Tuesday, October 19, 2010

REPLY TO JUST FOR CATHOLICS.ORG. 2: HOW CAN I KNOW? ON BIBLE ALONE

St. Luke the Evangelist writing the Gospel Account under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit and guided by the Apostles.

HOW CAN I KNOW?

* This is the second part of my rebuttal of the website JUSTFORCATHOLICS.ORG. of Joe Mizzi. Readers complained to me that it is very deceptive in style, pretending to be Catholic in order to lure our faithful to the Born-Again Cult.

[The Holy Scriptures are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus (2 Timothy 3:15).]

Yes, they can make you wise but it is nowhere stated by this passage that SCRIPTURES ALONE are the guide for salvation and it is also nowhere stated in this passage that we shall be saved by FAITH ALONE. NO, NO, NO… Your chosen verse does not give the conclusion that you are claiming to have been contained in the text. Thus, you are free to hallucinate until you open your eyes to the truth that your Scriptures Alone and Faith Alone Dogmas are UNBIBLICAL and mere TRADITION OF MEN.

[The Lord Jesus described two ways, the broad road leading to destruction and the narrow one leading to life. How can we know the way that leads to heaven, and avoid the other?]

By rejecting MAN-MADE DOCTRINES which are not truly coming from the Holy Spirit but from heretics who concocted new doctrines contrary to what is actually taught by the Lord Jesus and His Apostles under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. And your beloved doctrines of BIBLE ALONE, FAITH ALONE, RAPTURE, ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED, SALVATION AS ONE-TIME EVENT, CHRISTIANS ARE DUNGHILL COVERED WITH SNOW AND MANY OTHERS are EXAMPLES OF MAN-MADE TEACHINGS.

[The Gospel is the true way to life because it is God's message to humanity.]

CORRECT. BUT SOLA SCRIPTURA or BIBLE ALONE is contrary to the Gospel and is not contained in the Gospel. So, you claim that you are presenting the Gospel is a mere illusion not founded on reality. Where can you find in THE GOSPEL accounts that Jesus taught ‘Bible Alone’?

[People have invented several religions but all of them are false; the Bible warns us that “the world through wisdom did not know God” (1 Corinthians 1:21).]

THE MOST RECENT INVENTED RELIGIONS NOWADAYS ARE THE BORN-AGAIN SECTS. THEIR VERY REGISTRATION IN THE GOVERNMENT RECORDS FOR INCORPORATION SHOWS THAT THEY ARE NEWLY INVENTED IT IS THEREFORE VERY CLEAR THAT THIS PASSAGE AND THIS STATEMENT POINT DIRECTLY ON YOUR OWN BORN-AGAIN RELIGION.

[God's message is recorded in the Bible.]

YES. BUT THE BIBLE DOES NOT SAY THAT GOD’S ENTIRE MESSAGE IS RECORDED IN THE BIBLE ALONE. WILL YOU PLEASE GIVE ME THE PASSAGE SAYING THAT THE WHOLE OF GOD’S MESSAGE OR THE ENTIRE MESSAGE OF GOD IS RECORDED IN THE BIBLE ALONE?

[It was written by holy people who were guided by the Holy Spirit.]

HA, HA, HA… THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NOW YOU HAVE ACCEPTED OUR DOCTRINE THAT THERE ARE HOLY PEOPLE. IF THERE ARE HOLY PEOPLE THEN THESE PEOPLE WHO BECAME HOLY BY THE GRACE OF GOD ARE NOT ‘DUNGHILL COVERED WITH SNOW’ BECAUSE DUNGHILLS WHETHER COVERED WITH SNOW, KETCHUP, SOYSAUCE OR CREAM ARE STILL DIRTY. THE TRUE BELIEVERS ARE PURIFIED, CLEANSED AND SANCTIFIED BY GOD NOT JUST ‘IMPUTED’ BUT THOROUGHLY MADE HOLY.

HERE, YOU HAVE ACCEPTED OUR DOCTRINE ON SAINTS…THAT THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN REDEEMED ARE MADE HOLY. THEY ARE THE ‘SAINTS’ OF GOD.

THIS IS CONTRARY TO THE BORN-AGAIN DOCTRINE OF IMPUTED JUSTIFICATION. BECAUSE THAT BELIEF DOES NOT SPEAK OF THE CLEANSING AND TOTAL SANCTIFICATION OF THE BELIEVERS BUT ONLY DECLARATION OF RIGHTEOUSNESS WHILE REMAINING IN A STATE OF SIN – THUS, ‘DUNGHILL COVERED WITH SNOW’. NO MATTER HOW THICK THE SNOW IS THE HUMAN PERSON FOR THE BORN AGAIN IS NOT THE SNOW BUT THE DUNGHILL. YOU AND YOUR MEMBERS ARE VERY DIRTY THEN. FOR THAT REASON, THERE IS NO HOLY PERSONS AMONG THE BORN-AGAIN BECAUSE YOU ARE ALL ‘DUNGHILL COVERED WITH SNOW.’

