-
Father tanong ko lang po, yung sinasabi po ng Pentecostals na baptism in
the name of Jesus only, biblical po ba iyon at paano ko ba po
irerespond ang mga sinasabi ng Pentecostals na si Jesus po ang Ama, Anak
at Espiritu Santo? Thank you and God bless!
-
DEAR JUAN CARLO,
[Father tanong ko lang po, yung sinasabi po ng Pentecostals na baptism in the name of Jesus only,biblical po ba iyon]
ANG TALATANG GINAGAMIT NG MGA PENTECOSTAL PARA SA CLAIM NILANG IYAN AY ITO:
Act 2:38 At sinabi sa kanila ni Pedro, Mangagsisi kayo, at mangagbautismo ang bawa't isa sa inyo sa pangalan ni Jesucristo sa ikapagpapatawad ng inyong mga kasalanan; at tatanggapin ninyo ang kaloob ng Espiritu Santo.
SA TALATANG IYAN ANG PUNTO NI SAN PEDRO AY DAPAT MAGPABAUTISMO ANG MGA NAIS MAPATAWAD SA KANILANG MGA KASALANAN O UPANG MALIGTAS. SUBALIT ANG OPISYAL AT TAMANG PAMAMARAAN NG PAGBIBINYAG AY HINDI GALING KAY SAN PEDRO KUNDI SA PANGINOONG JESUCRISTO MISMO. ITO PO ANG BIBLICAL FOUNDATION NG CATHOLIC BAPTISM:
Mat 28:18 At lumapit si Jesus sa kanila at sila'y kaniyang kinausap, na sinasabi, Ang lahat ng kapamahalaan sa langit at sa ibabaw ng lupa ay naibigay na sa akin.
Mat 28:19 Dahil dito magsiyaon nga kayo, at gawin ninyong mga alagad ang lahat ng mga bansa, na sila'y inyong bautismuhan sa pangalan ng Ama at ng Anak at ng Espiritu Santo:
Mat 28:20 Na ituro ninyo sa kanila na kanilang ganapin ang lahat ng mga bagay na iniutos ko sa inyo: at narito, ako'y sumasa inyong palagi, hanggang sa katapusan ng sanglibutan.
AYAN. MALINAW PA SA SIKAT NG ARAW NA TRINITARIAN FORMULA ANG PINAGAGAMIT NI JESUS SA ATIN SA PAGBIBINYAG. SIEMPRE MAS MAY AWTORIDAD SI JESUS KESA KAY ST. PETER. HINDI MALI SI ST. PETER, TINUTURO LAMANG NIYA NA ANG MGA GUSTONG MAGING CRISTIANO AY DAPAT MAGPABINYAG SUBALIT DAPAT NATING SUNDIN ANG FORMULA NA BINIGAY NI JESUS.
KAYA MAS TAMA ANG CATHOLIC FORMULA OF BAPTISM KESA SA MGA PENTECOSTAL.
[at paano ko ba po irerespond ang mga sinasabi ng Pentecostals na si Jesus po ang Ama, Anak at Espiritu Santo? Thank you and God bless!]
ANG SABI NI JESUS "AKO AT ANG AMA AY IISA" [JOHN 10:30] AT ANG ESPIRITO SANTO AY TINATAWAG NA "THE SPIRIT OF CHRIST" [1 PETER 1:11]. SUBALIT MALINAW DIN NA ANG TATLONG ITO AY MERONG DISTINCTIONS. HALIMBAWA ANG ANAK AY NAKIKIPAG-USAP SA AMA TULAD NG SA DASAL NA "OUR FATHER" [MATTHEW 6:10ff.] GAYON DIN SA KANYANG LAST SUPPER DISCOURSE [JOHN 17:5] AT PINANGAKO NI JESUS NA ISUSUGO NIYA ANG ESPIRITO SANTO NA MAGMUMULA SA AMA [JOHN 15:26].
KITANG KITA NA BAGAMAT SILA AY MAY PAGKAKAISA MERON DING DISTINCTIONS.
ANG TURO NG SANTA IGLESIA: SILA AY NAGKAKAISA SA SUBSTANCIA O SA PAGKADIOS. SUBALIT MAY PAGKAKAIBA BILANG MGA PERSONA O ANG TINATAWAG NA 'DISTINCTION OF PERSONS'. ONE IN ESSENCE BUT DIFFERENT IN PERSONS.
KAYA MAS TAMA ANG ARAL NG IGLESIA CATOLICA SA TRINITY KESA SA TURO NG PENTECOSTAL NA KAUSAP MO.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
KATANUNGAN HINGGIL SA TAMANG FORMULA NG BAUTISMO AT SA UNITY OF THE TRINITY
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
KATANUNGAN TUNGKOL SA PARAISO NG EDEN AT KUNG GALING DAW SA BAKULAW ANG TAO
-
- ESL said...
-
Hi Fr. Abe,
Good Day po...
Question lang po?
When God created Adam... sa Paradise of Eden po ba o sa mundong kinatatayuan natin ngayon?
Kasi curious lang po ako doon evolution of man na nangaling daw sa APE?
Thank You! and God Bless!
- May 19, 2011 6:33 PM
-
[Hi Fr. Abe,]
HELLO ESL.
[Good Day po...]
GOOD DAY DIN SA IYO.
[Question lang po?
When God created Adam... sa Paradise of Eden po ba o sa mundong kinatatayuan natin ngayon?]
UNANG UNA, DAPAT MONG TIGNAN NA WALANG SINABI ANG BIBLIA NA ANG PARADISE CALLED EDEN AY WALA SA MUNDONG KINATATAYUAN NATIN NGAYON. VERY CLEAR ANG BOOK OF GENESIS NA ANG PARAISO NG EDEN AY NAPAPALIBUTAN NG 4 NA ILOG AT MAY MGA HALAMAN. SIGURO NAMAN ALAM MO NA WALANG ILOG SA BUWAN AT WALANG HALAMANAN SA MARS. HE HE HE...
