Saturday, January 30, 2010

IS THERE ANY BIBLICAL EVIDENCE THAN AN ANGEL IS BEING SENT BY GOD SPECIFICALLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF TEACHING RELIGIOUS TRUTHS?

The Angel Raphael accompanying Tobiah on the road, he helped him catch a big fish which was later used for incense that drove out the demon.
[IS THERE ANY BIBLICAL EVIDENCE THAT AN ANGEL IS BEING SENT BY GOD SPECIFICALLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF TEACHING RELIGIOUS TRUTHs?]

The angels were sent to earth to relay God's message. Sometimes they answer few questions as St. Gabriel did to the Virgin Mary [Luke 1] but most of them simply relay what God had told them to say.

There is one instance that an angel stayed on earth for long as in the case of St. Raphael when he accopanied Tobiah in the journey but his purpose was not primarily to teach but to protect Tobiah, to heal Tobit and to defeat the demon that disturbs the peace of that family [cf. The Book of Tobit].

Angels are also protectors of the people and of cities or nations such as Michael the Angel-Protector of Israel [see Daniel 10:13].

For preaching and teaching, the Lord sent the Prophets and ultimately the LORD JESUS and His Apostles:

Heb 1:1-2 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds.

The ministry of preaching and teaching people are given to human beings and the Lord Jesus as well as the Holy Spirit as EXCEPTIONS because they are Divine. But not to Angels as the INC claimed.

Preaching and Teaching are not the duties of Angels but the human ministers of God, consecrated by the Lord Jesus through His Holy Spirit:

John 20:21-22 He said therefore to them again: Peace be to you. As the Father hath sent me, I also send you. When he had said this, he breathed on them; and he said to them: Receive ye the Holy Ghost.

Mathew 28:18-20 And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth. Going therefore, teach ye all nations: baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you. And behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.

ANO BA ANG SINULOG NG CEBU?

A cultural dancer performs the Sinulog Dance in front of the re-enactment of the Conversion of Rajah Humabon, the King of Cebu and the first Filipino baptized Catholic.
Anonymous said...

Dear Father,

Good evening Father,maitanong ko long po ano ba tong SINOLOG NG CEBU?Tapos ginawa pang kompitisyon ng ating mga kabayang pilipno,Is this accepted to the Roman Catholic Church?

Thank you... and good evenig...God bless us all.

January 24, 2010 10:25 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

[Good evening Father,maitanong ko long po ano ba tong SINOLOG NG CEBU?]

Ang Sinulog sa Cebu is a cultural dance by ancient Filipinos believed to be practiced by our forefathers in Cebu during the time of Rajah Humabon and his Queen Juana.

When the Spaniards came to the Philippines the Augustinian friars have successfully converted the King and the Queen to the Catholic Faith and gave them the first image of the Sto. Nino or The Holy Child as a gift. That image proved to be very miraculous and considered by the Cebuanos as a magnificent image of the King of the World, the Lord Jesus. One of the miracles of the Sto. Nino gave birth to the Sinulog dance:

"The word Sinulog comes from the Cebuano adverb sulog which is "like water current movement," which describes the forward-backward movement of the Sinulog dance. The dance consists of two steps forward and one step backward, done to the sound of drums. The dance is categorized into Sinulog-base, Free-Interpretation. Candle vendors at the Basilica continue to perform the traditional version of the dance when lighting a candle for the customer, usually accompanied by songs in the native language.

The Sinulog dance steps were believed to originate from Rajah Humabon's adviser, Baladhay. It was during Humabon's grief when Baladhay was driven sick. He then ordered his native tribe to bring Baladhay into a chapel where the Santo Niño was enthroned. Moments later, surprisingly, Baldhay was heard shouting and was found dancing with outmost alertness. Baladhay was questioned as to whether why was he awake and was shouting. Baladhay explained that he found a small child, pointing to the image of the Santo Niño, on top of him and trying to wake him up. He, at great astonishment, scared the child away by shouting but couldn't explain why he was dancing the movements of the river. Up to this day, the two-steps forward, and the one-step backward movement dance is still used by the Santo Niño devotees believing that it was the Santo Niño's choice to have Baladhay dance." [Wikipedia]

Since then the Sinulog Dance became an essential part of the Sinulog Festival honoring the most beloved patron of the Metropolitan City of Cebu, the Queen of the South.

[Tapos ginawa pang kompitisyon ng ating mga kabayang pilipno,Is this accepted to the Roman Catholic Church?]

The Sinulog Dance is primarily a cultural dance. It is considered religious only because it is performed as an honor to the Patron Saint. But, it is not a liturgical dance of the Church or an official act of prayer for Catholics. Thus, it is usually used outside the liturgical celebrations of the Church.

The competition is not necessarily bad as long as it is done properly and respectful of the feast. For instance, in many Churches there are singing contest: Single or Choral competitions of Sacred Music. These are not contrary to the faith. What is to be corrected are the abuses. Outside the feast, it can also be performed as part of the culture of the people of Cebu. I have attended many educational or cultural conventions when it was performed to demonstrate to the visitors the beauty of the Culture of the Southern Philippines. And if Tinikling, Pandango sa Ilaw can be used for competition such as those in schools during cultural presentations then it is not contrary to the nature and dignity of the dance and its sacred purpose.

If the competition is done simply to inspire the participants to honor the Holy Child better and better there is nothing wrong with that. It is actually an invitation to find a better way of expressing our Adoration and Worship, not of the image, but of what the image represent THE LORD JESUS THE CHILD BORN OF THE VIRGIN MARY.

January 30, 2010 9:50 PM

Dapat Bang Lagyan ng Bangkay ang Tabernaculo?

