The Meeting of Jacob and Rachel by William Dyce
-
[EX-WIFE? WHAT DO YOU MEAN? WERE YOU GRANTED DIVORCE IN THE U.S.? OR YOUR MARRIAGE IS ANNULLED?]
Yes I was recently granted divorce in the US and planning to marry the person that I truly love. You must know that I am minister of a Church here in the US. My first marriage was a match not made in heaven. How come? It was a marriage that was not bound by God because it was a marriage without true love. I cannot fully disclose but all I can say is that I just agreed to the wedding out of pity for her. But I learned to love her. Until irreconcilable differences sets in through the years. Yes I admit we had a mistake but now I'm ready to marry the woman I truly love.
-
Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[EX-WIFE? WHAT DO YOU MEAN? WERE YOU GRANTED DIVORCE IN THE U.S.? OR YOUR MARRIAGE IS ANNULLED?]
[Yes I was recently granted divorce in the US and planning to marry the person that I truly love.]
AND YOU ARE TRYING TO JUSTIFY YOUR DIVORCE EVEN IF IT IS AGAINS THE WILL OF THE LORD. WHAT CAN HAD JOINED CAN BE PUT ASUNDER BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WHO IS ALSO PRO-ABORTION. HOW NICE OF YOU.
NOW, YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU ARE MARRYING A PERSON THAT YOU TRULY LOVE. DIDN'T YOU SAY SUCH A THING TO YOUR WIFE WHOM YOU DIVORCED TO WED THIS LEGAL CONCUBINE? YOU ALSO TOLD HER THAT YOU TRULY LOVE HER DIDN'T YOU? AND WHEN YOU PREFER TO DIVORCE THIS SECOND WOMAN THEN YOU CAN TELL TO THE THIRD WOMAN THAT SHE IS YOUR TRUE LOVE. HOW NICE.
[You must know that I am minister of a Church here in the US.]
MINISTER OF THE CHURCH? DEFINITELY NOT OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. HOW CAN YOU BE A MINISTER OF CHRIST WHEN YOU CAN VIOLATE THE WILL OF CHRIST AND INSTEAD YOU ARE BREAKING WHAT GOD HAD UNITED BY THE POWER OF THE CIVIL GOVERNMENT. WHO IS YOUR GOD JESUS OR OBAMA? ARE YOU MINISTER OF CHRIST OR OF OBAMA?
[My first marriage was a match not made in heaven.]
SINCE YOU WANTED DIVORCE YOU CLAIM THAT YOUR MARRIAGE IS NOT MADE IN HEAVEN. HOW NICE OF YOU. WELL, IF THAT IS SO WHY DID YOU MARRY HER? YOU MARRIED HER BECAUSE YOU WERE IN LOVED WITH HER GENUINELY AND YOU BELEIVED THAT GOD WANTED THE TWO OF YOU TOGETHER. NOW, HEAVEN MUST BEND TO SATISFY YOUR ADULTEROUS CHOICES.
[How come? It was a marriage that was not bound by God because it was a marriage without true love.]
YOU MADE A FOOL OUT OF YOURSELF AND OUT OF THE LORD AND YOUR CHURCH. IMAGINE, AN ALLEGED MINISTER OF GOD MARRYING A WOMAN WITHOUT TRUE LOVE... THAT IS EXTREME MANIFESTATION OF HYPOCRISY AND DECEPTION COMBINED TO THE MAXIMUM LEVEL.
[I cannot fully disclose but all I can say is that I just agreed to the wedding out of pity for her.]
O GOODNESS, WHAT YOU HAVE DONE IS NOT PITY BUT DECEPTION AND DISHONESTY. YOU CLAIMED PUBLICLY THAT YOU LOVED HER AND THAT YOU WANTED TO BE WITH HER 'TILL DEATH DO US PART' AND THEN YOU DIDN'T MEAN THAT AT ALL. THAT IS DISGUSTING. YOUR CLAIM OF PITY FOR HER IS PATHETIC AND UNCONVINCING.
ANYWAY, YOU ARE AN EDUCATED PERSON... A HIGHLY EDUCATED ONE BECAUSE YOU ARE A MINISTER OF YOUR SECT. YOU HAVE READ AND STUDIED THE WORD OF GOD. STILL, YOU HAVE GIVEN HER YOUR 'CONSENT' TO BE HER HUSBAND.
[But I learned to love her.]