Gen 2:7 At nilalang ng Panginoong Dios ang tao sa alabok ng lupa, at hiningahan ang kaniyang mga butas ng ilong ng hininga ng buhay; at ang tao ay naging kaluluwang may buhay.
Gen 2:8 At naglagay ang Panginoong Dios ng isang halamanan sa Eden, sa dakong silanganan: at inilagay niya roon ang taong kaniyang nilalang.
Gen 2:9 At pinatubo ng Panginoong Dios sa lupa ang lahat na punong kahoy na nakalulugod sa paningin, at mabubuting kanin; gayon din ang punong kahoy ng buhay sa gitna ng halamanan, at ang punong kahoy ng pagkakilala ng mabuti at masama.
Gen 2:10 At may isang ilog na lumabas sa Eden na dumilig sa halamanan; at mula roo'y nabahagi at nagapat na sanga.
NILIKHA NG DIOS ANG TAO MULA SA ALABOK AT INILAGAY SA DAIGDIG NA NILIKHA NIYA:
Gen 1:28 At sila'y binasbasan ng Dios, at sa kanila'y sinabi ng Dios, Kayo'y magpalaanakin, at magpakarami, at kalatan ninyo ang lupa, at inyong supilin; at magkaroon kayo ng kapangyarihan sa mga isda sa dagat, at sa mga ibon sa himpapawid, at sa bawa't hayop na gumagalaw sa ibabaw ng lupa.
Gen 1:29 At sinabi ng Dios, Narito, ibinigay ko sa inyo ang bawa't pananim na nagkakabinhi, na nasa ibabaw ng balat ng lupa, at ang bawa't punong kahoy na may bunga ng punong kahoy na nagkakabinhi; sa inyo'y magiging pagkain:
Gen 1:30 At sa bawa't hayop sa lupa, at sa bawa't ibon sa himpapawid; at sa bawa't nagsisiusad sa ibabaw ng lupa na may buhay ay ibinigay ko ang lahat na pananim na sariwa na pinakapagkain; at nagkagayon
KAYA, IMPOSIBLE NA ANG PARAISO NG EDEN AY WALA SA DAIGDIG NA ITO. ANG LINAW LINAW NA PURO "LUPA" ANG DESCRIPTION. HE HE HE...
WELL, YUNG LUPANG KINATATAYUAN NATIN NGAYON SIEMPRE E HINDI NA EXACTO NA TINUNGTUNGAN NI EBA AT ADAN SUBALIT ITO PA RIN ANG EARTH NA TINIRHAN NILA.
[Kasi curious lang po ako doon evolution of man na nangaling daw sa APE?]
YANG ARAL NA GALING DAW ANG TAO SA APE AY THEORY LANG. HINDI PA IYAN NAPATUNAYAN. ACTUALLY, HINDI SILA MAKAPAGPAKITA NG UNGGOY NA NAGING TAO. KASI ANG TAO GALING SA TAO, ANG UNGGOY GALING SA UNGGOY. KAYA HINDI PA NAPAPATUNAYAN ANG SCIENTIFIC OPINION NA IYAN.
[Thank You! and God Bless!]
WELCOME PO. GOD BLESS YOU DIN.
- May 25, 2011 9:01 AM
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
MAGKASALUNGAT BA ANG LK 23,43 AT ANG JN 20,17?
- Anonymous said...
-
Father di po ba sinabi nya kay Dimas yung magnanakaw na NGAYON din ay
isasama kita sa Paraiso.. Ang Paraiso ang tahanan ng ating Ama di po ba,
ibig sabihin po ba non nakrating agad ang ating Panginoong Jesus at
isinama si Dimas sapagkat sinabi Niya na "NGAYON din..
Pero bakit po matapos ang tatlong araw nang Siya ay mabuhay.. bakit sinabi Niya kay Magdalena (Juan 20:17) "Huwag mo akong hawakan, sapagkat hindi pa ako nakapupunta sa Ama.."
Maraming salamat po ako po'y laging taga subaybay ng inyong blog at marami po akong nalinawan sa ating pananampalataya..
- May 24, 2011 9:49 AM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[Father di po ba sinabi nya kay Dimas yung magnanakaw na NGAYON din ay
isasama kita sa Paraiso.. Ang Paraiso ang tahanan ng ating Ama di po ba,
ibig sabihin po ba non nakrating agad ang ating Panginoong Jesus at
isinama si Dimas sapagkat sinabi Niya na "NGAYON din..
Pero bakit po matapos ang tatlong araw nang Siya ay mabuhay.. bakit sinabi Niya kay Magdalena (Juan 20:17) "Huwag mo akong hawakan, sapagkat hindi pa ako nakapupunta sa Ama.."]
DEAR ANONYMOUS,
ANG STATEMENT NI JESUS SA REPENTANT THIEF SA LUCAS 23:43 AY HINDI TUNGKOL SA PAGPUNTA SA ISANG LUGAR. ITO AY TUNGKOL SA KALIGTASAN. THE REPENTANT THIEF WANTED TO BE SAVED. KAYA BINIGYAN SIYA NI LORD NG ASSURANCE NA SIYA AY MALILIGTAS OR IN OTHER WAY OF SAYING IT: "PAPASOK SA LANGIT". IBIG SABIHIN PINAKIKITA AT PINATUTUNAYAN NI JESUS NA SIYA ANG ATING PANGINOON, TAGAPAGLIGTAS AT TAGAPAGTUBOS MULA SA KASALANAN.
