-
FATHER GOOD DAY PO,,,
PAKISAGOT PO NG TANONG KO PO ANO PO B ANG NASA GAWA 2 :36???
GINAWA HO BANG LORD NG DIOS SI CRISTO O HINDI??
TAPOS NALITO AKO NUNG PINOST KO YUNG ISAIAH 9:6 TUNGKOL YUNG SA PAGTAWAG NG ALMIGHTY GOD NG AMA KAY CRISTO...
NABARA ATA AKO NG ISANG IGLESIA NI MANALO TUNGKOL DYN..
DHL MAS MAKAPANGYARIHAN N DAW SI CRISTO KESA SA AMA DAHIL SA WORD N ALMIGHTY GOD,,
KUNG MAKAPANGYARIHANG DIOS AY SI CRISTO AY AMA B AY HINDI N??
-
Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[FATHER GOOD DAY PO,,,
PAKISAGOT PO NG TANONG KO PO ANO PO B ANG NASA GAWA 2 :36???
GINAWA HO BANG LORD NG DIOS SI CRISTO O HINDI??]WELL, BASAHIN NATIN ANG TALATANG IYAN:
Act 2:36 "All the people of Israel, then, are to know for sure that this Jesus, whom you crucified, is the one that God has made Lord and Messiah!"
HE HE HE... UNA SA LAHAT ANO BA ANG IBIG SABIHIN NG "GINAWA" DIYAN SA TALATA? ITO BA AY TULAD NG ISANG KOTSE NA GINAWA? INVENTED OR MADE OUT OF MATERIAL THINGS? HINDI. ANG IBIG SABIHIN NIYAN GOD THE FATHER BESTOWED THE HIGHEST HONOR TO HIS SON JESUS.IBIG SABIHIN BA NIYAN ANG KARANGALAN, KADAKILAAN AT KAPANGYARIHAN NI CRISTO AY HINDI KANYA DAHIL BIGAY LANG NG AMA? HINDI KANYA TALAGA YON. GOD THE FATHER GAVE TO JESUS WHAT BELONGS TO HIM AND JESUS IN RETURN GIVES TO THE FATHER WHAT HE HAS. THEY ARE BOTH GIVING TO EACH OTHER IN RECIPROCATION OF LOVE:John 16:15 All that belongs to the Father is mine. That is why I said the Spirit will take from what is mine and make it known to you.John 17:10 All I have is yours, and all you have is mine. And glory has come to me through them.PAREHO NILANG TAGLAY ANG PAGKA-DIOS AT ANG LORDSHIP.
IBIG BANG SABIHIN NIYAN E MAS MABABA SI JESUS SA AMA? HINDI. WALANG NAKASULAT NA GANYAN. DAHIL ANG AMA AT SI CRISTO AY BOTH LORD AND GOD BECAUSE THEY ARE ONE GOD.
IBIG BANG SABIHIN AY DATI HINDI LORD SI CRISTO THEN LATER GINAWA LANG NA LORD? KAGAYA NG DATI HINDI PRESIDENTE THEN NAGING PRESIDENTE? HINDI RIN. DAHIL ANG PAGIGING LORD NI JESUS AY HINDI NAKAUGAT SA KANYANG PAGKA-DIOS NA SA SIMULA PA AY SIYA NA:
John 1:1 In the beginning the Word already existed; the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
ISA PA, WHEN DID GOD DECLARE THAT JESUS IS LORD? FIRST, FROM ETERNITY. HE DID THAT IN HEAVEN IN ETERNAL DECLARATION:
Heb 1:8 About the Son, however, God said: "Your kingdom, O God, will last forever and ever! You rule over your people with justice.
SO, THAT IS A DECLARATION THAT JESUS IS GOD WHOSE KINGDOM IS FOREVER AND EVER. WHAT IS THAT? ETERNAL - WITHOUT BEGINNING AND WITHOUT END. THAT IS WHY JESUS IS ALSO ETERNAL:
Heb 13:8 Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever.
JESUS IS ETERNAL. HE IS LORD FROM THE VERY BEGINNING. JESUS IS 'THE SAME' EVERSINCE. WALANG PAGBABAGO. KUNG LORD SIYA NGAYON, LORD DIN SIYA NUON AT SA DARATING.
DURING HIS STAY ON EARTH HE CLOTHED HIMSELF WITH HUMILITY BY NOT SHOWING HIS FULL DIVINITY. BUT HE REMAINS AS GOD AND LORD. BOTH THE FATHER AND THE SON ARE ETERNAL - BOTH ARE ALPHA AND OMEGA - THE BEGINNING AND THE END:
THE FATHER:
Rev 1:8 "I am the first and the last," says the Lord God Almighty, who is, who was, and who is to come.
THE SON:
Rev 1:17-18 When I saw him, I fell down at his feet like a dead man. He placed his right hand on me and said, "Don't be afraid! I am the first and the last. I am the living one! I was dead, but now I am alive forever and ever. I have authority over death and the world of the dead.
AND,
Rev 22:12-13 "Listen!" says Jesus. "I am coming soon! I will bring my rewards with me, to give to each one according to what he has done. I am the first and the last, the beginning and the end."
THE ONE WHO DIED ON THE CROSS IS "THE LIVING ONE" - THE ALPHA AND THE OMEGA. HE IS ALSO THE SAME ONE WHO WILL RETURN TO GIVE HIS REWARDS. THAT IS JESUS.
[TAPOS NALITO AKO NUNG PINOST KO YUNG ISAIAH 9:6 TUNGKOL YUNG SA PAGTAWAG NG ALMIGHTY GOD NG AMA KAY CRISTO...]
BAKIT? SAAN KA NALILITO?
[NABARA ATA AKO NG ISANG IGLESIA NI MANALO TUNGKOL DYN..]
SA PAANONG PARAAN?
[DHL MAS MAKAPANGYARIHAN N DAW SI CRISTO KESA SA AMA DAHIL SA WORD N ALMIGHTY GOD,,]
HA HA HA... NAPAKA-TANGA NAMAN NG MANOLISTA NA IYON. MANOL TALAGA. HA HA HA... ANG SABI SI CRISTO AY ALMIGHTY GOD. WALANG SINABI NA SI CRISTO AY MORE POWERFUL THAN GOD THE FATHER OR THAT HE IS GREATER THAN GOD THE FATHER. IT MEANS NA ANG GOD THE FATHER AT SI JESUS AY IISANG DIOS AT EQUAL SILA IN POWER AND DIGNITY:
JOHN 10:30 "AKO AT ANG AMA AY IISA"
SAAN SILA ISA? THEY ARE ONE AS 'ALMIGHTY GOD'. ONE IN DIVINITY... ONE IN POWER, GLORY AND HONOR.
