The Madonna and Child brought us Victory over the Condomists and the Abortionists and the Pillists on the Mothers Day Debate with the forces of Death
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx Ipasa 34.62%
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Ibasura 65.38%
These results are no earthquake, and no tsunami, but it looks like the wind beneath our wings was sufficient to grant us a wave strong enough to WIN CONVINCINGLY!
Congratulations to the pro-life panelists. You have fought a good fight, and we thank God that you are there.
Let us continue to move forward, knowing that real pro-life victory requires gaining "converts" DAILY! Dream pro-life and reap abundant life.
We can continue winning only if we are UNITED.
All it takes is political will, which is really synonymous to love of neighbor.
MANALIG TAYO SA DIYOS. IBASURA ANG RH BILL!
FR. ABE:
I watched the Debate last night and it was really nice. Our debaters were very clear and direct to the point. The pro-RH Bill were refuted convincingly point by point. One lady pro-RH Bill even deceptively used some quotes from Pope Gregory and the CBCP in order to appear as if the use of Contraception is acceptable to the Catholic Church but her position was found to be based on distortion. Later she admitted being a non-Catholic. It is a classic case of the devil quoting the Sacred Scriptures.
I salute Fr. Melvin Castro and Cong. Golez for leading our panel to victory.
THIS IS A MAJOR VICTORY.
BECAUSE OUR OPPONENTS, THE CONDOMISTS AND THE ABORTIONISTS, WERE CLAIMING THAT MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE ARE IN FAVOR OF THE RH BILL. THEY ARE USING THEIR BOGUS SURVEYS. NOW, IN AN OPEN DEBATE WATCHED LIVE BY THE FILIPINO PEOPLE... IN A MANNER SIMILAR TO 'PINOY BIG BROTHER' AND THE 'PHILIPPINE IDOL' THE FILIPINOS REJECTED THE RH BILL IN A LANDSLIDE VOTE: 65 % AGAINST.
PRAISE BE JESUS THE RISEN LORD, THE KING OF KINGS. ALLELUIA.
AVE MARIA PURISSIMA.
RIGHT DURING THE CELEBRATION OF THE MOTHERS DAY THE VIRGIN MARY CRUSHED THE SERPENT OF RH BILL. GLORY TO GOD IN THE HIGHEST...
LORD GOD, CRUSH THE HEAD OF THE SERPENT IN THE FORM OF RH BILL. GRANT US TOTAL VICTORY IN THIS WAR AGAINST THE CULTURE OF DEATH. LET THE GOSPEL OF LIFE TRIUMPH OVER THE POWER OF SATAN'S DEATH. AMEN.
.jpg)
![ST. JEROME EMILIANI [1486-1537]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_6dKQTchkJaA/R0lo013dyBI/AAAAAAAAB_4/XzUAPDESwwQ/s1600/St.+Jerome+in+prayer,+small_1.jpg)
alam mu, HATINGGABI n un eh, konti ang nanunuod subukan mu ipalabas yan ng gabi for example, 8pm, baka mbago ang poll n iyan and please, READ THE BILL FIRST.
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA... PALUSOT. ANG STYLE MO CONDOM NA BUTAS BUTAS. HA HA HA... KUNG 8pm yan o umaga e di mas lalo nang tumaas ang boto namin. He he he...
ReplyDeleteREAD THE BILL. HA HA HA... WE HAVE READ THE BILLS. THE RH BILL IS NOT A SINGLE BILL IT HAS MANY VERSIONS. SO STOP YOUR DECEPTION. BAKA IKAW ANG HINDI NAKABASA NG BILLS MO. HE HE HE... BILL BILL MO.
KILL BILL!!! NO TO RH BILL!!!
FIGHT THE CONDOMISTS WHO WANTS TO USE PUBLIC MONEY FOR THEIR SEXUAL ACTIVITIES.
The Church is Wise... RH Bill cannot fool the Church...
ReplyDeleteANG KAPAL NG MUKA NG MGA CONDOMISTS AT ABORTIONISTS. GUSTO PANG GAMITIN ANG TAXES NG MGA CATHOLICS PARA TUSTUSAN ANG KABULASTUGAN NILA SA LAMAN.
ReplyDeleteStop writing in all caps. It doesn't help you to get your point across. It just makes you look more pompous and annoying. Just a piece of advice...
ReplyDeleteAlso, since when did the vote of the public majority prove the value or sensibility of the winning thing in question? Just look at the presidents that this country elects. Don't gloat too hard over this victory, you could still be wrong.
@Anonymous
ReplyDeleteMagpakilala ka at wag magtago sa dilim! Pra kang BETLOG na laging nakatago!
Eto mga versions ng RH Bill (and i'm currently reading the lagman version.)
ReplyDelete(1) House Minority Leader Edcel Lagman of Albay, HB 96; (2) Iloilo Rep. Janette Garin, HB 101, (3) Akbayan Representatives Kaka Bag-ao & Walden Bello; HB 513, (4) Muntinlupa Representative Rodolfo Biazon, HB 1160, (5) Iloilo Representative Augusto Syjuco, HB 1520, (6) Gabriela Rep. Luzviminda Ilagan. In the Senate, Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago has filed her own version of the RH bill.
Hindi pa tapos ang laban. The Church should always be vigilant. Health in the Lord!
THE RH BILL IS LIKE THE RED DRAGON WHICH IS SATAN DISGUISED IN REVELATION 12:2. IT HAS SEVEN HEADS AND A LOT OF HORNS. LIKE THE DEMON THAT IT IS IT APPEARS ON SEVERAL FORMS.
ReplyDeleteYES, THE WAR IS NOT YET OVER. LET US CONTINUE OUR STRUGGLE AND VIGILANCE.
Thank you so much Brod for giving us the various versions of that Immoral Bill.
ReplyDelete[Stop writing in all caps.]
ReplyDeleteWHO ARE YOU TO TELL ME TO STOP WRITING IN ALL CAPS? THIS IS A DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY AND I PREFER TO USE THE CAPS. BETTER USE THE CAPS THAN USE CONDOMS AND PILLS FROM THE UNITED STATES BOUGHT BY TAXPAYERS MONEY.
[It doesn't help you to get your point across.]
ITS UP TO MY READERS TO DECIDE. IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT THEN THAT IS YOUR OPINION WHICH I DOESN'T SHARE.
[It just makes you look more pompous and annoying.]
HA HA HA... PUTTING CONDOM IN ONE'S GENITAL AND INSERT IT ON ANOTHER'S GENITAL OR ASS IS MUCH MUCH MORE POMPOUS AND ANNOYING... IF YOU ARE NOT AWARE AFTER USING THEM OR BEING USED BY THEM.
THE USE OF ALL CAPS IS PART OF THE HUMAN CIVILIZATION AND PART OF HISTORY OF LETTERS. BOTH THE TYPEWRITERS AND THE COMPUTERS PROVIDE FOR ALL CAPS. IF YOU ARE NOT AWARE.
[Just a piece of advice...]
THANKS BUT NO THANKS. YOU'VE BETTER PUT YOUR CONDOM WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS.
[Also, since when did the vote of the public majority prove the value or sensibility of the winning thing in question?]
IF WINNING THE PUBLIC VOTES IS NOT IMPORTANT THEN WHY DID YOUR PRO-RH PANEL ATTENDED THE LIVE DEBATE? THE FACT THAT YOU CONDOMISTS ARE REPRESENTED THEREIN SHOWS THE HYPOCRISY OF YOUR ARGUMENT. JUST BECAUSE YOU LOST THE VOTE YOU ARE TRYING TO DIMINISH ITS SIGNIFICANCE WHILE PREVIOUSLY YOUR LEADERS WERE BRAGGING THE SURVEYS IN YOUR FAVOR. HA HA HA...
[Just look at the presidents that this country elects.]
THE PRESIDENT WE HAVE NOW IS EXACTLY ON YOUR SIDE SO BEFORE YOU USE THE PRESIDENTS AGAINST US LOOK FIRST IN THE MIRROR OR RATHER ON WHAT REMAINS INSIDE YOUR USED CONDOMS AND SEE HOW DIRTY THEY ARE AFTER YOU HAVE INSERTED YOURSELVES AND EXPERIENCED YOUR FLESHLY ECSTASY.
[Don't gloat too hard over this victory, you could still be wrong.]
WE ARE SURE TO BE RIGHT BECAUSE WE ARE ON THE SIDE OF LIFE. EVERYTHING THAT IS LIFE-GIVING, LIFE ENHANCING AND LIFE SUPPORTING IS GOOD. WHILE EVERYTHING THAT IS CONTRARY OR AGAINST LIFE IS EVIL.
YOUR RH BILL IS EVIL. IT IS MORALLY EVIL AND SINFUL. WE ARE SURE OF THAT. VERY SURE.
Pro-RH Bill are cowards! magaling lang yan sila kapag nakatalikod ka. When I delivered my public lecture at Holy Cross College against RH BILL the Pro-RH BILL supports are very quite while I demolish their PRO-RH BILL arguments. During the open forum none of them dared to ask a question. But when the event was finished there I heard them blabbering and criticizing me. The Pro-RH BILL supporters do not have the guts to stand toe to toe against against Pro-Lifers.
ReplyDeleteThe Most Holy Trinity is with the Catholic Church, so who can be against us?
HA HA HA... PUTTING CONDOM IN ONE'S GENITAL AND INSERT IT ON ANOTHER'S GENITAL OR ASS IS MUCH MUCH MORE POMPOUS AND ANNOYING... IF YOU ARE NOT AWARE AFTER USING THEM OR BEING USED BY THEM.
ReplyDeleteTHE USE OF ALL CAPS IS PART OF THE HUMAN CIVILIZATION AND PART OF HISTORY OF LETTERS. BOTH THE TYPEWRITERS AND THE COMPUTERS PROVIDE FOR ALL CAPS. IF YOU ARE NOT AWARE.
[Just a piece of advice...]
THANKS BUT NO THANKS. YOU'VE BETTER PUT YOUR CONDOM WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS.
That's just immature.
WELL SAID BRO. ISAHEL.
ReplyDelete[That's just immature.]
ReplyDeleteIMMORAL.
Hope you had fun at the playground. :)
ReplyDeletefr abe, dude, check your grammar. haha
ReplyDeleteabortion is just wrong, so wrong and evil. but with condoms, i think it's fine. i mean there's no life yet right?
fr abe, have you ever jerked off when you were a kid? just be honest, you're a priest right? whether your jerked it off inside a condom or in the bathroom or in your bedsheet, it's just the same.. :)
and by the way, where in the scripture did it say that we should pray to mary (mother of Jesus)? she's dead and she can not intercede even if you pray like a gazillion hail maries!
Jesus said, I am the way, the truth and the life, no one shall come to the Father except through me. (how come you pray to mary? what can she do?)
Ha ha ha !!! Fr abe, sa palagay ko, mas immature pa yung nagsabing immature kayo !!! Imagine, porket natalo lang sa debate eh grabe na ang pagbabatikos nito sa pagbubunyi naten ! Siguro, hindi yan magcocomment ng mga ganyan kung sila ang nanalo sa nangyaring debate (which i think is impossible to happen !)
ReplyDeleteOne more thing that makes the "anonymous" immature ay yung pag puna niya sa manner ng pagsulat niyo po dito sa blog. In the first place, blog po ito ni fr. abe so technicaly, he could write in any manner he want kasi blog niya nga ito. And second, HINDI PO IMMORAL ANG GUMAMIT NG ALL CAPS KESA ANG GUMAMIT NG MGA CONDOMS AND CONTRCEPTIVES JUST TO HAVE FUN IN SEX. I THINK NA MGA PERVERTS ANG NAGSUSULOG NG RH BILL KASI IMAGINE, AYAW NILANG MAGKAANAK PERO GUSTO NILA NG SEX? IMBES NA PIGILAN ANG MGA SARILI SA KALASWAAN EH ANG BATAS PA ANG GUSTO NILANG GUMAWA NG PARAAN PARA KAHIT MAGSEX SILA ANG DI SILA MAGKAANAK ! VERY SELFISH ! VERY IMMORAL ! (sorry for my words but i just want to give emphasis to my "opinions")
I'm new here. If you could enlighten me father, I have been reading the RH Bill and I'd like to know specifically what parts of it the Church finds offensive. If you can please quote the specific provision of the law and why it is against the word of God.
ReplyDeleteDo you talk like that in church? Do you think God is proud of your actions? I am a Christian and I just have to say that I am embarrassed to be on the same side as you. How did you become a priest? Are the standards so low that you passed? You have no respect. You do not have to speak like that to make a point. It's easier to convince people if you speak calmly and avoid going against their principles.
ReplyDeleteCongratulations to all pro-lifers in the Philippines. The RH bill supporters can never win in a formal debate. Their argument is based upon libido.
ReplyDeleteThe effects of this Bill are irreversible...
ReplyDeletePoverty is the cause of the so called "OVERPOPULATION" therefore, the GOV't must address poverty first and what causes poverty? Corruption and Selfishness of Rich Honchos.
Abe, don't be such a hypocrite. I know what kind of skeletons you're hiding in your closet. You wouldn't want them to come out wouldn't you?
ReplyDelete[Poverty is the cause of the so called "OVERPOPULATION" therefore, the GOV't must address poverty first and what causes poverty? Corruption and Selfishness of Rich Honchos.]
ReplyDeleteNOYNOY GOT IT RIGHT DURING THE CAMPAIGN FOR THAT REASON CATHOLICS VOTED FOR HIM. HE USED THE SLOGAN: "KUNG WALANG CORRUPT WALANG MAHIRAP".
NOW THAT HE IS ELECTED INTO OFFICE HE CHOSE TO BE A TRAITOR TO HIS CATHOLIC FAITH AND FAVOR OF THE USELESS AND GOOD FOR NOTHING ATHEISTS-AGNOSTICS SUPPORTING THE RH BILL. AND SUDDENLY HE IS NOW BLAMING THE POPULATION AS THE ROOT CAUSE OF POVERTY.
I pray to god (whoever/whatever the different kinds of people in this country may conceive him/her/it to be) to pass this bill for a better nation. Because my conscience cannot bear inaction in the midst of poverty, and his Gospel teaches me to act on it. Amen.
ReplyDelete(Seriously, I'm praying for this every night. Through the intercession of the same saints. Amen.)
Honestly sir, I can't take you seriously. You don't sound like a priest and you definitely sound like a bigot. I respect Anti-RH and Pro-RH supporters who would rather have their stand than to those who do nothing but whine and be emotional and simply just attack other people who contradict their views. Bigotry, pure and simple. Attack the point of view, not the person. Isn't that what the Church teaches?
ReplyDeleteYou are a hypocrite. I'm sorry but it has to be said. You make all these references to the Scriptures as if to bolster your stand. Please do remember that the Scriptures also told tales about the Pharisees. Just my two cents.
CONDOMS FTW you people do not see the fucking poor ass kids running around the streets entering jeeps one by one and asking for a fucking peso? JEEZ, so immoral. YOU ALL NEED CONDOMS.
ReplyDeleteAnd you guys call yourselves Christians? Stop claiming that the Philippines is solely dependent on the Catholic Church. Not all Filipinos are catholics. And the Church shall be separate from the State.
ReplyDeleteBtw, being Pro-RH bill also means being pro-life, as this bill is concerned with the health and welfare of the majority of the Filipinos, which by the way will not affect the priests [since ideally you'll never get to have babies or even copulate] nor the nuns. So what is the rant about the RH bill all about? I guess it goes beyond your "being pro-life".Stop presenting twisted facts in effort to convince the people who already are in support of the RH bill.
I don't think the Lord will ever be proud of how this Fr. Abe person is acting up in his own blog. Srsly, that is how you react to the people who merely commented on the way you've written this entry? And I just want to make my self clear that I am commenting on Fr. Abe's reactions and whatnots, not about his stand on the bill itself.
ReplyDeleteIt will actually be pointless to still be discussing the Bill and its propositions to you guys who still think that this is an issue of morality.
I think it's nice that the clergy have begun to blog.
ReplyDeleteThis way they can reach out to young people...without getting into trouble ;)
In my honest opinion lang po, the government is trying to address the poverty issue through the bill, by reducing our population growth.
ReplyDeleteSa tingin ko po ang majority ng maapektuhan ng bill ay ang mga mahihirap nating mga kababayan na limitado ang edukasyon, kaalaman at kabuhayan para makapag-sustain ng pamilya. Kung hindi po nila kayang kontrolin ang desires nila at patuloy ang paglaki ng mga pamilya nila, tingin ko po hindi na kasalanan ng gobyerno yun.
Sir, kung sakaling maubos lahat ng corrupt, hindi naman po bababa ang bilang ng mga taong mahihirap at mga pinanapanganak ng mahirap. Sobra na po ang bilang ng tao sa Metro Manila at nakakalungkot sabihing karamihan dito ay mahihirap nating mga kababayan - hindi po sila nagbabayad ng buwis, middle class po ang pinaka-apektado at nadadagdagan lang ang utang natin sa ibang bansa para masuportahan sila ng mga programa.
Mahirap na po maghanap ng trabaho sa panahon natin, kahit mga college graduates ay hirap makapaghanap ng matinong trabaho. Kung susubukang gumawa ng programa at mag-provide ng kabuhayan sa lahat ng mahihirap nating kababayan, saan kukuha ng pondo ang gobyerno natin? Siguradong mas malaki ang kailangang gastusin kumpara sa pag-implement ng bill.
Sir, pwede din po kayong magsuggest ng alternative ways para ma-address ang issue ng poverty. Sana open po sa lahat itong discussion na to.
"HA HA HA... PALUSOT. ANG STYLE MO CONDOM NA BUTAS BUTAS. HA HA HA... KUNG 8pm yan o umaga e di mas lalo nang tumaas ang boto namin. He he he..."
ReplyDeletewow. you respond like a 5 year old.