YUNG KAY MARIA MAGDALENA SA JUAN 20:17 AY IBA ANG CONTEXT AT SITUATION. GUSTO NI MARIA NA HALIKAN ANG PAA NI JESUS SUBALIT SABI NI JESUS HUWAG MUNA. BAKIT? KASI GUSTO NIYANG MAGPUNTA AGAD SI MARIA MAGDALENA SA MGA APOSTOLES PARA IPAHAYAG ANG KANYANG MULING PAGKABUHAY.
ANG TINUTUKOY NI JESUS NA PAGPUNTA SA AMA NUONG KAUSAP NIYA SI MARIA MAGDALENA AY HINDI KALIGTASAN KUNDI ANG KANYANG ASCENSION O PAG-AKYAT SA LANGIT. AT TUTUO NGA NUONG AAKYAT NA SIYA SA LANGIT HINAYAAN NIYA ANG MGA BABAE NA SAMBAHIN SIYA AT YAKAPIN ANG KANYANG MGA PAA:
Mat 28:9 Suddenly Jesus met them and said, "Peace be with you." They came up to him, took hold of his feet, and worshiped him.
Mat 28:10 "Do not be afraid," Jesus said to them. "Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee, and there they will see me."
Mat 28:11 While the women went on their way, some of the soldiers guarding the tomb went back to the city and told the chief priests everything that had happened.
SO, IN LUKE 23 JESUS REFERS TO THE IMMEDIATE SALVATION OF THE REPENTANT THIEF WHILE WITH MARY MAGDALENE JESUS SIMPLY DEFERS PERMISSION OF ALLOWING MARY TO KISS HIS FEET UNTIL THE DAY OF HIS ASCENSION INTO HEAVEN.
[Maraming salamat po ako po'y laging taga subaybay ng inyong blog at marami po akong nalinawan sa ating pananampalataya..]
SALAMAT PO SA INYONG SUPORTA AT PURIHIN ANG PANGINOON AT NAKATULONG PO SA INYO ITONG BLOG NA ITO.
- May 24, 2011 10:18 AM
Saturday, May 21, 2011
G.K. CHESTERTON ON TODAY'S END OF THE WORLD
The Apostle of Common Sense logically exposed that all these errors have one thing in COMMON: "They make NO SENSE!"
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
SPLENDOR BLOG INSPIRES A YOUNG CATHOLIC TO DEFEND THE FAITH
Ave Maria!
First of all, I want to introduce myself. I am Bro. Alvin Keith S. De Perio, I am from Novaliches, Quezon City and presently studying Physical Therapy in Our Lady of Fatima University-Lagro and an active member of the Campus Ministry in our university. I am also a member of the Franciscan Tertiaries of the Immaculate, a lay branch of the Franciscans of the Immaculate, and a good friend and fellow confreres of Bro. Rafael Vicho, a DFF Member. Actually, I just heard this blog from him and when I visited your site, I found out that your blog has a very excellent and marvelous commentaries and answers regarding our faith based on our well-founded and strong doctrines of our Catholic faith that our Lord Jesus Christ has left us 2000 years ago. Our doctrines alone can refute against the illogical and baseless accusations by some Fundamentalists, Saksi ni Batman, Iglesia ni Manalo, Quibolistas, Lutherans and among others. Since the day I read your blog for the first time, I already become a good fan of yours and my day will not be complete without reading your latest blogs for that particular day. Your answers to them is definitely a big help for everybody, especially for those Catholics who are about to leave the Church to rethink and for all Catholics to know and defend their faith against all baseless accusations and a good resource item for lay people, catechists and even priests and religious. There are even times that I have to laugh hardly because of your funny and strong answers to some Born Again people regarding their baseless dogmas. Although your answers are mixed with some good sense of humor, it is very informative and helpful for everybody…
I also want to share some personal experiences regarding argumentations on faith. Actually, it happens a week ago. I have visited a good friend of mine in her stall near our campus and incidentally, she introduced me to her friend whom she regarded ‘God-fearing’ and a ‘biblical enthusiast’ which at that moment visited their carinderia stall of my friend. After he learned that I was a Catholic, he started out to state that the Catholic church is not from the Sacred Scriptures…..But I replied firmly that in the contrary, the Sacred Scriptures came from the Catholic church because the scriptures was been compiled in order to defend our doctrines from heresies during that time…..and the argumentation went on……Finally, after we passed on different topics about the papacy and rupture which I strongly but politely answer and refute his statements, the Catholic church emerged. I hope he is converted right now. Thanks be to God, to our Mother Mary, and to you…..Because I read your blog regularly and I learn a lot from it. I thank God that he uses you and your humble blog in order to educate and to train Catholics about their faith and how to defend it in such a way that is strong but charitable and polite. Your site is very accessible all especially to young people like me.
Lastly, I want to learn more about the Catholic faith and to know it better.. Despite that we have lectures on Franciscan spirituality and on our Catholic faith, I yearn to learn even more and better. I want to explore the faith that our ancestors has left us and strengthen them during their lifetime.. Do you have any seminars or lectures on a regular basis so that I can learn more? I hope that I can attend those seminars in the near future and if God wills it, I could meet you in person. Please continue this blog…..it is very helpful and informative, not to mention some good sense of humor and some funny explanations and keep up the good work. I will recommend this blog to all my friends who want to know about our Catholic faith. Rest assured, my prayers will be with you and to your team. Again, please accept my greetings to you and to Bro. Marwill Llasos, OP and May the Hearts of Jesus and Mary may guide you and your humble work. God bless you!
Yours in Jesus and Mary,
Alvin Keith S. De Perio
KAILANGAN PA BANG SUNDIN ANG UTOS NG DIOS NA 'HUMAYO AT MAGPAKARAMI'?