The Tabernacle courtyard. The Tabernacle is the Most Holy Place in the Bible and not even Moses was deemed worthy to be buried inside. The ordinary people with the exception of the priests were not allowed to enter its sacred ground.
[At ano naman ang masama kung ihihimpil ang bangkay ng Ka Erdy sa Tabernakulo!]
Talagang masama iyan dahil ang Tabernaculo ng Templo ay nakalagay sa Dakong Kabanal-banalan at hindi dapat lapastanganin sa paglalagay ng Bangkay. Lalo na kung ang bangkay ay pag-aari ng anak ng PEKENG ANGHEL.
[Kung hindi naman talaga nakikitang hungkag ang iyong kaalaman sa maga bagay bagay tungkol sa Iglesia. TANGA! Ang tabernakulo doon sa Central ay isang Multi-purpose building po iyon.]
SALAMAT PO SA PANGINOON AT NAPAKA-TALINO N'YO AT KAMI AY MANGMANG.
MAAARI PO BA NINYO KAMING TURUAN KUNG SAAN MAKIKITA SA BIBLIA NA ANG TABERNACULO AY DAPAT GAWING LIBINGAN NG MGA MANALO. Sapagkat aking binusisi ang Biblia at wala akong makitang talata na nagsasabing: DAPAT PAGLIBINGAN ANG TABERNACULO. Aber, sige nga po. NASAAN IYAN SA BANAL NA KASULATAN?
[Doon ginagawa ang mga ibat ibang pagtitipong pang-kapatiran ng Iglesia. Maging graduation ng mga estudyante, doon din ginagawa. Tanga!]
SALAMAT SA INYONG KATALINUHAN. AKING KINIKILALA ANG INYONG DAKILANG KARUNUNGAN, KAALAMAN AT LABIS NA TALAS NG PAG-IISIP. SALADO PO AKO SA INYO. HE, HE, HE...
SAAN PO BA SA BIBLIA SINASABING ANG TABERNACULO AY DAPAT GAMITIN SA IBAT-IBANG PAGTITIPONG PANGKAPATIRAN NG IGLESIA? SAAN? KASI ANG DAKONG KABANAL-BANALAN NG TEMPLO NA SIYANG SANTUARIO AT TABERNACULO AY HINDI PWEDENG PASUKAN NG KAHIT SINO KUNDI ANG DAKILANG SASERDOTE O MGA PARI LAMANG O MGA LEVITA.
YUN PO PALANG GRADUATION NG MGA ESTUDIANTE E PAGTITIPONG PANGKAPATIRAN NG IGLESIA SA INYO. SAAN PO SA BIBLIA IYON?
SAAN NAKASAAD SA BIBLIA NA PWEDENG IDAOS ANG GRADUATION NG MGA ESTUDIANTE SA LOOB NG TABERNACULO? SAAN?
[Sinabi mong aral ng demonyo ang paglalagay ng bangkay ng Ka Erdy sa Tabernakulo, e ano na ngayon tawag mo sa ginagawa nyo tuwing namamatay ang milyong katoliko, di ba inilalagay doin ninyo sa Simbahan ninyo.]
Meron po kaming CATHOLIC CEMETERY at duon po nilalagay ang mga bangkay ng libo-libong Catolico. Yun pong mga nakalibing sa Simbahan ay nasa mga Museleo o kaya ay sa mga underground resting place. WALA PONG INILALAGAY SA LOOB NG TABERNACULO KUNDI ANG 'BANAL NA TINAPAY' NA TINATAWAG DING 'BREAD OF PRESENCE' O 'THE SHOWBREAD'.
Kaya wag po ninyo kaming itulad sa inyong WALA SA BIBLIANG KAISIPAN kahit na labis-labis ang inyong katalinuhan.
[Ibig bang sabihin noon, sumasamba din kayo sa bangkay.]
KAMI PO AY HINDI SUMASAMBA SA BANGKAY KASI PO WALA KAMING INILAGAY SA LOOB NG TABERNACULO NA BANGKAY. SA ILALIM NG TABERNACULO PO MERON PERO HINDI SA LOOB. KAYO PO AY SA LOOB. BASAHIN PO NINYO ANG INYONG OFFICIAL BIBLE: "ANG BIBLIA" AT "KING JAMES VERSION" TIGNAN NINYO ANG PAGTALAKAY TUNGKOL SA TABERNACLE SA EXODUS 25-26 WALA PONG SINASABI NA PWEDENG PAG-LIBINGAN ANG TABERNACULO AT GAMITIN SA GRADUATION RITES.
HINDI RIN PO KAMI BALIW PARA GAMITIN ANG TABERNACULO PARA SA GRADUATION NG MGA ESTUDIANTE. IYAN AY KALAPASTANGANAN SA DIOS.

Panibagong Pakikipagtalastasan Hinggil sa Pasko

Madonna and Child by Segna di Buonaventura, 14th century
Philipp said...

dearAbe,

from Christ to the early christians the bible clearly mentioned nothing about the celebration of the birthday of Christ. at lalong walang binabanggit tungkol sa CHRISTMAS naimbento lang ito ng Church of Rome. Kaya talagang hindi ipinagbawal ng Christ ang celebration nito tulad ng Independence Day. Bakit? dahil matagal ng umakyat sa langit ang Lord bago naimbento ang christmas. Hindi raw ibinawalkaya malayang ginawa ng Christians whoe belief and tradition ay galang from Rome. At sa sumunod na mga taon pa hangga ngayon ay patuloy pa run sila si pagimbento ng mga gawa ng sinasabi nila na patungkol sa God. Ito ang Church na maraming ipinapatay dahil salungat sila sa kanilang paniwala at sila ay mga heretics daw. Turo kaya ito ng god nila na pumatay ng tao. Ito rin ang nag utos na gumawa, paglingkuran at sambahin ang mga larawan at rebulto ng tao. Ito rin ang nagturo na magdasal ng paulit ulit tulad ng mga Gentil na hindi nakikilala ang True God. Itinuro din na dasalan pa ng madalas ang isang tao kaysa sa Diyos. Sa bible ang title ng Holy Father ay para sa God pero ito ay para sa lider nila. Humula si Pablo na darating ang mga araw na ipagbabawal ang pagaasawa. At of course marami pang iba na puro imbento at salungatsaturo ng God. Talaga nga malaya kayong icelebtrate ang christmas kung ang ipinagbabawal ay ginagawa lao pa ang hindi binanggit sa Bible.

January 29, 2010 6:22 PM
*******
Fr. Abe, CRS said...
ANSWER TO PHILIP

[from Christ to the early christians the bible clearly mentioned nothing about the celebration of the birthday of Christ.]

It only goes to show that your eyes have been blinded by your hatred of the Catholic Church to the point that even the basic facts of the Gospels of Matthew and Luke have been hidden in your eyes. Both Gospel Accounts narrated the Birth or Nativity of Jesus.

THE GOSPEL OF LUKE GOES SO FAR AS TO PROCLAIM THROUGH THE WORDS OF THE ANGELS WHO SIMPLY SPOKE THE PROPHECY OF GOD THAT THE BIRTH OF THE CHILD JESUS WILL BRING GLAD TIDINGS... EVEN GREAT REJOICING TO ALL PEOPLE [Luke 2:10]

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE FULFILLMENT OF THAT DIVINE PROPHECY BECAUSE THROUGHOUT OUR GENERATIONS WE ARE BRINGING GLAD TIDINGS TO ALL PEOPLE THROUGH THE BIRTH CELEBRATION OF JESUS.

The Angels said: "TO ALL PEOPLE" when they spoke about the Jubilation concerning the Birth of Jesus. Surely, the Catholic Church is the one doing this because instead of rejoicing YOU AND YOUR RELIGION DECIDED TO BE AGAINST THAT REJOICING ON THE BIRTH OF THE LORD. You have become a living manifestation of Satanic opposition to the Christian jubilation on the Birth of the Messiah.

You are so angry that we celebrate it despite the fact that the Angels of God announced that the celebration of the Birth of Jesus shall be for ALL PEOPLE. You should ask yourselves if you are part of the human race or not. Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants and even some Moslems and non-Christians or PEOPLE OF GOOD WILL are praising God for the Nativity of Jesus yet you are so SAD about it. Ha, ha, ha... POOR YOU. Your opposition to Christmas is so PATHETIC.

[at lalong walang binabanggit tungkol sa CHRISTMAS naimbento lang ito ng Church of Rome.]

Saan nakasulat sa Biblia na ang celebration ng Birthday of Jesus or Nativity of the Lord or Christmas in popular language is invented by the Church of Rome? Where? YAN ANG IYONG INVENTION AT NG LIDER NG IYONG RELIGION.

ANG CELEBRATION NG PAGSILANG NG PANGINOONG JESU-CRISTO o PASKO AY NAGMULA SA BANAL NA KASULATAN. MGA ANGHEL AT MGA APOSTOL ang nagpahayag niyan.

Well, at siempre taglay-taglay ng Church of Rome ang pananampalatayang ito dahil ang mga taga Roma ay kabilang sa binabaan ng Espiritu Santo [Acts 2:10] at ang mga mabubuting Centurion na pinuri ni Jesus ang pananampalataya sa Evangelio ay mga Romano din. Kaya nga puring puri ni Pablo ang mga Roman Christians, e [Roma 1:1-8]. Ikaw lang naman ang galit sa Church of Rome.

Kaya, we are proud to be Roman Christians. Ang aming pananampalataya ay galing sa Rome na tunay na pinanirahan ng mga Apostol, sinulatan nila, nakasama nila at hindi mula sa Germany, Switzerland, America o Pilipinas. MAS NAKAKAHIYA KUNG SA U.S. AT SA APALIT O SA DILIMAN, QUEZON CITY NAGMULA ANG AMING PANANAMPALATAYA. NAKAKATAKOT YON. KASI HINDI NAGMULA SA MGA APOSTOLES ANG ARAL. IMBENTO LANG.

[Kaya talagang hindi ipinagbawal ng Christ ang celebration nito tulad ng Independence Day.]