"READ THE BILL. HA HA HA... WE HAVE READ THE BILLS. THE RH BILL IS NOT A SINGLE BILL IT HAS MANY VERSIONS. SO STOP YOUR DECEPTION. BAKA IKAW ANG HINDI NAKABASA NG BILLS MO. HE HE HE... BILL BILL MO."
hmm. you say it's a free world and you can comment any way you want to... but haven't you ever heard of PROPER online etiquette?
http://www.esc.edu/esconline/across_esc/underconstruction.nsf/wholeshortlinks2/Online+Etiquette?opendocument
please read number 8. thank you.
"KILL BILL!!! NO TO RH BILL!!!"
how dare you mention one of my most favorite movies of all time. offensive, sir!
"FIGHT THE CONDOMISTS WHO WANTS TO USE PUBLIC MONEY FOR THEIR SEXUAL ACTIVITIES."
okay. grammar. it's "WANT" not "WANTS". hahaha.
Now, don't you worry. I'm not gonna start arguing about the topic. I know you have a lot to say, so yeah. I just want you to know that you are rude and disrespectful to others. If you have opinions that you wish to express, do so in the proper manner.
"YOU'RE A FUCKING ASSHOLE WHO DOESN'T DESERVE TO LIVE" <- see? that's how you sound. HA HA HA.
may the Lord be with you. ;-)
"YOU'RE A FUCKING ASSHOLE WHO DOESN'T DESERVE TO LIVE" <- see? that's how you sound. HA HA HA--- anonymous your such a liar it tells quiet alot about the attitude of condomists or pro-RH bill. ang kapal mo pong magsalita ng proper internet etiquette dont teach us about those things u hypocrite! anong etiquette sa pagsusulong ng masama, I am a health worker, a nurse who is currently undergoing my masters degree, I know my craft and all I can say is that this RH bill (which I have read already po!) does promote abortion implicitly by the use of IUD which is abortifacient! furthermore it degrades the sense of sacredness of sex, alam mo ba na in psychology merong tamang edad at estado para makipagsex? pano na kaya pag ang lahat ng menorde edad ay bibigyan ng pagkakataong maka-avail ng condom?!
ReplyDeletedont talk abot etiquette you liar insolent fool! PANO NAMAN IF MAGCAPSLOCK LAHAT ANG MGA TAO DITO? ANG KAPAL RIN NG MUKHA MONG MAGTURO ABOUT GRAMMAR! HOY ANG LIIT NG ISSUE SA PAG GAMIT NG WANT OR WANTS HAHAHA AT NOBODY IS PERFECT KAYA WAG MONG ASAHAN NA AT ALL TIME TAMA ANG GRAMMAR NG KAHIT SINO!
PANO KAYA IF AKO NAMAN ANG MAGSABI SAYO NA READ THE BILL?! UGOK KA PO (HONESTLY SPEAKING)! GIVE EVERY1 THERE DUE SO HETO NA PO, ANG BOBO MO YAN ANG PALAGAY KO, IPAKITA MO YANG PICTURE MO O IDENTITY MO ANG DUWAG MO MR "ETIQUETTE" GUY!
KILL THE BILL, IF PWEDE LANG KILL ALL CONDOMISTS NALANG AT ABORTIONISTS NALANG KAYSA KILLING THE BABIES!
KUNG WALANG CORRUPT WALANG MAHIRAP!
[In my honest opinion lang po, the government is trying to address the poverty issue through the bill, by reducing our population growth.]
ReplyDeleteYAN ANG MALI. KASI ANG POVERTY ISSUE AY DAPAT SOLUSYUNAN SA PAMAMAGITAN NG SOUND ECONOMIC POLICIES, EDUCATION OF THE PEOPLE AT GOOD ADMINISTRATION HINDI NG REDUCTION OF POPULATION GROWTH. BAKIT? KASI ANG POPULATION NATIN ANG NUMBER ONE RESOURCES NG ATING BANSA. TAO ANG SOLUSYON SA PROBLEMA AT HINDI PROBLEMA ANG TAO KUNDI ANG KAMALIAN AT KASAMAAN NG TAO.
[Sa tingin ko po ang majority ng maapektuhan ng bill ay ang mga mahihirap nating mga kababayan na limitado ang edukasyon, kaalaman at kabuhayan para makapag-sustain ng pamilya.]
KUNWARI LANG YAN NA MAHIHIRAP ANG CONCERN FOR RH BILL. ANG TUTUO GUSTO LANG NILA NA GAMITIN NG GAMITIN ANG KATAWAN NILA SA SEX NG WALANG RESPONSIBILIDAD. GUSTO LANG NILANG MALIBRE SA CONDOMS AND PILLS GAMIT ANG TAXES NG TAONG BAYAN.
IBIG SABIHIN PALA OK LANG PARA SAYO NA MAGPARAMI NG MAGPARAMI ANG MGA MAYAYAMAN DAHIL MAYAMAN SILA AT ANG MGA MAHIHIRAP AY DAPAT KONTROLIN? KALOKOHAN. ANG BUMUBUHAY SA ECONOMIA NG BANSA AY ANG MGA MAHIHIRAP AT MIDDLE CLASS. SILA RIN ANG NAGPAPADALA NG BILYON BILYONG REMITTANCES AS OFW.
[Kung hindi po nila kayang kontrolin ang desires nila at patuloy ang paglaki ng mga pamilya nila, tingin ko po hindi na kasalanan ng gobyerno yun.]
KAYA NILANG KONTROLIN ANG DESIRES NILA DAHIL TAO SILA. HAYUP LANG ANG HINDI NAKAPAG CONTROL NG KANILANG MGA SARILI DAHIL INSTINCT ANG KANILANG SINUSUNOD. KAYA NGA HINDI KAILANGAN ANG CONDOMS AT PILLS DAHIL SELF-CONTROL ANG KAILANGAN. IYON AY LIBRE AT HINDI NA KAILANGAN PANG BILHIN MULA SA U.S. AT SA WESTERN COUNTRIES.
[Sir, kung sakaling maubos lahat ng corrupt, hindi naman po bababa ang bilang ng mga taong mahihirap at mga pinanapanganak ng mahirap.]
ReplyDeleteKUNG WALANG CORRUPT WALANG MAHIRAP. TANDAAN MO YAN.
[Sobra na po ang bilang ng tao sa Metro Manila]
DAHIL NAGSISIKSIKAN SA METRO MANILA. OUTSIDE METRO MANILA AY MALUWAG. KAYA NGA DAPAT PAUNLARIN DIN ANG MGA PROVINCIA. HINDI CONDOM ANG SOLUSYON.
[at nakakalungkot sabihing karamihan dito ay mahihirap nating mga kababayan]
NAKU, YAN KA NA NAMAN. KUNWARI CONCERN SA MGA MAHIHIRAP. BAKIT YAYAMAN BA ANG MAHIHIRAP KAPAG SINAKSAKAN MO NG CONDOMS ANG PAGITAN NG MGA HITA NILA? TRABAHO ANG IBIGAY HINDI CONDOMS. LIBRENG GAMOT HINDI PILLS.
[- hindi po sila nagbabayad ng buwis,]
BAKIT ANG MAYAYAMAN NAGBABAYAD NG BUWIS? E SILA NGA ITONG BILYON BILYON ANG PANDADAYA SA TAXES. ANG SWELDO NG MAHIRAP KALTAS KAGAD SA TAX SAMANTALANG ANG MGA MAYAYAMAN AY MERONG MGA ACCOUNTANTS AND CORPORATE LAWYERS PARA MABAWASAN ANG OBLIGATIONS NILA SA TAX. KONTI NA NGA LANG ANG TAX TAPOS IPANGBIBILI MO PA NG CONDOMS PARA SA LAMAN MO. MAHIYA KA NAMAN SA SARILI MO. HUMINGI KA NG LIBRENG CONDOMS AT PILLS MULA SA IKAPO NG MGA PASTOR NYO AT MULA SA SWELDO NG MGA ATEISTA AT AGNOSTICS NG U.P. WAG TAXES NG MGA CATHOLICS. HE HE HE...
[middle class po ang pinaka-apektado at nadadagdagan lang ang utang natin sa ibang bansa para masuportahan sila ng mga programa.]
MAS KAWAWA ANG MIDDLE CLASS AT LALONG TATAAS ANG UTANG NATIN KUNG GAGASTOS ANG GOBIERNO NG PAMBILI NG CONDOMS PARA SA MGA KAHALAYAN NG MGA TAO. PARA MAIBSAN ANG KANILANG PAGIGING GANID SA LAMAN, PARA MA SATISFY ANG KANILANG MGA KABIT AT ANG MGA ANAL-SEX NG MGA BADING.
[Mahirap na po maghanap ng trabaho sa panahon natin, kahit mga college graduates ay hirap makapaghanap ng matinong trabaho.]
SUUTAN MO NG CONDOMS AT PAINUMIN MO NG SAMPUNG BOTE NG PILLS ANG MGA WALANG TRABAHO AT TIGNAN NATIN KUNG MAGKAKATRABAHO SILA. HINDI CONDOMS AT PILLS ANG SOLUSYON. MALAYO.
[Kung susubukang gumawa ng programa at mag-provide ng kabuhayan sa lahat ng mahihirap nating kababayan, saan kukuha ng pondo ang gobyerno natin?]
DUN SA PAMBILI NG CONDOMS AT PILLS. GAMITIN YON SA EDUKASYON, SA INFRASTRACTURA AT SA LIBRENG HEALTH SERVICE. ANG CONDOMS AY HINDI PART NG HEALTH DAHIL HINDI NAMAN SAKIT ANG SEXUAL DESIRES.
[Siguradong mas malaki ang kailangang gastusin kumpara sa pag-implement ng bill.]
ANG PAG-IMPLENTA NG BILL AY PANDAGDAG GASTOS LANG. MERON NA NGANG ECONOMIC PROBLEMS DADAGDAGAN MO PA ANG CONDOMS-FUND PROBLEMS, PILLS-FUND PROBLEMS, IUD-FUNDS PROBLEMS... NAKU, ESEP-ESEP.
[Sir, pwede din po kayong magsuggest ng alternative ways para ma-address ang issue ng poverty.]
ANG SUGGESTION KO GAMITIN ANG FUNDS NG GOVERNMENT FOR FREE EDUCATION O FREE HOSPITALIZATION HINDI FREE CONDOMS AT FREE PILLS. WAG NINYONG GAMITIN ANG MAHIHIRAP PARA MALUBOS ANG MAKA-LAMAN NINYONG PAGNANASA.
[Sana open po sa lahat itong discussion na to.]
OPEN ITO SA MGA TAONG DISKUSYON ANG GUSTO.
[I think it's nice that the clergy have begun to blog.
ReplyDeleteThis way they can reach out to young people...without getting into trouble ;)]
TROUBLES ARE NOT EXCLUSIVE OF THE CLERGY. TEACHERS WERE HAVING THEIR OWN TROUBLES TOO, GOVT. OFFICIALS, SOLDIERS... WOMEN, MEN, HOMOSEXUALS, CHILDREN, SENIOR CITIZENS... PASTORS AND MINISTERS ARE GETTING INTO TROUBLE TOO. THERE ARE ALSO PASTORS AND MINSTERS OF EVANGELICAL CHURCHES ARRESTED, IMPRISONED DUE TO VARIOUS LEGAL OR MORAL TROUBLES. WHY DON'T YOU ADVISE ALL THESE PEOPLE TO BLOG?
@ Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteI was once upon a time oblivious to people who say that contraceptives are wrong. However, I changed my mind and was convinced of the evils of Reproductive Health (a misnomer, mind you because it don't promote health) after hearing the teaching of the Church.
Our arguments are not solely against libido (biased as you alleged). To prove our point, then refer to the scientific findings that go against RH from the Harvard University and the Mayo Clinic presented as evidence in the US Supreme Court. Read the column of Emil Jurado in Manila Standard dated 06 May 2011.
Take note that the scientific findings were from experts and not even the opinions of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines!
Emil Jurado is right when he said, "The RH bill presents a clear and present danger to all Filipinos."
Fr. Abe is just defending the Pro-life position. Stop commenting here because obviously, you cannot convert the Pro-lifers to your position.
We are not twisting your arm to believe us. But respect what others have to say even if they are contrary to yours. One more thing, don't start a debate if you don't want to be rebuked.
May peace be with you.
[It will actually be pointless to still be discussing the Bill and its propositions to you guys who still think that this is an issue of morality.]
ReplyDeleteDEFINITELY THIS IS AN ISSUE OF MORALITY. THIS ISSUE IS LEGAL, MORAL, SPIRITUAL, THEOLOGICAL, ECONOMIC, ETC.
YOU DO NOT CONSIDER IT A MORAL ISSUE MAYBE BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE MORALITY AT ALL.
Gigil na gigil sayo mga anti-lifers Fr ABE haha! Sila ang parang mga BATA, BATANG ISIP. Congtaz po sa sa ating lahat sa pakikipaglaban natin sa buhay! Maybe this is just a text vote but this one is a BIG victory! We cannot rejoice yet but let this simple victory keep the anti-lifers worrying hahaha.
ReplyDelete[And you guys call yourselves Christians?]
ReplyDeleteHOW ABOUT YOU? ARE YOU CHRISTIAN? ATHEIST? AGNOSTIC? COMMUNIST? WHAT?
[Stop claiming that the Philippines is solely dependent on the Catholic Church.]
WHO IS THE DEMON WHO TOLD WHO THAT THE PHILIPPINES IS SOLELY DEPENDENT ON THE CATHOLIC CHURCH? DEFINITELY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DIDN'T SAY THAT. STOP YOUR ILLUSIONS AND HALLUCINATIONS. TOO MUCH CONDOMS IS DANGEROUS TO YOUR MIND.
[Not all Filipinos are catholics.]
WE KNOW. BUT MAJORITY OF FILIPINOS ARE CATHOLICS. THAT IS WHY WE SHALL FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL AGAINST THE RH BILL.
[ And the Church shall be separate from the State.]
O WE KNOW THAT. WE DO NOT INTERFERE IN THE GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION OF THIS COUNTRY. WE DO NOT ENTER MALACANANG TO DISTURB THE WORKS OF THE PRESIDENT AND HIS CONDOMISTS COHORTS. BUT WE ALSO DEMAND FROM THE GOVERNMENT TO RESPECT OUR DOCTRINES WHICH CONSIDER THE USE OF CONTRACEPTION INTRINSICALLY EVIL AND IMMORAL. THE STATE MUST RESPECT THE FAITH OF THE MOSLEMS, OF THE IGLESIA NI CRISTO AND OTHERS BUT IT MUST ALSO RESPECT THE FAITH OF THE GREAT MAJORITY WHO ARE CATHOLICS.
[Btw, being Pro-RH bill also means being pro-life,]
O NO, NO, NO. IT IS JUST SAYING BEING A SATANIST IS BEING A CHRISTIAN. EXCUSE ME.
THE RH BILL IMPLEMENTS MASSIVE USE OF CONTRACEPTION WHICH PREVENTS LIFE. THAT IS NOT BEING PRO-LIVE, IT IS BEING PRO-DEATH. ANTI-LIFE. AGAINST LIFE.
DON'T EMPLOY ON US YOUR GOBBLEDYGOOK REASONING.
[as this bill is concerned with the health]
ReplyDeleteO NO, NO, NO... THIS IS NOT ABOUT HEALTH THIS IS ABOUT UNCONTROLLED LUST AND SEXUAL URGES TO BE SATISFIED TO THE FULL USING PUBLIC MONEY.
PREGNANCY IS NOT A SICKNESS AND THE BIRTH OF A CHILD IS NOT A SICKNESS. IT IS NOT ABOUT HEALTH BUT ITS ABOUT THE LUSTS OF PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO HAVE A LOT OF SEX AS LONG AS THEY WANT AT THE EXPENSE OF CATHOLIC TAXPAYERS.
IF THE ATHEISTS OF U.P. WANT TO USE CONDOMS LET THEM USE THEIR OWN SALARIES OR LET THEM FORM A JOINT BANK ACCOUNTS OUT OF THEIR OWN POCKET... THE SAME FOR THE BORN AGAIN AND THE IGLESIA NI MANALO, THE AGNOSTICS AND THE JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS. DON'T INCLUDE THE TAXES OF CATHOLICS. WE ARE PRO-LIFE AND WE DO NOT PREVENT THE FORMATION OF LIFE IN THE WOMB.
[and welfare of the majority of the Filipinos,]
WE CATHOLICS ARE THE MAJORITY AMONG THE FILIPINOS. STOP ACTING AS IF YOU ARE OUR SPOKESPERSON. YOU ARE NOT. LET THE MINORITIES USE THEIR OWN PERSONAL MONEY TO PUT CONDOMS IN THEIR GENITALS OR IN THEIR BEHINDS. LET THEM ENJOY TOGETHER THEIR CONDOMS AND PILLS SO THAT THEY NUMBER WILL FURTHER DIMINISH BY NEXT YEAR. HE HE HE...
[which by the way will not affect the priests [since ideally you'll never get to have babies or even copulate] nor the nuns.]
OUR VOWS OF CELIBACY IS OUR CONTRIBUTION TO POPULATION CONTROL. AND WE ARE DOING IT FREE OF CHARGE. WE DO NOT ASK FOR CONDOMS OR PILLS. AND DEFINITELY WE DO NOT REQUEST THE GOVERNMENT TO PROVIDE US WITH PILLS FROM ABROAD BOUGHT IN DOLLARS OR TO BE INSERTED WITH IUD, ETC BY THE PAID DOCTORS. NO, NO, NO... NADA, NUNCA, IN RUSSIAN: NYET, NYET.
BUT THE PRO-RH BILL ARE VERY DEMANDING. THEY WANT CONDOMS FROM U.S., PILLS FROM EUROPE, IUD INSERTED BY DOCTORS. VERY CAPRICIOUS. IN FILIPINO: ANG KAPAL NG MUKA AT NG MGA KASARIAN... BAKIT PATI YON MAKAPAL? KASI MAY CONDOMS. KAYA KUMAPAL LALO. MAKAPAL TALAGA.
[So what is the rant about the RH bill all about?]
THE RANT IS THAT WE DONT WANT YOU TO PUT CONDOMS INBETWEEN YOUR LEGS USING PUBLIC MONEY. USE YOUR PERSONAL MONEY, DON'T INCLUDE PUBLIC MONEY. WE WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO COPULATE AND FORNICATE TO THE FULL AT OUR EXPENSE.