[KUNG MAKAPANGYARIHANG DIOS AY SI CRISTO AY AMA B AY HINDI N??]
HINDI. KASI SI CRISTO AT ANG AMA AY IISANG DIOS. KAYA WALANG MAS MATAAS O MAS MAKAPANGYARIHAN SA KANILA. USING AN ANALOGY, SINO ANG MAS MAKAPANGYARIHAN SA PILIPINAS SI NOYNOY BA O SI BENIGNO SIMEON AQUINO III? ANG SAGOT PAREHO. KASI IISA SILA.
.jpg)
![ST. JEROME EMILIANI [1486-1537]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_6dKQTchkJaA/R0lo013dyBI/AAAAAAAAB_4/XzUAPDESwwQ/s1600/St.+Jerome+in+prayer,+small_1.jpg)
anonymous dude, wag na wag ka magpapaniwala sa mga ministro o taga-akay ng mga IGLESIA NI MANALOCIFER ha.. mapapahamak ang kaluluwa mo dyan! Promise!! manahimik ka na lang sa EKKLESIA KATHOLIS(CATHOLIC CHURCH). Manalocifer yang mga yan kasi mga mamamatay tao yan!! Lucifer is Guilty of killing Mankind same as Felix using his revolver. hehehe
ReplyDeleteGood Morning po Father!
ReplyDeleteGusto ko lamang po magkweto sa inyo sa klase ko sa Philosophy teacher ko and at the same time po matulungan at madagdagan po ninyo ang mga sagot na sinabi ko po sa professor ko.
Dapat po topic namin nung araw na iyon eh Pre-Socratic Philosophers po ... Eh kaso po napunta po agad kami sa research work ng libro and ito po ang unang tanong.
Why does Catholic make the sign of the cross when they pass the church?
Marami pong sumagot, because to give respect daw po , because inside of it is where the tabernacle can be found and Jesus is inside it , tapos ang sagot ko po ganyan din po . Then tinanong niya po kami kung bkit daw po ba nag sign of the cross, ang sabi ko po kasi
We Glory in the Cross, kasi po it is the sign of the triumph of our Lord against the devil our enemy.
Then sabi nya po, may nabasa raw po siyang Doctrine daw ng Catholic Church na sabi nya po eh nakasulat raw po doon na " Catholic make the sign of the Cross to be protected. "
Tapos po ang follow up question nya po, Does anyone here made the sign of the cross whenever you leave your house, I raised up my hand firmly! Then he ask me why... I told him that, I make the sign of the cross whenever I leave the house to ask for prayer to our Lord to protect me in any harm and from the enemies on my way.
Then he said " To protected from the enemies, so meaning whenever you pass by the church and make the sign of the cross , the church is the enemy. "
I told him that the enemy that I am talking about are those cannot be seen by our naked eyes, those supernatural being " the devil".
Then he said that " So you mean to say that there are enemies inside the Church." And i said yes but I am not talking on the Church itself.
( kaya ko po sinabing there is enemy inside the church kasi po diba the smoke of the devil enter the church, kaya nga po maraming temptation minsan sa misa, like inaantok preventing from listening the gospel and etc..)
Tapos po kung ano ano na po ang sinabi ng professor ko.. and stick to his answer na " church daw po ay enemy. " Sabi nya po kasi nabasa niya raw po iyon sa " Ang antanda ng Krus" na " we make the s.o.t.c to be protected to the enemy, doctrine daw po iyon ng catholic, eh ayoko naman pong bastusin siya at sabihing hindi lang naman ganyan kaikli ang doctrine ng catholic tungkol sa SOTC.
Saka po diba father naisip ko lang po i-consider ko na ang sagot nya na to be protected to the enemy, so ang enemy takot sa cross, eh ang tanong ba takot ba ang CATHOLIC CHURCH sa Cross? Hindi po diba? Lahat po ng Church natin ay may Cross at mahal na mahal natin . So ibig sabihin HINDI po ENEMY ang CHURCH. ( sayang Father di ko nasabi sa kanya! ahaha. ) additional info po kung pwede po...
Tapos po next question eh
ReplyDeleteWhy does Catholic ask for intercession of Saints , Holy people and the Blessed Virgin Mary?
Sabi po ng iba kong klasmeyt eh dahil raw po syempre Mother of God po si Mary so malakas po siya sa Anak .. Sumang ayon naman po yung professor ko. Hindi na po ako nag argue sa kanya pero nawindang po yung tenga ko sa sinabi nya So ibig sabihin daw po " So Mother of God si Mary so Mary is God?"
I said No! Then nag explain po ako na Mama Mary is the HIGHLY Favored of God kaya we ask for her intercession.. And the prayer of a righteous man is strong as it is written in the Bible. Tapos nag yung sa God issue po sabi ko po sa kanya si Mama Mary eh THEOTOKOS, nawindang po ata sa word na ginamit ko , halatang mang mang po sa Latin ... hindi po natuloy ang pag explain ko so nagbitaw po siya ng salita... " A man is a man so its parent is a man, An animal came from an animal, an insect, so a God should be born from a God. Tapos po tumayo po ako ulit, sabi ko sa kanya ang babaw po ng logic.. medyo pumalya na po ako dito at nataranta, kaya po ang napaliwanag ko po sabi ko Sir ang layo na layo ng " MOTHER OF GOD sa MARY IS GOD. " ini-spell ko pa po sa buong class hahahha... nagtawanan po mga klasmeyt ko... kaya po biglang tumawag ng ibang tao.... ( paki dagdagan naman po yung explanation na dapat po father para nxt time po alam ko na kung ano isasagot ko alam ko po di ko po napagtanggol ng husto si Mama Mary. )
Tapos po nakikinig na lang po ako sa kanya kasi high blood na rin po ako, nagbitiw po siya ng salita na naalala niya raw po ung isang argument ng kakilala niya na doon raw po sa Mary is the Mother of God eh sinisira ko raw po yung " God is the Alpha and the Omega" kasi raw po binigyan ko raw po siya ng simula which is Mama Mary raw po." Hindi na po ako nakapag rebutal kasi po hindi po agad ako makapag react medyo high blood na po ako sa kanya hahaha...
Then na realize ko po dapat po pala tinanong ko sa kanya na EH DI SINO GUMAWA KAY MAMA MARY? SUMULPOT BIGLA? pakidagdagan na lamang po father hahaha...
