSE FROM THE DEAD AND WHEN HE ORDERED THE STORM AND THE SEA. MANALO WAS NOT ABLE TO DO THAT. HE WAS NOT ABLE TO PERFORM A MIRACLE. HE IS FAKE.

[From the same Pasugo issue:]

LET US CHECK.

ANG MGA IDEYANG NAKASULAT SA IBABA AY OBVIOUS NA PEKE. DAHIL ANG NASABING AKLAT AY WALANG TAGALOG TRANSLATION KUNDI ORIHINAL NA ENGLISH.

ANG TAGALOG TRANSLATION NA IYAN AY QUESTIONABLE AT HINDI KAPANI-PANIWALA.

[Saan nagmula ang paniniwalang si cristo ay Diyos? Ang paniniwalang si Cristo ay Dios ay utay-utay na binalangkas ng Simbahang Katoliko sa paglipas ng mga taon.]

HA, HA, HA... PINATUNAYAN NATING MULA SA BANAL NA KASULATAN NG FIRST CENTURY, THEN ON SA MGA APOSTOLIC FATHERS NG SECOND AT THIRD CENTURY ANG PAGKADIOS NI CRISTO AY WALANG PATID NA IPINAHAYAG NG MGA GURO, PARI AT OBISPO NG IGLESIA CATOLICA. KAYA KASINUNGALINGAN ANG TAGALOG VERSION NA ITO. HINDI ITO NAAAYON SA TUNAY NA NAKASULAT SA AKLAT.

[Ganito ang pahayag ng paring Jesuita na si Pedro Sevilla: "Ipinahayag ng isang dalubhasa na utay-utay na binalangkas ng Simbahan ang pananampalataya sa pagka-Diyos ni Jesus sa impluho ng mga ibang relihiyon."]

HA, HA, HA... WALANG MATINONG PARING CATOLICO ANG MAGSUSULAT NG GANITO. AT NAKAKATAWA KASI ANG AKLAT NA "THE MEANING OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS" PUBLISHED NOON PANG 1956 IN ENGLISH. HOW CAN THEY QUOTE FR. SEVILLA WHOSE WORKS WERE IN SPANISH AND IN TAGALOG? HA, HA, HA...

TALAGANG PARA LANG MAKAPANDAYA AY GAGAWIN LAHAT.

[(At Nagsalita ang Diyos sa Pamamagitan ng Kanyang Anak, p. 181." Nang lumaganap ang Katolisismo sa mga bansang pagano ay saka lamang bumangon ang kaisipang si Jesus ay Dios:]

HINDI ITO GALING KAY PADRE SEVILLA. ITO AY GALING SA MGA KAAWAY NG IGLESIA CATOLICA. OBVIOUS. HE, HE, HE...

["It was when Christianity spread out into the pagan world that the idea of Jesus as Savior God emerged" (Powell, Davies, The Meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls, p. 90).]

HE, HE, HE... IMAGINE, IN THE REAL ENGLISH WHAT EMERGED IS THE IDEA OF A "SAVIOR'... THEN IN TAGALOG NAGING PAGIGING "DIOS' NA NI CRISTO. HA, HA, HA... HULING HULING PEKE ANG TRANSLATION AT MAY MANIPULASYON. ANG GALING MAGSINUNGALING NI MANALO.

September 14, 2010 8:42 PM