Talagang hindi pinagbabawal sa halip hinula pa na ito ay IPAGDIRIWANG NG LAHAT NG TAO. Aral ng Diablo na huwag ipagdiwang and pagsilang ni Cristo. Kasi ang pagdiriwang ng Pagsilang ng Mesiyas ay nagpapaalala sa Diablo na dumating na ang tunay na Hari ng Mundo.

[Bakit? dahil matagal ng umakyat sa langit ang Lord bago naimbento ang christmas.]

Aba at meron ka pang lakas ng loob na magmagaling na ang pagdiriwang ng Pasko ay naimbento ng umakyat na sa langit si Cristo.

SIMPLENG LOGIC LANG NAMAN YAN E. BAGO UMAKYAT SI CRISTO SA LANGIT NUONG ASCENSION SIEMPRE NAUNA MUNA ANG PAGSILANG NYA SA BETHLEHEM NG JUDEA. HE, HE, HE... NAKAKATAWA KA NAMAN. HA, HA, HA... KAHIT NAMAN SA EVANGELIO NI MATEO AT NI LUCAS E NAUNA ANG PASKO BAGO ANG ASCENSION. HA, HA, HA... NAKAKATAWA KA TALAGA. HA, HA, HA...

[Hindi raw ibinawalkaya malayang ginawa ng Christians whoe belief and tradition ay galang from Rome.]

Talagang hindi ipinagbawal. Sa katunayan ito ay hinula ng mga Propeta daan-daan o libong mga taon bago pa dumating ang takdang araw ng Pagsilang ni Cristo. Tapos ito ay ipinahayag ng mga Evangelista ng Panginoon.

KAYA NATURAL NA TULOY TULOY ANG PAG-ALALA NITO. KUNG NOONG HINDI PA ITO DUMARATING IPINIHAYAG NA NG MGA PROPETA MAS LALO NGAYONG ITO AY NAGANAP NA.

Kaya nagtataka ako kung anong uri ng pag-iisip meron ka, kasi taliwas sa pag-iisip ng mga Propeta, mga Angel at mga Apostol.

[At sa sumunod na mga taon pa hangga ngayon ay patuloy pa run sila si pagimbento ng mga gawa ng sinasabi nila na patungkol sa God.]

ON THE CONTRARY, ANG MGA BAGONG RELIHIYON NGAYON ANG NAG-IIMBENTO NG MGA BAONG ARAL. NAGING PROPETA ANG MGA IMPAKTA NA KAGAYA NI ELLEN GOULD WHITE, NAGING ANGHEL SI MANALO AT NAGING DIOS NA MAY PUWIT SI ELI SORIANO.

ANG AMING MGA ARAL AY DALISAY MULA NOON HANGGANG NGAYON.

[Ito ang Church na maraming ipinapatay dahil salungat sila sa kanilang paniwala at sila ay mga heretics daw.]

Ang patayan nuong araw ay hindi dahil sa aming pananampalataya kundi dahil sa Kultura noong panahong iyon. Legal at Moral nuon ang Death Penalty. Kahit sa Pilipinas ay kamakailan lang natanggal ang Death Penalty.

BAKIT HINDI MO BINABANGGIT NA PINAPATAY DIN NG MGA PROTESTANTE ANG MGA CATOLICO? WINASAK NILA ANG AMING MGA SIMBAHAN AT CATHEDRAL, PINUGUTAN NG ULO ANG AMING MGA PARI AT MADRE, SINUNOG ANG AMING MGA MONASTERIO. SIEMPRE KARAPATAN NG IGLESIA CATOLICA NOONG PANAHONG IYON NA IPAGTANGGOL ANG KANILANG BUHAY AT ARI-ARIAN.

[Turo kaya ito ng god nila na pumatay ng tao.]

TURO NG DIOS NA IPAGTANGGOL ANG PANANAMPALATAY AT BUHAY. BAKIT HINDI BA INUTUSAN NG DIOS NA GERAHIN NI MOISES, JOSHUA, SAMSON, KING SAUL AT KING DAVID ANG MGA KAAWAY NG ISRAEL AT NG PANANAMPALATAYA? MAGBASA KA NGA NG BIBLIA KASI PARANG IGNORANTE KA SA MGA ARAL NG BANAL NA KASULATAN HINGGIN SA JUST WAR.

[Ito rin ang nag utos na gumawa, paglingkuran at sambahin ang mga larawan at rebulto ng tao.]

Wala kaming aral na Sambahin ang rebulto ng tao. Kayo lang ang nagsasabi na sumasamba kami sa rebulto pero kami hindi namin aral yan. KAYA KAMI MAY MGA REBULTO AT LARAWAN DAHIL ANG TEMPLO NG DIOS AY MAY MGA LARAWAN NG ANGHEL, KERUBIN, TAO, BULAKLAK, LEON, PALMA, BAKA AT IBA PA NA MISMONG INIUTOS NG DIOS.

AT ANG TEMPLO NG DIOS NA PUNO NG LARAWAN AY BANAL AT PINAGLILINGKURAN NG MGA PARI NG DIOS.

[Ito rin ang nagturo na magdasal ng paulit ulit tulad ng mga Gentil na hindi nakikilala ang True God.]

Ang utos ay: Huwag magdadasal ng WALANG KABULUHANG PAULIT-ULIT. Walang sinasabing wag magdadasal ng PAULIT-ULIT. Inalis mo ang ADJECTIVE sa Salita ng Dios, YAN AY MASAMANG PAGBABAWAS NG SALITA NG DIOS.

ANG OUR FATHER, HAIL MARY AT GLORY BE AY MAY KABULUHANG PAULIT-ULIT. Kaya dapat lamang na paulit-ulit dasalin.

PERO KAIPOKRITUHAN NYO LANG NAMAN YAN. DAHIL ANG MGA BORN-AGAIN, MGA INC AT ADD AY NAG-DADASAL DIN NG PAULIT-ULIT.

[Itinuro din na dasalan pa ng madalas ang isang tao kaysa sa Diyos.]

HINDI NAMIN ARAL YAN. IKAW ANG MAY GAWA NYAN. MAS MAHABA AT MAS MADALAS ANG AMING DASAL SA DIOS KESA SA TAO.

[Sa bible ang title ng Holy Father ay para sa God pero ito ay para sa lider nila.]

Nakasulat sa Biblia na ang taong may hawak ng susi ng kaharian ay tatawaging "Ama". Kaya ang tagapamahala ng Susi ng Kaharian ng Langit ay tinatawag na Ama at may adjective na 'holy' sapagkat ang bayan ng Dios ay isang BAYANG BANAL, A HOLY PEOPLE. Kaya ang lider nito siempre ay Holy.

[Humula si Pablo na darating ang mga araw na ipagbabawal ang pagaasawa.]

Hindi kami nagbabawal na pag-aasawa. Mas marami pa nga ang kinakasal namin kesa sa buong miembro nyo. NAPAKA DAMING KATOLIKO ANG NAGPAPAKASAL AT NAG-AASAWA. MAG-ASAWA ANG NANAY AT TATAY KO, MGA PAWANG CATOLICO SILA. Kaya tigilan mo ang iyong halusinasyon.

KUNG MASAMA ANG HINDI PAG-AASAWA, E DI MASAMA SI CRISTO DAHIL HINDI SYA NAG-ASAWA. GAYON DIN SI PABLO, JUAN, ANDRES AT IBA PA. KASI HINDI SILA NAG-ASAWA.

[At of course marami pang iba na puro imbento at salungatsaturo ng God.]

WALA KAMING TURO NA SALUNGAT SA TURO NG DIOS. ANG MGA ARAL NAMIN AY SALUNGAT SA TURO NI MANALO AT NI SORIANO AT NG MGA BORN AGAIN DAHIL INIMBENTO LAMANG NILA ANG KANILANG MGA DOCTRINA.

[Talaga nga malaya kayong icelebtrate ang christmas kung ang ipinagbabawal ay ginagawa lao pa ang hindi binanggit sa Bible.]