[ We can trust the Bible because it is God's book.]

WE CAN TRUST THE BIBLE BECAUSE IT IS GOD’S BOOK. ON THE OTHER HAND, WE CANNOT TRUST THE BORN AGAIN BECAUSE THEIR DOCTRINE OF ‘BIBLE-ALONE’ IS UNBIBLICAL AND NON-BIBLICAL. IT IS AN INVENTED DOCTRINE ONLY INVENTED IN THE 16TH CENTURY BY MARTIN LUTHER, THE HERETIC.

IF YOU TRULY TRUST THE BIBLE THEN YOU ARE COMPELLED TO REJECT ‘BIBLE ALONE’ DOCTRINE BECAUSE IT IS NOT PART OF THE BIBLE WHICH IS GOD’S BOOK. SOLA SCRIPTURA IS CONTRARY TO THE SCRIPTURES OF GOD.

[We can also be confident that it is the sure guide to Heaven.]

THE BIBLE YES BUT NOT THE BORN-AGAIN THEY ARE LIARS AND INVENTORS OF DOCTRINES.

[The Holy Scriptures “are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus” (2 Timothy 3:15).]

YES. BUT THE PASSAGE NEVER SPEAKS OF SOLA SCRIPTURA.

[What about church tradition? Jesus warned us against tradition (Mark 7:1-13).]

O LIAR, LIAR, LIAR. YOU ARE BEING DECEPTIVE HERE. THIS IS NOT APOSTOLIC TRADITION. WE DO NOT FOLLOW THE TRADITIONS OF THE JEWS CONCERNING WASHING OF HANDS, ETC. NO, NO, NO.

OUR APOSTOLIC TRADITION IS GIVEN HERE:

2 Thessalonians 2:15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold THE TRADITIONS which ye have been taught, whether by WORD, or our EPISTLE.

SEE, HE, HE, HE… HOLD FAST TO THE TRADITIONS [plural]. STAND FAST TO THEM. AND THESE TRADITIONS ARE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN.

DEFINITELY THESE TRADITIONS REFERRED TO BY ST. PAUL ARE NOT THE SAME WITH THE ONE REJECTED BY JESUS. HOW COME YOU ARE IGNORANT OF IT? OR YOU DELIBERATELY WITHHELD THIS PASSAGE?

[He accused the Jews that they were “making the word of God of no effect through your tradition.” They should have remained faithful to the written Word. Similarly, church tradition has changed the clear teaching of the Bible.]

THE FACT THAT THERE IS NOT APOSTOLIC TRADITION IN BORN-AGAIN SECTS AND CULTS IS A SOLID PROOF OF ITS DEMONIC NATURE AND SATANIC ORIGIN. BECAUSE THE TRUE CHRISTIAN CHURCH HAS APOSTOLIC TRADITION:

2 Thessalonians 3:6 Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after THE TRADITION WHICH HE RECEIVED OF US.

HOW COME THE BORN-AGAIN DO NOT HAVE TRADITION FROM THE APOSTLES? BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT APOSTOLIC IN ORIGIN… INSTEAD THEY ARE NEWLY INVENTED BY THE MODERN DAY HERETICS.

[For instance, the church commends the veneration of statues even though the second commandment forbids the making of graven images and bowing down before them (Exodus 20:4).]

JOE MIZZI IS LYING HERE. EXODUS 20:4 FORBIDS THE MAKING OF GRAVEN IMAGES OF FALSE GODS AND IDOLS. BUT IT IS NOWHERE STATED IN THE PASSAGE THAT IT IS EVIL TO MAKE GRAVEN IMAGES OF ANGELS AND SAINTS. IN FACT, JUST FEW CHAPTERS AFTER EXODUS 20 GOD ORDERED… COMMANDED MOSES TO MAKE GRAVEN IMAGES OF CHERUBIMS TO BE PUT ON TOP OF THE ARK OF THE COVENANT WHICH WAS PLACED IN THE HOLY OF HOLIES:

Exodus 25:18 And thou shalt MAKE two CHERUBIMS OF GOLD, of BEATEN WORK shalt thou make them, in the two ends of the mercy seat.

Exodus 25:19 And make one cherub on the one end, and the other cherub on the other end: even of the mercy seat shall ye make the cherubims on the two ends thereof.

Exodus 25:20 And the cherubims shall stretch forth their wings on high, covering the mercy seat with their wings, and their faces shall look one to another; toward the mercy seat shall the faces of the cherubims be.

