-
One question Fr. Abe, CRS
From your at post http://bromarwilnllasos.blogspot.com/2009/03/truth-about-apparitions-part-one.html, It says:
Pezzotta recounts how he eavesdropped on the conversations of the crowd who went to the exhibit. He says that some of them talked about (and even betted) how powerful certain images were more powerful than the others.
There’s absolutely no way to verify the anecdote of Pezzotta. Assuming it really happened, it simply means that there are misguided Catholics who do not know their faith very well. However, Pezzotta should not pass off the erroneous, if not ridiculous, views of the uninformed or mis-informed Catholics to be the official teaching of the Church.
- Why have you said that "there are misguided Catholics". Isn't that mean, people are not taught to read the "Word of God"(Holy Bible)?
Why it has an Exhibit? Does God teaches people to create IMAGES or any GRAVEN image? That just made people learn a NON Biblical doctrine. Why was the exhibit held anyways? to promote those graven images or statutes? It was said from Exodus 20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:" How then the practice of creating graven images still exerted?
I believed Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior that He Washed my Sins and I'm now one of His Children. (John 1:12).
I know we have reasons and beliefs and wherein we stand... I would love to hear from you.
Please no rude comments...let's just talk based on the Truth(The Word of God)John 3:32.
--
Clint
-
Pezzota is a great pastor. He found the truth in Christ, that only Him
must be followed and not those priests, papas, cerdinals, etc. Pezzota
only proved that the doctrines of Roman Catholic are not bible-based. He
found everything when he found Christ. Better read the bible first
before you judge Anthony Pezzota. Godbless!
-
PEZZOTA IS A COWARDLY BORN AGAIN PASTOR. HE WAS THOROUGHLY DEFEATED BY
JAMES AKIN OF CATHOLIC ANSWERS IN THEIR 'PRIESTHOOD' DEBATE AND SINCE
THEN HE REFUSED TO DEBATE THE CATHOLIC APOLOGISTS. HE FAILED MISERABLY
TO REFUTE THE BIBLICAL FOUNDATION OF CATHOLIC FAITH.
ATTY. MARWIL LLASOS ISSUED A FORMAL CHALLENGE TO DEBATE PEZZOTA ON MARY BUT HE REMAINED SILENT.
-
The anonyomous guy Father obviously does not know what he is saying. I
debunked Pezzotta's arguments and I dare his minions to refute me. It
seems that this anonymous guy is closed-minded. What truth are you
saying? Pezzotta is a certifiable liar and a twister of God's words. An
ignoramous and a charlatan. That's what he is. The statement of that
anonymous guy is a sweeping generalization that doesn't hold water. Give
specifics, cite instances, provide details and let's debate. Be
prepared to defend each and every allegation of Pezzotta. And I will be
delighted to demolish each and every one of them.
-
One question Fr. Abe, CRS
From your at post http://bromarwilnllasos.blogspot.com/2009/03/truth-about-apparitions-part-one.html, It says:
[I fully take responsibility to respond to the question because it was my article that Rev. Fr. Abe Arganiosa, CRS had the kindness to post in his blog.]
Pezzotta recounts how he eavesdropped on the conversations of the crowd who went to the exhibit. He says that some of them talked about (and even betted) how powerful certain images were more powerful than the others.
[That’s what Pezzotta claims in his book Truth Encounter. Do you have that book? You can check it out.]
There’s absolutely no way to verify the anecdote of Pezzotta.
[This is absolutely correct. It is just Pezzotta’s claims. Who are his witnesses to prove it happened? What are his documentary evidence to back up his claim? None at all. So, I repeat: THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WAY TO VERIFY THE ANECDOTE OF PEZZOTTA. Were you there?]
-
Assuming it really happened, it simply means that there are misguided
Catholics who do not know their faith very well. However, Pezzotta
should not pass off the erroneous, if not ridiculous, views of the
uninformed or mis-informed Catholics to be the official teaching of the
Church.
[Yes, that was my comment. What’s wrong with it?]
- Why have you said that "there are misguided Catholics".
[Yes, there are misguided Catholics as there are misguided Muslims, Protestants, Born Again Christians. We don’t have the monopoly of this. Even the apostle Paul severely chided the early Galatian Christians for their “foolishness” (Gal. 3:1).]
Isn't that mean, people are not taught to read the "Word of God"(Holy Bible)?
[Your conclusion does not follow your premise. Even if people are taught to read the Bible, is there any guarantee that they will do the right thing all the time. Satan even went as far as quoting the Bible. Was he ever converted? Or is it even possible to?
Across the years, may people – Protestants and Born Again Christians included – have read the Bible. But is it any guaranty that they will not twist the Scripture? On the contrary, the Bible categorically says, “As also in his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do with other Scriptures, unto their own destruction” (2 Peter 3:16), So what else is new?]
-
Why it has an Exhibit?
[Because the images are works of art. Haven’t you gone to museums where works of art are on exhibit?]
Does God teaches people to create IMAGES or any GRAVEN image?
[Aren’t you aware that he did? This goes to show your ignorance of the Bible which also makes you misguided. In Exodus 25:18-22, God did instruct his chosen messenger Moses to create IMAGES of gigantic cherubims. Aren’t these GRAVEN IMAGES? I am astonished that you do not know that.]
That just made people learn a NON Biblical doctrine.
[So God teaches a non-biblical doctrine, huh? Remember it was God Himself who INSTRUCTED Moses to create those images in Exodus 25:18-22. I can add more verses but that would be superfluity. It’s enough that there is an instance in the Bible that God commanded the creation of images. So the Bible teaches non-biblical doctrines? You are making the Bible contradict itself. Worse, you make God contradict Himself. Isn’t that blasphemy?]