HA HA HA... YOU LEARNED TO LOVE HER TO THE POINT THAT YOU DIVORCED HER. HA HA HA... VERY LOVELY. YOU ARE A PERFECT GENTLEMAN ON THE ORDER OF MERLIN.
[Until irreconcilable differences sets in through the years.]
IT IS YOUR FAULT. YOUR DECEPTION FINALLY WORN OUT. EVEN AMONG GENUINE LOVERS DIFFERENCES ARE STRONG IN MARRIED LIFE HOW MUCH MORE IF YOU ARE NOT TRULY IN LOVED WITH HER.
INSTEAD OF CORRECTING YOUR MISTAKES YOU ADDED ANOTHER ONE. YOU TRIED TO CORRECT DECEPTION WHICH IS A VIOLATION OF THE DIVINE COMMAND: "DO NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS..." BY SIN OF ADULTERY. BREAKING ONE'S MARRIAGE TO MARRY ANOTHER IS AN ACT OF ADULTERY.
[ Yes I admit we had a mistake but now I'm ready to marry the woman I truly love.]
YOU ARE NOT BELIEVABLE AND CONVINCING BECAUSE YOU ARE A DECEIVER AND DISHONEST. YOU ARE WILLING TO BREAK EVEN THE WORD OF GOD IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY YOUR WHIMS AND CAPRICES.
-
Anonymous said...
-
Eh father pano naman kung both partners were both married in a church
(non catholic) just for legal reasons? (just to suit their personal
needs) I mean hindi nila talaga love yung isa't isa simula pa lang,
parang set-up lang yung marriage nila for whatever reason and they are
both aware of it? Is this a ground for annulment? If they were married
in a protestant church, got divorced, and one of them wanted to marry a
catholic in the catholic church, will this be allowed? Kasi sa
pagkakaintindi ko para sa catholic church hindi valid ang marriage
outside it. So does it mean papayagan siya ng catholic church to marry a
catholic in a catholic church? Or kailangn pa talagang mag pa anull?
-
Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[Eh father pano naman kung both partners were both married in a church
(non catholic) just for legal reasons? (just to suit their personal
needs) I mean hindi nila talaga love yung isa't isa simula pa lang, ]
IF THEY ARE CATHOLICS AND THEY GET MARRIED IN NON-CATHOLIC CHURCH OR CIVILLY WE CONSIDER THAT AS NON-CANONICAL, NOT SACRAMENTALLY VALID. THEY ARE LIVING IN SIN BECAUSE THEIR UNION IS NOT BLESSED BY GOD. THAT IS WHY CIVILLY MARRIED CATHOLICS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE HOLY COMMUNION BECAUSE THEY COMMIT FORNICATION THROUGH A UNION NOT ESTABLISHED ACCORDING TO THE WILL OF CHRIST.
GETTING MARRIED IN NON-CATHOLIC SECT IS AN ACT OF BETRAYAL AGAINST THE CHURCH AND ONCE AGAIN MAKES THE UNION SACRAMENTALLY INVALID.
[parang set-up lang yung marriage nila for whatever reason and they are both aware of it?]
AGAIN, THAT KIND OF MARRIAGE IS BASED ON HYPOCRISY AND DECEPTION. THEY ARE NOT HONEST TO THEMSELVES AND BY DOING SO THEY DECEIVED THE PEOPLE.
[ Is this a ground for annulment?]
IT IS A GROUND FOR ANNULMENT, YES. BUT SINCE THEY DID IT INTENTIONALLY THEN THEY COMMITTED A GRAVE SIN AGAINST THE LORD AND AGAINST THE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THAT MARRIAGE: THE MINISTER, THE WITNESSES AND SPONSORS, ETC. THEY MADE A CHARADE OF THE HOLY MATRIMONY.
[ If they were married in a protestant church, got divorced, and one of them wanted to marry a catholic in the catholic church, will this be allowed? Kasi sa pagkakaintindi ko para sa catholic church hindi valid ang marriage outside it. So does it mean papayagan siya ng catholic church to marry a catholic in a catholic church? Or kailangn pa talagang mag pa anull?]
INDEED, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH CONSIDERS THE MARRIAGE OF PROTESTANTS AS INVALID AND THAT OF CIVIL MARRIAGE AS HAVING NO CANONICAL OR SACRAMENTAL EFFECT AT ALL. SO IF THEY LATER WANT TO GET MARRIED PROPERLY IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AFTER THE HAVING RECEIVED ANNULMENT THEN THERE IS NO PROHIBITION. BUT, THE PREVIOUS MARRIAGE MUST BE PROPERLY ANNULLED. THE BINDING LEGAL CONTRACT MUST BE RESPECTED AND THE CHURCH RESPECTS THE CIVIL AUTHORITY ON THAT ASPECT.