[I guess it goes beyond your "being pro-life".]
WE GO BEYOND BECAUSE OUR POSITION IS NOT ONLY ON THE LEVEL OF THE FLESH BUT ALSO MORAL AND SPIRITUAL. WHILE ON YOUR PART YOU DO NOT GO BEYOND. INSTEAD, YOU GO WITHIN. YOU WRAPPED YOURSELF WITH CONDOMS AND YOU WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO PROVIDE FOR YOUR LUST FOR FLESH.
[Stop presenting twisted facts in effort to convince the people who already are in support of the RH bill.]
WE ARE NOT TWISTING FACTS. IT IS YOU CONDOMISTS AND PILLISTS WHO ARE DISTORTING THE FACTS. PEOPLE ARE NOW RISING AGAINST THE RH BILL. YOU WILL FEEL THE TRUE STAND OF THE PEOPLE AS WE RISE TO FACE YOU ON THIS ISSUE.
YOU PRETEND TO BE CARING FOR FILIPINOS BUT IN ACTUALLY YOU ARE KOWTOWING TO THE WHIMS AND CAPRICES OF THE U.S. LED BY OBAMA AND CLINTON.
[CONDOMS FTW you people do not see the fucking poor ass kids running around the streets entering jeeps one by one and asking for a fucking peso? JEEZ, so immoral. YOU ALL NEED CONDOMS.]
ReplyDeleteWE DON'T NEED CONDOMS.
THOSE KIDS DO NOT NEED CONDOMS. THEY NEED CLASSROOMS SO THAT THEY CAN STAY THERE AND BE EDUCATED, NOT CONDOMS.
THEY NEED TEACHERS NOT CONDOMS.
THEY NEED FOOD NOT CONDOMS.
THEY NEED TO BE TAKEN CARED OF BY THE GOVERNMENT NOT CONDOMS.
IF YOUR SOLUTION TO THAT IS CONDOM IT MEANS YOU AFFIRMED AND APPROVED CHILDREN PROSTITUTION ON THE STREETS. WHAT A SHALLOW, STUPID SOLUTION. INSTEAD OF STOPPING THE PROSTITUTION YOU JUST ALLOW IT TO GO ON BY GIVING CONDOMS. HA HA HA...
TRULY, SO MUCH CONDOMS AND PILLS IS DANGEROUS TO THE MIND AND TO THE SOUL AND TO THE SOCIETY. POOR KIDS... FOOD NOT CONDOMS.
TOINKZ!
ReplyDeleteIt will actually be pointless to still be discussing the Bill and its propositions to you guys who still think that this is an issue of morality. ---ANONYMOUS
TALO LANG KC KAYO SA GRAND DEBATE KAYA AYAW NYO NA IDISCUSS DITO, KAYA NAGRERESORT N LNG SA PERSONAL NA ATAKE YANG C MR.ETIQUETTE HYPOCRITE...
[these are just some of the verses I saw, as a priest shouldn't you be aware of these verses?]
ReplyDeleteOF COURSE, I AM AWARE OF THEM. AND LOOK AT MY STATEMENTS CLOSELY. I DIDN'T CURSE. I SIMPLY CALLED THE SPADE A SPADE.
I CALLED THEM "CONDOMISTS". WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT? THEY ARE SUPPORTING THE USE OF CONDOMS, THEY WANT GOVERNMENT MONEY FOR CONDOMS. THEY WANT TO IMPLEMENT CONDOMS.
THEY CALL ME HYPOCRITE. WELL, I NEVER USED A CONDOM. NEVER EVER. HOW CAN I BE A HYPOCRITE. OUR OPPONENTS ARE THE HYPOCRITE. THEY ARE USING THE TERM "HEALTH" FOR RH BILL. EXCUSE ME. CONDOM IS NOT FOR HEALTH... ITS FOR SEX, INCLUDING ANAL SEX OF HOMOSEXUALS. DO YOU FAVOR THAT BY USING THE SACRED SCRIPTURES?
IF THEY DEMAND FREE "BAND AIDS" FOR ALL FILIPINOS THEN I WILL SHOUT "YES TO THAT". BUT THEY ARE NOT ADVOCATING FREE VITAMINS, FREE BAND AIDS, FREE ALCOHOL, FREE HOSPITALIZATION, FREE CHECK UP. BUT FREE CONDOMS TO SATISFY THEIR GENITALS.
DON'T TELL ME THAT IT IS NOT TRUE. WHERE DO USE THE CONDOMS FOR? IS IT FOR THE NOSE, FOR THE EARS OR FOR GENITALS? FOR GENITALS. SO IT IS FOR THE SATISFACTION OF THEIR GENITALS TO HAVE SEX AND MORE SEX WITHOUT BEGETTING CHILDREN.
[please do not take this as an attack in anyway.]
OK FINE. BUT DON'T TAKE THIS AS A PERSONAL ATTACK ALSO. I DO NOT EVEN KNOW YOU. HOW CAN I ATTACK YOU? I ATTACK ONLY IDEAS, OPINIONS AND POSITIONS. I ATTACK THE USE OF CONDOMS AND ITS IMMORAL USE.
[Sorry that my comment is really long.]
ITS ALRIGHT. WE HAVE ENOUGH SPACE FOR YOU.
[I will pray for you and your readers. God Bless :)]
THANK YOU SO. WE WILL PRAY FOR YOU TOO. AND GOD BLESS YOU TOO. MAY THE GOD OF LIFE BLESS YOU AND LEAD YOU AWAY FROM IMMORALITIES OF THEIS SEX-CRAVED WORLD.
Good Day Father
ReplyDeleteI would ask why the communist persecute the church
particularly in the USSR (Russia) ?
[Honestly sir, I can't take you seriously.]
ReplyDeleteTO TELL YOU FRANKLY THE FEELING IS MUTUAL.
[You don't sound like a priest and you definitely sound like a bigot.]
BEING ANONYMOUS YOU DO NOT EVEN SOUND HUMAN AT ALL. YOU SOUND LIKE A CONDOMIZED BIGOT.
[I respect Anti-RH and Pro-RH supporters who would rather have their stand than to those who do nothing but whine and be emotional and simply just attack other people who contradict their views.]
YOU ARE THE EXACT REPRESENTATION OF THE DEMON THAT YOU HATE.
[Bigotry, pure and simple.]
CONDOMIST!!!
[Attack the point of view, not the person. Isn't that what the Church teaches?]
HA HA HA... SO, YOU AGREE WITH THE MORAL TEACHING OF THE CHURCH ON THAT. YET YOU WANT TO ENJOY YOUR CONDOM. HOW NICE? WHAT CAN WE CALL THAT? ISN'T THAT HYPOCRISY? YOU ARE USING THE TEACHING OF THE CHURCH IN ORDER TO ATTACK THE CHURCH AND ITS MORAL TEACHING. HOW CLEVER YOU ARE... I MEAN... CUNNING. VERY SERPENT-LIKE.
[You are a hypocrite.]
HA HA HA... I NEVER USED A CONDOM. NEVER EVER.
YOU ARE THE HYPOCRITE. PRETENDING TO UPHOLD THE TEACHING OF THE CHURCH TO RESPECT THE PERSON YET YOU ARE ATTACKING THE MORAL TEACHING OF THE CHURCH CONCERNING THE DIGNITY AND VALUE OF HUMAN LIFE.
[I'm sorry but it has to be said.]
NO NEED TO BE SORRY. ANYWAY, IT IS OBVIOUS THAT YOU ARE NOT HONEST IN EXPRESSING IT. WE KNOW ITS FAKE. THANKS BUT NO THANKS.
[You make all these references to the Scriptures as if to bolster your stand. Please do remember that the Scriptures also told tales about the Pharisees.]
YEAH, THEY TOLD TALES ABOUT PHARISEES. HE HE HE... BUT THEY ALSO TOLD TALES ABOUT THE LYING SERPENT WHO DECEIVED. YOU ARE SIMILAR TO THAT SERPENT. YOU ATTACK WHILE YOU KEEP YOURSELF HIDDEN IN THE BUSH. YOU ARE STINGING BUT PRETENDING TO BE GENTLE.
[Just my two cents.]
ACTUALLY IT IS NOT EVEN A CENT. ITS A LITTLE LOWER THAN THAT IF IT HAS VALUE AT ALL.
[I pray to god (whoever/whatever the different kinds of people in this country may conceive him/her/it to be)]
ReplyDeleteTHIS ATHEIST OR AGNOSTIC IS NOT A GENUINE BELIEVER OF GOD. HA HA HA... NICE TRY. HA HA HA...
GANITO NA BA KA CHEAP ANG MGA ATHEISTS AT AGNOSTICS NGAYON. MA DRAMA SA BUHAY. HA HA HA... PUNONG PUNO NG DRAMATIZATION. I TOLD YOU: "SO MUCH CONDOMS AND PILLS IS DANGEROUS TO YOUR HEALTH." HA HA HA...
LOKOHIN MO ANG LELANG MONG PANOT!!!
[to pass this bill for a better nation.]
HOW CAN WE BE BETTER WHEN YOU ARE THE ONE ENJOYING THE CONDOMS IN-BETWEEN YOUR LEGS?
THIS IS NOT FOR THE BETTERMENT OF OUR NATION. RH BILL IS FOR YOUR BETTERMENT SO THAT YOU CAN INSERT MORE CONDOMS IN YOUR PHALLIC AND IN YOUR BUTT HOLE WITHOUT USING YOUR PRIVATE MONEY BUT INSTEAD FUNDED BY OUR GOVERNMENT. O NO, NO, NO... NOT SO EASY.
YOU CAN CALL YOUR DEMONIC GOD OR YOUR COMMUNIST POLITBURO OR YOUR COUNCIL OF ATHEISTS-AGNOSTICS AND THE LIKES IF YOU WANT BUT WE WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO REACH YOUR FLESHLY ECSTASY AT OUR EXPENSE. NO WAY!!!
[Because my conscience cannot bear inaction in the midst of poverty, and his Gospel teaches me to act on it. Amen.]
CONSCIENCE? DO YOU HAVE A CONSCIENCE? YOUR CONSCIENCE IS INSIDE YOUR CONDOM AND YOUR ROTTEN PILLS.
YOU DARE TO USE THE TERM GOSPEL. SO YOUR GOD WHOM YOU CANNOT EVEN DETERMINE WHO HAS A GOSPEL. VERY CLEVER THIS ANONYMOUS LIAR. HA HA HA...
YOU SEE GUYS, HOW LOW THESE PRO-RH BILL CAN GO JUST TO ADVANCE THE INSERTION OF CONDOMS IN THEIR BODIES. AGAIN, THE WORD OF WISDOM: "TOO MUCH CONDOM AND PILLS IS DANGEROUS TO YOUR HEALTH." HA HA HA...
(Seriously, I'm praying for this every night. Through the intercession of the same saints. Amen.)
HA HA HA... FROM AN UNDETERMINED GOD TO THE MALE-GOD WHO HAS A GOSPEL AND THEN HE ABANDONED THE GOD OF THE GOSPEL AND HE WENT TO THE SAINTS WITHOUT MENTIONING WHO ARE THESE SAINTS. HA HA HA...
THEN HE IS USING "AMEN". WOW, CONDOMS MUST HAVE PENETRATED NOT ONLY THE HOLES AND THE MOUTH OF THIS ONE... AND THEY HAVE AFFECTED HIS BRAIN ALREADY. HA HA HA...
WHAT A BELIEVER-PRETENDER!!! HA HA HA..
[Abe, don't be such a hypocrite. I know what kind of skeletons you're hiding in your closet. You wouldn't want them to come out wouldn't you?]
ReplyDeleteLET THE LIGHT OF CHRIST SHINE IN OUR HEARTS AND LEAD US TO TRUTH AND JUSTICE.
LORD JESUS, MY RISEN LORD... MY CREATOR AND REDEEMER. YOU ARE THE LIGHT OF MY LIFE. PLEASE PROTECT ME FROM THE EVIL PLANS OF THE ENEMIES. BIND SATAN INTO HELL AND HIS EVIL DESIRES SO THAT THROUGH THE POWER OF YOUR GRACE YOUR PEOPLE WILL BE ABLE TO PROCLAIM THE GOSPEL OF LIFE IN PEACE AND LIBERTY. MAY THE MANTLE OF THE IMMACULATE VIRGIN BE OUR PROTECTION FROM THE VENOM AND MALICE OF THE FOES. AMEN.
ST. MICHAEL DEFEND US, PROTECT US ALWAYS...
AVE MARIA PURISSIMA, SIN PECADO CONCEVIDA!
this is sad. how the church and people are divided for the bill. i wonder how God feels about this..
ReplyDeleteTHE CHURCH AND THE PEOPLE ARE NOT DIVIDED FOR THE BILL. THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE IN THIS NATION ARE OPPOSED TO THE RH BILL.
ReplyDeleteTHE SUPPORTERS ARE FROM MINORITY ATHEISTS, AGNOSTICS, BORN-AGAIN, IGLESIA NI CRISTO AND THE FEW TRAITORS TO THEIR CATHOLIC FAITH.
WE SHALL DEFEAT THEM BY THE POWER OF BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LAMB.
Father, kami pong mga pro-life dito sa Dipolog City ay suporta po sa inyo. Keep up the good work Father Abe! We will pray for you. - Jan Lumanta
ReplyDeleteSALAMAT PO SA MGA KAPATID NATIN SA DIPOLOG CITY.
ReplyDeleteLET US INTENSIFY OUR FIGHT AGAINST THE RH BILL. LALO NA NGAYON NA NAGTUTULONG TULONG ANG MGA KAMPON NG DEMONIO LABAN SA SANTA IGLESIA: MGA CONDOMISTS, ABORTIONISTS, BIGAMISTS, PRO-HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS, MGA ATHEISTS, AGNOSTICS, BORN AGAIN, IGLESIA NI MANALO, MGA KOMUNISTA AT MGA SATANISTA.
GAGAPIIN NATIN SILA SA KAPANGYARIHAN NG PANGINOONG JESUCRISTO: "THE GATE OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST THE CHRUCH."
Lord, have mercy. Pass the RH Bill now!
ReplyDeleteKAY SATANAS KA MAGDASAL O KAY OBAMA O SA MGA ATEISTA SA U.P. BAKA TUGUNIN KA NILA... HINDI BALIW ANG DIOS PARA HADLANGAN ANG PAGBUO NG BUHAY DAHIL SIYA ANG PINAGMUMULAN NG BUHAY.
ReplyDeleteFr. Abe you're the man! ang lupet mo talaga!
ReplyDeleteIkaw na! the best ka!
TO GOD BE THE GLORY.
ReplyDeletepuedeng sumali..?...PRO kasi ako eh
ReplyDeletePRO LIFE.....
Fr. Abe, pasensiya na, I have nothing to say basta I am Pro...Pro-Life...hehehe
related article po fr. Abe, baka magustuhan niyo...
http://apocalypsisjesuchristi.wordpress.com/category/rh-bill/
God bless you po fr. Abe
TO FR. ABE and to all of PRO-LIFE CATHOLIC SUPPORTERS, NICE JOB IN DEFENDING LIFE, IN DEFENDING OUR FAITH, IN DEFENDING THE LIFE OF THE UNBORN and THE MOTHERS.
ReplyDeleteWAY TO GO! TWO THUMBS UP.
GOD BLESS US ALL
No to RH bill, kill bill, the immoral bill..
ReplyDeleteKILL THE RH BILL......
ReplyDeleteibasura ang RH BILL....
ReplyDeletehindi condom at pills ang sagot sa kahirapan.bakit hindi nalang pagpapatayo ng paaralan at pag bili ng mga bagong libro ang atupagin ng mga congresista na yan.sayang lang po ang pinapasweldo sa inyo ni juan dela cruz.simpleng pangungurakot lang po ang ginagawa nyo.kung baga ginigisa nyo kami sa sarili naming mantika.
ung mga taong PRO RH BILL. MAG ISIP ISIP PO KAYO......
please kill the RH BILL....
ReplyDelete[Good Day Father
ReplyDeleteI would ask why the communist persecute the church
particularly in the USSR (Russia) ?]
GOOD DAY TO YOU TOO.
THERE ARE MANY REASONS WHY THE COMMUNISTS PERSECUTED THE CHURCH:
1. COMMUNISM IS ONE OF THE OFFSHOOTS OF ATHEISTIC PHILOSOPHY.
CONSEQUENTLY, THEY HATE GOD AND BELIEF IN GOD. SINCE THEY CANNOT KILL GOD DIRECTLY THEY POINT THEIR HATRED TO RELIGIONS PARTICULARLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. IN RUSSIA, THE DOMINANT RELIGION THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH COOPERATED WITH THE COMMUNISTS AND BECAME PUPPETS SO THEY WERE NOT FULLY PERSECUTED. THE CATHOLICS REFUSED TO SUBMIT TO THEIR AUTHORITIES SO THEY BECAME THE MAIN TARGET.
BUT THE CATHOLIC BISHOPS, NUNS AND PRIESTS WERE SENT TO CONCENTRATION CAMPS. SOME WERE TORTURED TO DEATH, OTHERS MURDERED BY FIRING SQUAD AND OTHERS SUBJECTED TO HARD LABORS.
THEY CONFISCATED OUR CHURCHES, MONASTERIES AND SCHOOLS. SOME WERE BURNED TO ASHES, SOME WERE TURNED INTO FACTORIES, OTHERS WERE GIVEN TO THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX.
2. THE COMMUNISTS DECEIVED THEMSELVES WITH THEIR OWN INVENTED SLOGANS THAT THE CHURCH IS PART OF THE ELITES AND THE BUREAUCRATS THAT MUST BE ELIMINATED. THEY FAILED TO RECOGNIZE THE WORKS OF CHARITIES OF THE CHURCH AND THAT ITS PROPERTIES ARE OWNED BY THE LOCAL CATHOLICS LIVING IN THE AREA.