-
Why was the exhibit held anyways? to promote those graven images or statutes?
[As I said these are art pieces that’s why they are put on display for art appreciation. So, if a museum puts on exhibit Buddha, or Bulul or any of the anitos, does that mean the museum also promotes graven images?]
It was said from Exodus 20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:" How then the practice of creating graven images still exerted?
[Well, go a few chapters after verse 20 where God Himself commanded the making of giant images. I cited Exodus 25:18-22, and as I said, I can add more. How come you are selective in your Bible quotes?]
I believed Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior that He Washed my Sins and I'm now one of His Children. (John 1:12).
[And so do we. Don’t claim it for yourself. And by the way, we just don't "believed" - WE BELIEVE, always in the present tense, not in the past.]
-
I know we have reasons and beliefs and wherein we stand... I would love to hear from you.
[I have given you the answers and I hope you search your Bible for these truths that are hidden from you. Your selective Bible quotes simply means you do not have the Truth, the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth. So help you God.
I also love to hear from you about my questions. I shall be waiting.]
Please no rude comments...
[Which of my comments above are rude? “Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth?” (Gal. 4:16).]
-
let's just talk based on the Truth (The Word of God) John 3:32.
[Sure, why not? But let me just say that the Truth is a Person, not a book. The Truth is Jesus Christ, the Way, the TRUTH and the Life (Jn. 14:16). How come you do not know that? Maybe, you are not in the Truth because if you are, you won’t miss it. And the Word of God is also a Person, not a book – Jesus Christ (Jn. 1:1, Rev. 19:14).
Let me check your citation for the Word of God. You used John 3:32. What does it say? Here: “And what he hath seen and heard, that he testifieth; and no man receiveth his testimony.” Where is the Word of God there? Oops. Please don’t full us with your wrong citations. Be very careful. Your lack of grasp on the Bible shows. And to ask you back your own question, were you not taught the "Word of God"?]
Saturday, October 29, 2011
MORE FROM ATTY. MARWIL LLASOS ON PASTOR ANTHONY PEZZOTA
Friday, October 28, 2011
SAN PEDRO CALUNGSOD - Editorial, Philippine Daily Inquirer 11-28-2011
Almost a dozen years after he was beatified by Pope John Paul II in 2000, Blessed Pedro Calungsod is set to become the second Filipino saint after San Lorenzo Ruiz de Manila. Through a unanimous vote, the cardinal-members of the Holy See’s Sacred Congregation for the Cause of Saints determined that the 2002 recovery of a woman, who had been clinically dead for two hours, was a miracle attributed to the intercession of Calungsod, to whom her doctor had reportedly prayed. Now, Beato (Blessed) Pedro Calungsod will soon be “San Pedro Calungsod.”
What’s the difference between a Blessed and a Saint? The Spanish Dominican historian Fr. Fidel Villarroel, the most prolific saint-maker in the Philippines who did the “positio” or historical legwork to have Lorenzo Ruiz canonized, explains that beatification is “a declaration of the Church that a dead person, judging from his or her heroic life, is proposed to Christians for local veneration or limited cult as a model of virtuous living and as an intercessor and advocate for them before God.” While a miracle is needed to be attributed to a person who died naturally and is proposed for beatification, no such miracle is needed for a martyr. Martyrdom automatically elects the martyr to the beatitude of heaven. Beatification is expected to lead to canonization, in which the cult of the blessed is widened so as to include the universal Church. Therefore canonization means a wider veneration for Calungsod.
Notwithstanding the prospects for a wider—and more universal—veneration for Calungsod, we should not miss out on the fact that he hailed from the local, from the Visayas, in fact, where three provinces and ethnic groups claim him as their own—Cebu, Bohol and Iloilo.
It is only right for the Visayas to finally have a canonized saint; after all, Christianity is older there than in Manila by nearly half a century. The head start was provided in 1521 when Humabon and his people welcomed Magellan and the Spaniards and underwent Christian baptism; his wife was re-christened after Queen Juana of Spain and received for a gift the image of the Holy Infant of Jesus—the Santo Niño. What happened between the time the remnants of Magellan’s fleet left to return to Spain in what became the first circumnavigation of the globe and the time the Spaniards, led by Legazpi, came back to the Philippines in 1565 is what Nick Joaquin calls as “the most tantalizing period in Philippine history.” Upon the Spaniards’ return, they found the image of the Santo Niño in an altar among several anitos, perhaps the first recorded evidence of folk Catholicism.
Today the Santo Niño of Cebu, together with the Santo Rosario of Peñafrancia, La Naval de Manila and Manaoag shrines, is the biggest Catholic devotion in the Philippines. The fact that the devotion has spread from Cebu to Manila (witness the Santo Niño feasts every January in Tondo and Pandacan) should indicate the catholicity of popular Catholic liturgy and religious pilgrimage.
Too often, Catholic feasts have been derided by liberals and secularists as a waste of time and resources. But Joaquin and another National Artist for Literature, the late Alejandro Roces, defended the fiesta as an “accurate barometer of progress” and the engine for nation-building. Fiestas, after all, celebrate the milestones in a community. “With births, marriages and deaths recorded, Filipinos began to see themselves as historical beings,” Roces writes. “The town was the nation in embryo. This explains why the Filipino word of town, ‘bayan,’ is also the word for nation. The Filipino saw his nation as just an expansion of his hometown . . .” Similarly, Europe became Europe because of the ancient annual great pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela of Spain.