TALAGANG MALAYA KAMI MAG CELEBRATE NG CHRISTMAS. KASI ANG PAGSILANG NI CRISTO AY INIHULA NA MAGDUDULOT NG MALAKING KAGALAKAN SA LAHAT NG TAO.

KUNG HINDI KA NAGDIRIWANG AT NAGSASAYA SA PAGSILANG NI CRISTO IBIG SABIHIN AY HINDI KA TAO, O HINDI KA KABILANG SA TUNAY NA PANANAMPALATAYA. HE, HE, HE...

Paano ba magkaroon ng MALAKING KAGALAKAN o GLAD TIDINGS:

1. Pagsamba at pagpupuri sa Dios
2. Kainan ng masasarap na pagkain
3. Kantahan ng masasayang awitin
4. Bigayan ng regalo
5. Pagdedekorasyon ng tahanan at ng bayan
6. Pagsasalo-salo

GANYAN ANG CELEBRASYON NAMIN NG PASKO. IKAW MALUNGKOT.

ANG ALAM KONG MALUNGKOT SA PAGSILANG NI CRISTO AY SI SATANAS. KASI KATAPUSAN NA NYA. GAYON DIN SI HERODES.

Ang aral mo laban sa pagdiriwang ng Pagsilang ni Cristo ay galing kay SATANAS at kay HERODES.

January 30, 2010 5:56 PM

BAKIT MAITIM ANG NAZARENO SA QUIAPO DIOS BA ITO NG MGA ITA? Tanong ng Isang Manunuligsa

Jesus Carrying the Cross
Anonymous said...

Bakit si Maria walang birthday celebration? Hindi nyo alam o wala kayong maimbento katulad ng Dec.25? Bakit yomg nasareno nyo sa Quiapo negro dios-diosan ba yon ng mga ITA?Ha,ha,ha....

January 29, 2010 9:04 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

[Bakit si Maria walang birthday celebration?]

Ibig sabihin ay ignorante ka sa aral ng mga Katoliko dahil merong birthday ang Birheng Maria para sa amin. He, he, he... Kelan? SECRET. Ha, ha, ha...

[Hindi nyo alam o wala kayong maimbento katulad ng Dec.25?]

ALAM NAMIN NA IGNORANTE KA SA PANANAMPALATAYANG KATOLIKO KAYA HINDI MO ALAM NA MAY KAARAWAN KAMI NI MARIA.

IPINAKITA MO SA AMIN NA MABABAW ANG IYONG KAALAMAN SA ARAL CATOLICO DAHIL KAHIT SIMPLENG BAGAY SA BUHAY NAMIN AY HINDI MO ALAM.

[Bakit yomg nasareno nyo sa Quiapo negro dios-diosan ba yon ng mga ITA?Ha,ha,ha...]

Ha, ha, ha... Maitim ang larawan ng Poong Nazareno sa Quiapo dahil kahoy na itim ang ginamit. Ha, ha, ha... Nakita mo na ba ang drawing ni Rizal na yari sa charcoal, puro maitim ang mga taong nilarawan nya sa charcoal kasi kulay itim ang charcoal e. Kapag ang kahoy na inukit ay brown siempre brown din ang kalalabasan, maliban na lang kung pipinturahan ng ibang kulay. Kung ang material na ginamit ay ginto, pilak o tanso ganon din ang kulay na kalalabasan. Kung marmol depende sa kulay ng marmol. Ganon yon!

Bakit maitim ang ginamit na kahoy? Kasi, inisip ng artist na sunog sa araw ang balat ni Jesus dahil sa matinding sikat ng araw at naka-iitim din ang mga natuyong dugo. Ang artist ay nilarawan ang Panginoong Jesus Nazareno nuong pinapasan niya ang krus patungong Kalbaryo. Natuyuan ng matinding pawis, dugo, alikabok ang katawan ng Panginoong Jesus noon at nabilad sa matinding sikat ng araw. Kaya tama lang na maitim na kahoy ang gamitin sa eskultura. May angal ka ba roon?

Kami ang katuparan ng hula ng mga propheta at ni San Mateo na si Jesus ay tatawaging: NAZARENO [cf. Mateo 2:23]. Bakit kayo hindi nyo tinatawag na Nazareno si Cristo? Ibig sabihin, hindi kayo ang tunay na pananampalataya.

Isa pa, H'WAG MONG MATAHIN ANG MGA ITA. Ikaw nga nahihiya kang magpakilala kung sino ka. Siguro magkamuka kayo ng mga Ita. Isa pa, wala namang masama kung ang Nazareno ay Dios ng mga Ita. ang Dios ay Dios ng lahat ng tao, Ita man o hindi.

Ang Panginoong JESUS NAZARENO ay ang PANGINOON NG MGA PANGINOON AT HARI NG MGA HARI. Sa Kanya nakaatang ang pamamahala ng buong daigdig [Apoc 19:16/ Apoc 12:5/ Is 9:6). KAYA SIYA ANG PANGINOON NG MGA ITA, MGA BALUGA, MGA NEGRITO, GAYON DIN NG MGA LANGGAM, KALAPATI AT IBON. Bakit, hindi mo alam yan? HA, HA, HA...

SI CRISTO ANG PANGINOON NG LAHAT NG TAO AT NG BUONG SANSINUKOB.

MABUHAY ANG POONG NAZARENO!
January 30, 2010 4:05 PM

RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY OF ELI SORIANO DEFENDER WHY I AM CALLING FOR JUSTICE AGAINST SORIANO EVEN THOUGH I AM NOT THE RAPED VICTIM

Jesus the True Prophet of God faced the Trial of Men, here before Pontius Pilate
*******
Here is my latest response to the Ang Dating Daan [ADD] apologists who keep on posting here links to their Blogs, inviting me to read their claims. Well, I have no time for that. I leave that apostolate to our lay Catholic Apologists but once they come here, I will response to them point by point.
Since this exchange was uprooted from original post where the comments were posted I answered in capital letters to contrast my response with the one from ADD. It is not intented to shout whatsoever.
Here is one of the latest exchange with them:
christiandefenders said...

It's alright if you don't care to visit our blogs. Former Catholics like us will continue to defend our new found faith. The Catholic Priest has repeatedly said that Bro. Eli Soriano is a Rapist without carefully examining if that is true or not. Was he able to witness the incident? Was he even raped in order to cry for justice?
That is a very weak argument for those people who knows that Bro. Eli is just a victim of false information circulating on the perverted minds of bigots who doesn't know how to defend their faith properly.

We shall continue this discussion on the Internet as we deem appropriate.

January 29, 2010 10:13 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

RESPONSE TO MAMA ELI DEFENDER

[It's alright if you don't care to visit our blogs.]

I AM BUSY WITH MY OWN MINISTRY AND THIS VERY BLOG SO THAT THERE IS NO TIME TO VISIT YOURS. I DON'T NEED YOUR BLOGS IN MY LIFE SINCE MANY CATHOLICS ARE READING THIS BLOG AND YOU DO ALSO. SO, WHY BOTHER TO VISIT YOURS?

[Former Catholics like us will continue to defend our new found faith.]

IT ONLY SHOWS THAT AS YOU DEFEND THE DOCTRINES INVENTED BY MAMA ELI YOU HAVE MANIFESTED IGNORANCE OF YOUR FORMER FAITH. IT IS A PITY THAT YOU HAVE DECIDED TO FOLLOW THE TEACHINGS INVENTED BY A FALSE PROPHET WHO MERELY APPEARED IN THE LATTER TIMES RATHER THAN THE APOSTOLIC CHURCH THAT GAVE THE BIBLE TO THE WORLD.

[The Catholic Priest has repeatedly said that Bro. Eli Soriano is a Rapist without carefully examining if that is true or not.]

MAMA ELI IS ACCUSED OF HOMOSEXUAL RAPE IN THE COURT OF LAW. THAT IS A FORMAL AND SERIOUS COMPLAINT BECAUSE IT INVOLVES CRIMINAL ACT. AT THE SAME TIME THE ACCUSATION IS ABOMINABLE TO THE LORD BECAUSE HOMOSEXUAL ACTS ARE CONDEMNED IN THE BIBLE. HOW MUCH MORE HOMOSEXUAL RAPE?