Tapos daldal na po siya ng daldal, even Rizal daw po ... galit daw po siya sa Catholic Church ... in Noli and El Fili raw po makikita ang proof sa mga pari... Damaso raw po... Tapos po nagtaas po ako ng kamay... nabasa ko po kasi yung retraction ni Rizal sa Blog nyo tungkol sa catholic church and nag explain po ako sa buong class ... Sabi ko po Sino kasama ni Simon bago siya mamatay sa last part ng El Fili? Hindi ba si Fr. Florentino ... and sabi ko po na si Rizal ay nagbalik sa Santa Iglesia bago siya mamatay , he even confessed and receive communion. Tapos sabi nya po that's impossible daw... nakooo ahhaha... kung di lang po siya prof. hahamunin ko po iyon na maglabas ng ibidensya hahhaa...
ReplyDeleteNapakarami pa po niyang sinabi na kahit na po Catholic siya eh hindi po akma sa teaching natin... May hindi po ako alam sa mga sinabi niya Father paki sagot na rin po,
Yung mga gamit raw po ni Blessed John Paul II eh blessed na rin daw po sabi nya, pati yung krib, even yung bahay ... kaya raw po tinatago natin sabi nya po we worship and pray pa raw po ... ( na alam ko naman po na di tayo nag worship doon and pray) ... gusto ko lang po malamn kung totoo po na halos lahat po ng gamit ni Blessed John Paul II ay itinatago po ... Alam ko po na mahalaga ang mga ito and in fact diba po may kwento sa bible na nahawakan lang po ata ung isang tela ng isang santo and gumaling ... paki clear po di ko na p kasi maalala hahaha ^^..
And isa pa rin po ... sabi niya po na holy raw po yung dugo kaya po dapat lang daw pong ibalik sa lupa and marumi daw po ito so makakasama sa health ( we are talking po sa dugo ng baboy na hindi kinakain ng Inc ) ... nakalagay raw po iyon sa bible na Holy ang dugo.. saan po ba nakalagay yun? at meron po ba talaga? mukang wala po haha.. Dugo po ni Christ yes ... pero baboy? I wonder hahhaa...
And bkit po ang jehova eh ayaw magpa blood transfussion ? Bakit po father?
Sige po father, medyo mahaba na po ang kwento ko hahaha... Ewan ko po diyan sa prof. ko na iyan Catholic pa naman din po... Paki dagdagan na lamang po ng mga tamang sagot father ung tungkol sa mga iyan Father... Maraming maraming salamat po! Isa po ako sa inspired na Reader ng Blog ninyo Father and willing to protect our Doctrine , our Faith and our Church.! Salamat po!
INCs theology is inconsistent with the core identity of Christianity leaving it vulnerable to intellectual criticism. Their theology is so shallow that it cannot withstand philosophical arguments.
ReplyDeleteAsk them the following questions and they cannot answer them.
What is the Holy Spirit?
What is an angel?
What are the attributes of God?
What is the philosophical explanation of nature and person?
TNX FATHER ABE S SAGOT,,,,
ReplyDeleteHETO PALA YUNG LINK SA FACEBOOK KUNG SAAN KAMI NAG DEDEBATEHAN,,
http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=16133&post=96734&uid=228839851567#topic_top
ALAM MO FATHER KAGAGALING KO LANG SA BIBLE STUDY,,,
HEHEHEH. TNX SA INSPIRATION,,
AKO PO PALA YUNG NAGPADALA SAU NG TANONG N YN,,, TNX TALAGA
Question from Ferdinand:
ReplyDeleteWhat is the Holy Spirit?
INC: Ewan namin! malay naman namin dyan!
What is an angel?
INC: ni hindi nga namin kilala si ARKANGHEL SAN MIGUEL AT RAPHAEL e. Ang kilala lang naming Anghel si Felix Manalo.(Wow ang anghel pala namamatay din at nagkakasakit ng GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE!!). hehehe
esep esep mga alagad ni Manalo....
HA HA HA... MATINDI ITO. HA HA HA...
ReplyDeletewag magpapaniwala s mga manaLISTA n mga yan,huwag nating hahayaang iLISTA ang mga kaluluwa natin sa demonyo,tandaan wlang mababasa sa biblya n IGLESIA NI CRISTO.huwag nating bibigyan ng pagkakataon yang mga yan n mahuthutan tayo ng pera para sa korporasyon ng mga manalong yan,simbahan nila me sungay,yun yung ginagamit nila pantusok oh kaya lalagyan ng mga resibo,hehe,hindi sila naniniwala sa purgatoryo,pero si manalo nilang sumambulat ang bituka eh malamang nakita n nya ang purgatoryo,hindi sila nagbibinyag ng mga bata,kaya ngman ang mga batang namatay sakanila hindi nakakarating s langit,tama po b ako father?ang mga matitinong anghel hindi nanggagahasa,hindi hahatulan ng immorality,pero ang anghel nilang binagsak s lupa nagkaroon sya nun,ang mga doktrina nila INComplete,Diyos nila pilay,kulang sa persona,walang CRISTO at HOLY SPIRIT,in short mga bulaang propeta dahil s kelan lang lumitaw ang relihiyon nila.hehe
ReplyDelete*anti-manalo
[Good Morning po Father!]
ReplyDeleteGOOD MORNING TOO.
[Gusto ko lamang po magkweto sa inyo sa klase ko sa Philosophy teacher ko and at the same time po matulungan at madagdagan po ninyo ang mga sagot na sinabi ko po sa professor ko.]
ANONG SCHOOL KA NAG-AARAL? PWEDE BANG MALAMAN? AT ANONG RELIGION NG PROFESSOR MO?
[Dapat po topic namin nung araw na iyon eh Pre-Socratic Philosophers po ... Eh kaso po napunta po agad kami sa research work ng libro and ito po ang unang tanong.]
COMMON TACTICS IYAN NG MGA TEACHERS NA IBA ANG RELIGION. GINAGAMIT NILA ANG MGA SUBJECTS NILA PARA SA KANILANG MGA KAWALANG-HIYAAN AT KASINUNGALINGAN. DAPAT IREKLAMO SA DEAN ANG PROFESSOR NA IYAN.
[Why does Catholic make the sign of the cross when they pass the church?]
BECAUSE WE GIVE GLORY TO GOD AND WE DECLARE OUR ALLEGIANCE TO CHRIST OUR SAVIOR AND REDEEMER WHO SAVED AS WELL AS REDEEMED US BY HIS DEATH ON THE CROSS. WE ARE SHOWING HIM THAT WE GLORY IN HIS CROSS:
Galatians 6:14 As for me, however, I will boast only about the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ; for by means of his cross the world is dead to me, and I am dead to the world.