The examples of Calungsod and Lorenzo Ruiz should indicate that the “hometown” has grown to embrace as well the globe. Both of them earned the palm of martyrdom abroad—the latter in Japan, the former in what’s now Guam. They may as well have been the first Filipino OFWs! And although they died with clerics (Calungsod with the Jesuit Fr. Diego Luis de San Vitores, and Lorenzo with several Dominican friars), they were laymen, an indication of how Christianity had really taken root among the Filipinos. Their martyrdom having sown and watered the seed of Christianity elsewhere, they’re veritable ambassadors and embodiments of the catholicity of the Catholic faith. They’re the Philippine Church’s gifts to universal humanity. They make us proud to be Filipinos and Christians.
Labels:
Candidate for Sainthood,
Canonization
Arousal During NFP's Times of Abstinence
The Marriage of The Virgin Mary and St. Joseph
Arousal During NFP's Times of Abstinence
Expressions of Affection Within Marriage
WASHINGTON, D.C., OCT. 19, 2011 (Zenit.org).- Here is a question on ethics answered by the fellows of the Culture of Life Foundation.
* * *
William E. May, is a Senior Fellow at the Culture of Life Foundation and retired Michael J. McGivney Professor of Moral Theology at the John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family at The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C.
E. Christian Brugger is a Senior Fellow of Ethics and director of the Fellows Program at the Culture of Life Foundation; and the J. Francis Cardinal Stafford Chair of Moral Theology at St. John Vianney Theological Seminary in Denver, Colorado.
[Readers may send questions regarding bioethics to bioethics@zenit.org. The text should include your initials, your city and your state, province or country. The fellows at the Culture of Life Foundation will answer a select number of the questions that arrive.]
Q: I'd like to ask a question about the appropriate place in marriage of sexually arousing behavior.
I'm getting married in November. I am presently taking an
antidepressant medication that could be dangerous for an unborn child.
My fiancé and I are planning on using NFP [Natural Family Planning] to
avoid pregnancy when we get married. Originally we were excited to
welcome a child right away into our life. But now that we know that the
medication might seriously harm any child we conceive, we are looking
into the legitimate options open to us for responsible family planning
(perhaps I'll be able to go off the medication later, maybe I can switch
medications, or maybe we'll always need to avoid and we will look into
adoption).
I am specifically interested in
answering the question whether or not we should avoid arousal after we
get married while we're abstaining, in the way we have been striving to
do during our courtship. I have read conflicting thoughts on this. I
(we) would be grateful for any help you can give us. And we would
appreciate your prayers!
William E. May and E. Christian Brugger reply:
A: You ask whether there is any obligation after you are married and
legitimately practicing periodic continence to avoid "arousal" during
the times when you believe you should abstain from engaging in the
conjugal act.
For the sake of clarity, we will presume that your belief is rooted
in a conscience judgment that you should not pursue pregnancy while you
are taking this medication. Pope Paul VI teaches that "serious reasons"
can justify such a judgment (Humanae Vitae, Nos. 16, 10); Pius XII uses
the term "serious motives" (Address to Italian Midwives, 1951); John
Paul II calls them "just reasons" (Theology of the Body, No. 125.3), and
Benedict XVI speaks about "grave circumstances" (Papal Message to
Humanae Vitae Congress, Oct. 2, 2008). Avoiding severe injury to a
gestating child clearly is a serious reason to abstain from intercourse
during fertile periods, and so without knowing further details, you do
seem justified in using NFP to avoid pregnancy.
By "arousal" we take you to mean sexual arousal that ordinarily leads
to genital intercourse. It is the kind of behavior that helps the male
have an erection and the female to receive him bodily into herself. This
behavior is, of course, good and upright for married couples to intend
when they are preparing for intercourse. We presume that you and your
fiancé are presently avoiding "arousal" behavior of this kind, and
rightly so, since you are not yet married.
It seems to us that a married couple, who judge they should not
engage in the conjugal act here and now, also should not deliberately
cause the kind of arousal befitting the preparation for intercourse, and
so should avoid arousal type of behavior. This does not exclude
ordinary expressions of affection. But behavior that deliberately causes
genital stimulation is more rightly considered "foreplay." It is likely
to put oneself (and one's spouse) into a proximate occasion of the
grave sin of masturbatory behavior; or to tempt the couple, in the heat
of the moment, to engage in intercourse against their prior moral
judgment that they should now abstain. We leave to you the judgments
about what types of behavior may elicit this kind of sexual arousal.
We warn against an overly scrupulous interpretation of what we've
said. A mark of a healthy relationship is the freedom between spouses to
love one another and express appropriate affection during "feast" or
"famine." If certain types of arousing behavior should be avoided during
times of abstinence, this emphatically does not mean that spouses
should be distant toward one another. There are a hundred ways to
express love and affection non-sexually that can deepen spousal unity
during these times: back scratches, foot rubs, hugs, sharing a glass of
red wine, watching a good video, taking a road trip, going out to
dinner. The most important thing is not to stop talking to one another.
Spouses, especially husbands, should not pout or act irritably during
times of abstinence because of the sacrifice entailed. It's not the
wife's fault -- "her darn fertility" -- that's making you sacrifice.
It's your collective moral judgment that this is the right thing to do.
As Christians, that moral conviction takes on a greatly enhanced
character in the understanding of God's will. This is what Jesus wills
for me -- for us -- right now. Embrace it and let it facilitate a growth
in charity, humility and self-control.
William E. May, is a Senior Fellow at the Culture of Life Foundation and retired Michael J. McGivney Professor of Moral Theology at the John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family at The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C.
E. Christian Brugger is a Senior Fellow of Ethics and director of the Fellows Program at the Culture of Life Foundation; and the J. Francis Cardinal Stafford Chair of Moral Theology at St. John Vianney Theological Seminary in Denver, Colorado.