BUT INSTEAD OF FACING HIS CASE IN THE COURT MAMA ELI IS DOING A VILLAR. HIDING FROM THE PROPER FORUM. AND HE IS DOING A PING LACSON, DISAPPEARING FROM THE LAW. YOUR FALSE PROPHET IS ACTING EXACTLY LIKE THE TRADITIONAL POLITICIANS. HE IS SHOWING LOW CLASS AND UNETHICAL BEHAVIORS. RUNNING FROM CRIMINAL CASES IS A SIGN OF GUILT.

I AM NOT THE ONE CONDEMNING YOUR COWARDLY LEADER. HE IS DOING IT TO HIMSELF.

IF HE WANTS TO PROVE HIS INNOCENCE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. LET HIM APPEAR IN COURT, PLEAD NOT GUILTY AND PRESENT HIS EVIDENCES AS WELL AS WITNESSES. THAT IS THE ONLY WAY.

[Was he able to witness the incident?]

THAT IS THE REASON WHY HE HAS TO FACE THE COURT. SO THAT THE WITNESSES CAN BE QUESTIONED AND CROSS-EXAMINED BY THE LAWYERS. SO THAT THE TESTIMONIES OF WITNESSES CAN BE VALUED BY THE JUDGE WHO HAS THE COMPETENCE AND LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY TO PASS JUDGMENT TO HIS CASE.

UNFORTUNATELY, INSTEAD OF PRESENTING HIS WITNESSES TO THE COURT MAMA ELI IS HIDING LIKE A COWARD. HE IS PRETENDING TO BE COURAGEOUS IN HIS WORDS YET COWARDLY IN HIS ACTIONS. THE ACCUSER, DANIEL VERIDIANO, HAS MORE COURAGE TO FILE HIS ACCUSATIONS ON THE COURT.

MUCH MORE, YOU AND THE ENTIRE ADD GROUP IS AS EQUALLY IMMORAL. LIKE THE MOTHER OF JASON IVLER YOU ARE CUNNINGLY HIDING YOUR MAMA ELI FROM THE LAW. YOU ARE HARBORING AN ACCUSED CRIMINAL IN YOUR OWN HIDING PLACES.

[Was he even raped in order to cry for justice?]

HOW CAN I BE RAPED I'M A MALE-VIRGIN? HA, HA, HA... I CONSECRATED MY BODY TO GOD FOR THE GLORY OF THE CHURCH AS JESUS, PAUL AND THE APOSTLES DID.

CRYING FOR JUSTICE AGAINST THE ACCUSED CRIMINALS ARE NOT EXCLUSIVE OF VICTIMES. IT IS THE DUTY OF ALL LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS OF THE COUNTRY, SUCH AS YOURS TRULY AND ALL CHRISTIANS AND OF ALL PEOPLE OF GOOD WILL.

NONE OF MY RELATIVES HAVE BEEN KILLED BY THE AMPATUANS YET I CRIED FOR JUSTICE TO BRING THE ACCUSED TO THE COURT OF LAW. NONE OF MY RELATIVES WERE KILLED IN THE DACER-CORBITO OR NIDA BLANCA CASE. YET I CRIED FOR JUSTICE TO THE VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES. WHEN THE FAMOUS MAYOR OF LAGUNA, SANCHES, WAS ACCUSED OF RAPE THE ENTIRE NATION CRIED FOR JUSTICE.

DO YOU WANT US TO STOP CRYING FOR JUSTICE BECAUSE I WAS NOT THE ONE RAPED? HOW ABOUT THE AMPATUANS SHALL I ALSO STOP CRYING FOR JUSTICE TO THE VICTIMS IN MAGUINDANAO BECAUSE I AM NOT ONE OF THOSE KILLED? YOUR REASONING DEFIES NOT ONLY LOGIC BUT ALSO HUMAN INTELLIGENCE. THAT KIND OF REASONING IS PROPER FOR ANIMALS BUT NOT FOR HUMAN BEINGS WHO HAVE COMPASSION FOR THE VICTIMS AND LOVE OF TRUTH AS WELL AS JUSTICE.

I AM WONDERING IF YOU ARE A FILIPINO BECAUSE CRIMINAL CASES IS ALWAYS: PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. THE ACCUSED. AND I AM WONDERING IF YOU ARE CHRISTIAN OR EVEN HUMAN. BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE COMPASSION FOR THE VICTIM WHO COURAGEOUSLY FILE HIS CASE ON COURT AND INSTEAD PREFER TO HIDE YOUR FUGITIVE MAMA ELI.

WHERE IS YOUR HEART? WHERE IS YOUR COMPASSION? HOW COME IN THE RECESSES OF YOUR HEART YOU PREFER TO ADORE YOUR COWARDLY LEADER RATHER THAN TO BRING HIM TO JUSTICE SO THAT TRUTH CAN BE KNOWN AND JUDGMENT CAN BE DELIVERED?

IF YOU WILL NOT DO IT NOW, THEN YOU WILL BE RESPONSIBLE BEFORE THE JUSTICE OF GOD. YOUR LEADER, YOU AND HIS OTHER COHORTS.

[That is a very weak argument for those people who knows that Bro. Eli is just a victim of false information circulating on the perverted minds of bigots who doesn't know how to defend their faith properly.]

UNLESS MAMA ELI FACES THE COURT THEN HE CANNOT CLAIM INNOCENCE. JESUS FACED THE COURT AND HE WAS FOUND INNOCENT. RIZAL AND NINOY AQUINO FACED THEIR ACCUSERS AND THEY WERE FOUND INNOCENT. MAHATMA GANDHI FACED THE COURT AND WAS FOUND INNOCENT. THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY FOR MAMA ELI TO DO: FACE THE COURT THEN WE SHALL SEE IF HE IS TRULY INNOCENT OR NOT. WE SHALL SEE IF THE COURT IS TRULY BIASED OR NOT. UNLESS HE DO SO HE HAS NO GROUND TO CRY AS IF HE IS A VICTIM OF INJUSTICE.

[We shall continue this discussion on the Internet as we deem appropriate.]

AS LONG AS YOU ARE COMING TO THIS BLOG, I WILL BE VERY WILLING TO ANSWER YOU AS I DID IN THE PAST. IT IS MY PLEASURE TO RESPOND TO PEOPLE LIKE YOU, BECAUSE THE MORE YOU ANSWER THE MORE YOU PUT YOUR RELIGION AND YOUR COWARDLY LEADER INTO SHAME.

January 30, 2010 2:56 PM

Friday, January 29, 2010

Our Reaction to the Claim of Islam that Jesus, Moses, Adam and Eve are Moslems?

The Lord Jesus as the Pantokrator in Monreale Apse
Anonymous said...

Dear Father,

Good evening Father, Do you agree that according to the teaching of Islam, Jesus Christ,Moises,Abraham,Adan and Ave they are Muslim?Do you agree with them or not? Why? Thank you and God bless us all...

January 29, 2010 9:26 PM

Fr. Abe, CRS said...

The teaching of the Koran about Adam and Eve and about Mary are simply adapted from the Holy Bible of Judaism and Christianity. So before they are known by Moslems they were belonging to the Judaeo-Christian Tradition.

The God of the Christians is different from the God of the Moslems because they do not believe in the Holy Trinity and in the Incarnation of the Son of God. So, Jesus cannot be a Moslem because He is proclaimed by Christians from Apostolic times as the Incarnated God - the Savior and Redeemer of mankind. So it will be impossible that the Lord Jesus is a Moslem because His teachings are essentially contrary to the claims of Islam.

For Islam Jesus is a mere prophet who is even lower than Mohammed, the last of their prophets. In fact, their title for Mohammed is THE PROPHET. On the other hand, the Christian titles for Christ is THE LORD OF LORDS, THE KING OF KINGS, THE SON OF GOD, THE REDEEMER, THE SAVIOR, etc. Titles that are attributed to the Almighty alone.

