God the Father embracing clothing the Prodigal Son
Delegates at the United Church of Christ's General Synod 28 recently voted overwhelmingly in favor of amending the denomination's constitution so that the phrase “heavenly Father” will no longer be present anywhere in its text.
Instead of reading “A Local Church is composed of persons who,
believing in God as heavenly Father,” under the proposal, Article V of
the church constitution would read, “A Local Church is composed of
persons who, believing in the triune God.”
Delegates passed the
proposal 613 to 161 in favor of the changes to the text, as reported by
UCNews. Ten delegates abstained from voting.
So why the changes?
The
UCC wants to broaden the phrase so as not to be exclusive in its
language. Barb Powell, a spokesperson for the denomination, spoke to
World Net Daily about the inclusive language already used among many UCC
congregations. “In the UCC, our language for God, Christ and the Holy
Spirit … is preferred to be more open for different expressions of the
Trinity,” she said. “Heavenly Father is just one vision.”
The Biblical Witness Fellowship, a group of UCC pastors
and church members that was formed in response to “UCC's theological
surrender to the moral and spiritual confusion of contemporary culture,”
made their disapproval of the decision clear. David Runnion-Bareford,
executive director of BWF and a leader who supported keeping “heavenly
Father” in the language of the constitution, spoke out on the
organization's website before the vote was taken in Tampa, Fla., last weekend.
“Rejecting God as Father in an age of fatherlessness is unthinkable,”
he said. “God acted toward us in amazing grace when He offered to be
our Father through the sacrifice of his Son, Jesus Christ who offers us
life in his name. This is not something we as humans made up in some
other time. Rejecting our Father is act of arrogant rebellion in the
name of cultural conformity that only further alienates members,
churches, but more importantly God himself.”
Other changes to the
constitution include a change in the governing body's structure, though
the “heavenly Father” debate is among the most polarizing.
The Rev. Bennett Guess, another spokesperson for the UCC, doesn't see a problem with the changes.
“We
are still a Trinitarian denomination,” Guess saidm, USA Today reported.
“This was not a theological document. It was a restructuring from five
boards to one. And in doing this, we dealt with bylaws written decades
ago, before the denomination's commitment to using inclusive and
expansive imagery for God.”
The changes to the denomination's
constitution are now in the hands of the 38 Conferences of the United
Church of Christ, which will decide whether or not to ratify the
document before the next General Synod in 2013.
SOURCE: The ChristianPost.com
http://www.christianpost.com/news/united-church-of-christ-votes-to-take-heavenly-father-out-of-constitution-51934/

.jpg)
Satan is their father.
ReplyDeleteDahil sa radical feminism natanggal ang God the Father. Baka sa susunod ay gawing babae ang Holy Spirit.
ReplyDeleteYAN TALAGA ANG PLANO NILA AT SUSUNOD NA HAKBANG.
ReplyDeleteFather Abe, did the bishops violate Article VI section 29
ReplyDelete(2) No public money or property shall be appropriated, applied, paid, or employed, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, sectarian institution, or system of religion, or of any priest, preacher, minister, other religious teacher, or dignitary as such, except when such priest, preacher, minister, or dignitary is assigned to the armed forces, or to any penal institution, or government orphanage or leprosarium.
????
IF THE BISHOPS HAVE COMMITTED ILLEGAL ACTS THEN THEY HAVE TO FACE IT IN COURTS. ITS UP TO LEGAL EXPERTS TO DECIDE.
ReplyDeleteI think it is Arroyo who should take the blame for mishandling of funds.
ReplyDeleteThey were offered a donation so they accepted the donation. no malice.
OO NGA.
ReplyDeleteISA PA, ITONG MGA OBISPO NA ITO AY NAGLILINGKOD SA MAHIHIRAP NA LUGAR. TULAD NG BASILAN, BUTUAN... AT IBA PANG LUGAR SA MINDANAO.
Naku, akala mo naman ang ibang secta hindi nakikinabang sa gobyerno... MGA IPOKRITO!
ReplyDeleteKAYA NILALAPITAN ANG MGA YAN NG MGA POLITIKO LALO NA KAPAG PANAHON NG KAMPANYA DAHIL SA BLOC VOTING, AT ANG KAPALIT AY ANO???
???