[Readers may send questions regarding bioethics to bioethics@zenit.org. The text should include your initials, your city and your state, province or country. The fellows at the Culture of Life Foundation will answer a select number of the questions that arrive.]
Labels:
Bioethics,
Natural Family Planning,
Sexual Ethics
ST. ATHANASIUS, POPE ST. LIBERIUS AND THE CANONICAL TRAITOR MARCEL LEFEBVRE
- Anonymous said...
-
Siguro kung nabuhay ka sa panahon ng Arianism at nung inExcommunicate ni
Pope Liberius si St. Athanasius baka Arian ka na rin kasi pilit mong
sinasabi na YOU BELIEVE IN WHAT THE POPE SAYS....HAHA! Hindi naman Diyos
ang Santo Papa at pwede siyang magkamali. THe Pope is there to teach
the Tradition, not to innovate it. Pwedeng magkamali ang Santo Papa lalo
kung hindi siya nagtuturo Ex Cathedra...
SEe, almost all the Bishops during the time of Athanasius are Arians and he was excommunicated, madali mong masasabi sa panahon ngayon na tama si St. Athanasius kasi tinitignan mo ang panahon nila ilang daang taon na ang nakakalipas. Pero kung andun ka, malamang isa ka sa mga NAGMUMURA KAY ATHANASIUS at BUMABASTOS SA MGA TAGASUNOD NIYA...HAHA!
GO ON! BE A ROLE MODEL NG KABASTUSAN SA MGA TUTA MO...HAHAHAHA!!!
- October 26, 2011 3:59 PM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[Siguro kung nabuhay ka sa panahon ng Arianism at nung inExcommunicate
ni Pope Liberius si St. Athanasius baka Arian ka na rin kasi pilit mong
sinasabi na YOU BELIEVE IN WHAT THE POPE SAYS....HAHA!]
HA HA HA... TALAGANG SIRA-ULO NA ITONG MGA SSPX ANIMALS NA ITO. IMAGINE, THEY ARE NOW PARROTING THE PROTESTANT ACCUSATIONS AGAINST POPE ST. LIBERIUS. HOY, IF YOU ARE IGNORANT THE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST POPE ST. LIBERIUS IS BASED ON FORGED DOCUMENTS. POPE LIBERIUS WAS A VALIANT DEFEDER OF ST. ATHANASIUS AND WAS EXILED IN DEFENSE OF ST. ATHANASIUS AS WELL AS FOR HIS REFUTATION OF THE ARIAN HERESY.
IN FACT, IN THE LIST OF POPES POSTED IN THE WALLS OF THE BASILICA OF ST. PAUL OUTSIDE THE WALLS HE IS LISTED AS A SAINT, IT IS SUPPORTED BY 16 MARTYROLOGIES AND HIS FEAST DAY WAS ASSIGNED IN PRE-VATICAN II LITURGY ON SEPTEMBER 23. OBVIOUSLY, THE SSPX HAS BECOME PROTESTANTS IN MIND AND HEART AND IN PRACTICE. HOW DARE YOU MALIGN THE POPE ON WHOSE INSPIRATION OUR LADY SHOWED THE DESIGN OF SANTA MARIA MAGGIORE BASILICA. POPE LIBERIUS WAS HIGHLY PRAISED BY STS. ATHANASIUS, AMBROSE AND OTHER OF HIS CONTEMPORARIES. ONLY ENEMIES OF THE FAITH MALIGNS HIM, AND YOU ARE ONE OF THEM.
IF WE ARE LIVING DURING THE TIME OF ST. ATHANASIUS I WOULD BE DEBATING THE ARIANS AS I DEBATED THE HERETICS OF TODAY. IT WAS PAUL VI, JOHN PAUL THE GREAT AND RATZINGER-BENEDICT XVI WHO REFUTED THE HERESIES OF TODAY NOT THE SSPX. AND WE THE CATHOLIC FAITH DEFENDERS ARE THE ONES DEBATING THE ENEMIES OF THE FAITH NOT THE SSPX WHO ARE DOING NOTHING BUT SCRATCHING THEIR LEGS IN THEIR EXTRAVAGANT, POMPOUS LITURCIGAL CLOTHES.
WHO AMONG THE PRIESTS OF SSPX ENGAGED THE ARIAN HERESIES OF IGLESIA NI MANALO? NONE! THEY ARE BUNCH OF COWARDS JUST LIKE LEFEBVRE DURING THE VATICAN II. SILENT AND INSIGNIFICANT BUT OUTSIDE HOWLING LIKE A SENILE WOLF IN THE WINTER OF HIS LIFE.
[Hindi naman Diyos ang Santo Papa at pwede siyang magkamali.]
ANG SANTO PAPA ANG PINILI NG DIOS PARA HINDI TAYO MALIGAW SA PAGKAKAMALI. BAKIT SI LEFEBVRE BA DIOS? SI PILAY-FELLAY BA DIOS? SILA BA HINDI NAGKAKAMALI? ANG PAPA MAY DIVINE INSPIRATION SI LEFEBVRE - THAT WACKY OLD FOOL IS NOT INFALLIBLE AND NOT DIVINE. DREAM ON. SA SANTO PAPA AKO HINDI SA ULYANIN MONG LIDER NA SIRA-ULO.
-
[THe Pope is there to teach the Tradition, not to innovate it.]
THE POPE TEACHES THE TRADITION AND HE DIDN'T INNOVATE. HE PURIFIED IT AND MADE IT SIMPLE. HE REMOVED THE NON-NECESSARIES SUCH AS THOSE EXPENSIVE, EXTRAVAGANT AND POMPOUS CLOTHES.