- The Madonna and Child by Masaccio
-
Hello father,
Ask lang po,kailangan parin ba susundin ang go to the world and multifly,kahit napakarami ng tao ang walang kinakain?
- May 18, 2011 12:05 PM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
KUNG WALANG KINAKAIN ANG IBANG TAO YUN AY HINDI DAHIL SA DAMI NG POPULATION KUNDI DAHIL SA MARAMING REASONS:
1. GRAFT AND CORRUPTION
2. GOVERNMENT FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT SOUND ECONOMIC POLICIES
3. LAZINESS OF THE PEOPLE CONCERNED
AT IBA PA.
ANG UTOS NA HUMAYO AT MAGPAKARAMI AY VALID PA RIN. DAHIL KAILANGAN NATING IPAGPATULOY ANG LAHI NG TAO. YAN AY NAKAUGAT SA KATOTOHANANG ANG MGA MAG-ASAWA AY GUSTONG MAGKA ANAK NA BUNGA NG KANILANG PAGMAMAHALAN.
SUBALIT ANG UTOS NA IYAN AY HINDI NANGANGAHULUGAN NA MAGTALIK LANG NANG MAGTALIK ANG MAG-ASAWA. KUNDI DAPAT DIN SILANG MAGTRABAHO AT MAGSUMIKAP. ANG MAG-ASAWA AY DAPAT MAGPLANO NG PAMILYA GAMIT ANG PAMAMARAAN NG DIOS HINDI ANG MGA IMORAL NA BAGAY TULAD NG CONDOMS AT PILLS. DAGDAG GASTOS LANG YON.
MAS LALONG DADAMI ANG WALANG MAKAKAIN KUNG ANG PONDO NG GOBIERNO AY GAGASTUSIN PARA SA CONDOMS AT PILLS NG MGA TAONG TAWAG NG LAMAN LAMANG ANG SINUSUNOD. SELF-CONTROL HINDI KAHALAYAN SA LAMAN ANG TAMANG PAGPAPLANO.
PAGKAIN ANG BILHIN HINDI CONDOMS AT PILLS.
- May 18, 2011 12:39 PM
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
ANO ANG MASASABI NATIN SA BORN AGAIN DOCTRINE AND PRACTICE NA "ALTAR CALL"
- Anonymous said...
-
oh mayroon pa po akong isang katanungan: nde ba po masama ung tinatawag
na "ALTAR CALL" kung saan binibigyan po kyo ng pagkakataong tanggapin si
Jesus as your Personal Lord and Savior? at sabi po ng mga Born Again na
madali lng po ang kaligtasan: eto lng po ang paraan kung paanong
maligtas ang tao: A-Admit that you're a sinner(Rom 3:23), B-Believe in
Jesus Christ (Acts 16:31) and C-Confess Him as your Lord and Savior (Rom
10:9) Ano po ang masasabi nyo po dito?
- May 16, 2011 5:59 PM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[oh mayroon pa po akong isang katanungan: nde ba po masama ung tinatawag
na "ALTAR CALL" kung saan binibigyan po kyo ng pagkakataong tanggapin
si Jesus as your Personal Lord and Savior?]
IYANG ARAL TUNGKOL NG MGA BORN AGAIN NA ANG TAWAG AY 'ALTAR CALL' IS A HYPOCRITICAL DOCTRINE. KAIPOCRITOHAN LANG IYAN NG MGA BORN AGAIN.
BAKIT? KASI WALA NAMAN SILANG ALTAR E. PINASIRA NILA ANG MGA ALTAR. MERON LANG SILANG "STAGE" KUNG SAAN PINAPUPUNTA NILA ANG MGA TAO PARA I DECLARE DAW SI JESUS AS PERSONAL LORD AND SAVIOR.
PA ALTAR CALL, ALTAR CALL PA SILA E PINAGWAWASAK NGA NILA ANG MGA ALTAR AT WALA SILANG MGA ALTAR. ANG CATHOLIC CHURCH ANG MERONG ALTAR.
NGAYON, HINDI MASAMA NA IPAHAYAG MO SI JESUS AS YOUR LORD AND SAVIOR. SUBALIT ANG MALI SA ALTAR CALL NG MGA BORN AGAIN AY ANG DOCTRINA NILA NA ANG SALVATION IS A ONE TIME EVENT. PAG NAG-ALTAR CALL KA DAW AT TINANGGAP MO SI JESUS AS LORD AND SAVIOR E SAVED KA NA. KALOKOHAN. SAAN NAKASULAT SA BIBLIA NA PAG NAG-ALTAR CALL KA E LIGTAS KA NA? SAAN NAKASULAT SA BIBLIA NA ANG SALVATION IS A ONE TIME EVENT? SAAN NAKASULAT SA BIBLIA NA ONCE SAVED WILL ALWAYS BE SAVED? WALA.
LOOK AT JIMMY SWAGGART, THE FAMOUS BORN AGAIN PREACHER DURING THE 80's. HE CLAIMED THAT MOTHER TERESA WILL NOT GO TO HEAVEN EVEN IF SHE WAS FEEDING THE HUNGRY AND TAKING GOOD CARE OF THE THOUSANDS OF LEPROUS AND ORPHANS BECAUSE SHE IS NOT BORN AGAIN. WHILE SWAGGART CLAIMED THAT HE AND HIS FOLLOWERS ARE SAVED ALREADY. THEN THAT BORN AGAIN BASTARD WAS FOUND TO BE HIRING A PROSTITUTE REGULARLY FOR SEXUAL SERVICE. HA HA HA... SO, WAS HE REALLY SAVED? WHEN HE MADE HIS ALTAR CALL WAS JIMMY SWAGGART SAVED ALREADY? AND WHEN HE WAS FORNICATING WITH HIS HIRED PROSTITUTE WAS HE SAVED THEN?