Wala namang problema jan e. kung may kasalanan ang mga obispo..they are ready to face it.. hindi sila tatakbo na katulad nung ibang Lider ng Relihiyon. Hindi naman po kasi porket nasa loob ka na ng simbahan e, hindi ka na pwedeng magkamali.. kaya sana hwag po tayong maging judgemental dahil, hindi porket nagkamalai sila ay nagkamali na ang buong KAWAN ng Diyos. Hindi po ganun yun.
ReplyDeleteVERY GOOD.
ReplyDeleteAT LEAST TAYO HINAHARAP NATIN. ANG GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS HULING HULI NA DENY TO DEATH PA. NAGTATAGO PA. NONE OF THE BISHOPS ESCAPED.
The media is being unfair regarding the issue! There are reports that, there are also other recipients besides the bishops and yet they are not included in this scandal!
ReplyDeleteThis is more of a moral issue than a political issue unlike what most people think.
Why are the bishops brought out in the spotlight?When the PCSO or Arroyo Administration are the ones to blame for mishandling of funds!The bishops in my opinion are the ones who should be least involved in this issue, Aquino is really desperate to implement the RH-Bill.Defamation of character is a very old tactic, and a good start to cripple the on-going anti RH-Bill campaign.The Church and PCSO already had strong relations to help the poor long before this issue came out as stated by Morato(former chairman of PCSO).
What's funny is, critics and atheist alike are more concerned for the moral behavior of our bishops :)
Binabato nila ng mga akyusasyon na corrupt daw ang ating mga obispo.Lumalabas na concern na concern ang mga hipokritong atheista, hindi naman nila pera diba? kinuha ba ang pera iyon sa kanilang mga pitaka? may autoridad ba ang mga ibospo sa pondong iyon?
nabubuang na siguro ang mga hipokritong critico at mga atheista.
DEAR ANONYMOUS,
ReplyDeleteYOU HAVE TOUCHINGLY EXPRESSED MY OWN FEELINGS ON THE ISSUE. OUR BISHOPS ARE CHAMPIONS OF CHARITABLE WORKS AND BEING PARTNERS OF THE GOVERNMENT IT IS BUT PROPER FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO HELP THEM IN THEIR WORKS OF CHARITY.
THE ATHEISTS AND THE COMMUNISTS AND THE ANTI-CATHOLICS ARE NOW MORALIZING. THESE POLITICAL AND SOCIAL PROSTITUTES ARE ENJOYING THE CHARADE LIKE VULTURES.
SIGE LANG MGA DEMONIO, MAGPAKASAYA KAYO UNTIL THE CATHOLIC INDIGNATION RISE AND BURST FORTH LIKE A BROKEN DAM. THEN YOU WILL TAST WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR.
Hayzz Father, ako po yung student doon sa philosophy na nagtanong po sa inyo last time,
ReplyDeleteBinuksan ko po agad ang blog po ninyo para tignan ang tungkol dito sa issue ng ating mga obispo and marining po ang response po ninyo... Ang professor ko po kasi, tinitira nanaman po kayo... Dahil nga po dito sa issue...hindi ko po kasi alam yung tungkol sa issue... Pero atleast nalinawan na po ako sa mga nabasa ko ngayon... Salamat po and ready na po akong sagutin ulit ang anti-catholic kong professor ahhaha....
PRAISE THE LORD. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK. ASK THE HOLY SPIRIT FOR WISDOM AND FORTITUDE TO DEFEAT THAT BEAST DISGUISE AS A PROFESSOR.
ReplyDeletefather abe ang maganda po sa mga obispo natin ay hinaharap ang mga kontrbersyal na nangyayari sa kanila hindi tulad ng mga iba diyan, nagtatago sa batas. hehehe. kilala mo na yun father.hehehe. yung archbishop namin dito sa cotabato father na si archbishop quevedo ay maraming natulungan hindi lang mga katoliko kundi mga muslim. kaya nga yung muslim dito sa cotabato ay mahal na mahal ang simabahang katoliko. nung binaha po yung cotabato city ay ang simbahan ang unang tumulong sa mga nasalanta.
ReplyDeleteNAPAKA GALING NI ARCH. QUEVEDO KANINA SA SENATE. ANG GAGALING NG MGA BISHOPS NATIN. HONEST, LOGICAL AND HIGHLY EDUCATED. HINDI KAGAYA NG MGA PASTOR NA MGA BOBO AT ILLOGICAL.
ReplyDelete