[Pwedeng magkamali ang Santo Papa lalo kung hindi siya nagtuturo Ex Cathedra...]
MAS LALONG PWEDENG MAGKAMALI SI LEFEBVRE DAHIL KELAN MAN HINDI SIYA PWEDENG MAGTURO NG EX CATHEDRA. ANG SSPX AY HINDI PWEDENG MAGTURO NG EX CATHEDRA DAHIL WALA ITONG KARAPATAN AT AUTORIDAD. MGA NANGANGARAP NG GISING. MANANATILI KAMI SA VICAR OF CHRIST KESA SA EXCOMMUNICADONG KAURI NI LUCIFER AT LUTHER. MGA LITURGICAL AND CANINICAL SSPX TRAITORS. MGA ASONG ULOL SA LABAS NG SANTA IGLESIA.
[SEe, almost all the Bishops during the time of Athanasius are Arians and he was excommunicated,]
YUNG MGA OBISPONG MGA NAGING ARIANS SILA AY TULAD NI LEFEBVRE NA NAGING TRAIDOR SA SANTO PAPA. SI ST. ATHANASIUS AY HINDI LUMABAN SA SANTO PAPA. SA HALIP PINURI PA NIYA SI POPE ST. LIBERIUS DAHIL SA KATAPATAN NITO NA KAHIT NA EXILED PINAGLABAN PA RIN ANG TUNAY NA PANANAMPALATAYA. HINDI SIYA TRAIDOR NA TULAD NI LEFEBVRE.
PEKE AT FORGERY ANG CLAIM THAT POPE ST. LIBERIUS EXCOMMUNICATED ST. ATHANASIUS. IN FACT, SIYA ANG NAGBALIK KAY ST. ATHANASIUS FROM EXILE.
[madali mong masasabi sa panahon ngayon na tama si St. Athanasius kasi tinitignan mo ang panahon nila ilang daang taon na ang nakakalipas.]
TAMA SI ST. ATHANASIUS DAHIL ITO ANG TINURO NG SANTO PAPA AYON SA BIBLIA AT APOSTOLIC TRADITION. SI LEFEBVRE AY HINDI TULAD NI ST. ATHANASIUS... SI ATHANASIUS NILABANAN NIYA SI ARIUS HINDI ANG PAPA. SI LEFEBVRE ANG SANTO PAPA ANG NILABANAN KAYA KAMPON SIYA NG KADILIMAN. SIYA AY MANIFESTATION NG GATE OF HELL NA BINABANGGIT NI LORD SA MATTHEW 16:18.
[Pero kung andun ka, malamang isa ka sa mga NAGMUMURA KAY ATHANASIUS at BUMABASTOS SA MGA TAGASUNOD NIYA...HAHA!]St. Athanasius, faithful to the Pope until the end
HA HA HA... GUNI-GUNI MO LAMANG IYAN. SI FELLAY AT SI WILLIAMSON AT ANG MGA PARI NG SSPX AY MGA DUWAG LUMABAN SA MGA ARIAN PASTORS NG IGLESIA NI CRISTO. KAMI ANG LUMALABAN. SURELY, KUNG NANDUON KAMI NUNG PANAHON NI ATHANASIUS GAGAWA RIN AKO NG BLOG REFUTING THE ARIAN HERESIES OF ARIUS. SI LEFEBVRE, FELLAY AT WILLIAMSON TAHIMIK LANG KASI MGA DUWAG. LITURGY LANG ANG PAG-UUSAPAN NILA. MAMIMILI LANG SILA NG MAGAGANDA AT MAMAHALING DAMIT SA CONSTANTINOPLE AT ALEXANDRIA AT SA ROME. MGA INUTIL AT MAAARTENG MGA LITURGICAL TRAITORS.
[GO ON! BE A ROLE MODEL NG KABASTUSAN SA MGA TUTA MO...HAHAHAHA!!!]
KAYO ANG MGA BASTOS. MGA LITURGICAL ANIMALS... MGA CANONICAL SERPENTS... MGA ANAK NG INYONG AMANG DIABLO. MGA WALANG SILBI SA LIPUNAN, PURO LANG KAARTEHAN SA LITURHIYA ANG GUSTO.
- October 28, 2011 11:39 AM
- FOR MORE INFORMATION CONCERNING POPE ST. LIBERIUS PLEASE VISIT THIS BLOG:
- http://papastronsay.blogspot.com/2009/09/holy-pope-liberius-there-is-place-for.html
Labels:
Arianism,
Marcel Lefebvre,
Pope St. Liberius,
SSPX,
St. Athanasius
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DOCTRINE AND DOGMA?
- St. Peter settles the doctrinal disputes at the Council of Jerusalem
- Anonymous said...
-
fr. abe may tanong po ako ano po ang kaibahan ng dogma sa doctrine?
- October 27, 2011 9:17 PM
St. Silas reads the Decree sent by the Apostles from Jerusalem
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
- [fr. abe may tanong po ako ano po ang kaibahan ng dogma sa doctrine?]
DOCTRINE. Any truth taught by the Church as necessary for acceptance by the faithful. The truth may be either formally revealed (as the Real Presence), or a theological conclusion (as the canonization of a saint), or part of the natural law (as the sinfulness of contraception). In any case, what makes it doctrine is that the Church authority teaches that it is to be believed. This teaching may be done either solemnly in ex cathedra pronouncements or ordinarily in the perennial exercise of the Church's magisterium or teaching authority. Dogmas are those doctrines which the Church proposes for belief as formally revealed by God. (Etym. Latin doctrina, teaching.)