[at sabi po ng mga Born Again na madali lng po ang kaligtasan:]
KASINUNGALINGAN LANG NILA YA PARA MARAMING MALOKO AT MAUTO NILA SA IKAPO. ANG MGA APOSTOLES NI CRISTO AY NAGPAKAHIRAP PARA MAKAMIT ANG BUHAY NA WALANG HANGGAN. WALANG NAGPASARAP LANG SA KANILA. MALINAW ANG PALIWANAG DYAN NI SAN PABLO:
1 Cor 4:9 For it seems to me that God has given the very last place to us apostles, like people condemned to die in public as a spectacle for the whole world of angels and of human beings.
1 Cor 4:10 For Christ's sake we are fools; but you are wise in union with Christ! We are weak, but you are strong! We are despised, but you are honored!
1 Cor 4:11 To this very moment we go hungry and thirsty; we are clothed in rags; we are beaten; we wander from place to place;
1 Cor 4:12 we wear ourselves out with hard work. When we are cursed, we bless; when we are persecuted, we endure;
1 Cor 4:13 when we are insulted, we answer back with kind words. We are no more than this world's garbage; we are the scum of the earth to this very moment!
1 Cor 4:14 I write this to you, not because I want to make you feel ashamed, but to instruct you as my own dear children.
ANG MGA APOSTOLES AY NAGBATA NG HIRAP PARA KAY CRISTO. HISTORICALLY, NAMATAY SILA AT NAGBUWIS NG BUHAY PARA KAY CRISTO AT SA EVANGELIO. MADALI BA YAN?
[eto lng po ang paraan kung paanong maligtas ang tao: A-Admit that you're a sinner(Rom 3:23), B-Believe in Jesus Christ (Acts 16:31) and C-Confess Him as your Lord and Savior (Rom 10:9)]
TAMA ANG MGA YAN. IYAN DIN AY ARAL NG IGLESIA CATOLICA. PERO TIGNAN MO ANG MGA IYAN. WALA DIYANG "FAITH ALONE AND BIBLE ALONE" NG MGA BORN AGAIN. KITANG KITA DIYAN SA "B" NA HINDI LANG FAITH O BELIEVING ANG KAILANGAN PARA MALIGTAS KAILANGAN DIN NG "A" AT "C". PAREHONG GOOD WORKS YON: REPENTANCE AND BEARING WITNESS TO JESUS.
KAYA KUNG TINATANGGAP NILA IYANG A, B and C NA IYAN E WASAK NA ANG KANILANG "FAITH ALONE" AT "BIBLE ALONE" DOCTRINE.
[Ano po ang masasabi nyo po dito?]
ANG MASASABI KO AY PALPAK ANG DOCTRINA NG MGA BORN AGAIN. WALA SA BIBLIA.
- May 17, 2011 9:29 AM
NO FAITH ALONE IN LUKE 23, 40-43
- Anonymous said...
-
Lk 23:40-43 The other one, however, rebuked him, saying, "Don't you fear
God? You received the same sentence he did. Ours, however, is only
right, because we are getting what we deserve for what we did; but he
has done no wrong." And he said to Jesus, "Remember me, Jesus, when you
come as King!" Jesus said to him, "I promise you that today you will be
in Paradise with me."
Hello.. Fr.Abe, I have a question.. just out of curiosity. :) How did the thief go to paradise with Jesus when he hasn't done good works? The only thing I can think of was he has done good works even before he accepted Jesus..but is that enough?
and sorry I thought of another question.. how much good works is enough? since he was a thief, I can only assume that he was a sinner, especially since he reached crucifixion .. he would've created such a very big offense..
and just a thought.. I really think that thief was a lucky person.. he met Jesus and talked to him, and he was the 1st person in heaven through Jesus, that would have been a great celebration in heaven since Jesus came back and he was just in time for it!
I look forward at hearing your answer :)
- May 17, 2011 12:47 AM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[Hello.. Fr.Abe, I have a question.. just out of curiosity. :) How did
the thief go to paradise with Jesus when he hasn't done good works? The
only thing I can think of was he has done good works even before he
accepted Jesus..but is that enough?]
HA HA HA... YOU DIDN'T READ THE POST ABOVE. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY. ST. PAUL STATED THAT SALVATION IS BY CONFESSING THE LORD AND BY BELIEVING. IT IS NOT FAITH ALONE BUT BY CONFESSING [ACTION] or PROCLAIMING JESUS TO OTHERS BY MOUTH... YEAH, BY MOUTH, THAT IS WHY IT IS ACTION. AND BY BELIEVING. HE HE HE...
NOW, IS IT TRUE THAT THE GOOD THIEF DIDN'T DO GOOD WORKS? NO, NO, NO... HE DID GOOD WORKS. WHAT ARE THOSE GOOD WORKS:
1. HE CONFESSED BY MOUTH THAT JESUS IS LORD AND KING. HE ACKNOWLEDGED JESUS BEFORE MEN. THAT IS BEARING TESTIMONY TO JESUS.
2. HE ADMITTED HIS FAULTS AND HE WAS SORRY FOR IT.
3. HE PRAYED TO JESUS.
4. HE DECLARED JESUS' INNOCENCE.
5. HE CORRECTED THE BLASPHEMY OF HIS COMPANION THIEF.
SEE, ONLY BLIND WILL SAY THAT HE DID NOT DO GOOD WORKS WHILE ON THE CROSS. HE DID A LOT OF GOOD WORKS THERE. HE WAS TALKING GOOD THINGS IN FAVOR OF THE LORD JESUS. HE WAS REPENTANT.