AS TRUE CHRISTIANS WE CATHOLICS BOAST ONLY ABOUT THE CROSS OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST BECAUSE IT IS OUR SIGN THAT WE ARE DEAD TO THE WORLD. THE PROBLEM WITH THAT PROFESSOR IS THAT HE IS DEAD TO CHRIST BUT ALIVE TO THE WORLD. HE BELONGS TO SATAN AND NOT TO THE BODY OF CHRIST WHICH IS THE CHURCH.
[Marami pong sumagot, because to give respect daw po , because inside of it is where the tabernacle can be found and Jesus is inside it , tapos ang sagot ko po ganyan din po . Then tinanong niya po kami kung bkit daw po ba nag sign of the cross, ang sabi ko po kasi
We Glory in the Cross, kasi po it is the sign of the triumph of our Lord against the devil our enemy.]
TAMA ANG MGA SAGOT NINYO.
[Then sabi nya po, may nabasa raw po siyang Doctrine daw ng Catholic Church na sabi nya po eh nakasulat raw po doon na " Catholic make the sign of the Cross to be protected. "]
ReplyDeleteNAGSISINUNGALING YAN. PILITIN NYO SIYA NA IPAKITA SA INYO ANG AKLAT NA BINASA NIYA. REMEMBER ANG OFFICIAL DOCTRINE NATIN AY NASA CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. KAY PAG HINDI CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ANG BINASA NIYA IYON AY OPINION LAMANG AT HINDI OFFICIAL DOCTRINE. PERO NAGSISINGALING LANG YON. HEARSAY ANG BASEHAN NIYA. HE HE HE… BOBO ANG PROFESSOR NA IYAN. KINAKAYA-KAYA NIYA KAYO KASI ALAM NA MGA BATA PA KAYO. HE HE HE… TANUNGIN MO SIYA NA: “SIR, KUNG KAYO PO BA AY HAHAMUNIN NG DEBATE NG CATHOLIC FAITH DEFENDERS TUNGKOL SA SIGN OF THE CROSS HANDA PO BA KAYONG LUMABAN?” HE HE HE…
IBIGAY MO NGA DITO ANG PANGALAN NG PROFESSOR NA IYAN. KASI TRAIDOR SIYA. MGA ESTUDIANTE ANG NILALABANAN NIYA HINDI ANG MGA EXPERTS SA CATHOLIC DOCTRINES. GIVE ME HIS NAME AT TITIRAHIN KO DITO. HE HE HE…
[Tapos po ang follow up question nya po, Does anyone here made the sign of the cross whenever you leave your house, I raised up my hand firmly! Then he ask me why... I told him that, I make the sign of the cross whenever I leave the house to ask for prayer to our Lord to protect me in any harm and from the enemies on my way.]
TAMA. YOUR ANSWER IS VERY BIBLICAL KASI ANG MGA WALANG TATAK NG CROSS AY HINDI PROTECTED FROM SATAN:
Ezek 9:3-6 ‘Ang kaluwalhatian ng Diyos ng Israel ay tumaas sa mga KERUBIN na dating kinaroroonan patungo sa pintuan ng templo at tinawag ang taong nakasuot ng lino at sa kanyang tagiliran ay may hawak na sisidlan ng panulat. Sinabi sa kanya ng Panginoon, lumibot ka sa lunsod, lumibot ka sa Jerusalem at TATAKAN NG KRUS ang mga noon ng mga taong humihibik at umiiyak dala ng lahat ng kasuklam-suklam na bagay na ginagawa sa loob ng lunsod…Patayin ninyo ang matanda, binata, dalaga, bata at babae hanggang sa malipol ang lahat, subalit HUWAG NINYONG GALAWIN ANG SINO MANG MAY TATAK NA KRUS.’ [ABB-Abriol]
IN ENGLISH VERSION OF THE NEW JERUSALEM BIBLE:
3 The glory of the God of Israel rose from above the winged creature where it had been, towards the threshold of the Temple. He called to the man dressed in linen with a scribe's ink-horn in his belt
4 and Yahweh said to him, 'Go all through the city, all through Jerusalem, and mark a cross on the foreheads of all who grieve and lament over all the loathsome practices in it.'
5 I heard him say to the others, 'Follow him through the city and strike. Not one glance of pity; show no mercy;
6 old men, young men, girls, children, women, kill and exterminate them all. But do not touch anyone with a cross on his forehead. Begin at my sanctuary.' So they began with the old men who were in the Temple.
AT IYAN AY SINUSUPORTAHAN NG BAGONG TIPAN:
ReplyDeleteThe Fulfillment of the Prophecy
Rev 7:3 ‘Saying, HURT NOT the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have SEALED the servants of our God IN THERE FOREHEADS.’
Rev 14:1 ‘And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred and forty and four thousand, having HIS FATHER’S NAME WRITTEN IN THEIR FOREHEADS.’
In Ang Biblia: ‘ang apat na put apat na libong may pangalan niya (Cordero), at pangalan ng kanyang Ama, na nasusulat sa kanikaniyang NOO.’
Rev 22:4 And they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads. [ANG BIBLIA: At makikita nila ang kaniyang mukha; at ang kaniyang pangalan ay sasa kanilang mga noo.]
ANG PROBLEMA SA PROFESSOR MO AY GALING SA DEMONIO ANG SECTA NIYA KAYA GALIT SA KRUS NI CRISTO. IYAN ANG HALIMBAWA NG KAAWAY NG KRUS NI CRISTO:
St. Paul in Tears for the Enemies of the Cross
Phil 3:18-19 ‘for many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the ENEMIES of THE CROSS of Christ: whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things.’
KAYA SABIHAN MO SIYA NA SABI NG KAIBIGAN MONG PARI AY KAMPON SIYA NG DEMONIO DAHIL KAAWAY SIYA NG KRUS NI CRISTO.
Then he said " To protected from the enemies, so meaning whenever you pass by the church and make the sign of the cross , the church is the enemy. "
ReplyDeleteI told him that the enemy that I am talking about are those cannot be seen by our naked eyes, those supernatural being " the devil".
[Then he said that " So you mean to say that there are enemies inside the Church." And i said yes but I am not talking on the Church itself.]
HA HA HA… MALI KA. WALANG ENEMY INSIDE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. KAYA TAYO NAG SIGN OF THE CROSS IN FRONT OR INSIDE OF THE CHURCH IS TO GIVE GLORY TO CHRIST AND TO SHOW THAT WE BELONG TO CHRIST. WE MAKE THE SIGN OF THE CROSS WHEN WE ARE AFRAID OR TO BE PROTECTED BECAUSE THE CROSS IS THE INSTRUMENT OF SALVATION USED BY JESUS TO DEFEAT SATAN. IT SHOW TO SATAN THAT WE BELONG TO CHRIST AND NOT TO EVIL. HE HE HE…
[( kaya ko po sinabing there is enemy inside the church kasi po diba the smoke of the devil enter the church, kaya nga po maraming temptation minsan sa misa, like inaantok preventing from listening the gospel and etc..)]