Exodus 25:21 And thou shalt put the mercy seat above upon the ark; and in the ark thou shalt put the testimony that I shall give thee.

Exodus 25:22 And there I will MEET with thee, and I will COMMUNE with thee from above the mercy seat, from BETWEEN THE TWO CHERUBIMS which are upon the ark of the testimony, of all things which I will give thee in commandment unto the children of Israel.

O THAT IS VERY CLEAR. THE LORD GOD ORDERED MOSES TO MAKE STATUES OF CHERUBIMS MADE OF GOLD. AND IN VERSE 22 GOD PROMISED THAT HE WILL MEET MOSES BETWEEN THE TWO STATUES. IF STATUES AND ALL GRAVEN IMAGES ARE ABOMINABLE TO GOD THEN HOW COME HE CHOSE TO MEET AND COMMUNE WITH MOSES IN BETWEEN THESE STATUES?

THE FACT THAT GOD WANTS TO HAVE STATUES OF CHERUBIMS SHOWS THAT THE BORN-AGAIN ARE LYING TO US. NOT ALL STATUES ARE PROHIBITED BY GOD AND NOT ALL ARE VIOLATION OF HIS COMMAND NOT TO MAKE GRAVEN IMAGES WHICH IS A PROHIBITION ON FALSE GODS AND IDOLS. MUCH MORE, GOD CAN MEET AND COMMUNICATE WITH HIS PEOPLE THROUGH STATUES OF ANGELS AND OF HIS HOLY SERVANTS.

[What about religious teachers? We should listen to teachers as long as their teaching is faithful to the Bible.]

THAT IS THE REASON WHY WE HAVE TO REJECT THE BORN AGAIN PASTORS BECAUSE THEIR TEACHINGS ARE NOT FAITHFUL TO THE BIBLE. THEY INSTEAD RELY ON THE INVENTED DOGMAS OF MARTIN LUTHER AND OF JOHN CALVIN, TWO OF THE MOST POPULAR HERETICS IN THE LATER TIMES.

[We ought to imitate the people of Berea who “received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so” (Acts 17:11).]

THE BEREANS SEARCHED THE SCRIPTURES DAILY LIKE WHAT THE CATHOLICS ARE DOING IN EVERY DAILY WORSHIPS BUT THEY DIDN’T ADVOCATE ‘BIBLE ALONE’. WHERE DID THE BEREANS SAY THAT? NOWHERE.

THE BEREANS DIDN’T PRACTICE SOLA SCRIPTURA. ACTUALLY YOUR INTERPRETATION OF L’AFFAIR BEREANS IS DISTORTED. LET US CHECK THE PASSASGE:

Act 17:10 And the brethren immediately sent away Paul and Silas by night unto Berea: who coming thither went into the synagogue of the Jews.

Act 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

Act 17:12 Therefore many of them believed; also of honourable women which were Greeks, and of men, not a few.

ACTS 17:10 THE APOSTLES SENT ST. PAUL AND SILAS TO BEREA WHY? BECAUSE SCRIPTURES ALONE ARE NOT ENOUGH. THEY NEED THE PRESENCE OF THE CHURCH AUTHORITY TO EXPLAIN THE SACRED SCRIPTURES TO THEM.

IN ACTS 17:11 ST. PAUL FOUND THE BEREANS MORE OPEN TO THE GOSPEL BECAUSE THEY WERE READING THE SCRIPTURES AND IN v. 12 THE BELIEVED. DID THEY BELIEVE THROUGH ‘BIBLE ALONE’? NO. THEY BELIEVED BECAUSE OF THE PREACHING OF STS. PAUL AND SILAS AND THEIR FIDELITY TO SACRED SCRIPTURES. IT’S NOT FAITH ALONE THEN BUT APOSTOLIC PREACHING + SCRIPTURES or VICE VERSA.

[What about our personal opinion? We should eagerly seek God's way, not our own. “Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding” (Proverbs 3:5).]

VERY GOOD. WE MUST NOT BELIEVE YOU THEN BECAUSE YOUR TEACHINGS ARE ONLY YOUR OWN PERSONAL OPINIONS. IN FACT, OTHER PASTORS ARE NOT TEACHING THE THINGS THAT YOU ARE SAYING. ACTUALLY THERE IS NO UNITY IN DOCTRINES AMONG BORN-AGAIN. SO YOU AND YOUR FELLOW PASTORS MUST NOT BE TRUSTED AT ALL BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT ‘GODS’. WE CAN ONLY TRUST GOD. I HOPE YOU HAVE AN IOTA OF TRUST ON YOUR WIFE, YOUR CHILDREN AND ON YOURSELF BECAUSE YOU ARE HUMAN.

[The Bible is the only sure guide to heaven.]