On the part of Moses, the Bible referred to him as the leader of the chosen people. That chosen people in the Old Testament is not Arabia as stated in the Koran but Israel. The promise of God was realized in Israel and not in Arabia the place of the offsprings of Ishmael, the illigitimate son of Abraham with Hagar the slave. Instead, the promise was given to the descendants of Isaac, the son of Abraham by his wife Sarah. Moreover, when the Lord gave the Ten Commandments to Moses one of the provisions is: Do not commit Adultery. Since the Koran allows polygamy then there will be no Adultery. The husband is free to commit adulterous affairs with many women. As the Bible tries to preserve the dignity of the woman as a partner of man, the Koran seems to be relegating the women to a mere instruments of pleasure of the Moslem males. I'm simply looking at doctrines here. No offense meant whatsoever to Islam and its followers.

January 29, 2010 9:40 PM

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Announcement

Many readers are asking why I am not updating this Blog for some days already. Please be informed that Fr. Abe, our blogger, is attending the 2nd NATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE CLERGY in Manila. He is pre-occupied in the retreat and prayers involved therein. Once he returned to his office he will resume the update and he has a lot of things to post. Please pray for all of us priests in the Congress. We have already exceeded 5,500 in number. God bless us all.

Friday, January 15, 2010

THE BIBLICAL FOUNDATION OF CATHOLIC STAND ON INFANT BAPTISM by Rev. Fr. Abe P. Arganiosa, CRS

The Presentation of the Child Jesus in the Temple, the Holy Family with Old Simeon
*******
The Catholic Church is frequently under attack for her decision to baptize children. The Anti-Catholics are arguing that children don’t deserve Baptism because they don’t have the required knowledge and faith yet. Our question however is: Where in the Bible is it stated that Children must not be baptized? Chapter and verse please!

That prohibition of Baptism for Infants and Children is a Protestant invention. It is nowhere found in the Bible and therefore it is a product of their own mind prone to doctrinal heresies. Even though the Scriptures didn't categorically and explicitly teach that Children must be baptized or not, the Sacred Scriptures gave us more than enough reason to be convinced that Infant Baptism is a Biblical practice.

Here are the testimonies of Scriptures:

1. Babies are gifted with special knowledge. They are graced with Wisdom and Understanding not given even to the learned.

Mt 11:25 At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes.

2 Tim 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
Ha, ha, ha... St. Timothy knew the Scriptures from childhood. It means that the children of INC, ADD, Born Again are ignorant, while the children of the Old Testament and the Catholic Church are knowledgeable of Scriptures. I do not intend to insult the babies of other religions but since their own parents especially religious leaders are proclaiming that children do not have knowledge of the faith then their babies by admission are IGNORANT while their Catholic counterparts are knowledgeable.

Who says that the Babies must not be baptized because they do not know anything? The enemies of the Church! The Lord Jesus on the other hand speaks differently. He declared that Babies have knowledge that surpasses those of the wise of this world.

2. Children Praise God – They have basic element of Faith. In fact, they utter PERFECT Praise to God.

Ps 8:2 Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength because of thine enemies, that thou mightest still the enemy and the avenger.

Mt 21:16 And said unto him, Hearest thou what these say? And Jesus saith unto them, Yea; have ye never read, Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast perfected praise?

If babies can praise God then they have faith. It is a faith that is visible to God but not to the senses of the human adults. Thus, it is wrong to say that they don’t have faith. Who are we to claim such a thing? We do not have the power to know the real spiritual value of each human person. Only God can truly know what the children can and not do. Our knowledge is limited only to the determination of the senses.

3. The Children are the exemplars of the Greatest in the Kingdom. In the eyes of God they possess Spiritual Greatness

Mt 18:1-4 At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven? And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them, And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.

How can the greatest in the Kingdom such as the humble children can be denied of Baptism? Being humble and greatest in the eyes of God make them more worthy than the sinful adults or equal to the adults living justly in the Lord.

4. Whoever receives a child receives Jesus.

Mt 18:5 And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me. [Catholics receive the Children in Baptism and in doing so we are welcoming Christ through the Children.]

5. Children are Heirs of the Kingdom of God

Mt 19:14 but Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven." [Mk 10:14/ Lk 18:15-17]

If the Kingdom of Heaven belongs to the children then they are worthy of Baptism. How come it is being deprived of them? Let us bear in mind that Baptism is the Sign of the Kingdom:

6. God wills Salvation for Children

Mt 18:14 Even so it is not the will of your Father which is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish.

Why do we have to deprive them of Baptism when we know that Baptism is one of the requirements for Salvation:

Mk 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

7. The Election of the Just Starts from Conception and Infancy

Jer 1:4-5 Then the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations. [The calling and choosing of the prophet Jeremiah started in his mother’s womb. If Jeremiah was sanctified from the womb then he is deserving of Baptism.]

Lk 1:15 For he shall be great in the sight of the Lord, and shall drink neither wine nor strong drink; and he shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mother's womb. [St. John the Baptist was filled with the Holy Spirit from before birth. So, he is deserving of Baptism.]

Gal 1:15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace... [The calling of St. Paul started way back when he was still in his mother’s womb. For God the young Paul was already called but for the Anti-Catholics he is not worthy of the grace of Baptism. Absurd.]

WE LOVE & ACCEPT THE CHILDREN FROM WOMB AND DURING THEIR INFANCY BECAUSE ‘GOD FIRST LOVED US’ AS SHOWN ABOVE. St. John reminds us of that:

1 Jn 4:19 We love him, because he first loved us.

If God loved us first and that love started even from before our birth, why then we have to discriminate Infants in Sacrament of Baptism when in fact the Kingdom that it promises belongs to these Children? Each of us, adult or infant, is called to God through Baptism not because of our assent, but because He first loved us.

8. Children must be Welcomed & not Despised

Mt 18:10 Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.

Mt 19:14 But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.

The word used by Jesus here is Paidion which is properly translated as INFANTS.

Παιδίον paidion
Neuter diminutive of G3816; a childling (of either sex), that is, (properly) an infant, or (by extension) a half grown boy or girl; figuratively an immature Christian: - (little, young) child, damsel.

Prohibiting Baptism to Children is an act of Despising and Rejection because it is giving judgment that children are not worthy of God’s grace when in fact they are more deserving of it.

9. Children are part of the Promise in Baptism

2 Sam 7:11 And as since the time that I commanded judges to be over my people Israel, and have caused thee to rest from all thine enemies. Also the LORD telleth thee that he will make thee an house.

Act 2:39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.

10. Entire household are being baptized

Acts 10:47-48 Peter baptized the entire house of Cornelius, which generally included infants and young children. There is not one word in Scripture about baptism being limited to adults.

The Faith of the Father of the Family is Operative and Effecitve for the entire Family. When he converts the entire family receives Baptism & Salvation as in the case of Cornelius’ Family:

Act 11:14 Who shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved.

Acts 16:15 Paul baptized Lydia and her entire household. The word "household" comes from the Greek word "oikos" which is a household that includes infants and children.

Acts 16:32-34 - Paul baptized the jailer (an adult) and his entire household (which had to include children). Baptism is never limited to adults and those of the age of reason.

Act 16:30-34 And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house. And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their stripes; and was baptized, he and all his, straightway. And when he had brought them into his house, he set meat before them, and rejoiced, believing in God with all his house.

Acts 18:8 And Crispus, the chief ruler of the synagogue, believed on the Lord with all his house, and many of the Corinthians hearing believed, and were baptized.

Lk 19:9 And Jesus said unto him, This day is salvation come to this house, forsomuch as he also is a son of Abraham. [Children are sons of Abraham too and they are SONS & DAUGHTERS OF GOD.]