[and sorry I thought of another question.. how much good works is enough? since he was a thief, I can only assume that he was a sinner, especially since he reached crucifixion .. he would've created such a very big offense..]
IT IS THE LORD GOD WHO IS THE ONLY LORD AND SAVIOR AND THE SUPREME JUDGE OF SINNERS SO IT IS GOD WHO WILL THE SAY HOW MUCH GOOD WORKS IS ENOUGH. THAT QUESTION MUST BE ADDRESSED TO THE SUPREME JUDGE OF ALL THE LIVING AND THE DEAD, NOT TO ME.
HOW ABOUT IN FAITH ALONE? HOW CAN THE PROTESTANTS AND THE BORN AGAIN DETERMINE IF THE FAITH IS REAL, GENUINE OR SINCERE OR ENOUGH FOR SALVATION? LOOK AT JIMMY SWAGGART, THE FAMOUS BORN AGAIN PREACHER DURING THE 80's. HE CLAIMED THAT MOTHER TERESA WILL NOT GO TO HEAVEN EVEN IF SHE WAS FEEDING THE HUNGRY AND TAKING GOOD CARE OF THE THOUSANDS OF LEPROUS AND ORPHANS BECAUSE SHE IS NOT BORN AGAIN. WHILE SWAGGART CLAIMED THAT HE AND HIS FOLLOWERS ARE SAVED ALREADY. THEN THAT BORN AGAIN BASTARD WAS FOUND TO BE HIRING A PROSTITUTE REGULARLY FOR SEXUAL SERVICE. HA HA HA... SO, WAS HE REALLY SAVED? WHEN HE MADE HIS ALTAR CALL WAS JIMMY SWAGGART SAVED ALREADY? AND WHEN HE WAS FORNICATING WITH HIS HIRED PROSTITUTE WAS HE SAVED THEN?
BUT, GOOD WORKS MUST NOT BE REMOVED WITH FAITH AS CRITERIA FOR SALVATION. REMEMBER, ABRAHAM WAS JUSTIFIED BY WORKS AND NOT BY FAITH ONLY:
James 2:24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only. -
[and just a thought.. I really think that thief was a lucky person.. he met Jesus and talked to him, and he was the 1st person in heaven through Jesus, that would have been a great celebration in heaven since Jesus came back and he was just in time for it!]
HA HA HA... YOU SOUND LIKE A FENG SHUI MASTER, LOOKING AT IT AS LUCK. HA HA HA...
IN ORDER TO REPENT AND BE SORRY FOR ONE'S SIN IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO MEET JESUS DURING HIS LIFETIME HERE ON EARTH. SINNERS CAN ALWAYS REPENT AND CALL ON THE NAME OF THE LORD. THE NEXT GENERATION OF CHRISTIANS REPENTED AND BECAME BELIEVERS NOT THROUGH THE PRESENCE OF THE HISTORICAL JESUS BUT THROUGH THE MINISTERS OF THE CHURCH SENT BY JESUS:
Act 2:37 When the people heard this, they were deeply troubled and said to Peter and the other apostles, "What shall we do, brothers?"
Act 2:38 Peter said to them, "Each one of you must turn away from your sins and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, so that your sins will be forgiven; and you will receive God's gift, the Holy Spirit.
Act 2:39 For God's promise was made to you and your children, and to all who are far away---all whom the Lord our God calls to himself."
Act 2:40 Peter made his appeal to them and with many other words he urged them, saying, "Save yourselves from the punishment coming on this wicked people!"
Act 2:41 Many of them believed his message and were baptized, and about three thousand people were added to the group that day.
IF YOU WILL THINK THAT WAY THEN YOU ARE ONE VERY VERY UNLUCKY GUY BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT MET THE LORD JESUS ON THE CROSS.
-
May 17, 2011 8:15 AM
Monday, May 16, 2011
NO FAITH ALONE IN EPH 2,8-9 AND ROM 10,9-10
Anonymous said...
-
father are all of us unworthy to enter the Throne of God? Ephesians
2:8-9 says "For by grace are ye saved through faith it is the gift of
God. Not by works lest any man should boast" and a follow up question:
How do you explain Romans 10:9-10 which says "For if thou shalt confess
with your mouth the Lord Jesus and shalt believe in thine heart that God
raised him from death, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man
believeth unto righteousness and with the mouth confession is made unto
salvation" Oo nga po pala, eto ang kadalasang minimisinterpret ng mga
Evangelicals at mga Born Again. Tulungan nyo po akong iinterpret ito ng
maigi
- May 15, 2011 10:03 PM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[father are all of us unworthy to enter the Throne of God?]
WE ARE ALL UNWORTHY ON OUR OWN MERIT AND ABILITY BUT SINCE CHRIST OUR HIGH PRIEST DIED AND MEDIATED FOR US THEN WE CAN “APPROACH” THE THRONE OF GOD. NOT “ENTER” THE THRONE OF GOD BECAUSE THE THRONE OF GOD IS ONLY FOR GOD AND THE LAMB [cf. Rev 22:1].
BY DYING FOR US JESUS GRANT US THE GRACE TO ENTER THE HEAVENLY SANCTUARY BECAUSE HE SANCTIFIED HIS CHOSEN PEOPLE:
Heb 10:14 For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.
THIS GRACE ENABLES THE PEOPLE OF GOD TO ENTER THE HEAVEN:
Heb 10:19 Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus…
THROUGH THE BLOOD OF JESUS OUR LORD AND KING AND GREAT HIGH PRIEST, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TEACHES THAT THE BAPTIZED CAN APPROACH THE THRONE OF DIVINE GRACE AND OF DIVINE MERCY:
Heb 4:14 Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession.
Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.
Heb 4:16 Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.