HA HA HA… ANG STATEMENT NI POPE PAUL VI THAT THE SMOKE OF SATAN ENTERS THE CHURCH REFERS TO THE SINFULNESS OF THE HUMAN PERSONS WHO COMMIT SINS AGAINST GOD LIKE JUDAS ISCARIOT WHO BECAME A TRAITOR. BUT DON’T MIX IT WITH THE SIGN OF THE CROSS. HINDI NATIN DOCTRINE IYANG SMOKE OF SATAN NA IYAN. ANG OFFICIAL DOCTRINE NATIN: “THE GATE OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST THE CHURCH” [MATTHEW 16:18]
[Tapos po kung ano ano na po ang sinabi ng professor ko.. and stick to his answer na " church daw po ay enemy. "]
HE HE HE… MALI NGA KASI ANG SINAGOT MO E. BINIGYAN MO SIYA NG AMMUNITION PARA ATAKIHIN ANG CHURCH NATIN. GINAMIT MO ANG SIMPLE STATEMENT NI POPE PAUL VI WHEREIN HE REFERS TO THE PRACTICAL PROBLEMS OF THE CHURCH DURING HIS TIME AT GINAWA MONG APPLICABLE SA CHURCH IN GENERAL. MALI KA DON. SAAN MO BA NAKUHA IYANG ‘SMOKE OF SATAN’ STATEMENT MO?
ITO ANG TANDAAN MO, DAPAT ALAM MO ANG KAIBAHAN NG MGA ORDINARY STATEMENTS NG ATING MGA LEADERS IN COMPARISON WITH THE ‘OFFICIAL DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH’. POPE PAUL VI SIMPLY REFERS TO THE PROBLEMS OF THE CHURCH E IKAW NAMAN SINABI MO NA THE ENEMY IS INSIDE THE CHURCH, PALPAK KA TALAGA DUON. HE HE HE… ANONG ENEMY INSIDE THE CHURCH E SI SATAN AY OUTSIDE THE CHURCH, HE IS NOT A MEMBER AND HE IS AN ENEMY OF THE CHURCH.
[Sabi nya po kasi nabasa niya raw po iyon sa " Ang antanda ng Krus" na " we make the s.o.t.c to be protected to the enemy, doctrine daw po iyon ng catholic, eh ayoko naman pong bastusin siya at sabihing hindi lang naman ganyan kaikli ang doctrine ng catholic tungkol sa SOTC.]
NAMBABASTOS SIYA E DI BASTUSIN MO NA RIN. HINDI NYA GINAGALANG ANG CATHOLIC FAITH NATIN BAKIT SIYA IGAGALANG. HINDI SIYA KAGALANG-GALANG. DAPAT RESPECTFUL SIYA NG FAITH OF OTHERS IN THE CLASSROOM. DUON SIYA BUMANAT SA LOOB NG CHURCH NILA O GUMAWA SIYA NG PERSONAL BLOG NIYA HINDI YUNG KLASE ANG GAGAMITIN NIYA.
[Saka po diba father naisip ko lang po i-consider ko na ang sagot nya na to be protected to the enemy, so ang enemy takot sa cross, eh ang tanong ba takot ba ang CATHOLIC CHURCH sa Cross? Hindi po diba? Lahat po ng Church natin ay may Cross at mahal na mahal natin . So ibig sabihin HINDI po ENEMY ang CHURCH. ( sayang Father di ko nasabi sa kanya! ahaha. ) additional info po kung pwede po...]
ReplyDeleteOK YAN. PERO WAG KALANG DEFENSA NG DEFENSA. YOU ALSO ATTACK HIS FAITH. KAYA MAHALAGA NA ALAM MO ANG RELIGION NYA. THEN PAG-ARALAN MO ANG MGA ARAL NILA AT BANATAN MO SA HARAPAN NG CLASE. WAG NINYONG HAYAANG INSULTUHIN KAYO HE SHOULD LEARN HOW TO RESPECT THE FAITH OF OTHERS.
Tapos po next question eh
Why does Catholic ask for intercession of Saints , Holy people and the Blessed Virgin Mary?
[Sabi po ng iba kong klasmeyt eh dahil raw po syempre Mother of God po si Mary so malakas po siya sa Anak .. Sumang ayon naman po yung professor ko. Hindi na po ako nag argue sa kanya pero nawindang po yung tenga ko sa sinabi nya So ibig sabihin daw po " So Mother of God si Mary so Mary is God?"
I said No! Then nag explain po ako na Mama Mary is the HIGHLY Favored of God kaya we ask for her intercession.. And the prayer of a righteous man is strong as it is written in the Bible.]
VERY GOOD ANSWER.
GANUN PA MAN TANGA TALAGA ANG PROFESSOR NA IYAN. OBVIOUSLY HINDI IYAN NAG-ARAL NG THEOLOGY AT MABABAW ANG KANYANG LOGICAL REASONING. KASI PAG SINABI MONG MOTHER OF GOD IT DOES NOT MEAN NA GOD SI MARY. HALIMBAWA, SINABI MONG ‘THE MOTHER OF THE PRESIDENT’ ONLY AN IDIOT WILL THINK THAT THE MOTHER IS ALSO A PRESIDENT UNLESS IN CASE OF TITA CORY AND PRES. NOYNOY WHICH IS A RARE CASE. THE MOTHER OF PRES. RAMOS WAS NOT A PRESIDENT AND SO THE REST OF OUR FORMER PRESIDENTS.
[Tapos nag yung sa God issue po sabi ko po sa kanya si Mama Mary eh THEOTOKOS, nawindang po ata sa word na ginamit ko , halatang mang mang po sa Latin ... hindi po natuloy ang pag explain ko so nagbitaw po siya ng salita... " A man is a man so its parent is a man, An animal came from an animal, an insect, so a God should be born from a God.]
HA HA HA… THAT PROFESSOR IS STUPID. HE IS LIMITING HIMSELF IN ORDINARY HUMAN CONCEPT OF BEGETTING. BUT JESUS IS NOT BORN UNDER ORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES BECAUSE JESUS IS UNIQUE. HE IS THE “ONE AND ONLY” SAVIOR. THEREFORE HIS BIRTH IS UNIQUE, “ONE AND ONLY” ALSO.