Jn 4:53 So the father knew that it was at the same hour, in the which Jesus said unto him, Thy son liveth: and himself believed, and his whole house. [The Faith of the Parents is the Faith of the entire Family.]

Act 11:14 Who shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved.

Gen 36:6 And Esau took his wives, and his sons, and his daughters, and all the persons of his house, and his cattle, and all his beasts, and all his substance, which he had got in the land of Canaan; and went into the country from the face of his brother Jacob.

Josh 24:15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD. [The decision of the Head of the House is efficacious for all its members.]

1 Chron 10:6 So Saul died, and his three sons, and all his house died together.

These verses show that OIKOS [Household] generally includes children.

1 Cor 1:16 - Paul baptized the household ("oikos") of Stephanus. Baptism is not limited to adults.

11. THE CHILDREN, THE WEAK & THE SICK RECEIVE THE GRACE OF GOD THROUGH THEIR PARENTS, GUARDIANS OR FRIENDS

Mt 8:5-13 Jesus healed the Centurion’s servant boy because of the faith of the Centurion [Lk 7:9-10]:

Mat 8:10 When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel. [Jesus speaking of the Faith of the Centurion.]

Mt 8:13 And Jesus said unto the centurion, Go thy way; and as thou hast believed, so be it done unto thee. And his servant was healed in the selfsame hour. [The Lord didn’t even assess the faith of the Sick Servant. The faith of the Centurion was enough for Him to perform a miracle.]

Mt 15:21-28 Jesus healed the Daughter of a Canaanite Woman because of the Mother’s Fatih:

Mat 15:28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour. [The Faith of the Mother was enough for Jesus to perform a miracle for the sick daughter. The mother’s faith is operative and efficacious for the offspring.]

Mt 17: 21-28 Jesus healed the possessed & epileptic son after the father pleaded & knelt before him.

Mt 9:18-19, 23-25 Jesus brought the daughter back to life after her father, Jairus, pleaded with Him [Mk 5:21-43/ Lk 8:40-56]. [The Faith of the Father is efficacious for his daughter.]

Mt 9:1-8 Jesus healed the Paralytic sent to Him through the opened roof. [Lk 5:17-26]

Mt 9:2 [GNB] where some people brought to him a paralyzed man, lying on a bed. When Jesus saw how much faith they had, he said to the paralyzed man, "Courage, my son! Your sins are forgiven."

Lk 4:40 [GNB] After sunset all who had friends who were sick with various diseases brought them to Jesus; he placed his hands on every one of them and healed them all. [Here the intervention and decision of FRIENDS to bring the sick to Jesus merited healing for each of them.]

12. Parents Have Authority to Consecrate their Children to God from Childhood or Even Before Birth

Josh 24:15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

1 Sam 1:11 And she vowed a vow, and said, O LORD of hosts, if thou wilt indeed look on the affliction of thine handmaid, and remember me, and not forget thine handmaid, but wilt give unto thine handmaid a man child, then I will give him unto the LORD all the days of his life, and there shall no razor come upon his head. [Hannah promised to dedicate her future son Samuel to God for the rest of his life. This mother didn’t wait for the consent of her incoming son.]

Did she fulfil that promise? Did she really consecrated her son to a lifetime service to the Temple? YES!

1 Sam 1:26-28 And she said, Oh my lord, as thy soul liveth, my lord, I am the woman that stood by thee here, praying unto the LORD. For this child I prayed; and the LORD hath given me my petition which I asked of him: Therefore also I have lent him to the LORD; as long as he liveth he shall be lent to the LORD. And he worshipped the LORD there.

Hannah decided on her own to offer to God her Son throughout his life, yet Hannah is blessed by God as a Woman of Faith. The Catholics are offering of Infants to be consecrated to the Lord in Baptism yet the other sects look at it as evil. Let us pray that their judgment on the matter be God-like.

1 Tim 3:12 Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well. [Parents are rulers over their Children. They are the one deciding for their children.]

13. Through the Parents [even the father or mother alone] the Children are Consecrated to God or Sanctified

Ex 12:24-28 And ye shall observe this thing for an ordinance to thee and to thy sons for ever. And it shall come to pass, when ye be come to the land which the LORD will give you, according as he hath promised, that ye shall keep this service. And it shall come to pass, when your children shall say unto you, What mean ye by this service? That ye shall say, It is the sacrifice of the LORD'S passover, who passed over the houses of the children of Israel in Egypt, when he smote the Egyptians, and delivered our houses. And the people bowed the head and worshipped. And the children of Israel went away, and did as the LORD had commanded Moses and Aaron, so did they. [The Passover was based on the father’s faith. If he did not kill and eat the lamb, his first-born child would have died.]

1 Cor 7:12-14 But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away. And the woman which hath an husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let her not leave him. For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy.

The faith and prayers of the Believer are effective for the sanctification of the Unbeliever. How much more the faith and prayer of the Parents for the Sanctification of their Children.

14. The Circumcision of the Jews takes place 8 days after the birth of the child. In New Testament, Baptism replaced Circumcision as the Sign of the Covenant.

Gen 17:12 And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.

Lev 12:3 And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.

Circumcision is a necessary sign of the covenant:

Gen 17:13-14 He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant. And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.

Lk 1:59-60 And it came to pass, that on the eighth day they came to circumcise the child; and they called him Zacharias, after the name of his father. And his mother answered and said, Not so; but he shall be called John.

Lk 2:21 And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.

The Sign of the Covenant [In Old Testament – Circumcision] had to take place on the 8th Day – the day which in the New Testament become the Day of New Creation, The Resurrection Day of the Lord = Sunday.

Baptism replaces Circumcision as a sign of membership and entrance into the New Covenant, it is the perfection of the old sign:

Col 2:11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ: Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.

If Circumcision was imperative for infants then Baptism must also be imperative for infants. Christ came not to exclude children but to save all… He came not to restrict but to expand and perfect the saving plan of God:

Lk 18:15-17 And they brought unto him also infants, that he would touch them: but when his disciples saw it, they rebuked them. But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God. Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child shall in no wise enter therein.

15. From the womb Children are affected by Sin and Uncleanness, thus, they are in need of Baptismal washing, regeneration

Rom 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned… [Paul explains that sin came through Adam and death through sin. Babies' souls are affected by Adam's sin and need baptism just like adult souls.]

Eph 2:3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. [Due to this presence of sin, St. Paul called us Children of Wrath. We need to remove this sin so that we can truly become Children of God.]

Ps 51:5 Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.

Job 14:1 Man that is born of a woman is of few days, and full of trouble. He cometh forth like a flower, and is cut down: he fleeth also as a shadow, and continueth not. And dost thou open thine eyes upon such an one, and bringest me into judgment with thee? Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one.

Well, no one among creatures can wash away sin but what is impossible for men is possible for God [Mk 10:27/ Lk 18:27]:

Ps 51:7 Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean: wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.

Ezek 36:25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness…

Zech 13:1 In that day there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness.

This promise of washing from sin and from uncleanness is fulfilled in Baptism:

Act 22:16 And now, why wait any longer? Get up and be baptized and have your sins washed away by praying to him.' [Ananias to Paul]

1 Cor 6:11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

Tit 3:5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost…

Heb 10:22 Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.

1 Pt 3:21 [GNB] which was a symbol pointing to baptism, which now saves you. It is not the washing off of bodily dirt, but the promise made to God from a good conscience. It saves you through the resurrection of Jesus Christ…

The denial then of Baptism to Infants is terrible act of negligence. It is allowing these innocent young human persons to remain in the state of sin for a longer period of time. It is like knowing that the baby is sick yet the parents decided not to give him the necessary medicine until the child can decide on his own.

16. Children are baptized so that they can be with Christ. So that they can share in the New Life of Christ – His Death & Resurrection

Gal 3:26-27 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

ADDENDUM:
INFANT BAPTISM IN THE HISTORY & TRADITION OF THE CHURCH
[From Scripture Catholic apologetic site by John Salza]

"And many, both men and women, who have been Christ's disciples from childhood, remain pure and at the age of sixty or seventy years..." Justin Martyr, First Apology, 15:6 (A.D. 110-165).