DOGMA. Doctrine taught by the Church to be believed by all the faithful as part of divine revelation. All dogmas, therefore, are formally revealed truths and promulgated as such by the Church. They are revealed either in Scripture or tradition, either explicitly (as the Incarnation) or implicitly (as the Assumption). Moreover, their acceptance by the faithful must be proposed as necessary for salvation. They may be taught by the Church in a solemn manner, as with the definition of the Immaculate Conception, or in an ordinary way, as with the constant teaching on the malice of taking innocent human life. (Etym. Latin dogma; from Greek dogma, declaration, decree.)
ANSWERS FROM CATHOLIC DICTIONARY ONLINE BY The Servant of God FR. JOHN HARDON, S.J.THERE IS NO NEED FOR YOU TO ASK ME QUESTIONS THAT CAN BE FOUND EASILY ONLINE. HERE IS THE LINK TO THE CATHOLIC DICTIONARY:
http://www.therealpresence.org/dictionary/ddict.htm
-
October 28, 2011 10:22 AM
Labels:
Dogma,
Far-East Doctrine,
Questions from Readers
DID ST. LOUIS GRIGNON DE MONTFORT TEACH THAT MARY IS GOD?
- St. Louis Grignon de Montfort loves the Blessed Virgin Mary much but he taught that Mary is less than an atom in comparison with Christ.
- Anonymous said...
-
Nabasa ko rin po sa Prov. 4:7 The beginning of wisdom is: get WISDOM;...
so, ibig po bang sabihin na kung gusto magkaroon ng wisdom, kunin ang
WISDOM o pumunta ka sa WISDOM.
Opo, opo, ako ay baliw at tanga pero sagutin ang mga kagaya ko.
- October 28, 2011 8:58 AM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[Nabasa ko rin po sa Prov. 4:7 The beginning of wisdom is: get
WISDOM;... so, ibig po bang sabihin na kung gusto magkaroon ng wisdom,
kunin ang WISDOM o pumunta ka sa WISDOM.]
WALA DIYANG NAKASAAD NA SI MARY ANG WISDOM. ANG WISDOM AY NAGMUMULA SA DIOS. SI MARIA AY HINDI DIOS. ANG PAGHINGI NG KARUNUNGAN MULA SA DIOS AY HINDI PAGTUTURO NA DIOS SI MARIA. ANG LAYO!!!
[Opo, opo, ako ay baliw at tanga pero sagutin ang mga kagaya ko.]
MABUTI NAMAN AT INAMIN MO... SINASAGOT KITA AT NASAGOT NA ANG IYONG MGA KABALIWAN.
- October 28, 2011 9:15 AM
- Anonymous said...
-
Salamat po, Padre na inyong sabihin na ako ay tanga at baliw, inaamin ko po iyan.
Bakit po tinawag ang Wisdom as She at sa Prov. 7:4: Say to Wisdom, "You are my SISTER; Wisdom 7:12 Wisdom is their LEADER, though I had not known She is the MOTHER of these.
Nabasa ko po sa True Devotion to Mary, page 15 written by St. Louis Grignion de Monfort: For God has made her(Mary) queen of heaven and earth LEADER of his armies, keeper of his treasurer, dispenser of his graces, worker of his wonders, RESTORER OF HUMAN LIFE, MEDIATRIX on behalf of men, DESTROYER of his enemies, and faithful associate in his great works and triumphs.
- October 28, 2011 8:45 AM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[Salamat po, Padre na inyong sabihin na ako ay tanga at baliw, inaamin ko po iyan.]
PURIHIN ANG PANGINOON NA NAGBUBUNYAG NG ISIP NG MGA PALALO AT NG MGA HERETICO.
[Bakit po tinawag ang Wisdom as She at sa Prov. 7:4: Say to Wisdom, "You are my SISTER; Wisdom 7:12 Wisdom is their LEADER, though I had not known She is the MOTHER of these.]
HA HA HA... WISDOM IS CALLED 'SHE' FIGURATIVELY. BUT WISDOM IS ABSTRACT JUST LIKE ALL VIRTUES... LOVE, PEACE, JOY, FAITH, GRACE... THESE ARE ABSTRACT AND THEREFORE THERE ARE INSTANCES THAT THEY ARE FIGURATIVELY REFERRED TO AS EITHER HE OR SHE. THE SAME THING FOR THE MOTHERHOOD OF WISDOM THAT IS MERE ANALOGICAL OR FIGURATIVE.
THE PROBLEM WITH YOU IS THAT YOUR DELUSIONS DO NOT ALLOW YOU TO SEE THINGS IN PROPER ORDER. MAY NAKITA KA LANG NA MOTHER E SI MARY KAAGAD ANG NASA ISIP MO. HE HE HE... SI MARY AY MOTHER OF JESUS AT HINDI MOTHER-WISDOM. MAGKAIBA YON.
[Nabasa ko po sa True Devotion to Mary, page 15 written by St. Louis Grignion de Monfort: For God has made her(Mary) queen of heaven and earth LEADER of his armies, keeper of his treasurer, dispenser of his graces, worker of his wonders, RESTORER OF HUMAN LIFE, MEDIATRIX on behalf of men, DESTROYER of his enemies, and faithful associate in his great works and triumphs.]
KITA MO NA ANG KATANGAHAN MO. LALO MO LANG PINUKPOK ANG SARILI MO. HE HE HE... SI MARIA AY GINAWANG REINA KASI NANAY SIYA NI JESUS. SINO ANG NAGBIGAY NG GRASYA KAY MARIA PARA MAGING REYNA? ANG DIOS. MEANING, HINDI DIOS SI MARIA. HA HA HA... KUNG SI MARIA AY DIOS HINDI SIYA QUEEN KUNDI KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS. GRABE ANG KITID NG UTAK NG MGA HERETICO NA ITO.