AFTER MURDERING THE CATHOLICS, THE RUSSIAN COMMUNINISTS LET BY THEIR POLITBURO BECAME MUCH WORSE THAN THE DEMONS THAT THEY HATED SO MUCH. THEY ABUSED POWERS, THEY REMOVED THE FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE, THEY PROHIBITED FREE SPEECH, DISRESPECTED THE LAWS OF THE LAND, CONFISCATED PRIVATE PROPERTIES... THE POOR REMAINED POORER WHILE THE NEW LEADERS BECAME TYRANTS, DESPOTS AND DICTATORS.
THEN, THE PEOPLE STARTED ESCAPING FROM THE COMMUNISTS TERRITORIES. THEY PROHIBIT THEIR CITIZENS TO TRAVEL FREELY. CHILDREN WERE TAKEN FROM THEIR PARENTS TO BE SOLDIERS OR ATHLETES IN CAMPS. NO FREE MEDIA WERE ALLOWED. NO DEMONSTRATIONS WERE ALLOWED.
AND MIND YOU... THEY IMPLEMENTED RH BILL. LIKE THE 2 CHILD POLICY OF CHINA... THEY PROMOTE ABORTIONS.
AS YOU CAN SEE RUSSIAN COMMUNISM COLLAPSED TOGETHER WITH THAT OF THE ENTIRE EASTERN EUROPE DUE TO THE MORAL FORCE OF BLESSED JOHN PAUL THE GREAT WHO LED PEOPLE TO DEFY THE COMMUNISTS BY PUBLICLY PROFESSING THEIR FAITH NO MATTER WHAT THE CAUSE. AND DUE TO THE MILITARY AND POLITICAL PRESSURE FROM RONALD REAGAN WHO JOINED FORCE WITH JOHN PAUL THE GREAT.
WHEN RUSSIAN COMMUNISM COLLAPSED IT WAS FOUND TO BE AN ECONOMIC FAILURE. EASTERN EUROPE WAS WALLOWING IN POVERTY. THEN CHINA AND VIETNAM DECIDED TO BE CAPITALISTS AS WELL. THE ONLY ONE THAT REMAINS IS NORTH KOREA... WHICH KEEPS ON THREATENING THE WORLD WITH NUCLEAR HOLOCAUSTS.
SO, REMEMBER THIS:
DON'T ALLOW YOURSELVES TO BE FOOLED BY THE COMMUNISTS AND THE ATHEISTS EITHER FROM U.P. OR WHEREVER. THEY KEEP ON RALLYING AND RALLYING DEMANDING FREEDOM AND CRITICIZING THE CHURCH AND OTHERS, EXCEPT THEMSELVES. ONCE, THEY ARE IN POWER THEY WILL MURDER US ALL AND REMOVE ALL OUR FREEDOMS.
THANKS BE TO GOD OUR COUNTRY DIDN'T FELL INTO COMMUNISM THANKS TO CARDINAL SIN AND TITA CORY WHO WORKED HAND IN HAND IN RESTORING DEMOCRACY TO OUR LAND AND DEFEAT THE FORCES OF THE ATHEISTS FROM THE LEFT AND THE REBEL SOLDIERS FROM THE RIGHT. THE EDSA REVOLUTION WHICH IS A MARIAN MIRACLE SAVED OUR COUNTRY FROM THE SATANIC ATHEISTIC-COMMUNISM WHO ARE PROPONENTS OF CONTRACEPTION AND ABORTIONS AND MURDERERS OF CATHOLICS.
ISN'T IT OBVIOUS HOW THESE ATHEISTS, AGNOSTICS, CONDOMISTS AND ABORTIONISTS HATE SO MUCH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH? THEY DON'T HAVE GOD... THEIR gods IS THEIR FLESH. IT IS SATANIC IN ORIGIN.
[Do you talk like that in church?]
ReplyDeleteNO, BECAUSE THE ENEMIES OF THE CHURCH ARE NOT ATTENDING MY MASSES BUT I MEET THEM IN THIS BLOG. SO I PREACH INSIDE OUR CHURCHES AND I FIGHT THE ANTI-CATHOLICS AND THE CONDOMISTS IN THIS BLOG. ANY PROBLEM WITH THAT?
[Do you think God is proud of your actions?]
VOX POPULI VOX DEI. AS YOU CAN SEE OUR PEOPLE APPRECIATE WHAT I AM DOING. THEY ARE HAPPY THAT THEIR PRIEST IS FIGHTING FOR THEM AND NOT ONLY SILENT INSIDE THE CONVENT.
[I am a Christian and I just have to say that I am embarrassed to be on the same side as you.]
I DOUBT IF YOU ARE TRULY A CHRISTIAN. YOU ARE SIMPLY ONE OF THE CONDOMISTS PRETENDING TO BE A CHRISTIAN TO SILENCE ME. EVEN SATAN CAN PRETEND TO BE AN ANGEL OF LIGHT, DO YOU KNOW THAT?
[How did you become a priest?]
I WAS ORDAINED BY MY BISHOP AFTER MORE THAN A DECADE OF FORMATION IN THE SEMINARY. ARE YOU IGNORANT OF THAT PROCESS?
[Are the standards so low that you passed?]
ACTUALLY THE STANDARDS ARE VERY HIGH BUT THANKS BE TO GOD I PASSED WITH FLYING COLORS. HAPPY? HA HA HA...
[You have no respect.]
I DONT HAVE RESPECT FOR CONDOMS AND ABORTIONS AND FOR WHATEVER LAW THAT PROMOTES INTRINSICALLY EVIL ACTS, MUCH MORE OF THOSE THAT ATTACKS OUR CATHOLIC FAITH. IF YOU WANT TO BE RESPECTED BE RESPECTABLE. I DON'T HAVE RESPECT TO PEOPLE WHO ARE ATTACKING THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SO THAT THEY CAN FORNICATE AS LONG AS THEY WANT WITH PUBLIC FUNDS TO FUEL THEIR COPULATIONS.
[You do not have to speak like that to make a point.]
I NEED TO SPEAK LIKE THAT BECAUSE OUR OPPONENTS ARE SPEAKING LIKE THAT. THEY WILL UNDERSTAND THEIR OWN MANNER OF SPEAKING SUCH AS BEING FRANK AND DIRECT, STINGING AND FIGHTING.
[It's easier to convince people if you speak calmly and avoid going against their principles.]
THE CONVINCING IS DONE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE STILL SEARCHING FOR TRUTH. THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, THEY ARE HERE TO ATTACK. THE ATTACKERS MUST BE REPULSED NOT BE CONVINCED. WE WILL DO THE CONVINCING AFTER WE DEFEAT THEM. OTHERWISE, IF THEY WIN OVER US IT WILL BE IMPOSSIBLE TO CONVINCE BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE UPPER HAND. THEY WILL BRAINWASH OUR PEOPLE.
kaya lalong dumadami ang mga taong nag lilive-in,dahil sa mga kunsintidor na pumapabor sa RH BILL na yan.
ReplyDeleteKudos Father Abe and all pro-lifers in the Philippines! I´m a Filipino SVD Missionary working here in Argentina. Libre po dito ang condoms sa kanila at personal ko pong na saksihan ang "negative effects" nito sa mga kabataan at pati narin sa pamilya. Very common among youths (as early as 13-14 years old) ang pagkakaroon ng multiple partners. Ito din ang kadalasang nangyayari sa mga mag-asawa na karamihan ay humahantong sa hiwalayan. At sa bandang huli ang mga anak ang nag suffer. ANg masama pa ay malimit nagiging cycle ito sa isang pamilya sapagkat nangayari din ito sa kanilang mga anak.
ReplyDeleteTHANK YOU VERY MUCH EMY...
ReplyDeleteTHANK YOU VERY MUCH FR. JAKE. WE SALUTE YOUR MISSIONARY WORKS THERE IN ARGENTINA. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORKS.
ReplyDeleteTHAT IS THE REASON WHY FATHER WE DON'T WANT TO GIVE AN INCH TO THE ENEMIES OF LIFE HERE IN OUR COUNTRY. WE WILL FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL FOR THE GOSPEL OF LIFE. WE DONT WANT TO SING "DON'T CRY FOR ME ARGENTINA" LATER ON DUE TO THE MORAL AND SPIRITUAL AND ECONOMIC DAMAGE THAT THIS WILL WILL BRING TO OUR BEAUTIFUL LAND. PLEASE PRAY FOR US.
[fr abe, dude, check your grammar. haha]
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA... YOU ARE SO GREAT IN GRAMMAR. CLAP CLAP CLAP. HAPPY? HA HA HA...
[abortion is just wrong, so wrong and evil. but with condoms, i think it's fine. i mean there's no life yet right?]
CONDOMS IS WRONG AND EVIL BECAUSE THEY PREVENT LIFE. TERMINATION OF LIFE OR KILLING OF LIFE IS NOT THE ONLY THING THAT IS EVIL IN THIS WORLD. THERE ARE OTHERS. PREVENTING LIFE TO GROW IS ONE OF THEM.
[fr abe, have you ever jerked off when you were a kid? just be honest, you're a priest right?]
HA HA HA... WHY DO I HAVE TO BE HONEST WITH YOU? ARE YOU HONEST WITH ME? HERE YOU ARE MIGS LOPES, IN YOUR RECENTLY GIVEN MESSAGE YOU ARE USING ANOTHER PSEUDO-NAME. HE HE HE... YOU MUST HAVE JERKED OFF A LOT TO THE POINT THAT YOU HAVE SPILT YOUR BRAIN EITHER INSIDE YOUR CONDOMS, OR IN YOUR SHOWER ROOM OR IN YOUR BEDROOM. HA HA HA... TOO MUCH CONDOMS AND PILLS IS DANGEROUS TO YOUR MIND AND VALUES.
[whether your jerked it off inside a condom or in the bathroom or in your bedsheet, it's just the same.. :)]
REALLY? HA HA HA... NO WONDER YOU ARE A JERK!!! HA HA HA....
[and by the way, where in the scripture did it say that we should pray to mary (mother of Jesus)?]
ReplyDeleteOF COURSE, WE CAN PRAY TO MARY BECAUSE MARY IS A CHRISTIAN AND A HUMAN PERSON. PRAYER IS SIMPLY ASKING SOMEONE. IN THE BIBLE PRAYER IS ADDRESSED ALSO TO HUMAN PERSONS:
Gen 12:13 Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister: that it may be well with me for thy sake; and my soul shall live because of thee.
Gen 13:8 And Abram said unto Lot, Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee, and between my herdmen and thy herdmen; for we be brethren.
Gen 13:9 Is not the whole land before thee? separate thyself, I pray thee, from me: if thou wilt take the left hand, then I will go to the right; or if thou depart to the right hand, then I will go to the left.
Gen 16:2 And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai.
Gen 23:13 And he spake unto Ephron in the audience of the people of the land, saying, But if thou wilt give it, I pray thee, hear me: I will give thee money for the field; take it of me, and I will bury my dead there.
Gen 24:2 And Abraham said unto his eldest servant of his house, that ruled over all that he had, Put, I pray thee, thy hand under my thigh:
Gen 25:30 And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage; for I am faint: therefore was his name called Edom.
Gen 27:19 And Jacob said unto his father, I am Esau thy firstborn; I have done according as thou badest me: arise, I pray thee, sit and eat of my venison, that thy soul may bless me.
Exo 4:18 And Moses went and returned to Jethro his father in law, and said unto him, Let me go, I pray thee, and return unto my brethren which are in Egypt, and see whether they be yet alive. And Jethro said to Moses, Go in peace.
ReplyDeleteNum 23:27 And Balak said unto Balaam, Come, I pray thee, I will bring thee unto another place; peradventure it will please God that thou mayest curse me them from thence.
Jos 7:19 And Joshua said unto Achan, My son, give, I pray thee, glory to the LORD God of Israel, and make confession unto him; and tell me now what thou hast done; hide it not from me.
Jdg 4:19 And he said unto her, Give me, I pray thee, a little water to drink; for I am thirsty. And she opened a bottle of milk, and gave him drink, and covered him.
Jdg 11:17 Then Israel sent messengers unto the king of Edom, saying, Let me, I pray thee, pass through thy land: but the king of Edom would not hearken thereto. And in like manner they sent unto the king of Moab: but he would not consent: and Israel abode in Kadesh.
Jdg 13:15 And Manoah said unto the angel of the LORD, I pray thee, let us detain thee, until we shall have made ready a kid for thee.
1Sa 9:18 Then Saul drew near to Samuel in the gate, and said, Tell me, I pray thee, where the seer's house is.
ReplyDelete1Sa 10:15 And Saul's uncle said, Tell me, I pray thee, what Samuel said unto you.
2Sa 1:4 And David said unto him, How went the matter? I pray thee, tell me. And he answered, That the people are fled from the battle, and many of the people also are fallen and dead; and Saul and Jonathan his son are dead also.
2Sa 14:2 And Joab sent to Tekoah, and fetched thence a wise woman, and said unto her, I pray thee, feign thyself to be a mourner, and put on now mourning apparel, and anoint not thyself with oil, but be as a woman that had a long time mourned for the dead:
2Sa 14:12 Then the woman said, Let thine handmaid, I pray thee, speak one word unto my lord the king. And he said, Say on.
2Sa 14:18 Then the king answered and said unto the woman, Hide not from me, I pray thee, the thing that I shall ask thee. And the woman said, Let my lord the king now speak.
1Ki 2:20 Then she said, I desire one small petition of thee; I pray thee, say me not nay. And the king said unto her, Ask on, my mother: for I will not say thee nay.
2Ki 2:2 And Elijah said unto Elisha, Tarry here, I pray thee; for the LORD hath sent me to Bethel. And Elisha said unto him, As the LORD liveth, and as thy soul liveth, I will not leave thee. So they went down to Bethel.
2Ki 2:9 And it came to pass, when they were gone over, that Elijah said unto Elisha, Ask what I shall do for thee, before I be taken away from thee. And Elisha said, I pray thee, let a double portion of thy spirit be upon me.
Isa 29:11 And the vision of all is become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot; for it is sealed:
Isa 36:11 Then said Eliakim and Shebna and Joah unto Rabshakeh, Speak, I pray thee, unto thy servants in the Syrian language; for we understand it: and speak not to us in the Jews' language, in the ears of the people that are on the wall.
Jer 32:8 So Hanameel mine uncle's son came to me in the court of the prison according to the word of the LORD, and said unto me, Buy my field, I pray thee, that is in Anathoth, which is in the country of Benjamin: for the right of inheritance is thine, and the redemption is thine; buy it for thyself. Then I knew that this was the word of the LORD.
Jer 42:2 And said unto Jeremiah the prophet, Let, we beseech thee, our supplication be accepted before thee, and pray for us unto the LORD thy God, even for all this remnant; (for we are left but a few of many, as thine eyes do behold us:)
Jon 1:8 Then said they unto him, Tell us, we pray thee, for whose cause this evil is upon us; What is thine occupation? and whence comest thou? what is thy country? and of what people art thou?
Act 8:34 And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray thee, of whom speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man?
AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE BIBLE, FROM BOTH OLD AND NEW TESTAMENT, PRAYER CAN BE ADDRESSED TO HUMAN BEINGS AND EVEN ANGELS. TO KINGS, PROPHETS, WOMEN, ETC.
she's dead and she can not intercede even if you pray like a gazillion hail maries!
[Jesus said, I am the way, the truth and the life, no one shall come to the Father except through me. (how come you pray to mary? what can she do?)]
HA HA HA... WE DIDN'T SAY THAT JESUS IS NOT THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE SO WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? WHERE DID JESUS SAY THAT WHEN YOU PRAY TO MARY HE IS NO LONGER THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE? WHERE? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE.
YOU ARE INVENTING A DOCTRINE THAT IS NOT BIBLICAL. YOU ARE PROHIBITING SOMETHING THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED BY THE BIBLE.
[she's dead and she can not intercede even if you pray like a gazillion hail maries!]
ReplyDeleteWHERE CAN YOU FIND IN THE BIBLE THAT MARY IS DEAD?
MARY IS ALIVE BECAUSE THE TRUE BELIEVERS OF JESUS WILL NOT DIE AND EVEN IF THEY DIE THEY WILL RISE AND LIVE:
John 11:25-26 Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?
OF COURSE WE BELIEVE THAT. UNFORTUNATELY FOR YOU YOU DEMONICALLY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT.
MOSES DIED ALREADY [Deuteronomy 34:5] AND WAS BURIED ON MOUNT NEBO BUT APOSTLES TESTIFIED THAT HE IS ALIVE AND WAS TALKING WITH JESUS ON MOUNT TABOR DURING THE TRANSFIGURATION:
Matthew 17:3 And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.
MOSES BEING A TRUE SERVANT OF GOD LIKE MARY AS WELL AS ELIJAH ARE ALIVE.
IT MEANS THAT YOU AND YOUR KIND WILL DIE, NOT ONLY YOUR BODIES BUT ALSO YOUR SOULS BUT THE TRUE BELIEVERS OF GOD WILL NOT DIE SPIRITUALLY. THEY ARE ALIVE WITH GOD. AND MARY IS A TRUE BELIEVER OF GOD. SHE IS THE HANDMAID OF THE LORD [LUKE 1:38] AND THE HIGHLY FAVORED OF GOD [LUKE 1:28].
YOU WILL DIE AN IMMORTAL DEATH, YOU BASTARD BUT NOT MARY. BECAUSE SHE IS THE HIGHLY FAVORED OF GOD. YOU ARE A PIECE OF SHIT IN COMPARISON WITH MARY. YOU AND YOUR PASTORS ARE PIECE OF GARBAGE IN COMPARISON WITH MARY THE HIGHLY FAVORED OF GOD.
[Hope you had fun at the playground. :)]
ReplyDeleteHOPE YOU HAD FUN EXPERIENCE YOUR GREASE INSIDE YOUR CONDOMS... ENJOY THE ECSTASY OF YOUR ROTTEN FLESH.
[and why pray to saints and to mary?]