REALLY? WHERE IS THAT IN THE BIBLE? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE.

THAT DOCTRINE IS DEMONIC. WHY? THERE IS ANOTHER SURE GUIDE TO HEAVEN BESIDES THE BIBLE. WHAT IS THAT? THE CHURCH – THE PILLAR AND GROUND OF TRUTH:

1 Timothy 3:15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is THE CHURCH of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.

AND THIS ONE, TRUE CHURCH SHALL NOT BE OVERCAME EVEN BY THE GATE OF HELL:

Matthew 16:18 "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."

O THAT IS CLEAR AND CATEGORICAL. THE CHURCH… THE ONE AND ONLY CHURCH, NOT THE DISUNITED CHURCHES OF THE BORN AGAIN, BUT THE ONE AND ONLY CHURCH IS THE PILLAR AND GROUND OF TRUTH. SO THEN, IF YOU ARE IN THE CHURCH YOU ARE GROUNDED ON TRUTH. THAT CHURCH IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.

[The person who learns, believes and obeys its message can say: “Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path” (Psalm 119:105).]

THANK YOU AGAIN. SEE, YOU GOT IT CORRECTLY. IT IS NOT ‘FAITH ALONE’ BUT FAITH + GOOD WORKS [Learning and Obedience]. IT STARTS FROM LEARNING THEN BELIEVING AND THEN OBEYING. HE, HE, HE…

I LIKE YOU JOE MIZZI. YOU ARE AFFIRMING MANY OF OUR CATHOLIC BELIEFS TO THE DETRIMENT OF YOUR OWN.

31 comments:

  1. Hello po Father,

    I just want to ask you and to confirm as well,tungkol po sa pagpapagamot sa isang faith healer or albularyo...masama ho ba yun at against sa catholic faith natin? kahit pa yung paraan ng paggagamot nila ay base din sa mga dasal natin at hinihingi nila yung tulong ng Panginoon?Very rampant po kasi ito sa mga probinsya at naka experience din po ako nito dati.Maraming salamat po!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good evening po Father Arganiosa.

    May tanong lang po ako dito sa sinulat ninyo:

    BUT THE BIBLE DOES NOT SAY THAT GOD’S ENTIRE MESSAGE IS RECORDED IN THE BIBLE ALONE.

    Ang tanong ko po ay ano po yung halimbawa ng mensahe ng Diyos na hindi ko mababasa sa Biblia?

    Salamat po.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The right Doctrines concerning Eugenics, Euthanasia, Abortion, Contraceptives, Illegal Gambling, Pornography, Masturbation, Moral Principles concerning Atomic and Nuclear Warfare, Genetic Engineering, and other issues that are being debated nowadays but the Bible do not give a SPECIFIC AND CATEGORIAL AND DIRECT ANSWERS.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Salamat po.

    Pwede po bang follow up? Kapag po ba sinabing hindi lahat ng mensahe ng Diyos ay nakasulat sa Biblia ibig bang sabihin ay hindi lahat ay explicit? Maaring nandun pero implied, ganun po ba?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Papano mo nasabing nanduon kung hindi binanggit ng directa? Halimbawa, Euthanasia. Ang nakalagay sa Biblia ay 'Huwag kang papatay.' The proponents of Euthanasia will not buy the argument that Euthanasis is included in that command. In fact, there are religious groups, Protestant groups that accept the morality of Abortions and Euthanasia.

    How can you claim that it is there when you cannot point it out?

    ReplyDelete
  6. "But there are also many other things that Jesus did; if everyone of them were written down, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written." John 21:25 Therefore it is not only about explicit and implicit.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Pero ang ultimate result ng Euthanasia is may pinatay di po ba? Kaya pasok pa rin sa huwag kang papatay. Ganun din ang abortion, may pinatay. Katigasan na lang po ng ulo kung ito hindi tuturingin na pagpatay.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Para sa mga sumasang-ayon sa interpretasyon na iyan, pasok. For us Catholics who interpret it that way officially, yes pasok.

    But there are Christians who argue otherwise. Hindi daw pasok. Ngayon, papano mo lulutasin yon kung Biblia lang ang basehan?

    ReplyDelete
  9. That is why Jesus gave the Church the authority to bind and unbind.

    ReplyDelete
  10. CORRECT. THAT IS WHY THE LORD BUILT THE CHURCH [MT. 16:18-19] TO BE THE PILLAR AND GROUND OF TRUTH [1 TIM 3:15]. THE CHURCH IS THE OFFICIAL INTERPRETER OF THE BIBLE AND GUIDE OF THE PEOPLE ON MATTERS OF FAITH AND MORALS.