"And when a child has been born to one of them, they give thanks to God [baptism]; and if moreover it happen to die in childhood, they give thanks to God the more, as for one who as passed through the world without sins." Aristides, Apology, 15 (A.D. 140).

"Polycarp declared, 'Eighty and six years have I served Him, and He never did me injury: how then can I blaspheme my King and Saviour?" Polycarp, Martyrdom of Polycarp, 9 (A.D. 156).

"For He came to save all through means of Himself--all, I say, who through Him are born again to God--infants, and children, and boys, and youths, and old men." Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 2,22:4 (A.D. 180).

"I, therefore, brethren, who have lived sixty-five years in the Lord." Polycrates, Fragment in Eusebius' Church History, V:24:7 (A.D. 190).

"And they shall baptise the little children first. And if they can answer for themselves, let them answer. But if they cannot, let their parents answer or someone from their family." Hippolytus of Rome, Apostolic Tradition, 21 (c. A.D. 215).

"[T]herefore children are also baptized." Origen, Homily on Luke, XIV (A.D. 233).

"For this reason, moreover, the Church received from the apostles the tradition of baptizing infants too." Origen, Homily on Romans, V:9 (A.D. 244).

"Baptism is given for the remission of sins; and according to the usage of the Church, Baptism is given even to infants. And indeed if there were nothing in infants which required a remission of sins and nothing in them pertinent to forgiveness, the grace of baptism would seem superfluous." Origen, Homily on Leviticus, 8:3 (post A.D. 244).

"But in respect of the case of the infants, which you say ought not to be baptized within the second or third day after their birth, and that the law of ancient circumcision should be regarded, so that you think one who is just born should not be baptized and sanctified within the eighth day...And therefore, dearest brother, this was our opinion in council, that by us no one ought to be hindered from baptism...we think is to be even more observed in respect of infants and newly-born persons…" Cyprian, Epistle to Fidus 58(64):2, 6 (A.D. 251).

"It shows no crease when infants put it on [the baptismal garment], it is not too scanty for young men, it fits women without alteration." Optatus of Mileve, Against Parmenium, 5:10(A.D. 365).

"Have you an infant child? Do not let sin get any opportunity, but let him be sanctified from his childhood; from his very tenderest age let him be consecrated by the Spirit. Fearest thou the Seal on account of the weakness of nature?" Gregory Nazianzen, Oration on Holy Baptism, 40:17 (A.D. 381).

"Be it so, some will say, in the case of those who ask for Baptism; what have you to say about those who are still children, and conscious neither of the loss nor of the grace? Are we to baptize them too? Certainly, if any danger presses. For it is better that they should be unconsciously sanctified than that they should depart unsealed and uninitiated." Gregory Nazianzen, Oration on Holy Baptism, 40:28 (A.D. 381).

"'Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.' No one is expected: not the infant, not the one prevented by necessity." Ambrose, Abraham, 2,11:79 (A.D. 387).

"We do baptize infants, although they are not guilty of any sins." John Chrysostom, Ad Neophytos (A.D. 388).

"And if any one seek for divine authority in this matter, though what is held by the whole Church, and that not as instituted by Councils, but as a matter of invariable custom, is rightly held to have been handed down by apostolical authority, still we can form a true conjecture of the value of the sacrament of baptism in the case of infants, from the parallel of circumcision, which was received by God's earlier people, and before receiving which Abraham was justified, as Cornelius also was enriched with the gift of the Holy Spirit before he was baptized." Augustine, On Baptism against the Donatist, 4:24:31 (A.D. 400).

"While the son is a child and thinks as a child and until he comes to years of discretion to choose between the two roads to which the letter of Pythagoras points, his parents are responsible for his actions whether these be good or bad. But perhaps you imagine that, if they are not baptized, the children of Christians are liable for their own sins; and that no guilt attaches to parents who withhold from baptism those who by reason of their tender age can offer no objection to it. The truth is that, as baptism ensures the salvation of the child, this in turn brings advantage to the parents. Whether you would offer your child or not lay within your choice, but now that you have offered her, you neglect her at your peril." Jerome, Epistle to Laeta 107:6 (A.D. 403).

"Now, seeing that they [Pelagians] admit the necessity of baptizing infants,--finding themselves unable to contravene that authority of the universal Church, which has been unquestionably handed down by the Lord and His apostles,--they cannot avoid the further concession, that infants require the same benefits of the Mediator, in order that, being washed by the sacrament and charity of the faithful, and thereby incorporated into the body of Christ, which is the Church, they may be reconciled to God, and so live in Him, and be saved, and delivered, and redeemed, and enlightened. But from what, if not from death, and the vices, and guilt, and thraldom, and darkness of sin? And, inasmuch as they do not commit any sin in the tender age of infancy by their actual transgression, original sin only is left." Augustine, On forgiveness of sin and baptism, 39 [26] (A.D. 412).

"The blessed Cyprian, indeed, said, in order to correct those who thought that an infant should not be baptized before the eighth day, that it was not the body but the soul which behoved to be saved from perdition -- in which statement he was not inventing any new doctrine, but preserving the firmly established faith of the Church; and he, along with some of his colleagues in the episcopal office, held that a child may be properly baptized immediately after its birth." Augustine, Epistle 166:8:23 (A.D. 412).

"'C. Tell me, pray, and rid me of all doubts, why little children are baptized?

A. That their sins may be forgiven them in baptism." Jerome, Against the Pelagians, 3:18 (A.D. 415).

"Likewise, whosoever says that those children who depart out of this life without partaking of that sacrament shall be made alive in Christ, certainly contradicts the apostolic declaration, and condemns the universal Church, in which it is the practice to lose no time and run in haste to administer baptism to infant children, because it is believed, as an indubitable truth, that otherwise they cannot be made alive in Christ." Augustine, Epistle 167,7,21 (A.D. 415).

"Canon 2. Likewise it has been decided that whoever says that infants fresh from their mothers' wombs ought not to be baptized...let him be anathema." Council of Carthage, Canon 2 (A.D. 418).

"Concerning the Donatists it seemed good that we should hold counsel with our brethren and fellow priests Siricius and Simplician concerning those infants alone who are baptized by Donatists: lest what they did not do of their own will, when they should be converted to the Church of God with a salutary determination, the error of their parents might prevent their promotion to the ministry of the holy altar." African Code, Canon 47/51 (A.D. 419).

"[T]his concupiscence, I say, which is cleansed only by the sacrament of regeneration, does undoubtedly, by means of natural birth, pass on the bond of sin to a man's posterity, unless they are themselves loosed from it by regeneration." Augustine, On Marriage and Concupiscence, 1:23 (A.D. 420).

"Believest thou this?...When a newborn child is brought forward to receive the anointing of initiation, or rather of consummation through holy baptism." Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on John, 7 (A.D. 428).

"Question XIX. Concerning those who after being baptized in infancy were captured by the Gentiles, and lived with them after the manner of the Gentiles, when they come back to Roman territory as still young men, if they seek communion, what shall be done?

Reply: If they have only lived with Gentiles and eaten sacrificial food, they can be purged by fasting and laying on of hands, in order that for the future abstaining from things offered to idols, they may be partakers of Christ's mysteries. But if they have either worshipped idols or been polluted with manslaughter or fornication, they must not be admitted to communion, except by public penance." Leo the Great [regn. A.D. 440-461], Epistle to Rusticus 167 (A.D. 459).

"But with respect to trine immersion in baptism, no truer answer can be given than what you have yourself felt to be right; namely that, where there is one faith, a diversity of usage does no harm to holy Church. Now we, in immersing thrice, signify the sacraments of the three days' sepulture; so that, when the infant is a third time lifted out of the water, the resurrection after a space of three days may be expressed." Gregory the Great [regn. A.D. 590-604], Epistle to Leander 43 (A.D. 591).