ReplyDeleteALREADY ANSWERED ABOVE. BECAUSE THEY ARE HUMAN BEINGS AND THE BIBLE SHOWS THAT PRAYERS CAN BE ADDRESSED TO HUMAN BEINGS AND ANGELS, TO KINGS AND PROPHETS, TO THE SERVANTS OF GOD. WE ARE ASKING THEM TO PRAY FOR US TO GOD BECAUSE ST. JAMES DECLARED THAT THE PRAYER OF THE RIGHTEOUS PERSONS ARE POWERFUL, EFFICACIOUS AND AVAILS MUCH. I HAVE GIVEN THE BIBLICAL VERSES.
WHERE CAN YOU FIND IN THE BIBLE THE VERSES THAT PROHIBITS PRAYING TO MARY AND THE SAINTS? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE. IKAW NGAYON ANG HINAHAMON MO. ANO LABAN KA?
[they are all dead.. right?]
ARE YOU SURE? JESUS SAID THAT THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN HIM SHALL NEVER DIE. THEY ONLY PASS FROM THIS EARTHLY LIFE TO LIFE IN CHRIST. JESUS CATEGORICALLY EXPLAINED THAT:
Luk 16:22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;
SO, LAZARUS THE BEGGAR DIED AND THE RICH MAN DIED AND WAS BURIED. VERY CLEAR THE CORPSE OF THE RICH MAN AND OF COURSE LAZARUS WERE BURIED. HE HE HE...
Luk 16:23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
SO, IN HELL THE RICH MAN IS ALIVE AND HE WAS LOOKING. IN FACT HE SAW ABRAHAM. IF THE BODY OF THE RICH MAN WAS BURIED IN THE CEMETERY WHO IS THE ONE LOOKING AND SEEING? HE HE HE... FOR US CATHOLICS IT IS HIS SOUL. HIS BODY IS DEAD BUT HIS SOUL IS ALIVE.
ABRAHAM, AN OLD TESTAMENT SAINT, WHO WAS JUSTIFIED BY GOD THROUGH FAITH IS ALIVE. HE HE HE... HE IS NOT DEAD SPIRITUALLY. HIS SOUL IS ALIVE EVEN THOUGH HIS BODY WAS BURIED ALSO IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. HE HE HE...
Luk 16:24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
HA HA HA... THE SOUL OF THE DEAD RICH MAN IS CRYING... SHOUTING. ASKING... PRAYING TO WHOM? TO ABRAHAM... NOT DIRECTLY TO GOD.
Luk 16:25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
ABRAHAM WAS SPEAKING. HE IS TRULY ALIVE. HE IS NOT LIKE THE SOULS OF YOUR DEAD RELATIVES THAT ARE DEAD AS DEAD. ABRAHAM, MOSES, MARY AND OUR CATHOLIC SAINTS ARE ALIVE. YOURS ARE DEAD. HA HA HA... POOR YOU!!! HA HA HA...
[paki sagot naman po o, so that majustify nyo whether your rituals are indeed pleasing to God.]
AYAN ANG SAGOT. OUR RITUALS ARE PLEASING TO GOD BECAUSE OUR RITUAL WAS COMMANDED BY JESUS TO HIS APOSTLES TO DO. JESUS TOOK THE BREAD AND THE WINE AND SAID "THIS IS MY BODY" AND "THIS IS MY BLOOD" AND HE CONCLUDED "DO THIS IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME.
SO THAT IS WHAT WE ARE DOING IN OUR RITUALS. WHILE THE RITUALS OF YOU CONDOMISTS IS THAT YOU ARE REMOVING YOUR PANTS AND YOUR UNDERWEARS THEN YOU INSERT THE CONDOMS, YOU ENJOY UNLIMITED SEX WITHOUT BEGETTING CHILDREN TILL YOU DROP IN ECSTASY AND LOSS OF ENERGY, AND THEN YOU DRINK THE PILLS. WHERE CAN YOU FIND THAT IMMORAL, DEMONIC ACTS IN THE BIBLE? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE. SHOW ME. WE WANT TO SEE HOW GOOD YOU ARE IN THE BIBLE. HA HA HA...
[why didn't you approve my comment?]
ReplyDeleteTHEY ARE APPROVED. IT SO HAPPENED THAT YOUR COMMENT IS FULL OF JERKED OFF SO THAT I DECIDED TO GIVE ATTENTION TO OTHERS AND SET ASIDE YOURS FOR THE MEANTIME. IT IS NOW APPROVED AND ANSWERED POINT BY POINT TO YOUR HEART'S CONTENT. IF YOU HAVE A HEART.
[wala ka bang sagot tunkol sa prayers offered to mary?]
OF COURSE THERE ARE. YOUR QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED IN THIS BLOG A LONG TIME AGO. IT SO HAPPENED THAT YOU POST THAT QUESTION INHERE WHERE THE TOPIC IS RH BILL. OBVIOUSLY, YOU CANNOT DEFEND YOUR DEMONIC USE OF CONDOMS AND PILLS THAT IS WHY YOU ARE RUNNING AWAY TO DIFFERENT TOPIC.
[being catholic has a lot of loopholes and rituals which is not written in the bible..]
DEFINITELY OUR CATHOLIC FAITH IS BIBLICAL AND OUR RITUALS ARE BIBLICAL. IT SO HAPPENED THAT YOU ARE IGNORANT OF THE BIBLE. IT IS YOUR USE OF CONDOMS AND PILLS THAT IS UNBIBLICAL AND DEMONIC IN ORIGIN.
WALANG LOOPHOLES SA AMING MGA RITUALS. ANG MAY LOOPHOLES AY ANG MGA CONDOMS NYO. LAHAT NG BANSANG NAGPAPAGAMIT NG CONDOMS AY DUMADAMI ANG AIDS INFECTED PERSONS. HA HA HA... CONDOM NA BUTAS BUTAS. BUTAS SA HIV VIRUS. HA HA HA...
[bakit nyo pinagbawal noon ang pagbasa ng bible when it is clearly stated in the bible na kailangan ispread ung word?]
HA HA HA... TANGA KA PALA E. KAMI ANG ANG UNANG NAGPALAGANAP NG BIBLE. HA HA HA...
ANG NAG-IMBENTO NG PRINTING PRESS AY ISANG CATHOLIC INVENTOR, SI JOHANNES GUTTENBERG. HINDI SYA CONDOMIST NA TULAD MO KUNDI CATOLICONG TULAD KO. HA HA HA... AT ANG UNANG AKLAT NA INILIMBAG NYA USING THE PRINTING PRESS AY BIBLES.
ANG NAGPALAGANAP NG BIBLIA SA BUONG DAIGDIG AY ANG CATHOLIC CHURCH. GUMAYA LANG KAYO SA AMIN. GAYA GAYA, PUTO MAYA. HA HA HA...
NAKU, GAMITIN ANG UTAK. YAN KASI SA SOBRANG GAMIT NG CONDOM NAMANHID NA PATI UTAK MO. AT DAHIL SA KAIINOM NG PILLS E WALA NANG LAMAN ANG UTAK MO. STERILE NA HINDI LANG ANG ITLOG MO PATI UTAK. HA HA HA...
[bakit merong purgatoryo noon for so many years and ngayon nyo lang iproproclaim na wala pala??]
TANGA KA NAMAN. KELAN NAMIN TINURO NA MERONG PURGATORIO NUON AT NGAYON AY WALA? HA HA HA... KELAN? ANG DOCTRINE OF PURGATORY AY DOCTRINA NG IGLESIA CATOLICA AT HINDI NAMIN SINABING WALA NANG PURGATORIO NGAYON. YAN BA ANG KATANGAHAN NA TINURO SA YO NG MGA PASTOR MO? BOPOL ANG PASTOR MO. HA HA HA... SABIHAN MO NA MAG-ARAL ULI. SAYANG KA, MAGALING KA PA NAMAN SA GRAMMAR KASO KULANG KA SA KAALAMAN. HA HA HA...
NAKU, WAG KANG TATANGA-TANGA, WAG KANG TANGA!!! HA HA HA...
is this what they call theological dance? jumping from 1 church teaching to another so as to overload the apologist and hopefully (for the enemy) to render him incapable of answering many questions? ang sama ng tama ng gong-gong na yan...
ReplyDeleteI am against the RH-BIll!! yes i am not perfect, yes i am a sinner, yes i am inclined to sin due to lust, but i am against evil still!! mahirap maging preso sa kasalanan kaya LABANAN natin ito bago pa tayo makulong ng tuluyan...
Kill the (RH) BILL!
PARA SILANG MGA HALIMAW NA NAG-IIBA IBA NG ANYO. PAG HINDI MAKASAGOT SA POPULATION ISSUE PUPUNTA SA POVERTY ISSUE, PAG TINAMAAN SA POVERTY ISSUE PUPUNTA SA AIDS ISSUE.. PAG NATALO DUON TATAKBO SA MGA DOCTRINAL ISSUE. PATI SI MAMA MARY E TINITIRA NA.
ReplyDeleteMAHIYA NAMAN SILA. VIRGEN AT FULL OF GRACE SI MAMA MARY. SILA NANLALAGKIT GALING SA MGA PANDIKIT SA LOOB NG MGA CONDOMS NILA.
Many years ago Daniel was given a great vision about all the nations of the earth till the end of time. In this vision he saw the last beast to be "diverse from all the others." (Daniel 7:19) But how diverse would it be? According to Revelation 17:3 beast will have a woman riding it. Since prophecy defines a woman as a church, and a beast as a nation. Is there such an entity described in history? Is there a church and state mixed together as one some place today? Yes there is. Only one place on earth has ever done this. THE VATICAN ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH has been established upon this type of union, and is now finalizing plans to use this prophesized church & state structure to obtain global rule in the place of pagan Rome.
ReplyDeleteRevelation 17:3, "So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns."
Now before I define these seven heads I would like to remind you that I am not giving my "private interpretation" of this prophetic symbol. The Word of God states we are never to do this. (See 2Peter 1:20) According to Revelation, that beast the woman is sitting on, that we already defined as the Vatican church & state conglomerate, will have seven heads. But how does prophecy define those seven heads? Look just a few verses lower to find out. The Angel that is showing John this vision actually tells him point blank what those heads actually mean.
Revelation 17:9, "And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth."
The word "mountain" can also be translated out as a hill. Is there a church and state sitting on seven hills somewhere on this world? It is within the city of Rome, called The City on Seven Hills, that the entire area of Vatican State Proper is now confined. See the catholic’s very own ‘The Catholic Encyclopedia’, p. 529.
Rome is known to be built upon seven hills. Rome was said to have been founded when Romulus and Remus, twin sons of Mars, ended up at the foot of the hill Palatine and founded the city. The other six hills are Capitoline (the seat of government), Quirinal, Viminal, Esquiline, Caelian, and Aventine.
Understand first that Daniel 7:23 tells us this Beast will be "diverse from all kingdoms." How diverse you ask? As we define the prophetic symbols we understand this woman that is sitting on the beast is actually a church and a NATION combined. It is what Daniel said. There will be a kingdom that will arise that will be TOTALLY DIFFERENT than any other kingdom that ever existed on Earth. The Vatican fits this perfectly! Never was there a nation that was both a nation and a church that the same time! NEVER! And even if there was, did it have SEVEN HILLS to sit on as we see Rome Italy has being doing since its inception? Do a search online for "SEVEN HILLS' and you will see numerous pages with maps of the city of ROME!
CATHOLICISM IS PAGANISM
[Many years ago Daniel was given a great vision about all the nations of the earth till the end of time. In this vision he saw the last beast to be "diverse from all the others." (Daniel 7:19) But how diverse would it be?] According to Revelation 17:3 beast will have a woman riding it.]
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA… IT IS VERY OBVIOUS THAT YOU JUMPED FROM ONE PASSAGE TO THE OTHER. THE PROPHECY OF THE PROPHET DANIEL DOES NOT SPEAK OF A WOMAN BUT OF A MAN. SO, THERE IS A CONFLICT IN YOUR INTERPRETATION. YOU ARE OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY.
[ Since prophecy defines a woman as a church, and a beast as a nation.]
LIAR, LIAR, LIAR… THE PROPHECY DIDN’T DEFINE A WOMAN AS CHURCH AND A BEAST AS NATION. WHERE IS THAT? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE. YOU ARE HALLUCINATING.
THERE IS NO DEFINITION GIVEN. NO, NO, NO… NOTHING, NADA, NUNCA. IN RUSSIAN: NYET, NYET. HA HA HA… LIAR, LIAR, LIAR.
[Is there such an entity described in history? Is there a church and state mixed together as one some place today? Yes there is. Only one place on earth has ever done this. THE VATICAN ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH has been established upon this type of union, and is now finalizing plans to use this prophesized church & state structure to obtain global rule in the place of pagan Rome.]
HA HA HA… YOU INVENTED A DEFINITION WHEN IN FACT NONE WAS GIVEN AND OUT OF YOUR DELUSIONAL DEFINITION YOU CONCOCTED THAT THE BEAST AND THE WOMAN MEANS CHURCH AND STATE COMBINE. HA HA HA…
ACTUALLY, THE DESCRIPTION GIVEN OF A WOMAN IS NOT A CHURCH BUT A GREAT CITY:
Rev 17:18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.
YOU SEE, THE WOMAN IS NOT REFERRED TO AS CHURCH BUT THE GREAT CITY. IF YOU ARE NOT IGNORANT OF GEOGRAPHY YOU WILL REALIZE THAT THE VATICAN CITY IS ONE OF THE SMALLEST CITIES IN THE WORLD, IF NOT THE SMALLEST. AND AS A STATE IT IS THE SMALLEST STATE IN THE WORLD. HA HA HA… IT IS NOT GREAT ECONOMICALLY BECAUSE IT IS NO MATCH TO NEW YORK, LONDON, PARIS, BERLIN, TOKYO, ETC. IT IS NOT GREAT POLITICALLY BECAUSE IT IS NO MATCH WITH WASHINGTON, MOSCOW, PARIS, LONDON, BEIJING IN DIPLOMACY. IT IS NOT EVEN A MEMBER OF THE GREAT 7 CONSIDERED AS THE MOST POWERFUL NATIONS ON EARTH. IT IS NOT PART OF THE PERMANENT MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED NATIONS UNLIKE THE U.S., RUSSIA, CHINA, BRITAIN, FRANCE, GERMANY, ETC. MILITARILY OUR SWISS GUARD IS NOT EVEN 1,OOO IN NUMBER AND ONLY FOR DECORATIONS MOST OF THE TIME. THEY ARE ATTIRED IN OLD FASHIONED UNIFORMS. HA HA HA…
ONLY AN IDIOT WILL CONSIDER THE VATICAN POWERFUL. IN FACT, PAKISTAN, INDIA AND NORTH KOREA HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS BUT THE VATICAN HAS NONE. HA HA HA…
PLEASE STOP THROWING YOUR STUPIDITIES HERE.
[Revelation 17:3, "So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns."]
ReplyDeleteBLASPHEMIES ARE GRAVE SINS, MORTAL SINS FOR THE ROMAN CATHOLICS. DEFINITELY, THAT GREAT CITY IS NOT REFERRING TO THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH. OUR OFFICIAL MANUAL OF FAITH STATES:
2148 Blasphemy is directly opposed to the second commandment. It consists in uttering against God - inwardly or outwardly - words of hatred, reproach, or defiance; in speaking ill of God; in failing in respect toward him in one's speech; in misusing God's name. St. James condemns those "who blaspheme that honorable name [of Jesus] by which you are called."78 The prohibition of blasphemy extends to language against Christ's Church, the saints, and sacred things. It is also blasphemous to make use of God's name to cover up criminal practices, to reduce peoples to servitude, to torture persons or put them to death. The misuse of God's name to commit a crime can provoke others to repudiate religion.
Blasphemy is contrary to the respect due God and his holy name. It is in itself a grave sin.79
- [Catechism of the Catholic Church #2148]
IT REFERS MORE TO THE PROTESTANTS IN NEW YORK AND LOS ANGELES WHO ARE FAMOUS FOR THEIR BLASPHEMIES AND COURSES SUCH AS “FUCH YOU”, “DAMN YOU”, “SHIT MAN”… AND THE LIKES. THESE ARE NOT CATHOLICS. THESE ARE AMERICAN BLASPHEMIES AND CURSES. IT CAME FROM PEOPLE WHO PRODUCED AND ARE PRODUCING CONDOMS, PILLS AND IUD’s.
BLASPHEMIES ARE PROHIBITED IN THE VATICAN CITY BUT NOT IN WASHINGTON, NEW YORK, LOS ANGELES, PARIS AND MOSCOW AND EVEN METRO MANILA.
[Now before I define these seven heads I would like to remind you that I am not giving my "private interpretation" of this prophetic symbol. The Word of God states we are never to do this. (See 2Peter 1:20)]
LIAR, LIAR LIAR… HA HA HA… WHERE IN THE VERSES THAT YOU HAVE PRESENTED THE STATEMENTS THAT THE WOMAN IS A CHURCH AND THE BEAST A STATE? WHERE? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE. HA HA HA… LIAR, LIAR LIAR.
[According to Revelation, that beast the woman is sitting on, that we already defined as the Vatican church & state conglomerate, will have seven heads.]
ReplyDeleteYOU DEMONICALLY DEFINED IT AS VATICAN CHURCH AND STATE CONGLOMERATE WITHOUT ANY BIBLICAL BASIS AT ALL.
THE WHORE IS MORE APPROPRIATE FOR THOSE WHO UPHOLD CONTRACEPTIONS AND ABORTIONS BECAUSE THEY JUST WANT TO WALLOW IN UNLIMITED SEX AND FORNICATIONS JUST LIKE IN U.S. AND IN EUROPE WHEN PRE-MARITAL SEX, DIVORCE, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, CONTRACEPTIONS AND ABORTIONS ARE WIDE-SPREAD. AND YOU ARE ONE OF THEM. THE PRO-RH BILL IS LIKE A WOMAN IN FORNICATING HEAT LONGING FOR BLOOD THAT WILL SQUIRT IN THE CONDOM OF HER ADULTEROUS LOVER.