    THE FORMULA: ME AND THE BIBLE ALONE IS DANGEROUS. THIS WILL LEAD TO DOCTRINAL CHAOS LIKE WHAT IS HAPPENING AMONG BAPTISTS AND BORN AGAIN. LABO-LABO SILA.

    ReplyDelete
  11. [CORRECT. THAT IS WHY THE LORD BUILT THE CHURCH [MT. 16:18-19] TO BE THE PILLAR AND GROUND OF TRUTH [1 TIM 3:15]. THE CHURCH IS THE OFFICIAL INTERPRETER OF THE BIBLE AND GUIDE OF THE PEOPLE ON MATTERS OF FAITH AND MORALS.

    THE FORMULA: ME AND THE BIBLE ALONE IS DANGEROUS. THIS WILL LEAD TO DOCTRINAL CHAOS LIKE WHAT IS HAPPENING AMONG BAPTISTS AND BORN AGAIN. LABO-LABO SILA.]

    Pero ang dami-daming churches ngayon. Paano ko malalaman kung alin sa mga diyan ang totoo? Anong basehan natin para sabihin na itong iglesia na ito ay totoo?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hindi namn po talaga malulutas ang lahat ng Problema tungkol sa Moral issue ngayon..Kasi nakahula namn sa bible na ang kasamaan ay lalago kaya nga gugunawin ang mundo dahil sa kasamaan..Pero yun mga hindi nasulat sa bible hindi batayan yan para sa sabibihn na hindi sapat ang bible para maligtas..

    thanks,

    Christian

    ReplyDelete
  13. Christian, WALA AKONG SINABI NA HINDI SAPAT ANG BIBLE PARA MALIGTAS. ANG SINABI KO AY MALI ANG ARAL NA 'BIBLE ALONE' DAHIL ITO AY HINDI TINUTURO NG BIBLIA. KUNG TALAGANG NANINIWALA KA SA BIBLIA DAPAT HINDI MO PAPANIWALAAN ANG DOGMA NA INIMBENTO LANG NI MARTIN LUTHER AT WALA SA BIBLIA.

    ReplyDelete
  14. [Pero ang dami-daming churches ngayon. Paano ko malalaman kung alin sa mga diyan ang totoo? Anong basehan natin para sabihin na itong iglesia na ito ay totoo?]

    HINDI BIBLIA ANG SASAGOT NIYAN KUNDI CHURCH HISTORY.

    ANG TUNAY NA IGLESIA AY:

    1. Si Cristo ang nagtatag
    2. Sa Israel nanggaling
    3. Noon pang 30-33AD nag-umpisa hindi bagong litaw
    4. Ito ay pinalaganap ng mga Apostol sa Roma, Corinto, Efeso, at iba pang dinalaw nilang lugar.
    5. Ito ang nag-tipon at nagpatibay sa Biblia.

    AND HINDI TAGLAY YAN, MGA BAGONG SULPOT SA TABI-TABI AY MGA PEKE AT MULA SA MGA BULAANG PROPETA.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Father kung church history po ang pag-uusapan di po ba na isa sa mga kaagaw ng Roman Catholic Church dito ay ang Eastern Orthodox Church? Nandyan din po yung mga Sedevacantists. Lahat po sila sumisipi sa history. Kayninong history ako dapat maniwala?

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Sedevacantists appeared only after the Second Vatican Council while the Orthodox Churches were formerly under the Authority of the Bishop of Rome and separated only in 1054. In the Creed of Nicaea-Constantinopolitan of the Early Christians what is stated is THE CATHOLIC CHURCH not THE ORTHODOX CHURCHES.

    The Church of Rome is mentioned in the Bible but Constantinople and Moscow, the two chief Patriarchates of the Orthodox were not even mentioned at all.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Pero kung magiging objective po ako, susuriin ko rin yung mga historical references nila at for sure may mga negative comments din sila laban sa Roman Catholic Church. For sure din i-ko-contest niyo po yung mga reperensya nila. Saan po tayo kukuha ng reliable history?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Ang mga walanghiyang pariseo at priest noong time ni Jesus ay malaki ang influence sa politika.Sila ang nagsulsol para ipako sa krus si Jesus.Yung mga tao na yan ay di naman nawala kahit ng mamaty si Jesus,naging miyembro pa ang mga yan ng early church khit di sila totoong kristyano.Hinaluan ng Pulitika ang tunay na church. Katunayan yan ng dumating ang kastila sa Pinas,Kakutsaba ng priest ang mga Kastila.Minana nila yang kawalanghiyaan noon pa ngayon na lang nabubulgar..Kaya hindi 100 percent totoo ang History ng Roman Catholic..

    ReplyDelete
  19. Nobody denies your right to study both sides of history. We are confident that if you will truly be objective then the strength of our claims will stand up against theirs. Even among Orthodox they cannot even unite. They are divided. Then their own Saints, the Fathers of the Church unanimously attests to the primacy of the See of Rome.