SI ST. LOUIS GRIGNON DE MONTFORT AY HINDI HERETICO NA TULAD MO. HINDI SIYA BALIW AT HINDI NIYA TINURO NA DIOS SI MARIA AT HINDI NIYA TINURO NA SI MARIA ANG WISDOM INCARNATE. PWEDE BA TIGILAN ANG KABALIWAN.
-
October 28, 2011 9:27 AM
Labels:
Marian Apologetics,
Mary is God Heresy
Thursday, October 27, 2011
THE WOMAN CLOTHED WITH THE SUN AND THE HERESY CLAIMING THAT MARY IS GOD
The Woman Clothed With the Sun on the Tilma of Juan Diego given by the Blessed Virgin Mary
- Anonymous said...
-
Bakit po kayo nakaarrive at the conclusion na si Mary iyong featured as
the Woman cloth with the sun, di ba kasi nakalagay duon na she gave
birth to a male child who will rule the world with an iron rod?
Paki-understand lang po ang biblical verse na ito: Sirach 15:1-3 He who fears the Lord will do this; he who is practiced in the Law will come to WISDOM. Motherlike She will meet him, like a young bride, She will embrace him, nourish him with the BREAD of understanding, and give him the WATER of learning to drink.
Walang sinabi rito na si Maria but ang WISDOM ang magnourish with BREAD and WATER which is a symbolic allusion of Jesus.So ang Mother or young bride na ito can be inferred as Mary.
Prov. 9:5 Wisdom says: "Come eat of my food and drink of the wine I have mixed!
Ang nagmix ng FOOD and WINE (again, a symbolic allusion of Jesus) ay ang WISDOM.
Si Jesus ay bridegroom at hindi youngbride at hindi rin siya Mother. So, who is She?
- October 26, 2011 11:53 PM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[Bakit po kayo nakaarrive at the conclusion na si Mary iyong featured as
the Woman cloth with the sun, di ba kasi nakalagay duon na she gave
birth to a male child who will rule the world with an iron rod?]
KITAM TALAGANG KULANG ANG IYONG KAALAMAN SA CATHOLIC THEOLOGY TAPOS MAGDU DUNONG DUNUNGAN KANG DIOS SI MAMA MARY.
HINDI AKO ANG NAGTURO NA SI MARY ANG WOMAN CLOTHED WITH THE SUN. IYAN AY OFFICIAL NA TURO NG SANTA IGLESIA AT TINURO NG MGA SANTO PAPA. MALINAW NAMAN NA ANG BATA AYA NG MESIYAS AT SI MARIA ANG INA NG MESIYAS. HE HE HE… KAYA NGA QUEEN OF THE WORLD SI MARY KASI INA SIYA NG KING OF THE WORLD NA SI JESUS. SIYA AY INANG REYNA. NALAMAN KO YAN DAHIL TINURO SA AKIN NG CATHOLIC CHURCH. KAHIT ANG WIKIPEDIA AY ALAM IYAN:
“Catholic tradition assigns the identity of the woman to the Virgin Mary after her assumption into heaven, where she is revealed in all her glory as the "Queen of Heaven", "Mother of God", "Mother of the Church", the "Co-Redemptrix", and the "Mediatrix of all graces." This view has been affirmed by Pope Pius X[5], Pope Pius XII[6], Pope Paul VI[7], and Pope John Paul II[8]. According to this view, the woman's "male child," is a reference to Jesus (Revelation 12:5), since he is destined to "rule all nations with a rod of iron" (Revelation 12:5). The dragon trying to devour the woman's child at the moment of his birth (Revelation 12:4) is a reference to Herod the Great's attempt to kill the infant Jesus (Matthew 2:16). Through his death and resurrection, Jesus "was snatched up to God and to his throne" (Revelation 12:5).” -- THE WOMAN CLOTHED WITH THE SUN
ANG ARAL MO AY HINDI GALING SA CHURCH KUNDI GALING SA DEMONIO.
-
[Paki-understand lang po ang biblical verse na ito:]
OK
[ Sirach 15:1-3 He who fears the Lord will do this; he who is practiced in the Law will come to WISDOM.]
YUN DAW MGA MAY TAKOT SA DIOS AY GAGAWA NG MABUTI AT LALAPIT O MAGMAMAHAL SA KARUNUNGAN. NGAYON, KUNG HINDI KA TANGA SA BIBLIA AT SA CATHOLIC CATECHISM ALAM MO NA ANG WISDOM AY GALING SA HOLY SPIRIT. IT IS ONE OF THE SEVEN GIFTS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT AT HINDI GALING KAY MAMA MARY. BESIDES, WISDOM ALSO IS FOUND IN THE WORD OF CHRIST – THE GOSPEL AS DECLARED BY THE BIBLE:
Psalm 111:10 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom; a good understanding have all those who practice it. His praise endures for ever!
SEE, THE BEGINNING OF WISDOM IS THE FEAR OF THE LORD. WISDOM COMES FROM THE LORD NOT FROM MARY. MARY IS CALLED THE SEAT OF WISDOM BECAUSE SHE CONCEIVED JESUS BUT SHE IS NOT WISDOM ITSELF.
[Motherlike She will meet him, like a young bride, She will embrace him, nourish him with the BREAD of understanding, and give him the WATER of learning to drink.]