FIRST, JESUS IS BORN BY A VIRGIN. IS THE MOTHER OF THAT PROFESSOR A ‘VIRGIN’ WHEN SHE GAVE BIRTH TO HIM? NO, BECAUSE THE GENITAL OF HIS MOTHER WAS PENETRATED BY THE GENITAL OF HIS FATHER DURING THEIR SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. BUT IN CASE OF MARY SHE WAS NOT TOUCHED BY ANY MAN WHEN SHE CONCEIVED AND GAVE BIRTH TO JESUS:
ReplyDeleteIsaiah 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Mat 1:22-23 Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
JESUS IS GOD WHO BECAME FLESH BUT WE ARE NOT. SO, TO USE THE ORDINARY CASE AS AN EXAMPLE FOR JESUS SMACKS OF STUPIDITY. WE ALL KNOW THAT JESUS IS BEGOTTEN BY THE FATHER IN ETERNITY AS REGARDS HIS DIVINITY:
Psalm 2:7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
Act 13:33 God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up Jesus again; as it is also written in the second psalm, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee.
Heb 1:5 For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?
Heb 5:5 So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high priest; but he that said unto him, Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee.
John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
John 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
BUT AS REGARDS HIS HUMANITY JESUS IS BORN BY A WOMAN NAMED MARY:
Galatians 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law,
SO THE SON OF GOD WAS BORN OF A WOMAN. THAT WOMAN IS MARY. THE ONE BORN BY MARY IS SON OF GOD WHICH MEANS HE IS OF THE SAME SUBSTANCE WITH GOD [PHILIPPIANS 2:6]. MARY GAVE BIRTH TO THE LOGOS-GOD WHO BECAME FLESH [cf. JOHN 1:1 and JOHN 1:14]. FOR THAT REASON MARY IS NOT ONLY A MOTHER OF A MAN BUT THE MOTHER OF THE LORD. THE BIBLE IS CLEAR AND SPECIFIC ON THAT:
Luke 1:43 And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
MARY GAVE BIRTH TO THE KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS. SHE IS THE MOTHER OF THE LORD, THE MOTHER OF THE KING AND THE MOTHER OF GOD.
BUT IT IS STUPID TO CLAIM THAT IF THE SON IS GOD THEN THE MOTHER IS ALSO GOD. THAT IS ILLOGICAL AND UNFOUNDED ON REALITY BECAUSE THE BIBLE CALLED MARY AS ‘THE MOTHER OF THE LORD’ YET MARY IS NOT ‘THE LORD’.
[Tapos po tumayo po ako ulit, sabi ko sa kanya ang babaw po ng logic.. medyo pumalya na po ako dito at nataranta, kaya po ang napaliwanag ko po sabi ko Sir ang layo na layo ng " MOTHER OF GOD sa MARY IS GOD. " ini-spell ko pa po sa buong class hahahha... nagtawanan po mga klasmeyt ko... kaya po biglang tumawag ng ibang tao.... ( paki dagdagan naman po yung explanation na dapat po father para nxt time po alam ko na kung ano isasagot ko alam ko po di ko po napagtanggol ng husto si Mama Mary. )]
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA… YOU DID WELL. VERY GOOD.
[Tapos po nakikinig na lang po ako sa kanya kasi high blood na rin po ako, nagbitiw po siya ng salita na naalala niya raw po ung isang argument ng kakilala niya na doon raw po sa Mary is the Mother of God eh sinisira ko raw po yung " God is the Alpha and the Omega" kasi raw po binigyan ko raw po siya ng simula which is Mama Mary raw po."]
HA HA HA… SABIHIN MO TALAGANG ILLOGICAL SIYA. KASI HINDI NAMAN SINASABI DUON SA DOGMA NG MOTHER OF GOD NA MAYSIMULA SI JESUS. SO HE IS OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY. HIS ACCUSATION IS UNFOUNDED IN REALITY. HA HA HA… ANG TURO NATIN IS THAT WHEN THE LOGOS-GOD BECAME FLESH [JOHN 1:14] HE ENTERED INTO HUMAN EXISTENCE. HE ENTERED INTO TIME AND SPACE BECAUSE HE ASSUMED HUMAN FLESH. THAT IS THE MEANING OF BEING BORN IN THE FULLNESS OF TIME ‘UNDER THE LAW’ IN GALATIANS 4:4.
[ Hindi na po ako nakapag rebutal kasi po hindi po agad ako makapag react medyo high blood na po ako sa kanya hahaha...]
HA HA HA… KEEP YOUR COOL. WAG KANG PADADALA SA GALIT. BUT YOU PREPARE YOURSELF FOR YOUR NEXT MEETING. HE HE HE…
[Then na realize ko po dapat po pala tinanong ko sa kanya na EH DI SINO GUMAWA KAY MAMA MARY? SUMULPOT BIGLA? pakidagdagan na lamang po father hahaha...]
TAMA YAN. MAMA MARY IS A CREATURE OF GOD. SHE IS THE HANDMAID OF THE LORD. KAYA HINDI NATIN SIYA GINAGAWANG KAPANTAY NG DIOS. AGAIN THAT IS ANOTHER SIGN OF HIS STUPIDITY. KASI MARAMING MGA ANAK NA HIGHER THAN THEIR MOTHERS. HALIMBAWA, PRINCE WILLIAM OF ENGLAND IS GREATER THAN PRINCESS DIANA FROM BIRTH KASI HE IS DIRECTLY IN LINE FOR THE THRONE WHILE PRINCESS DIANA WAS A COMMONER BEFORE BECOMING A PRINCESS. BUT QUEEN ELIZABETH WAS GREATER THAN PRINCE CHARLES WHEN SHE GAVE BIRTH TO HIM BECAUSE SHE WAS THE QUEEN-REGENT.
[Tapos daldal na po siya ng daldal, even Rizal daw po ... galit daw po siya sa Catholic Church ... in Noli and El Fili raw po makikita ang proof sa mga pari... Damaso raw po... Tapos po nagtaas po ako ng kamay... nabasa ko po kasi yung retraction ni Rizal sa Blog nyo tungkol sa catholic church and nag explain po ako sa buong class ... Sabi ko po Sino kasama ni Simon bago siya mamatay sa last part ng El Fili? Hindi ba si Fr. Florentino ... and sabi ko po na si Rizal ay nagbalik sa Santa Iglesia bago siya mamatay , he even confessed and receive communion.]
VERY GOOD. YOU DID VERY WELL.
[Tapos sabi nya po that's impossible daw... nakooo ahhaha...]