    The Sedevacantists are mere offshoot of Lefebvre Schism that started from the 70's.

    If you will reason that why then you will only fall into relativism. Even the Bible can be interpreted by the Devil the various ways. All ideas are subject to different interpretation. But if you will be true to your statement that you will be objective then you will reach the Objectivity of Truth, the Certitude of Knowledge in all fields of studies including Church History.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Father, kung yung interpretation ng Bible ay pwedeng ma-interpret ng Devil, how much more sa historical writings na prone ma-distort.

    ReplyDelete
  21. YES. WHAT THE DEVIL CANNOT DESTROY IS THE WORD OF GOD AND THE CHURCH FOUNDED BY JESUS. THE TWO MUST GO HAND IN HAND.

    REMEMBER WHAT JESUS SAID TO PETER: "YOU ARE ROCK [PETROS] AND UPON THIS ROCK I WILL BUILD MY CHURCH AND THE GATE OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Mt16:18]. THUS, THE CHURCH FOUNDED ON PETER IS THE ONE PROTECTED BY JESUS NOT THE CHURCH FOUNDED BY LUTHER, BILLY GRAHAM, MANALO OR SORIANO.

    ReplyDelete
  22. [Ang mga walanghiyang pariseo at priest noong time ni Jesus ay malaki ang influence sa politika]

    BAGO KA MAGDUNONG-DUNUNGAN GAMITIN MO ANG UTAK MO.

    LAHAT NG RELIGION: CHRISIANITY, HINDUISM, BUDDHISM, TAOISM, ETC. AY MALAKI ANG INFLUENCIA SA PULITIKA. GANON DIN SA IBAT IBANG GRUPO NG CRISTIANISMO: BORN AGAIN, IGLESIA NI MANALO O DATING DAAN... LAHAT YAN AY MAY IMPLUENSIYA SA PULITICA.

    WALANG SINABI SA BIBLIA NA LAHAT NG MGA PARI NG LUMANG TIPAN AY MASAMA.

    * ANG TATAY NI JUAN BAUTISTA NA SI ZACARIAS [cf. Luke 1] AY ISANG PARING KALUGOD-LUGOD SA DIOS. SIYA AT ANG KANYANG ASAWA NA SI ELIZABETH AY KAPUWA MATUWID O RIGHTEOUS IN THE EYES OF GOD [Luke 1:6].

    * SI SIMEON AY MATUWID [JUST AND DEVOUT] AT TUNAY NA LINGKOD NG DIOS [Luke 2:25]

    * SI NICODEMO AY PHARISEO SUBALIT KAIBIGAN AT TAGAPAGTANGGOL NI JESUS [Juan 3:1ff.]. SIYA AY MAKATARUNGANG HUMUSGA AT IPINAGTANGGOL SI JESUS LABAN SA IBANG PARISEO [Juan 7:50-51]. TUMULONG PA SIYA SA PAG-AASIKASO SA BANGKAY NI JESUS [Juan 19:39].

    * SI GAMALIEL AY ISANG PHARISEO AT LEADER DIN NG MGA JUDIO. MALAKAS SA PULITIKA DAHIL PINAGBIBIGYAN NI PILATO ANG REQUESTS NIYA. ITO ANG TUMUTULONG KAY JESUS AT NAGPALIBING SA KANYA [Juan 19:38]

    * SI GAMALIEL NA ISA SA MGA MIEMBRO NG SANHEDRIN AT DOCTOR NG BATAS. IPINAGTANGGOL NIYA ANG KALAYAAN NG MGA APOSTOLES AT ANG KARAPATAN NILANG ITAGUYOD ANG IGLESIA [Acts 5:34]. SIYA RIN ANG PANTAS NA NAGING GURO NI SAN PABLO NUNG SIYA AY PARISEO PA [Acts 22:3].

    KAYA MAG-ARAL PARA HINDI PURO KATANGAHAN ANG PINAGSASABI.

    ReplyDelete
  23. [Sila ang nagsulsol para ipako sa krus si Jesus.]

    HINDI LAHAT. MERONG MGA MABUBUTI.

    [Yung mga tao na yan ay di naman nawala kahit ng mamaty si Jesus,]

    NAWALA RIN SILA DAHIL NAMATAY DIN SILA TULAD NG MGA APOSTOL. KABALIWANG SABIHIN NA HINDI SILA NAWALA.

    [naging miyembro pa ang mga yan ng early church khit di sila totoong kristyano.]