IF THEY HAVE DIVORCED BEFORE THAT IS NOT WILLED OR CAUSED OR ALLOWED BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. THEY CAN BE ACCEPTED IN CATHOLIC MARRIAGE IF THERE IS NO IMPEDIMENT FOR THEM TO BE MARRIED IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. AND IF THEY WANT TO MARRY A CATHOLIC THEY MUST BE BAPTIZED AS CATHOLIC FIRST OR IF THEY WISH TO REMAIN PROTESTANT THEY MUST AGREE THAT THE CHILDREN TO BE BORN SHALL BE BROUGHT UP IN THE CATHOLIC FAITH.
.jpg)
![ST. JEROME EMILIANI [1486-1537]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_6dKQTchkJaA/R0lo013dyBI/AAAAAAAAB_4/XzUAPDESwwQ/s1600/St.+Jerome+in+prayer,+small_1.jpg)
Twisting the truth to fulfill personal needs. Problem is, we treat love as if it was meant to satisfy us fully.
ReplyDeleteLove is sacrifice, as shown by Jesus Christ on the cross.
-Avelino Escolano
DIVORCE IS ACTUALLY "I LOVE YOU UNTIL I DUMP YOU". HE HE HE... IT IS A SUPERFICIAL LOVE... DEVOID OF ETERNITY.
ReplyDeleteWell some people, especially those pro-divorce, that Mt 19:6 is only applicable to those whom God has put together. So does it mean if God was NOT the one who put you together ay pwede ng paghiwalayin ng TAO? How do we know if in marriage God was the one who puts you together and just the couple or worse the devil? People can do crazy things kagaya ng gay marriages, satanic marriages... etc. So how do we know? Was the example posted above (the couple who got married but didn't love each other) an example of God putting two together? Anong gagawin nila sa marriage nila kung pumapalya na? Dapat ba nilang panindigan? Or is it ok ng paghiwalayin sila (divorce) kasi hindi naman sila applicable sa Matthew 19:6? Thank you father.
ReplyDelete[Well some people, especially those pro-divorce, that Mt 19:6 is only applicable to those whom God has put together. So does it mean if God was NOT the one who put you together ay pwede ng paghiwalayin ng TAO? How do we know if in marriage God was the one who puts you together and just the couple or worse the devil? People can do crazy things kagaya ng gay marriages, satanic marriages... etc. So how do we know? Was the example posted above (the couple who got married but didn't love each other) an example of God putting two together? Anong gagawin nila sa marriage nila kung pumapalya na? Dapat ba nilang panindigan? Or is it ok ng paghiwalayin sila (divorce) kasi hindi naman sila applicable sa Matthew 19:6? Thank you father.]
ReplyDeleteWE SHALL NOW IF THE ONE WHO BIND IS GOD OR NOT IF WE WILL FOLLOW THE CHURCH FOUNDED BY THE LORD JESUS PERSONALLY AND HAS BEEN GIVEN THE POWER TO BIND AND TO LOOSE:
Mt 16:16-19 Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." And Jesus answered him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
THE POWER TO BIND AND TO LOOSE WAS ENTRUSTED BY THE LORD JESUS TO HIS ONE AND ONLY FOUNDED CHURCH. AND SINCE THEN THAT PARTICULAR CHURCH, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, EXERCISES HER DIVINELY GIVEN AUTHORITY. SHE DECIDES ON FAITH AND MORALS WITH CERTITUDE AND WITH THE SAME POWER SHE FORGIVES SINS, SOLEMNIZE MARRIAGES, VALIDATES SACRAMENTS AND DECLARED NULL AND VOID INVALID UNIONS.
IT IS THE CHURCH - THE CATHOLIC CHURCH - WHICH CAN BIND AND LOOSE.
Naku! kaya naman pala divorce ng divorce ang mga protestante. they think they have the power to bind and loose. Granting, for the sake of argument,they are the true church as they claim, how can we refute their alleged power to loose? Is it safe to say na INAABUSE nila ang power allegedly given to them? They might insist on that power kasi yan ang nakasulat sa Scriptures.
ReplyDelete