ReplyDeleteANONG IMPOSSIBLE E KAYA NGA SI SIMON YBARRA AY NAGKUMPISAL KAY PADRE FLORENTINO SA ENDING NG EL FILIBUSTERISMO KASI SI RIZAL AY PABALIK NA SA SANTA IGLESIA CATOLICA. ACTUALLY ANG ENDING NG EL FILIBUSTERISMO ANG BIDA SI PADRE FLORENTINO. SA BIBIG NI PADRE FLORENTINO INILAGAY NI RIZAL ANG PAGLAYA NG PILIPINAS DUON SA KANYANG CONCLUDING STATEMENT. HE HE HE… BOBO TALAGA ANG PROFESSOR NA IYAN. HA HA HA…
[ kung di lang po siya prof. hahamunin ko po iyon na maglabas ng ibidensya hahhaa...]
DAPAT HINAMON MO NA. KASI ANG SOURCE MO AY REFERENCE BOOK NA AKDA NI GREGORIO F. ZAIDE NA GAMIT SA MGA SCHOOLS. E YUNG POSISYON NIYA SAAN MAKIKITA? LAWAY NIYANG BULOK. HA HA HA…
[Napakarami pa po niyang sinabi na kahit na po Catholic siya eh hindi po akma sa teaching natin... May hindi po ako alam sa mga sinabi niya Father paki sagot na rin po,]
CATHOLIC SIYA? NAKU, CATHOLIC LANG SIYA SA PANGALAN PERO HINDI NA SIYA CATHOLIC IN REALITY KASI HERETICAL ANG KANYANG MGA TEACHINGS AND BELIEFS. HE IS REJECTING THE CATHOLIC DOGMAS NA SO HINDI NA SIYA TUNAY NA CATHOLIC. SABIHIN MO SA KANYA MAY KAIBIGAN KANG PARI KUNG GUSTO NIYA INVITE MO KO SA CLASS NINYO TO DISCUSS WITH HIM.
[Yung mga gamit raw po ni Blessed John Paul II eh blessed na rin daw po sabi nya, pati yung krib, even yung bahay ... ]
HA HA HA… TANGA TALAGA SIYA. E BAKIT ANG BAHAY NI RIZAL PRESERVED AT INAALAGAAN PATI MGA PLATO PATI INODORO AT KUBETA. HA HA HA… BAKIT? KASI ALA-ALA IYON NG ‘GREAT MAN’ NG NATIONAL HERO. ANG MGA GAMIT AT BAHAY NI JOHN PAUL THE GREAT AY ALA-ALA NG ISANG INTERNATIONAL HERO NA NAGPABAGSAK SA EASTERN EUROPE COMMUNISM AT SA ISANG BAYANI NG PANANAMPALATAYA.
[kaya raw po tinatago natin sabi nya po we worship and pray pa raw po ... ( na alam ko naman po na di tayo nag worship doon and pray) ...]
SABIHIN MONG SINUNGALING SIYA KASI ANG BAHAY AT MGA GAMIT NI POPE JOHN PAUL THE GREAT AY HINDI NAKATAGO KUNDI PILGRIM AT TOURIST SPOT NA NGAYON TULAD NG BAHAY NI RIZAL. MAS MARAMI NGA LANG ANG NAGPUPUNTA SA BAHAY NI POPE JOHN PAUL THE GREAT KESA SA BAHAY NI RIZAL DAHIL ANG POPE AY INTERNATIONALLY KNOWN AND WELL-LOVED. RIZAL IS NOT AS POPULAR INTERNATIONALLY.
SIEMPRE HINDI NATIN SINASAMBA YON. THE FACT NA SINUNGALING SIYA NUNG SINABI NIYANG TINATAGO NATIN, KASINUNGALINGAN DIN ANG ACCUSATION NIYA NA SINASAMBA NATIN. A LIAR IN ONE IS A LIAR IN ALL. HE LOST ANY SENSE OF CREDEBILITY.
[ gusto ko lang po malamn kung totoo po na halos lahat po ng gamit ni Blessed John Paul II ay itinatago po ... Alam ko po na mahalaga ang mga ito and in fact diba po may kwento sa bible na nahawakan lang po ata ung isang tela ng isang santo and gumaling ... paki clear po di ko na p kasi maalala hahaha ^^..]
NAKALAGAY SA MUSEUM. PAPANONG TINATAGO. HA HA HA… YUN NGANG MGA BANKO NA INUPUAN NIYA, MGA DAMIT NA ISINUOT NIYA AT YUNG POPE MOBILE AT ANG MGA PLATONG KINAINAN NIYA AY MGA NAKALAGAY NA SA MUSEUM DITO SA PILIPINAS AT PINAKIKITA NG MEDIA NUNG NAMATAY SIYA AT NUNG BEATIFICATION NIYA. HA HA HA…
[And isa pa rin po ... sabi niya po na holy raw po yung dugo kaya po dapat lang daw pong ibalik sa lupa and marumi daw po ito so makakasama sa health ( we are talking po sa dugo ng baboy na hindi kinakain ng Inc ) ... nakalagay raw po iyon sa bible na Holy ang dugo.. saan po ba nakalagay yun? at meron po ba talaga? mukang wala po haha.. Dugo po ni Christ yes ... pero baboy? I wonder hahhaa...]
ReplyDeleteHA HA HA… ANG TINUTUKOY NA HOLY AY DUGO NI CHRIST. SA LUMANG TIPAN SINABI RIN NA HOLY ANG DUGO PERO DUGO NG TAO ANG TINUTUKOY DUON. TALAGA NAMANG GINAGALANG NATIN ANG DUGO NG TAO. HE HE HE…
YUNG MGA BABOY AY NILINIS NA NG DIOS. ANG LAHAT NG NILIKHA AY DATING ‘MABUTI’. GOD CREATED EVERYTHING GOOD:
Genesis 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was VERY GOOD. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
THEN DURING THE EXODUS EVENT PINAGBAWAL ANG IBANG HAYUP ISA NA DIYAN ANG BABOY. SUBALIT NUNG NEW TESTAMENT E NILINIS NA SILA NG DIOS:
Act 10:9 Nang kinabukasan nga samantalang sila'y patuloy sa kanilang paglalakad, at nang malapit na sa bayan, si Pedro ay umakyat sa ibabaw ng bahay upang manalangin, nang may oras na ikaanim;
Act 10:10 At siya'y nagutom at nagnais kumain: datapuwa't samantalang nangaghahanda sila, ay nawalan siya ng diwa;
Act 10:11 At nakita niyang bukas ang langit, at may isang sisidlang bumababa, gaya ng isang malapad na kumot, na nakabitin sa apat na panulok na bumababa sa lupa:
Act 10:12 Na doo'y naroroon ang lahat ng uri ng mga hayop na may apat na paa at ang mga nagsisigapang sa lupa at ang mga ibon sa langit.