    YUNG MGA NAGING MIEMBRO NG EARLY CHURCH AY NABINYAGAN AT TINANGGAP NG MGA APOSTOLES. SINO KA PARA SABIHING HINDI SILA TUNAY NA CRISTIANO. KAHIT NA ANG MGA APOSTOL AY HINDI SINABI IYAN. SA KATUNAYAN TUWANG TUWA PA NGA ANG MGA APOSTOL DAHIL ANG CHURCH AY KINGDOM OF PRIESTS, A ROYAL PRIESTHOOD:

    1 Peter 2:5 [NIV] "you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ."

    1 Peter 2:5 (New Living Translation)"And you are living stones that God is building into his spiritual temple. What’s more, you are his holy priests"

    YOU HATE SO MUCH THE PRIESTS AND THE PRIESTHOOD DAHIL IGNORANTE KA NA ITO AY ISA SA MGA ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TRUE CHURCH.


    [Hinaluan ng Pulitika ang tunay na church.]

    ANO BA ANG TUNAY NA CHURCH? PAKI SABI NGA SA AMIN? KELAN ITO NAHALUAN AT SINO ANG NAGHALO?

    [Katunayan yan ng dumating ang kastila sa Pinas,]

    BAKIT KASTILA LANG BA ANG DUMATING SA PILIPINAS?

    * DUMATING MUNA DITO ANG MGA MUSLIM. MAGKAHALO DIN ANG RELIGION AT POLITICS SA ISLAM.

    * DUMATING SA PILIPINAS ANG MGA INTSIK NA BUDDHISTS AT MALAKAS AT NAKIALAM DIN SILA SA PULITIKA.

    * DUMATING DIN SA PILIPINAS ANG MGA AMERCANO NA IMPLUENCIADO NG MGA PROTESTANTE.

    [Kakutsaba ng priest ang mga Kastila.]

    BAKIT ANG MGA PILIPINO HINDI BA KAKUTSABA NG MGA PULITIKO NGAYON? ANG MGA IGLESIA NI MANALO HINDI KAKUTSABA NG MGA POLITICO? ANG MGA BORN AGAIN HINDI NAMUMULITIKA? E HUMABOL PA NGA NG DALAWANG BESES SA PAGKA PRESIDENTE SI EDDIE VILLANUEVA.

    [Minana nila yang kawalanghiyaan noon pa ngayon na lang nabubulgar..]

    ANONG NGAYON LANG NABULGAR. KUNG HINDI MO ALAM ANG MGA KAWALANG HIYAAN NUON IBIG SABIHIN WALA KANG PINAG-ARALAN O SADYANG TANGA KA. PWEDE RIN NA PALA ABSENT KA SA KLASE. DAHIL ANG MGA NAGSULAT NG MGA KAWALANG-HIYAAN NUON AY MGA CATOLICO RIN.

    SUBALIT MGA CATOLICO RIN ANG GUMAWA NG MGA KABUTIHAN NUON. SILA ANG NAGTAYO NG MGA SCHOOLS - COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES - SCIENCE CENTERS, ORPHANAGES, HOSPITALS AT IBA PA.

    ANG MGA PROTESTANTENG DUTCH AY SUMALAKAY DIN SA PILIPINAS SUBALIT NATALO KAYA HINDI NAKAPASOK.

    LAHAT NG RELIHIYON AY MAY KASIRAAN. SUBALIT MERON DING KABUTIHAN. KUNG SA PARAMIHAN NG KABUTIHAN, LAMING KAMI SA LAHAT.

    [Kaya hindi 100 percent totoo ang History ng Roman Catholic.]

    ALIN ANG HINDI TUTUO? ALIN ANG TAMA?

    SI RIZAL, SINA JUAN LUNA AT IBA PA AY NAG-ARAL SA ESPANYA. MGA CATOLICO RIN ANG PINAGKUNAN NILA NG KARUNUNGAN. HINDI MGA BORN AGAIN O MGA MANOLISTA O DATING DAAN ANG NAGTURO SA MGA BAYANI NG BANSA.

    ReplyDelete
  24. [I just want to ask you and to confirm as well,tungkol po sa pagpapagamot sa isang faith healer or albularyo...masama ho ba yun at against sa catholic faith natin?]

    Dear Anonymous,

    THERE ARE SEVERAL POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. There are barrio folks who have NATURAL TALENTS OR ABILITIES to heal sicknesses. Examples of these are the Manghihilot. Pang napilayan ka at nagpunta ka ng Doctor, sesementuhin ka for a month. Pero sa manghihilot ay bubuhusan ka lang ng langis, hihilutin, tatapalan ng dahon at kinabukasan OK ka na.

    Yung mga ganitong manggagamot ay mabuti dahil natural talents ang gamit nila. This is a special gift from God.