-
[Ephesians 2:8-9 says "For by grace are ye saved through faith it is the gift of God. Not by works lest any man should boast"]
WELL, LET ME CITE A RENOWN CATHOLIC BIBLE COMMENTARY FOR EXPLANATION OF THESE VERSES:
“I. By whom, and in what manner, it was brought about and effected. 1. Negatively: Not of yourselves, Eph_2:8. Our faith, our conversion, and our eternal salvation, are not the mere product of any natural abilities, nor of any merit of our own: Not of works, lest any man should boast, Eph_2:9. These things are not brought to pass by any thing done by us, and therefore all boasting is excluded; he who glories must not glory in himself, but in the Lord. There is no room for any man's boasting of his own abilities and power; or as though he had done any thing that might deserve such immense favours from God.” [Matthew Henry Commentary]
SALVATION IS THE WORK OF GOD. IT WAS GIVEN TO US BY GRACE OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST. IT IS NOT BY OURSELVES THAT WE ACQUIRED IT BECAUSE MAN IS NOTHING WITHOUT THE ONLY SAVIOR WHO IS JESUS. SO MAN CANNOT BOAST TO GOD. OF COURSE, BECAUSE MAN IS NOTHING IN COMPARISON WITH GOD. EVERYTHING IS GRACE.
HOWEVER, WE MUST BEAR IN MIND THAT THE TEXT DOES NOT TEACH THAT SALVATION OR JUSTIFICATION IS BY FAITH ALONE. IT IS STATED THERE THAT IT IS NOT BY WORKS BUT IT IS NOWHERE STATED THAT IT IS BY “FAITH ALONE.” NO, NO, NO…
SO, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DOES NOT TEACH THAT SALVATION OR JUSTIFICATION IS BY WORKS. NO, NO, NO… BUT “BY FAITH AND GOOD WORKS” AS EXPLAINED BY ST. JAMES IN HIS EPISTLE:
Jas 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Jas 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
Jas 2:24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
SO, FAITH MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY WORKS. IT MUST NOT BE BY FAITH ALONE. THAT DOCTRINE IS A DEMONIC DOCTRINE INVENTED BY MARTIN LUTHER AND IS VERBATIM, WORD FOR WORD… SPECIFICALLY AND CATEGORICALLY REJECTED BY THE BIBLE: “NOT BY FAITH ALONE” OR “NOT BY FAITH ONLY” [James 2:24]. REGARDLESS OF THE BORN AGAIN’S THEOLOGICAL GOBLEDYGOOK THEY CANNOT DENY THE FACT THAT THEIR DOCTRINE IS CATEGORICALLY REJECTED AND CONDEMNED BY THE BIBLE WORD FOR WORD.
-
ST. PAUL AGREES WITH ST. JAMES. IN FACT, HE DIDN’T TEACH JUSTIFICATION
OR SALVATION BY “FAITH ALONE”. INSTEAD, YOU MUST READ EPHESIANS 2:8-9
FURTHER. LOOK AT EPHESIANS 2:8-10. LET US LOOK AT IT:
Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
* Ephesians 2:10 "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto GOOD WORKS, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them."
SO, WE CANNOT CLAIM TO BE THE SOURCE OF SALVATION BY OUR WORKS BUT THE GRACE OF GOD IS NOT FAITH ONLY. THE GRACE OF GOD LEADS US TO FAITH AND GOOD WORKS. SALVATION THEN IS BY GRACE THROURH FAITH BEARING FRUIT IN GOOD WORKS.
-
[and a follow up question: How do you explain Romans 10:9-10 which says
"For if thou shalt confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and shalt
believe in thine heart that God raised him from death, thou shalt be
saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness and with the
mouth confession is made unto salvation" Oo nga po pala, eto ang
kadalasang minimisinterpret ng mga Evangelicals at mga Born Again.
Tulungan nyo po akong iinterpret ito ng maigi]
LET US READ AND EXAMINE THE VERSES PIECE BY PIECE:
Rom 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
SALVATION IS PROMISED BY GOD [“thou shalt be saved”]. HOW CAN WE RECEIVE THIS SALVATION? THERE ARE TWO REQUIREMENTS:
1. Confessing Jesus by mouth as Lord.
THIS IS ACTION. THIS IS GOOD WORKS. THIS IS GIVING TESTIMONY TO JESUS BEFORE OTHER PEOPLE BY DOING CONCRETE ACTIONS SUCH AS SPEAKING OF JESUS TO OTHERS. ST. PAUL EXPLAINED IT WELL IN HIS EPISTLE TO TIMOTHY:
2 Tim 2:11-12 This is a true saying: "If we have died with him, we shall also live with him. If we continue to endure, we shall also rule with him. If we deny him, he also will deny us.
IF WE DENY JESUS HE WILL DENY US. IF WE PROCLAIM JESUS TO OTHERS THEN HE WILL NOT DENY US… ST. PAUL IS CLEAR. THE ACT OF PROCLAIMING JESUS TO OTHERS IS NECESSARY FOR OUR SALVATION. EVEN THE THIEF OF THE CROSS DID THIS WHEN WE ACKNOWLEDGED JESUS [AND BELIEVED IN JESUS] WHILE HE WAS HANGING ON THE CROSS:
Lk 23:40-43 The other one, however, rebuked him, saying, "Don't you fear God? You received the same sentence he did. Ours, however, is only right, because we are getting what we deserve for what we did; but he has done no wrong." And he said to Jesus, "Remember me, Jesus, when you come as King!" Jesus said to him, "I promise you that today you will be in Paradise with me."
SEE, THE LORD JESUS DIDN’T DENY THE REPENTANT THIEF WHO ACKNOWLEDGED HIM BEFORE MEN. HE WAS SAVED BY CONFESSING JESUS AS LORD AND BY HIS FAITH IN JESUS.