Act 10:13 At dumating sa kaniya ang isang tinig, Magtindig ka, Pedro; magpatay ka at kumain.
Act 10:14 Datapuwa't sinabi ni Pedro, Hindi maaari, Panginoon; sapagka't kailan ma'y hindi ako kumain ng anomang bagay na marumi at karumaldumal.
Act 10:15 At muling dumating sa kaniya ang tinig sa ikalawa, Ang nilinis ng Dios, ay huwag mong ipalagay na marumi.
[And bkit po ang jehova eh ayaw magpa blood transfussion ? Bakit po father?]
KASI MASAMA ANG UGALI NILA. YAN AY MANIFESTATION OF EXTREME SELFISHNESS.
[Sige po father, medyo mahaba na po ang kwento ko hahaha... Ewan ko po diyan sa prof. ko na iyan Catholic pa naman din po... Paki dagdagan na lamang po ng mga tamang sagot father ung tungkol sa mga iyan Father... Maraming maraming salamat po! Isa po ako sa inspired na Reader ng Blog ninyo Father and willing to protect our Doctrine , our Faith and our Church.! Salamat po!]
YOU ARE WELCOME BROD. GOD BLESS YOU TOO. LET US PRAISE THE LORD THAT YOU ARE INSPIRED BY THIS BLOG.
father sino po ba ang nauna si cristo o si aristotle
ReplyDeleteKUNG ANG PAG-UUSAPAN AY ANG PAGKADIOS NI CRISTO SIEMPRE SI CRISTO KASI SABI SA JOHN 1:1 SA SIMULA PA NARUON NA ANG LOGOS. SINO ANG LOGOS? SI CRISTO.
ReplyDeletePERO KUNG ANG TITIGNAN AY ANG PAGKAKATAWANG TAO NG LOGOS SI ARISTOTLE ANG NAUNA.
Hello po Father, Itatanong ko yun tungkol sa rosary, kasi po di ba sabi sa bible wag manalangin ng paulit ulit? diba po ang rosary ganun? paki tulungan lang po ako kasi po isa yan sa mga tinatanong sa akin ng ibang religion..
ReplyDeleteHindi natin nilalabag ang Matthew 6:7-8 dahil ang ating mga dasal sa Iglesia Catolica ay MAKABULUHANG PAULIT-ULIT at hindi WALANG KABULUHANG PAULIT-ULIT na siyang pinagbabawal ng Matthew 6:7-8. Tignan mong mabuti:
ReplyDeleteMateo 6:7-8 At sa pananalangin ninyo ay huwag ninyong gamitin ang WALANG KABULUHANG PAULIT ULIT, na gaya ng ginagawa ng mga Gentil: sapagka't iniisip nilang dahil sa kanilang maraming kasasalita ay didinggin sila. Huwag nga kayong magsigaya sa kanila: sapagka't talastas ng inyong Ama ang mga bagay na inyong kinakailangan, bago ninyo hingin sa kaniya.
TINANGGAL NG MGA ANTI CATHOLICS ANG ADJECTIVE NA 'VAIN' OR 'WALANG KABULUHAN' DUON SA REPETITIOUS PRAYER para lumabas na nilalabag natin ang talata. ITO AY ISANG GARAPALANG PANLOLOKO SA MGA KATOLIKO NA HINDI MAGALING GUMAMIT NG LOGICAL ANALYSIS.
Ang ating mga Dasal sa Rosary ay mga Biblical Prayers dahil ang mga ito ay hinalaw sa Biblia o dili kaya ay naka-base sa mga aral ng Biblia tulad ng...
1. OUR FATHER [Mateo 6:9-13]
2. HAIL MARY [Lucas 1:28/ 1:38]
3. THE CREED which is the summary of the major tenets of Salvation History contained in the Bible.
Sa Banal na Kasulatan may mga halimbawa ng mga repetitious prayers na hindi kinukondena ng Dios:
ReplyDelete1. Tulad ng Psalmo 136 kung saan paulit-ulit na sinasabi "For His love endures forever."
Psalm 136 (New International Version)
1 Give thanks to the LORD, for he is good.
His love endures forever.
2 Give thanks to the God of gods.
His love endures forever.
3 Give thanks to the Lord of lords:
His love endures forever.
4 to him who alone does great wonders,
His love endures forever.
5 who by his understanding made the heavens,
His love endures forever.
6 who spread out the earth upon the waters,
His love endures forever.
7 who made the great lights—
His love endures forever.
8 the sun to govern the day,
His love endures forever.
9 the moon and stars to govern the night;
His love endures forever.
10 to him who struck down the firstborn of Egypt
His love endures forever.
11 and brought Israel out from among them
His love endures forever.
12 with a mighty hand and outstretched arm;
His love endures forever.
13 to him who divided the Red Sea [a] asunder
His love endures forever.
14 and brought Israel through the midst of it,
His love endures forever.
15 but swept Pharaoh and his army into the Red Sea;
His love endures forever.
16 to him who led his people through the desert,
His love endures forever.
17 who struck down great kings,
His love endures forever.
18 and killed mighty kings—
His love endures forever.
19 Sihon king of the Amorites
His love endures forever.
20 and Og king of Bashan—
His love endures forever.
21 and gave their land as an inheritance,
His love endures forever.
22 an inheritance to his servant Israel;
His love endures forever.
23 to the One who remembered us in our low estate
His love endures forever.
24 and freed us from our enemies,
His love endures forever.
25 and who gives food to every creature.
His love endures forever.
26 Give thanks to the God of heaven.
His love endures forever.
2. Apocalipsis 4:8 kung saan ang mga anghel at mga banal sa langit ay paulit-ulit na nananalangin:
ReplyDeleteRev 4:8 At ang apat na nilalang na buhay, na may anim na pakpak bawa't isa sa kanila, ay mga puno ng mata sa palibot at sa loob; at sila'y walang pahinga araw at gabi, na nagsasabi, Banal, banal, banal, ang Panginoong Dios, ang Makapangyarihan sa lahat, na nabuhay at nabubuhay at siyang darating.
AYAN. TIGNAN MO. WALANG PAHINGA PA YAN ARAW AT GABI NA PAULIT-ULIT NA YON ANG SINASABI. PERO HINDI NAGAGALIT ANG DIOS.
Kung magsalita ang mga Born Again sa atin ay parang kala mo malilinis sila pagdating sa paulit-ulit na panalangin. Ang mga prayers nga nila ay paulit ulit na may nagsasalita ng Amen at Alleluia. Hindi ba paulit-ulit din yon?
ANG MGA MANALISTA NAMAN AY PAULIT ULIT ANG OPO, SIYANGA PO NILA.
Kaya wag kang magpapaniwala sa mga iyan.