THE SEVEN HEADS IS MORE APPROPRIATE TO THE 7 VERSIONS OF RH BILL FILED IN CONGRESS WHOSE GOAL IS TO SATISFY THE UNLIMITED AND CHILDLESS SEX ACTIVITIES OF THE PRO-RH BILL LIKE YOU. THAT IS WHAT WE CALL LEGISLATED HARLOTRY… CONTRACEPTIVE CONGLOMERATE JOINED BY WASHINGTON AND MANILA [THE U.S. CAPITOL AND MALACANANG, OBAMA AND NOYNOY].
[But how does prophecy define those seven heads? Look just a few verses lower to find out. The Angel that is showing John this vision actually tells him point blank what those heads actually mean.
Revelation 17:9, "And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth."
The word "mountain" can also be translated out as a hill. Is there a church and state sitting on seven hills somewhere on this world? It is within the city of Rome, called The City on Seven Hills, that the entire area of Vatican State Proper is now confined.]
HA HA HA… IDIOT. HA HA HA…
THE CITY OF ROME IS UNDER THE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT AND NOT UNDER THE CATHOLIC CHURCH…. STUPID. HE HE HE… THE PRIME MINISTER RUNNING ROME IS BERLUSCONE AND NOT THE POPE. BERLUSCONE HAS BEEN FOUND WITH MANY SEXUAL SCANDALS SUCH AS HAVING SEX WITH TEENAGERS AND HAD AN ADULTEROUS AFFAIR.
ALSO, YOU ARE LYING. THE VATICAN IS CALLED VATICAN BECAUSE IT SITS IN ONLY ONE HILL… ONLY ONE HILL!!! WHAT IS THAT HILL? THE VATICAN HILL. HA HA HA… IDIOT.
ANOTHER THING IS THAT THE VATICAN IS NOT PART OF THE SEVEN HILLS OF ROME, NEVER EVER. THE SEVEN HILLS OF ROME BELONGS TO THE TERRITORY OF THE PAGAN ROME WHICH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DEFEATED WHILE THE VATICAN IS SEPARATED FROM THE SEVEN HILLS BY THE TIBER RIVER. HA HA HA… LIAR LIAR LIAR!!! HE HE HE..
WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE SEVEN HILLS OF ROME:
ReplyDelete1. PALATINE HILL
2. AVENTINE HILL
3. CAPITOLINE HILL
4. QUIRINAL HILL
5. VIMINAL HILL
6. ESQUILINE HILL
7. CAELIAN HILL
OUR CATHOLIC RESPONSE:
1. The Whore of Babylon refers to the Pagan Rome and its Evil Emperors who persecuted the Christian CATHOLICS by feeding them to the Lions, Beheading and Crucifying them on the streets and in the Roman Colisseum and even burning them alive.
In fact, CHECK THE 7 HILLS OF ROME. NONE OF THEM IS VATICAN HILL!
THE CENTER OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS NOT IN ANCIENT ROME WHICH WAS THE SEAT OF EMPEROR NERO, CALIGULA, ETC. BUT THE VATICAN HILL THE PLACE OF MARTYRDOM AND BURIAL OF ST. PETER THE APOSTLE. THAT PLACE IS BEYOND THE TIBER RIVER AND NOT PART OF THE SEVEN HILLS OF ROME.
2. The Church that defeated Roman Paganism and stopped the Persecutions of Christians is THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH. She did that by the grace of God when Emperor Constantine became Christian. His mother was Catholic, The Empress Helena, a very holy and pious woman. In fact, she is a Catholic Saint.
It says that the Whore of Babylon shall be destroyed. Indeed, the Pagan Rome was destroyed... defeated by CATHOLICS. Now the Roman Coliseum where the Christians were being fed to the lions is now owned by the CATHOLIC CHURCH.
3. Rome is not the only City known as The City of Seven Hills. There is another. Actually there are many others. Including JERUSALEM:
HERE IS THE LIST OF THE SEVEN HILLS OF JERUSALEM:
ReplyDelete1) The northern summit (hill) is called Scopus [Hill One],
2) The middle summit (hill) was called Nob [Hill Two],
3) The highest point of Olivet itself, and the southern summit (hill) was called in the Holy Scriptures the "Mount of Corruption" or "Mount of Offence" [Hill Three] (II Kings 23:13).
4)On the middle ridge between the Kedron and the Tyropoeon Valleys there was (formerly) in the south "Mount Zion" [Hill Four] (the original "Mount Zion" and not the later southwest hill that was later called by that name),
5) The "Ophel Mount" [Hill Five],
6) To the north of that the "Rock" around which "Fort Antonia" was built [Hill Six],
7) And finally, there was the southwest hill itself [Hill Seven] that finally became known in the time of Simon the Hasmonean as the new "Mount Zion."
The false Christ will come to Jerusalem (the "City of Seven Hills") in order to rule the world, NOT to Rome in Italy!
cf. http://www.askelm.com/prophecy/p000201.htm
This corresponds to the earlier statement of St. John that the place of persecution of the Church and murderers of saints is "the place where the Lord was crucified":
Rev 11:8 "And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified."
What City is that? JERUSALEM NOT ROME and defInitely NOT THE VATICAN CITY.
AS A BONUS, HERE IS THE LIST OF CITIES WITH SEVEN HILLS FROM THE WIKIPEDIA:
ReplyDeleteList of cities claimed to be built on seven hills
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Amman, Jordan, Originally spread over seven hills like Rome, Amman now covers at least nineteen hills. The highest hill is Citadel Hill/Jabal el Qala,
Asunción, Paraguay, There are several small hills and slightly elevated areas throughout the city, including Cabará, Clavel, Tarumá, Cachinga, and Tacumbú, among others.
Bamberg, Bavaria, Germany, The seven hills of Bamberg are; Cathedral Hill, Michaelsberg, Kaulberg/Obere Pfarre, Stefansberg, Jakobsberg, Altenburger Hill, and Abtsberg.
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain said to be built on Mont Tàber, La Rovira, El Coll, El Carmel, La Peira, El Putxet and Montjuïc
Bath, England
Brussels, Belgium, said to be built on St.Michielsberg, Koudenberg, Warmoesberg, Kruidtuin, Kunstberg, Zavel and St.Pietersberg
Budapest, Hungary
Cagliari, Sardinia
Ceuta, Spain
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Dunedin, New Zealand
Edinburgh, Scotland
Gorzów, Poland
Guaranda, Ecuador
Iaşi, Romania (see Seven hills of Iaşi)
Istanbul, Turkey (see Seven hills of Istanbul)
Jerusalem, Israel [1], the northern summit (hill) is called Scopus [Hill One], The middle summit (hill) was called Nob [Hill Two], The highest point of Olivet itself, and the southern summit (hill) was called in the Holy Scriptures the "Mount of Corruption" or "Mount of Offence" [Hill Three] (II Kings 23:13), on the middle ridge between the Kedron and the Tyropoeon Valleys there was (formerly) in the south "Mount Zion" [Hill Four] (the original "Mount Zion" and not the later southwest hill that was later called by that name), the "Ophel Mount" [Hill Five], to the north of that the "Rock" around which "Fort Antonia" was built [Hill Six], and the southwest hill itself [Hill Seven] that finally became known in the time of Simon the Hasmonean as the new "Mount Zion."
Kampala, Uganda built on Mengo, Lubaga, Namirembe, Old Kampala, Kibuli, Nakasero and Makerere
Kiev, Ukraine [2]
Lisbon, Portugal
Los Angeles, California, United States
Lynchburg, Virginia, United States
Lviv, Ukraine
Macau
Mecca, Saudi Arabia
Melbourne, Australia
Moscow, Russia (See Seven hills of Moscow)
Nevada City, California, United States, built on Piety, Lost, Prospect, Aristocracy, Boulder, Nabob, and Buckeye Hills
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Nixa, Missouri, United States
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Prague, Czech Republic, said to be built on seven or nine hills: Hradčany, Vítkov, (Opyš), Větrov, Skalka, (Emauzy), Vyšehrad, Karlov and Petřín
Providence, Rhode Island, built on Christian Hill, College Hill, Constitution Hill, Federal Hill, Smith Hill, Tockwotten Hill, and Weybosset Hill.
Pula, Croatia
Richmond, Virginia, United States, built on numerous hills and escarpments to include Union Hill, Church Hill, Council Hill, Shockoe Hill, Gambles Hill, Navy Hill and Oregon Hill.
Rome, Georgia, United States
Rome, Italy (see Seven hills of Rome)
Saint-Étienne, France
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
San Diego, California, United States
San Francisco, California, United States (see List of hills in San Francisco, California)
Seattle, Washington, United States (see Seven hills of Seattle)
Sheffield, England
Somerville, Massachusetts, United States
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Tehran, Iran
Thiruvananthapuram, India
Tirumala, India
Torquay, England
Turku, Finland
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, built on Airport Hill, Bancroft Hill, Belmont Hill, Grafton Hill, Green Hill, Pakachoag Hill, and Vernon Hill.
Zevenbergen, Netherlands
HABANG TUMATAGAL DUMADAMI ANG MGA KATANGAHAN NG MGA PRO-RH BILL. HA HA HA…
ReplyDelete[See the catholic’s very own ‘The Catholic Encyclopedia’, p. 529.]
EXCUSE ME, WHAT VOLUME OF THE CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA? THERE ARE SEVERAL VOLUMES. I THINK YOU DO NOT OWN A REAL COPY OF THE ENCYCLOPEDIA. YOU ARE SIMPLY BRAGGING THINGS YOU ARE ACTUALLY IGNORANT OF.
[Rome is known to be built upon seven hills.]
ROME IS BUILT ON SEVEN HILLS, BUT NOT ONLY ROME. JERUSALEM, CONSTANTINOPLE, PHILADELPHIA AND OTHERS. AS LISTED ABOVE BY THE WIKIPEDIA THERE ARE 51 CITIES WITH 7 HILLS. YOU SEE HOW DECEPTIVE YOU ARE.
AND MUCH MORE, IT IS ROME THAT IS BUILT ON SEVEN HILLS NOT THE VATICAN. HA HA HA…
[Rome was said to have been founded when Romulus and Remus, twin sons of Mars, ended up at the foot of the hill Palatine and founded the city. The other six hills are Capitoline (the seat of government), Quirinal, Viminal, Esquiline, Caelian, and Aventine.]
YOU SEE, THIS IDIOT KNOWS THE LIST OF THE SEVEN HILLS AND IT ONLY SUPPORTS OUR ARGUMENT THAT THE VATICAN IS NOT IN ANY OF THE SEVEN HILLS. THE WOMAN SITS ON THE SEVEN HILLS NOT OUTSIDE OF THE SEVEN HILLS. HA HA HA…
[Understand first that Daniel 7:23 tells us this Beast will be "diverse from all kingdoms." How diverse you ask? As we define the prophetic symbols we understand this woman that is sitting on the beast is actually a church and a NATION combined.]
HA HA HA… NOTHING OF THAT SORT STATED IN THE BIBLE. THE WOMAN IS A GREAT CITY NOT A CHURCH. SHE IS A GREAT CITY. THE VATICAN IS ONE OF THE SMALLEST CITIES, ONE OF THE MOST INSIGNIFICANT MILITARILY, POLITICALLY, ECONOMICALLY…
[It is what Daniel said.]
ReplyDeleteTHE PROPHET DANIEL DIDN’T SAY THAT THE BEAST IS A CHURCH AND STATE CONGLOMERATE. WHERE DID HE SAY THAT? CHAPTER AND VERSE PLEASE.
[There will be a kingdom that will arise that will be TOTALLY DIFFERENT than any other kingdom that ever existed on Earth.]
HA HA HA… ANOTHER STUPIDITY. TIBET WAS THE SAME WITH VATICAN. IT WAS A CENTER OF RELIGION OF BUDDHISM AND AT THE SAME TIME THE DALAI LAMA WAS THE NATION’S LEADER. AND IT WAS ALSO THE SAME DURING THE TIME OF MOSES FOR ISRAEL. MOSES WAS THE LEADER OF THE FAITH AND OF THE NATION OF ISRAEL. SO, TO CLAIM THAT THE VATICAN IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT IS A MANIFESTATION OF PATHETIC FOOLISHNESS. YOU HAVE HAD AN OVERDOSE OF PILLS AND CONDOMS. HAVE MERCY ON YOUR SOUL. HE HE HE…
[The Vatican fits this perfectly! Never was there a nation that was both a nation and a church that the same time! NEVER!]
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA… IDIOT.
THE VATICAN IS UNIQUE BECAUSE IT IS A KINGDOM OF PRIESTS RUN BY BAPTIZED BELIEVERS OF CHRIST WITH BISHOPS, PRIESTS AND DEACONS:
1 Peter 2:5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.
1 Peter 2:9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:
THE UNIQUENESS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE FACT THAT IT IS A ROYAL PRIESTHOOD. IN THE TRANSLATIONS OF THE CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH VERSION: “You are a group of royal priests”. HA HA HA… WHAT IS THAT? THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. THAT IS WHY WE ARE UNIQUE. BECAUSE WE ARE THE TRUE BELIEVERS OF CHRIST. WE ARE A KINGDOM OF PRIESTS AND A HOLY NATION. IT IS BOTH A CHURCH i.e., FELLOWSHIP OF THE BAPTIZED BELIEVERS OF CHRIST, AND A HOLY NATION. CHURCH AND NATION COMBINED. HE HE HE…
[And even if there was, did it have SEVEN HILLS to sit on as we see Rome Italy has being doing since its inception? Do a search online for "SEVEN HILLS' and you will see numerous pages with maps of the city of ROME!]
ReplyDeleteTHAT IS RIGHT AND THE CITY OF ROME IS UNDER THE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT NOT OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. OURS IS THE VATICAN CITY WHICH IS NOT A GREAT CITY. HE HE HE…
NOW, LET ME CHECK THE CITATION OF THE PROPHET DANIEL AND LET US CHECK THE VERSES ONE BY ONE:
Dan 7:19 [KJV] Then I would know the truth of the fourth beast, which was diverse from all the others, exceeding dreadful, whose teeth were of iron, and his nails of brass; which devoured, brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with his feet;
LOOK AT THE PRONOUNS USED IN DESCRIBING THE BEAST. IT IS “HIS”… MEANING THE BEAST IS NOT A WOMAN BUT A MAN. HE HE HE…
MUCH MORE, WHAT WILL THIS BEAST DO AGAINST GOD? HERE IS THE ANSWER IN THE NEXT VERSES:
Dan 7:20 And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more stout than his fellows.
Dan 7:21 I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;
SEE, THE HORN OF THE BEAST SHALL DECLARE WAR WITH THE SAINTS. WHO HAS THE SAINTS? CATHOLICS. ONLY THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS SAINTS. REAL SAINTS SUCH AS MARTYRS FOR CHRIST. THE SAINTS WHO HAVE BEEN MARTYRED BY THE PAGAN ROMANS IN THE COLISEUM OF ROME ARE CATHOLICS, THE SAME THING TO THOSE IMPRISONED AND KILLED BY THE COMMUNISTS. THEY ARE CATHOLIC SAINTS.
THE PRO-RH BILL, THE IGLESIA NI MANALO, THE BORN AGAIN, THE JEHOVA WITNESSES OR SAKSI NI BAHO, THE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS ARE ATTACKING THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND ITS SAINTS.
HA HA HA… OBVIOUSLY, THE BEAST REFERS TO THE ENEMY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BECAUSE WE ARE NOT ENEMIES OF SAINTS. WE LOVE THE SAINTS… WE HONOUR AND VENERATE THEM WHILE WE WORSHIP AND ADORE GOD.
Dan 7:22 Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom.
ReplyDeleteTHE SAINTS SHALL POSSESSED THE KINGDOM. HE HE HE … IT REFERS TO THE VICTORY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH LED BY ITS SAINTS. AS YOU CAN SEE THE ROMAN COLISEUM WHERE THOUSANDS OF OUR MEMBERS WERE FED TO THE LIONS OR BLUDGEONED BY THE GLADIATORS IS NOW BELONGING TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
THEN, IT IS ALSO SUPPORTIVE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BECAUSE WE HAVE A KINGDOM POSSESSED BY THE SAINTS. SO, WHAT IS THE OTHER NAME OF THE VATICAN? ST. PETER’S SQUARE AND ST. PETER’S BASILICA. HA HA HA… WHAT ELSE? BASILICA OF ST. PAUL OUTSIDE THE WALLS. HA HA HA… WHAT ELSE? BASILICA OF ST. MARY MAJOR. HA HA HA… WHAT ELSE? BASILICA OF ST. JOHN LATERAN. HA HA HA… PURO SAINTS. THE KINGDOM AND NATION BELONGS TO THE ROYAL PRIESTS AND POSSESSED BY SAINTS. THAT IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. HINDI YAN MGA MANOLISTA, MGA BORN AGAIN O MGA SAKSI NI BAHO.
Dan 7:23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.
Dan 7:24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.
HOW ABOUT THE SOVIET EMPIRE OF THE COMMUNISTS? IS THERE A SOVIET EMPIRE BEFORE IT? NONE. IT WAS UNIQUE. WAS THERE A COMMUNIST EMPIRE BEFORE IT? NONE. IT WAS THE FIRST. THEN IT SUITS THEM.
Dan 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
AGAIN, THE BEAST SHALL UTTER GREAT WORDS AGAINST GOD AND SHALL FIGHT THE SAINTS. CATHOLICS WORSHIPS GOD. EVERY HOLY MASS WE SING: “GLORY TO GOD IN THE HIGHEST AND PEACE TO HIS PEOPLE ON EARTH.” BUT THE CONDOMIST AMERICANS ALWAYS SAY: “FUCK… GOD DAMNED.” ISN’T IT TRUE? EVEN IN THEIR MOVIES THEY ARE SAYING THAT. IT IS A COMMON EXPRESSION FOR THE CONDOMISTS AMERICANS WHO LEGALIZED ABORTIONS.
Dan 7:26 But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end.
Dan 7:27 And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.