THIS CONDITION IS ACTUALLY DEMANDED BY THE LORD JESUS HIMSELF FROM WHOM ST. PAUL HAD GOTTEN THE TEACHING CONCERNING SALVATION:
Mat 10:32 "Those who declare publicly that they belong to me, I will do the same for them before my Father in heaven.
Mat 10:33 But those who reject me publicly, I will reject before my Father in heaven.
THAT IS VERY CLEAR.
-
2. Believing in the heart that God raised Jesus from the dead.
THIS IS FAITH. FAITH IN THE RISEN CHRIST AND THAT CHRIST IS TRULY FROM GOD.
Rom 10:10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
SO, IT IS CONFESSION BY MOUTH AND BELIEVING IN THE HEART. GOOD WORKS AND ACTION.
THIS IS NOT FAITH ALONE! NO, NO, NO…
I HOPE THIS IS CLEAR ENOUGH FOR YOU. - May 16, 2011 9:51 AM
Sunday, May 15, 2011
REFLECTION ON TODAY’S GOSPEL – John 10:1-10 THE R.H. BILL AND THE ANTICHRIST
- let him enter by the door;
- let him preach Christ;
- let him seek Christ's glory, not his own.
REFLECTION ON TODAY’S FIRST READING Acts 2:14, 36-41 - CONDOM – THE NEW FORESKIN
By: Jub Alabastro CFD-Davao
In the first reading, St Peter tells us that through baptism, we are born-again in spirit; we are renewed and cleansed of our sins;
Act 2:38-39 And Peter said to them, "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. (39) For the promise is to you and to your children and to all that are far off, every one whom the Lord our God calls to him."
Later, in the same chapter, we read that those who were baptized were added to the Church. So baptism is a way by which we become members of Christ’s body the Church.
Act 2:47 Praising God, and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.
In the Old Testament, circumcision was a way in which one becomes a member of God’s people. It is a sign of covenant between God and Abraham and his descendants that He would be their God, and they shall be His people. The process involves the removal of foreskin.
Gen 17:10-14 RSV This is my covenant, which you shall keep, between me and you and your descendants after you: Every male among you shall be circumcised. (11) You shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskins, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between me and you. (12) He that is eight days old among you shall be circumcised; every male throughout your generations, whether born in your house, or bought with your money from any foreigner who is not of your offspring, (13) both he that is born in your house and he that is bought with your money, shall be circumcised. So shall my covenant be in your flesh an everlasting covenant. (14) Any uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin shall be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant."
Male strangers or foreigners could only take part in the celebration of the Passover if they had been circumcised.
Exo 12:48 NAB If any aliens living among you wish to celebrate the Passover of the LORD, all the males among them must first be circumcised, and then they may join in its observance just like the natives. But no man who is uncircumcised may partake of it.
In the New Testament, however, Baptism is the New Circumcision. We become members of the New People of God, the Church, not by circumcision administered by the hand, but by stripping off the CARNAL BODY, with the circumcision of Christ. (Col. 2:11-12.)
When men, even married men, used condom in opposition to the Church’s teaching, are they stripping off the Carnal Body? Is this a way of CIRCUMCISING THE HEART (Rom. 2:29?) Or is this a NEW WAY of putting back a NEW FORESKIN in opposition to the NEW CIRCUMCISION?
One must remember that in both New and Old Testament, the biblical usage of the word UNCIRCUMCISED does not just pertain to someone whose foreskin was not yet removed. It also referred to those who, despite being physically circumcised, DO NOT LISTEN TO GOD OR TO HIS APPOINTED AUTHORITY and act in disobedience as those who are uncircumcised.
Jer 6:10 DRB To whom shall I speak? and to whom shall I testify, that he may hear? behold, their ears are uncircumcised, and they cannot hear: behold the word of the Lord is become unto them a reproach: and they will not receive it.
Jer 9:26 DRB Upon Egypt, and upon Juda, and upon Edom, and upon the children of Ammon, and upon Moab, and upon all that have their hair polled round, that dwell in the desert: for all the nations are uncircumcised in the flesh, but all the house of Israel are uncircumcised in the heart.
Col 2:13 And even when you were dead (in) transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, he brought you to life along with him, having forgiven us all our transgressions;
Act 7:51 You stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always oppose the holy Spirit; you are just like your ancestors.
1Mac 1:15 They covered over the mark of their circumcision and abandoned the holy covenant; they allied themselves with the Gentiles and sold themselves to wrongdoing.
St. Paul in fact has a term for this outward circumcision unaccompanied by any spiritual change. He uses the term concision.
Php 3:2-3 DRB Beware of dogs: beware of evil workers: beware of the concision. (3) For we are the circumcision, who in spirit serve God and glory in Christ Jesus, not having confidence in the flesh.
Now, if baptism is the NEW CIRCUMCISION by which we become members of Christ’s body, doesn’t this NEW FORESKIN “strip us off” of our authentic membership in the Church, the New People of God? Regardless of whether OLD or NEW FORESKIN, doesn’t this make men SUPOT in Tagalog, or PISOT in Visayan?
St. Paul, speaking of the NEW SPIRITUAL CIRCUMCISION abolishing the old Jewish Ceremonial Law, but still maintaining the entire commandment in force under Christianity, gave us this message:
1Cor. 7:18-19 NAB Was someone called after he had been circumcised? He should not try to undo his circumcision. Was an uncircumcised person called? He should not be circumcised. (19) Circumcision means nothing, and uncircumcision means nothing; what matters is keeping God's commandments.
What is worth noting and reflecting in this passage is that he gave us this exhortation in the context of Married Life. This should be enough for us to heed God’s voice in the Church and reject the R.H. Bill for the welfare of the family.








.jpg)