    Meron namang iba na naturally magaling sa paggamit ng mga ugat o dahon na nagpapagaling ng maraming sakit. Ito rin ay natural talents. Kaya nga Albularyo ang tawag. Galing yon sa Herbularius - one who uses the herbs or leaves for healing. Hindi rin masama ito.

    Merong iba naman na walang talents subalit because of their Holiness of Life or Great Faith nakapagpapagaling. Ito ang halimbawa ng ating mga Saints. This is not by talents but by Grace from God.

    May mga manghihilot na nagdadasal habang nanghihilot gayon din ang mga Albularyo. Hanggang ang dasal nila ay ang mga Biblical Prayers natin Ok pa. Subalit kapag HINDI MAINTINDIHAN ANG MGA DASAL. Kapag kung ano anong bato at anting anting ang gamit at tumatawag ng espirito MASAMA YON.

    2. ITO ANG MGA ESPIRITISTA. Tumatawag ng spirits for healing. May oracion din sila at kung ano anong strange things ang ginagawa. AVOID THEM. EVIL SPIRITS ANG TINATAWAG NILA. Masama yon.

    Tignan mo rin kung maraming mga suot na mga medalyon na iba iba ang mga larawan. Mali yon. Kasi they believe na ang medalyon ang nagpapagaling hindi ang Panginoong Dios.

    [kahit pa yung paraan ng paggagamot nila ay base din sa mga dasal natin at hinihingi nila yung tulong ng Panginoon?]

    Walang masama sa pagdarasal subalit dapat tunay na dasal ang sinasabi hindi ang mga ungol, daing at mga hindi maintindihang mga oracion na kahit na ang nagsasalita ay hindi naiintindihan.

    [Very rampant po kasi ito sa mga probinsya at naka experience din po ako nito dati.]

    Na experience ko rin nung bata ako. kasi pare pareho naman tayong mga provinciano at mahihirap. Subalit later on I realized na mali yung iba.

    Dun ka lang sa natural talents ang taglay hindi tumatawag ng espiritu at hindi agimat o anting-anting ang gamit.

    [Maraming salamat po!]

    Welcome.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I address many of Joe Mizzi's article on my webpage:

    http://sites.google.com/site/catholicdefense/j4c-whatissolascriptura

    God Bless

    ReplyDelete
  26. Question lang po :

    ang sabi niyo po ang TRUE CHRUCH ay

    1. Si Cristo ang nagtatag
    2. Sa Israel nanggaling
    3. Noon pang 30-33AD nag-umpisa hindi bagong litaw
    4. Ito ay pinalaganap ng mga Apostol sa Roma, Corinto, Efeso, at iba pang dinalaw nilang lugar.
    5. Ito ang nag-tipon at nagpatibay sa Biblia.

    ano po basis ng 5 items na ito?

    tnx..

    ReplyDelete
  27. FACTS AND REALITY.

    If a church is founded by Felix Manalo or Soriano and not by Jesus then it is fake. If the fellowship is founded by Eddie Villanueva in the Philippines or by Pastor Piolo Pascual then it is fake.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Hello po.My question is clear...

    [Question lang po :

    ang sabi niyo po ang TRUE CHRUCH ay

    1. Si Cristo ang nagtatag
    2. Sa Israel nanggaling
    3. Noon pang 30-33AD nag-umpisa hindi bagong litaw
    4. Ito ay pinalaganap ng mga Apostol sa Roma, Corinto, Efeso, at iba pang dinalaw nilang lugar.
    5. Ito ang nag-tipon at nagpatibay sa Biblia.

    ano po basis ng 5 items na ito?

    tnx.. ]

    What is your basis for these 5 items?

    My question is very objective..

    thank you.

    regarding

    Felix, Soriano, or Eddie..or even anyone else na sinabing nagtatag or nagtay sila ng church..ofcourse fake yon..

    now pls answer my question po..tnx..

    ReplyDelete
  29. YOU ARE ASKING FOR THE BASIS AND I HAVE GIVEN IT TO YOU. WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY BASIS?

    ReplyDelete
  30. eh bakit po marami kayo sinasamba,at mas sinasamba nyo eh tao po,tulad po ni birhen Maria di ba po sabi sa bible na I am a Jealous God,Thou shall not worship other gods nasa 10 utos po yun diba? Sino po ba ang pinaniniwalaan nyong tagapagligtas?

    Jo

    ReplyDelete
  31. Aba e dapat kang magpatingin sa Psychiatrist Jo. Kasi ikaw lang naman ang nagsasabi na sinasamba namin si Birheng Maria. Kami hindi namin siya sinasamba, gundi iginagalang.

    SI CRISTO ANG PINANINIWALAAN NAMING TAGAPAGLIGTAS. BAKIT SINO BA SA AKALA MO?

    ReplyDelete