THE CATHOLIC SAINTS SHALL DEFEAT THE BEAST. AND IT WILL HAVE A KINGDOM THAT WILL NOT END. THAT IS WHY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS ALREADY ABOUT 2,000 YEARS BUT IT IS STILL INDESTRUCTIBLE. THE ANTI-CATHOLICS LIKE YOU EXERT SO MUCH EFFORT TO ATTACK OUR CHURCH AND OUR SAINTS BECAUSE YOU ARE A FOLLOWER OF THE BEAST MENTIONED BY DANIEL AND THE HARLOT MENTIONED IN REVELATION.
NOW LET ME CHECK THE DESCRIPTION IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION:
ReplyDeleteRev 17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
Rev 17:4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
Rev 17:5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
THERE IS NO INDICATION AT ALL THAT THE WOMAN IS A CHURCH AND A STATE CONGLOMERATE. NO, NO, NO… NADA, NUNCA… IN RUSSIAN: NYET NYET. HA HA HA…
Rev 17:6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
SEE, THE WOMAN IS DRUNK WITH THE BLOOD OF THE SAINTS AND THE MARTYRS OF JESUS. IT MEANS SHE KILLED A LOT OF SAINTS AND MARTYRS OF JESUS. WHO ARE THESE MARTYRS AND SAINTS OF JESUS? THEY ARE CATHOLICS. THEY ARE OUR SAINTS.
MEANING, THE WOMAN OR THE BEAST IS NOT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, RATHER THEY ARE THE ENEMIES OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. THAT INCLUDES THE ANTI-CATHOLICS MANOLISTA, SABADISTA, SAKSI NI BAHO, BORN AGAIN AT IBA PA. KASAMA NA RIN DIYAN ANG MGA ABORTIONISTA, CONDOMISTA, SI-PILL-ISTA, COMUNISTA AT IBA PA. KASAMA KA RON, MAGKAKAURI KAYO. KABILANG KAYO SA PWERSA NG HALIMAW. MGA HALIMAW KAYO SA BANGA.
[I'm new here. If you could enlighten me father, I have been reading the RH Bill and I'd like to know specifically what parts of it the Church finds offensive. If you can please quote the specific provision of the law and why it is against the word of God.]
ReplyDeleteSORRY FOR PAYING ATTENTION TO THIS QUESTION QUITE VERY LATE ALREADY. I THOUGHT THAT I ALREADY APPROVED THIS ONE AND I FOUND OUT THAT IT WAS NOT YET.
INSTEAD OF MAKING MY OWN PRESENTATION LET ME SHARE THE ANSWER GIVEN BY OTHER PRO-LIFE IN THE NET:
What does the Bible say about contraception?
by Jason T. Adams, MA
The Second Vatican Council’s statement on Divine Revelation teaches us that interpretation of the Sacred Scriptures must devote attention to “the content and unity of the whole of scripture, taking into account the tradition of the entire Church.”1 Much more than a moral manual or a doctrinal concordance, the Bible is an inspired expression of the faith and life of the Church. In contrast to the legalism of the Pharisees, the revelation of Christ was/is comprehensive, describing the positive fulfillment of the demands of love. Our application of this revelation to the specific moral questions of our age, in this case contraception, involves submitting our actions to the standard of life-giving love established by God, both in his fathering of the chosen people of old, and in his redemption of the New Israel.
The morality of contraception must be viewed in this light, that is, in the light of God’s ineffable love for human life and his plan for its transmission. Looking to the Bible for guidance on the issue of contraception must consider the Bible’s revelation of the sovereignty of God over creation and His plan for marriage. It must also recognize that Scripture reveals children as the supreme gift of marriage and a blessing from God.
Subverting the sovereignty of God: the deliberate act of rendering a sexual act infertile
Genesis 38:8-10
The Bible contains teachings relevant to contraception on a variety of levels. The most direct of these references is Genesis 38:8-10, the Onan Incident:
Then Judah said to Onan, “Go in to your brother’s wife, and perform your duty as a brother-in-law to her, and raise up offspring for your brother.” And Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so it came about that when he went in to his brother’s wife, he wasted his seed on the ground, in order not to give offspring to his brother. But what he did was displeasing in the sight of the Lord, so He took his life also.
Though God was certainly displeased with Onan’s disobedience to the Levirate Law: that is, the obligation of a man to sow children with his dead brother’s widow, his punishment for Onan far exceeded the penalty mandated for such a crime. According to Deuteronomy 25:5-10, the penalty is for the slighted widow to publicly humiliate the offender. God’s enactment of the death penalty for Onan indicates a heightened seriousness in the offense. The only additional element to Onan’s refusal to provide offspring is his choice to make the sexual act deliberately infertile by withdrawal.
That Onan’s punishment was due to his use of contraception is pointed out by Pope Pius XI in his encyclical Casti Connubii:
ReplyDeleteSmall wonder, therefore, if Holy Writ bears witness that the Divine Majesty regards with greatest detestation this horrible crime [contraception] and at times has punished it with death. As St. Augustine notes, ‘Intercourse even with one’s legitimate wife is unlawful and wicked where the conception of the offspring is prevented. Onan, the son of Judah, did this and the Lord killed him for it’ (55).
Even the most notable Protestant theologians agree on this point. Martin Luther, for example, equates Onan’s action with sodomy:
Onan must have been a malicious and incorrigible scoundrel. This is a most disgraceful sin. . . . We call it unchastity, yes, a Sodomitic sin. For Onan goes in to her; that is, he lies with her and copulates, and when it comes to the point of insemination, spills the semen, lest the woman conceive. Surely at such a time the order of nature established by God in procreation should be followed (Commentary on Genesis 38:8-10).2
Likewise, John Calvin, founder of Calvinism and other sects of Calvinist extraction such as Presbyterians and the United Church of Christ, calls Onan’s withdrawal “monstrous”:
Besides, he [Onan] not only defrauded his brother of the right due him, but also preferred his semen to putrify on the ground, rather than to beget a son in his brother’s name. The voluntary spilling of semen outside intercourse between man and woman is a monstrous thing. Deliberately to withdraw from coitus in order that semen may fall on the ground is doubly monstrous (Commentary on Genesis 38:8-10).3
Offspring are the supreme gift of marriage, a blessing from God through which God is revealed to the world.
ReplyDeleteThe Image and Likeness of God
Genesis 1:27-28
“God created man in his image, in the divine image he created him; male and female he created them. God blessed them, saying: ‘Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.’”
Genesis 9:1
“God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them: ‘Be fertile and multiply and fill the earth.’”
Guadium et Spes, the Second Vatican Council’s Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, discusses God’s primordial plan for marriage and its natural openness to fertility:
Children are the supreme gift of marriage and contribute greatly to the good of the parents themselves. God himself said: ‘It is not good that man should be alone,’ and ‘from the beginning [he] made them male and female’; wishing to associate them in a special way in his own creative work, God blessed man and woman with the words: ‘Be fruitful and multiply.’ Hence, true married love and the whole structure of family life which results from it, without diminishment of the other ends of marriage, are directed to disposing the spouses to cooperate valiantly with the love of the Creator and Savior, who through them will increase and enrich his family from day to day (no.50).
Endowed with the gift and responsibility to participate in God’s redemption of humanity, the married couple perpetuates and projects the image and likeness of God in its transmission of life. In his explanation of the vows of Catholic marriage and the question as to whether the new couple will accept children from the Lord, Pope John Paul II teaches:
“When the Church asks ‘Are you willing?’ she is reminding the bride and groom that they stand before the creative power of God. They are called to become parents, to cooperate with the Creator in giving life. Cooperating with God to call new human beings into existence means contributing to the transmission of that divine image and likeness of which everyone ‘born of a woman’ is a bearer.”4
The procreation of children is a further revelation of the image and likeness of God in that it creates a communion of persons, a family, which signifies the communion of persons essential to Christ. “The Christian family is a communion of persons, a sign and image of the communion of the Father and the Son in the Holy Spirit. In the procreation and education of children it reflects the Father’s work of creation” (CCC 2205).
ReplyDeleteMalachi 2:14-15
“.the Lord is witness between you and the wife of your youth, with whom you have broken faith though she is your companion, your betrothed wife. Did he not make one being, with flesh and spirit: and what does that one require but godly offspring?”
While this verse occurs in the context of a discourse on the infidelity of God’s people to the covenant wherein idolatry is likened to adultery, the point still holds. The analogy would make no sense if offspring were not customarily considered a necessary good of marriage. In other words, it is clear that offspring were considered the natural sign of a one-flesh union.
1 Timothy 2:15
“She will be saved through childbearing, provided she continues in faith and love and holiness-her chastity being taken for granted.”
Here Paul proclaims the great dignity of the vocation of motherhood and its indispensable role in the plan of God for the salvation of parents. St. Paul, moreover, implies that the whole body of Christ benefits from cherishing the transmission of human life; for when a mother cooperates with God in the creation of new life and its Christian formation, she contributes to the building up of the Christian community. By definition, a vocation is a pathway of holiness that exists to fortify the Kingdom of God. Childbearing, depicted by Paul as a vocation, is no exception.
Catechism Connection: Children Are a Blessing from God
ReplyDelete“Sacred Scripture and the Church’s traditional practice see in large families a sign of God’s blessing and the parents’ generosity.” Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2373
Psalm 127:3-5
“Behold sons are a gift from the Lord; the fruit of the womb is a reward. Like arrows in the hand of a warrior are the sons of one’s youth. Happy the man whose quiver is filled with them; they shall not be put to shame when they contend with the enemies at the gate.”
Psalm 128:1-4
“Happy are those who fear the Lord, who walk in his ways! For you shall eat the fruit of your handiwork; happy shall you be, and favored. Your wife shall be like a fruitful vine in the recesses of your home; your children like olive plants around your table. Behold, thus is the man blessed who fears the Lord.”
Exodus 23:25-26
“The Lord, your God, you shall worship; then I will bless your food and drink, and I will remove all sickness from your midst; no woman in your land will be barren or miscarry; and I will give you a full span of life.”
Deuteronomy 7:13-14
“As your reward for heeding these decrees and observing them carefully, the Lord, your God, will keep with you the merciful covenant which he promised on oath to your fathers. He will love and bless and multiply you; he will bless the fruit of your womb.. You will be blessed above all peoples; no man or woman among you shall be childless..”
Not only do these passages portray children as a natural blessing but as a transcendent blessing for fidelity to the covenant. As such, they are the best of what God offers for they are not just the natural reward of a well-ordered life but a divine premium that comes from the inner life of God. Before we receive them, they exist in the mind of God, worthy of his forethought and of his love. The Psalmist says, “Truly you have formed my inmost being; you knit me in my mother’s womb” (Ps 139:13). How could we view children as anything but precious gifts into which God pours his very being-gifts that come from His heart to be received with awe and gratitude?
For this reason “Sacred Scripture and the Church’s traditional practice see in large families a sign of God’s blessing and the parents’ generosity”(CCC 2373). Vatican II likewise teaches, “Among the married couples who thus fulfill their God-given mission, special mention should be made of those who after prudent reflection and joint decision courageously undertake the rearing of a large family” (GS 50).
Pharmakos and pharmakeia in the New Testament (Gal. 5: 19-26, Rev. 9:21, Rev. 21:8)
ReplyDeleteSome scholars (cf Kimberly Hahn in Life-Giving Love 5) hold that these New Testament words represent, in context, a stinging condemnation of contraception and chemical abortion. Usually translated as “sorcerer” and “sorcery,” they refer more specifically to a mixer of potions or to the potions themselves, medicines that were commonly directed at preventing fertility or at achieving abortion.
“Nor did they repent of their murders, their magic potions, their unchastity, or their robberies.” Rev 9:21
“But as for cowards, the unfaithful, the depraved, murderers, the unchaste, sorcerers, idol-worshipers, and deceivers of every sort, their lot is in the burning pool of fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” Rev. 21: 8
Summary
ReplyDeletePutting the whole picture together, we start with God’s “first commandment” to “increase and multiply,” we browse through the Old Testament in which children are seen as some of the best blessings of God and even as a requirement for His people, and we finish with contraceptive practices being classed with “immorality, impurity, licentiousness, and idolatry” and also with “murders, unchastity, and robberies.”
As we try to put on the heart of God, as revealed in the Scriptures, one of the main themes we encounter is His overflowing love for human life and especially for children. The fierce condemnation of immorality and of contraception in particular appear to reflect God’s great desire that people enjoy the full joys and healing that come from loving family life and service to children.
What to do?
All of us are closely connected to people involved with contraception and many of us have used contraceptives or are still doing so. Many of us have been sterilized – the ultimate contraceptive. Knowing now how God approaches these matters, we have a great opportunity to help others to deeper life and to walk this way ourselves.
We are well aware of our weaknesses and others’ as well. The full, abundant life of God, however, is waiting for us and for those we love, provided we open ourselves to it. One important step is simply to talk about the situation, to God, to each other, to a confessor, to a godly friend. If additional information is needed, One More Soul6 has a wide range of teaching materials that can help, as well as recorded testimonies of couples who have struggled with this situation before. There are more people every day who have faced this crisis and come out healed. The possibilities are broad and full of hope.
This pamphlet is drawn from Chapter 2 of Called to Give Life by Jason T. Adams. Jason Adams is a father of five and the Theology Chair at Guerin Catholic High School, Noblesville, Indiana. He serves as Outreach Associate for One More Soul, the publisher of Called to Give Life. He holds the degrees of Bachelor of Arts in Secondary Education from Purdue University, and Master of Arts in Theology and Christian Ministry from the Franciscan University of Steubenville. Jason and Linda have used Natural Family Planning to successfully postpone and achieve pregnancy throughout their marriage, and have shared their testimony to its benefits in Pre-Cana, RCIA, young adult/youth groups, and other venues.
Oh my gosh! This anti-RH peeps are proud already because most of the voters in the ABS-CBN poll voted for anti-RH. I think Pulse Asia is more reliable than this ABS-CBN poll because not all Filipinos watched the debate, including me. I just watched its replay here in the net. BTW, according to the reliable Pulse Asia, 69% of Filipinos want the RH Bill to be passed. Sorry, anti-RH peeps. Hahahahaha! Wish you luck on the GMA News TV debate. Hahaha! ♫ ♫ ♫ ☺ ☺ ☺ ♫ ♫ ♫
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA... I THINK THE PULSE ASIA ONLY INTERVIEWED THE DOGS OF DRA[CULA] CLAUDIO. HA HA HA... THE ABS-CBN POLL IS LIVE AND ON THE SPOT. OPEN TO ALL AND WELL ANNOUNCED. HA HA HA...
ReplyDeleteKAWAWA NAMAN ANG MGA TALUNAN. GIGIL NA GIGIL NA. GUSTONG GUSTO NA NILANG MA CONDOMAN.
Fr. Abe, it's Pulse Asia Philippines, not Pulse Asia Dr. Claudio. Use your common sense, Father Abe. BTW, is they only interviewed the "dogs" of Dr. Sylvia E. Claudio, M.D., Ph.D., then, it should be 100% pro-RH hahaha. Oh my gosh, Father Abe! That is simple logic. ♫ ♫ ♫ ☺ ☺ ☺ ♫ ♫ ♫
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA... I PRESUMED THAT SOME OF HER DOGS ARE MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE THAN HER.
ReplyDeleteFr. Abe, you know what? I guess the Roman Catholic laity is nicer than you. ;)
ReplyDeleteWE USED TO BE VERY NICE BUT AFTER YOU ARE ATTACKING OUR FAITH THEN WE HAVE TO STRONG AND TOUGH. WE HAVE TO ANSWER OUR ENEMIES IN A MANNER UNDERSTANDABLE TO THEM. WE ARE LEARNING FROM YOU THE ART OF WAR.
ReplyDeleteJesus tells us to love one another. And, because we do love one another, we want life for everyone to better. In my humble opinion, both Anti and Pro-RH have the best intentions in mind and heart, we just have different ways of going about it. We cannot control the actions of others, we can only control ourselves --and even then, not as well as we think or hope.
ReplyDeleteSex does not always equal love, marriage, or children. Let us accept that. Birth control and condoms do not always insure that you won't get pregnant or get STDs. It is also very unrealistic to expect everyone to abstain or be celibate.
REMEMBER: With or without the RH Bill, if God wants you to have children, He will find a way. :)
[REMEMBER: With or without the RH Bill, if God wants you to have children, He will find a way. :)]
ReplyDeleteTHAT IS ILLOGICAL AND INSULTING TO GOD. If you want Him to give you children you must be open to life. If you are wearing condoms or drinking pills then it is insulting to God to even think that He will give you kids when in fact you are opposing the natural process through which He makes the woman pregnant.
If you will refuse the child being offered by God through artificial means it is illogical to expect that he will give you one.
WHAT EVER U SAY, I AM PRO RH BILL, AND ONLY GOD CAN EXCOMMUNICATE ME,
ReplyDeleteI AM PRO RH BILL, hayaan nyo ang gobyerno gawin ang trabaho nila. I spend time to read all the comments here, ako po ay isang sakristan, sinusunod ko po ang salita ng diyos, pero ang pananaw ko po sa issue na ito, hindi na dapat makielam ang simbahan. ang RH bill po ay para sa mga taong gusto lamang gumamit ng contraceptives. nasa sarili na po nila un kung gagamit sila o hindi, tama po ba, at father siguro naman po, marunong kayo gumalang ng opinyon, magpakaPARE po tayo sa pagsagot sa mga komento.
ReplyDelete[I AM PRO RH BILL, hayaan nyo ang gobyerno gawin ang trabaho nila. I spend time to read all the comments here, ako po ay isang sakristan, sinusunod ko po ang salita ng diyos, pero ang pananaw ko po sa issue na ito, hindi na dapat makielam ang simbahan. ang RH bill po ay para sa mga taong gusto lamang gumamit ng contraceptives. nasa sarili na po nila un kung gagamit sila o hindi, tama po ba, at father siguro naman po, marunong kayo gumalang ng opinyon, magpakaPARE po tayo sa pagsagot sa mga komento.]
ReplyDeleteKUNWARI PA NA SACRISTAN. NAKU PEKE KA. HALATA NAMAN.
HINDI NAMIN PINAKIKIALAMAN ANG GOBIERNO. PINAGLALABAN LAMANG NAMIN ANG FAITH NAMIN LABAN SA MGA TRAIDOR SA PANANAMPALATAYA TULAD MO AT SA MGA FAKE NA CATHOLICS TULAD MO.
ANONG PAKIALAM NAMIN SA GOBIERNO? KAMI ANG PINAKIKIALAMAN NG GOBIERNO KASI GUSTO NG GOBIERNONG I-IMPOSE SA AMIN ANG CONDOM NILANG BULOK.
MAGPAKATAO KASI KAYO SA PAGSAGOT. HINDI YUNG PEKE ANG MGA IDENTITY. MGA ANTI CATHOLICS NA KUNWARI AY SACRISTAN.
[WHAT EVER U SAY, I AM PRO RH BILL, AND ONLY GOD CAN EXCOMMUNICATE ME,]
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA... TALAGANG HINDI KA TUNAY NA SACRISTAN KASI TANGA KA SA ARAL NG IGLESIA CATOLICA. ANG EXCOMMUNICATION AY IPINAGKALOOB NG PANGINOONG JESUS SA LIDER NG CHURCH WHEN HE GAVE ST. PETER THE POWER TO BIND AND TO LOOSE [MATTHEW 16:18-19] AT GAYON DIN ANG MGA APOSTOLES [MATTHEW 18:18].
MAGSAMA KAYO NI LAGMAN SA PAGPAPASASA NG CONDOMS AT PILLS.
Father Abe, say goodbye to your win on the television poll. Actually, on the online poll conducted by "Harapan: RH Bill - Ipasa o Ibasura?", most voters voted for "ipasa" than "ibasura". I just voted on 9:49 PM - 18 May 2011.
ReplyDelete==============
As of 9:49 PM - 18 May 2011 votes...
Ipasa - 66.37% (out of 100%)
Ibasura - 33.63% (out of 100%)
Proof: http://i51.tinypic.com/4v0137.png
==============
Sorry Father Abe, you anti-RH peeps didn't won on the online poll as of 9:49 PM. Hahay. Well, let us see if you anti-RH peeps can beat us in the future on this poll. Vote vote na. :)
BTW, according to Pulse Asia, 69% of Filipinos wants the RH Bill. (Source: http://tinyurl.com/LoserAnti-RHpeeps)
HA HA HA... SORRY FOR YOU. THE ONLINE VOTING IS LIMITED ONLY TO THOSE WITH ACCESS TO INTERNET WHICH IS VERY LIMITED IN OUR COUNTRY. WHILE THOSE WHO VOTED AFTER WATCHING THE DEBATE ON TV WERE MUCH MORE NUMEROUS BECAUSE EVEN THE POOR IN OUR COUNTRY OWN AT LEAST A SIMPLE TV SET. HA HA HA... POOR YOU. YOU ARE SO EAGER TO PUT CONDOMS IN BETWEEN YOUR LEGS. YOU ARE SO PATHETIC. KAAWA-AWA... KALUNOS LUNOS ANG IYONG KALAMNAN.
ReplyDeleteFather Abe, don't you trust Pulse Asia? BTW. not all Filipinos are ABS-CBN advocates.
ReplyDeleteI DON'T TRUST THE CONDOMISTS.
ReplyDelete"HA HA HA... SO, YOU AGREE WITH THE MORAL TEACHING OF THE CHURCH ON THAT. YET YOU WANT TO ENJOY YOUR CONDOM. HOW NICE? WHAT CAN WE CALL THAT? ISN'T THAT HYPOCRISY? YOU ARE USING THE TEACHING OF THE CHURCH IN ORDER TO ATTACK THE CHURCH AND ITS MORAL TEACHING. HOW CLEVER YOU ARE... I MEAN... CUNNING. VERY SERPENT-LIKE."
ReplyDeleteReally? Is that all you can say? You people, with your holier than thou attitudes act as if you're always on the right, even bashing other peoples' personal opinions, are the ones acting like demons and devils who whisper into peoples ears to make them follow you. God created us with free will to make our own choices. Whether they be right or wrong is for Him to decide so what gives you the right to act like judge and jury to those people who believe that this bill can help alleviate poverty?
You see, when I called you a hypocrite I never meant that you use a condom. Let me spell out for you: What happens to the children whom you so desperately want to be born when they are born into poverty, broken families, or incapable parents? Will the Church be there to support them, feed them, give them an education, and turn them into meaningful members of society? I'm not generalizing that all these children will be criminals, but be realistic. A lot of people commit crime because they aren't given enough opportunities to begin with. Here's another: What happens to the poor who ask for the free health care the RH Bill seeks provision for? Will the Church provide the free health care they refuse the government to provide?
You self-righteous elitists get your food through word service, while those in poverty work hard throughout the day and hope that their income will manage to help them survive. And here you are dictating to them what they should do and what they should not do, judging them for believing something else that you don't share.
I have faith that by supporting this bill I am doing the right thing. If it turns out to be wrong, well, by all means I'll see you Fr. Abe, in hell.
And for the record, just as it is your right to type in all caps, I reserve my right to remain anonymous. I'd hate it if people tried finding me and send me hate messages of no substance at all. It's irritating.
[Really? Is that all you can say?]
ReplyDeleteWHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO SAY? THANK YOU? HI? HELLO? SO WHAT?
[You people, with your holier than thou attitudes act as if you're always on the right,]
ALWAYS ON THE RIGHT? EXCUSE ME YOU ARE HALLUCINATING. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS ADMITTING ITS MISTAKES AND EVEN ASKED FOR FORGIVENESS FOR THE WRONG COMMITTED BY OUR MEMBERS. BUT THE MANALOS, THE BORN AGAIN, THE COMMUNISTS AND THE ATHEISTS ARE NOT HUMBLE ENOUGH TO ADMIT THEIR OWN MISTAKES TO OTHERS.
THE COMMUNISTS WHO MASSACRED HUNDRED OF THOUSANDS OF CATHOLICS IN EASTERN EUROPE DID THEY APOLOGIZE? NO. THE COMPANIES PRODUCING ABORTIFACIENT CONTRACEPTIVES DID THEY APOLOGIZE? NO.
YOU ARE OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY. YOU ARE TYING TO APPEAR 'ALWAYS RIGHT' AT OUR EXPENSE. SHAME ON YOU.
[even bashing other peoples' personal opinions,]
BASHING OTHER PEOPLE'S OPINIONS, EXCUSE ME. IT IS THE CATHOLIC FAITH THAT IS BEING BASHED HERE. DAILY THE MANOLISTA AND THE DATING DAAN AND THE BORN AGAIN ATTACK OUR CATHOLIC FAITH BUT WE DON'T HAVE RESPONSES EXCEPT A VERY FEW LIKE THIS BLOG. YOU ARE TWISTING THE FACTS JUST TO INSERT CONDOMS AND PILLS INSIDE YOUR BODY.
[are the ones acting like demons and devils who whisper into peoples ears to make them follow you.]
YOU ARE THE ONE ACTING LIKE THE DEVIL BECAUSE YOU ARE HIDING IN THE DARK. YOU ARE NEITHER MAN NOR ANIMAL. YOU ARE ATTACKING US FROM THE CLOUD OF DARKNESS IN WHICH YOUR FATHER THE DEVIL IS HIDING. SHOW YOURSELF AND YOUR IDENTITY. DO NOT HIDE IN THE DARK. GIVE US YOUR TRUE AND REAL IDENTIFICATION SO THAT WE CAN DISCUSS ON LEVEL PLAYING FIELD.
[God created us with free will to make our own choices.]
THAT SHOWS THAT YOU ARE NOT IDIOT. THE DOCTRINE THAT MAN HAS A FREE WILL IS A CATHOLIC DOCTRINE. THE BORN AGAIN DO NOT BELIEVE THAT MAN HAS FREE WILL BECAUSE FOR THEM IT WAS LOST BECAUSE OF SIN. THE MANALOS TEACHES THAT IN POLITICAL MATTERS THEIR MEMBERS MUST OBEY THE CHOICES OF THE MANALOS. THE SAKSI NI BAHO TEACHES THAT THEIR MEMBERS MUST NOT VOTE.
FOOL. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE ONE TEACHING AND PRACTICING FREEDOM FOR OUR MEMBERS. THAT IS WHY NOYNOY AND MIRRIAM AND OTHERS ARE FREE TO ATTACK OUR FAITH. LIAR, LIAR, LIAR.
[Whether they be right or wrong is for Him to decide so what gives you the right to act like judge and jury to those people who believe that this bill can help alleviate poverty?]
ReplyDeleteHOW ABOUT THE ATHEISTS OF U.P.? THE AGNOSTICS? DO THEY BELIEVE THAT MAN IS FREE? THE COMMUNISTS? THEY ARE ONLY GOOD IN CRITICIZING WHEN THEY ARE OUT OF POWER BUT ONCE THEY BECAME THE DOMINANT PARTY THEY ARE PROHIBITING RALLIES AND EXCHANGE OF OPINIONS. SO WHY DONT YOU ATTACK THEM.
YOU ARE IGNORANT OF THE CATHOLIC FAITH.
[You see, when I called you a hypocrite I never meant that you use a condom.]
YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE BECAUSE YOU ACCUSE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH OF STIFLING FREE WILL AND HUMAN FREEDOM. IT ONLY SHOWS HOW STUPID AND HYPOCRITE YOU ARE.
[Let me spell out for you: What happens to the children whom you so desperately want to be born when they are born into poverty, broken families, or incapable parents?]
LET ME SPELL OUT FOR YOU THAT AFTER YOU PUT CONDOMS IN YOUR GENITAL OR IN THE GENITAL OF YOUR LOVER OR HIS ASS... IN CASE OF HOMOSEXUAL ACTS... THE POOR ARE STILL POOR. SOLUTION TO POVERTY DOES NOT DEPEND ON THE CONDOMS IN YOUR GENITAL.
BROKEN FAMILIES IS DUE TO INFIDELITIES AND NOT BECAUSE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. IN FACT, THE SAME GROUP IN FAVOR OF CONTRACEPTION, ABORTION IN THE U.S. AND EUROPE ARE ALSO IN FAVOR OF DIVORCE. SO IT IS HYPOCRITICAL.
YOU PRETEND TO CARE FOR THE POOR AND THE BROKEN FAMILIES BUT YOUR CONCERN PRACTICALLY IS TO GAIN MULTIPLE ORGANISMS WITHOUT BEGETTING CHILDREN. YOU WANT TO LIVE LIKE DOGS AT OUR EXPENSE.
[Will the Church be there to support them, feed them, give them an education, and turn them into meaningful members of society?]
ReplyDeleteYES. VERY YES. BECAUSE MORE THAN THE GOVERNMENT WE HAVE MORE CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS IN THIS COUNTRY MORE THAN ANY OTHER GROUPS OR INSTITUTIONS. THE SERVICES GIVEN BY THE GOVERNMENT ALSO COMES FROM THE TAXES PAID BY THE CATHOLICS.
HOW ABOUT YOU DID YOU FEED THE HUNGRY? DID YOU PROVIDE HOMES FOR THE ORPHANS AND THE NEEDY? IF YOU DON'T KNOW OUR CHARITABLE WORKS THEN IT ONLY SHOWS THAT YOU ARE IGNORANT OR SIMPLY BLATANTLY BLIND.
WE CANNOT SOLVE THE POVERTY PROBLEM ALONE BUT WE ARE DOING MORE... MUCH MORE THAT YOU AND YOUR CO-CONDOMISTS. WE ARE DOING MORE GOOD IN THE SOCIETY MORE THAN THE AQUINIO AND THE LAGMAN FAMILY AND OTHER NON-CATHOLIC SECTS.
[I'm not generalizing that all these children will be criminals, but be realistic.]
BE REALISTIC. WHEN YOU PUT CONDOMS IN AROUND YOUR BALLS, DID THE POOR RECEIVE MORE RICE AND BREAD? HA HA HA... IN RH BILL IT IS YOUR BALLS THAT WILL ENJOY THE FUNDS NOT THE MOUTH OF THE POOR. IT IS YOUR OVARY THAT WILL BE TICKLED BY CONDOMS AND POLLUTED BY PILLS BUT IT WILL NOT GIVE JUICY HOTDOGS TO FEED TO THE HUNGRY.
[A lot of people commit crime because they aren't given enough opportunities to begin with.]
SO, IT IS JOBS THAT MUST BE PROVIDED NOT CONDOMS. THE MONEY FOR CONTRACEPTIVES SHOULD BE GIVEN TO BUY FREE MEDICINES INSTEAD OR FREE MILK OR FREE BREAD AS THEY USED TO DO WHEN WE WERE YOUNG. THERE WERE 'NONTRIBAN' BREAD GIVEN TO US IN THE CLASSROOMS DAILY. FREE BREAD NOT FREE CONDOMS.
[Here's another: What happens to the poor who ask for the free health care the RH Bill seeks provision for?]
ReplyDeleteIS CONDOMS FREE HEALTH? NO. THAT IS FREE SEX BUT NOT FREE HEALTH. IF THE POOR WILL BE GIVEN FREE HOSPITALIZATION THEN IT IS FREE HEALTH. YOU ARE OUT OF YOUR MIND.
[Will the Church provide the free health care they refuse the government to provide?]
WE ARE ALREADY HELPING THE GOVERNMENT BY PROVIDING FREE ORPHANAGES, FREE EDUCATION TO COUNTLESS STUDENTS IN OUR SCHOOLS, FREE TAKING GOOD CARE OF THE LEPROUS AND A LOT OF HOME FOR THE AGED... WE ARE DOING THAT DESPITE THE FACT THAT WE DO NOT RECEIVE TAXES.
THE DUTY OF GIVING FREE MEDICINES BELONGS TO THE GOVERNMENT BECAUSE IT IS THE ONE RECIEVING THE TAXES OF THE FILIPINOS, NOT US. BUT THE GOVERNMENT BOUGHT YOUR STUPIDITY THAT INSTEAD OF GIVING FREE MEDICINES THEY PREFER TO SPEND BILLIONS FOR CONDOMS AND PILLS. THAT IS DEMONIC.
HOW ABOUT YOU? DO YOU FEED THE HUNGRY? DO YOU GIVE FREE EDUCATION TO STUDENTS? WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO HELP? BEFORE YOU ATTACK US RECOGNIZE FIRST THAT YOU ARE ONE OF THE USELESS IN THIS SOCIETY NOT US.
[You self-righteous elitists get your food through word service,]
IDIOT. WE ARE WORKING WITH OUR OWN HANDS. WE ARE THE CARETAKER OF THE CHURCHES OF THE PEOPLE FOR WHICH WE DO NOT RECEIVE SALARIES EXCEPT THE PITTANCE BEING GIVEN TO US BY THE PEOPLE. WE ARE NOT LIKE YOU RECEIVING THOUSANDS FOR YOUR SALARIES AND STILL YOU WANT TO GET THE PUBLIC FUNDS TO FINANCE YOUR FORNICATIONS. GO TO HELL YOU CHILD OF SATAN. ENOUGH OF YOUR LIES. BY THE POWER OF CHRIST RETURN TO HELL WHERE YOU BELONG. YOU BELONG TO THE DOMINION OF DARKNESS THE DUNGEON FOR THE FATHER OF LIES AND HIS MINIONS LIKE YOU.
[while those in poverty work hard throughout the day and hope that their income will manage to help them survive.]
WE ARE WORKING HARD. WE ARE SERVING AS ADMINISTRATORS AND TEACHERS AND PROFESSORS AND EDUCATORS IN MANY OF OUR INSTITUTIONS AND ON MANY REGARDS FREE OF CHARGE. UNLIKE YOU WHO CRIES LIKE A GOAT WHEN YOU DO NOT RECEIVE YOUR SALARY.
[And here you are dictating to them what they should do and what they should not do, judging them for believing something else that you don't share.]
AND YOU? ARE YOU NOT DICTATING? HOW ABOUT THE GOVERNEMNT? IS IT NOT DICTATING? HOW ABOUT THE CONGRESS, IS IT NOT DICTATING? YOU ARE A FOOL. WE ARE ONLY EXERCIZING OUR RIGHT AS ANYBODY ELSE. SO YOU WANT YOUR SIDE TO BE DICTATING AND YOU HATE WHEN WE DO SO. YOU ARE SO PATHETIC. HA HA HA... SO MUCH CONDOMS MAKES YOUR MIND STICKY AND WET WITH GLUE-LIKE SUBSTANCES.
[I have faith that by supporting this bill I am doing the right thing. If it turns out to be wrong, well, by all means I'll see you Fr. Abe, in hell.]
YOU CAN ENJOY THE FIRE OF HELL IN ETERNITY. BECAUSE THE GOD OF LIFE WILL GIVE LIFE TO THOSE WHO DEFEND THE GOSPEL OF LIFE. LET ME SEE OF NOYNOY AQUINO, EDCEL LAGMAN AND COMPANY CAN GRANT SALVATION TO YOUR SOUL.
[And for the record, just as it is your right to type in all caps, I reserve my right to remain anonymous. I'd hate it if people tried finding me and send me hate messages of no substance at all. It's irritating.]
YOU ARE IRRITATED BECAUSE OF SO MUCH CONDOMS IN-BETWEEN YOUR LEGS. SO DO NOT BLAME US FOR YOUR IRRITATION. YOU ARE ONLY AFRAID THAT PEOPLE WILL SEE HOW STUPID YOU REALLY ARE. A PERSON WHO SUPPOSEDLY CARING FOR THE POOR BUT IN REALITY ONLY SEEKS FOR FREE AND CHILDLESS MULTIPLE ORGASMS AT THE EXPENSE OF PEOPLE'S MONEY.
"GOD formed the earth... He did not create it to be empty but formed it to be inhabited."
ReplyDeleteFr. Abe, God bless you. Go..go ..Father. I am Catholic, pro-life and against RH. Ang galing galing mo, very brave to defend our Catholic faith. I've heard already your name somewhere in Marian page. You are great Father! Idol kita. Sana ikaw na lang ang nag represent doon sa Harapan debate in ABS-CBN. Wish all our priests like you. May our Mother Mary and Saint Michael be with you and protect you.
ReplyDeletePRAISE THE LORD MARILOU.
ReplyDelete