HA HA HA… WISDOM IS ‘MOTHERLIKE’ BUT WISDOM IS NOT A MOTHER PHYSICALLY. THAT IS A MERE ANALOGY. IT REFERS TO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SOUL OF A GOOD PERSON INCREASING IN WISDOM BECAUSE OF HE IS LOVING RIGHTEOUSNESS. BEING FAITHFUL TO GOD THE SOUL IS INCREASING IN WISDOM. AND THOSE WHO ARE SEEKING THE LORD THE LORD RECIPROCATES WITH LOVE LIKE A MOTHER.
[Walang sinabi rito na si Maria but ang WISDOM ang magnourish with BREAD and WATER which is a symbolic allusion of Jesus.]
HA HA HA… THE MORE YOU SHOWED YOUR STUPIDITY. HA HA HA… THE ONE THAT GIVES US THE BREAD OF LIFE IS JESUS NOT MARY. THE TRUE BREAD FROM HEAVEN IS JESUS NOT MARY [JOHN 6:51], THEN UNDERSTANDING COMES FROM THE HOLY SPIRIT:
Psalm 111:10 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom; a good understanding have all those who practice it. His praise endures for ever!
Psalm 119:169 Let my cry come before thee, O LORD; give me understanding according to thy word!
AGAIN, UNDERSTANDING COMES FROM THE LORD AS WELL AS WISDOM:
Proverbs 2:6 For the LORD gives wisdom; from his mouth come knowledge and understanding;
PWEDE BA TIGILAN MO KAMI SA MGA KATANGAHAN MO. HERETIKONG PULPOL.
[So ang Mother or young bride na ito can be inferred as Mary.]
WALA. GUNI-GUNI MO LANG IYAN. HE HE HE… WISDOM AND UNDERSTANDING COMES FROM THE LORD. HINDI SI MARY ANG TINUTUKOY. HE HE HE… NAGDEDELIRIO KA NA SA KABALIWAN.
[Prov. 9:5 Wisdom says: "Come eat of my food and drink of the wine I have mixed!]
SI JESUS PA RIN IYON DAHIL SI JESUS ANG NAGBIGAY SA ATIN NG FOOD AND DRINK WHICH IS THE BREAD OF LIFE AND THE CUP OF ETERNAL SALVATION: “HERE IS MY BODY” EAT IT… “HERE IS MY BLOOD” DRINK IT…
[Ang nagmix ng FOOD and WINE (again, a symbolic allusion of Jesus) ay ang WISDOM.]
SI JESUS NGA IYON. SI JESUS ANG GUMAWA NG KANYANG BODY AND BLOOD. SIYA ANG GUMAWA AT NAGBIGAY NG FOOD AND DRINK HINDI SI MARY. HE HE HE… KAILAN NAGBIGAY SI MARY NG FOOD AND DRINK? KAHIT SA WEDDING OF CANA SI JESUS ANG NAGBIGAY NG DRINK HINDI SI MARY. HE HE HE…
[Si Jesus ay bridegroom at hindi youngbride at hindi rin siya Mother. So, who is She?]
HA HA HA… TANGA TALAGA. HINDI NAMAN SINABING MOTHER YUNG WISDOM. ANG SABI ‘MOTHERLIKE’ LIKE A MOTHER PERO HINDI IBIG SABIHIN ‘PHYSICALLY MOTHER’. ANALOGY LANG IYON. AT ANG SABI MAGBIBIGAY NG FOOD AND DRINK WHETHER SPIRITUALLY, ANALOGICALLY OR LITERALLY SI JESUS ANG NAGBIBIGAY NG BREAD AND WINE HINDI SI MARY. KAYA TIGILAN MO NA ANG IYONG KABALIWAN. HINDI RIN SI MARY ANG NAGBIBIGAY SA ATIN NG WATER TO DRINK KUNDI SI JESUS:
John 4:13-14 Jesus said to her, "Every one who drinks of this water will thirst again, but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst; the water that I shall give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life." - ACTUALLY THIS IS JUST A PARAPHRASING OF "THE LORD IS MY SHEPHERD" WHICH COMES FROM PSALM 23: The Lord as our Shepherds leads us to green pastures and lead us to drink in running streams. He makes our cups overflows and prepared a table or banquet for us. THAT IS JESUS NOT MARY! HERETICAL... THE TEACHING THAT MARY IS GOD IS HERETICAL!
-
October 27, 2011 10:02 PM
NATIONAL CONGRESS OF PHILIPPINES FOR LIFE
Pro-life leaders to speak at Cebu Nat’l “Philippines for Life” Congress
MANILA,
Oct. 26, 2011—The Queen City of the South plays host to the next big
gathering of luminaries, workers and newcomers in the pro-life movement
as the National “Philippines for Life” Congress 2011 happens on Nov.
16-18 at the Summit Circle Hotel, Cebu City.
Organized by Human Life International (HLI) Pilipinas, the conference
gathers pro-life leaders from the government, the Church and the
private sector to impart their knowledge and insight on varied topics.
Among the speakers are Senate Majority Leader Senator Vicente “Tito”
Sotto III, Davao Representative Karlo Nograles, former senator Francisco
“Kit” Tatad, former Manila mayor Jose “Lito” Atienza, Jr., economics
expert Dr. Roberto de Vera of the University of Asia and the Pacific,
businessman and The Philippine Star columnist Valeriano “Bobit” Avila,
HLI Asia and Oceania Director Dr. Ligaya Acosta, Antipolo Bishop Gabriel
V. Reyes DD, Bacolod Bishop Vicente M. Navarra, DD, and Catholic
Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines Episcopal Commission on Family
and Life (CBCP-ECFL) Executive Secretary Fr. Melvin Castro.
Mass will be celebrated daily during the three-day conference, with
Cebu Archbishop Jose S. Palma DD, Cebu Archbishop Emeritus Ricardo
Cardinal Vidal, and Butuan Bishop Juan de Dios M. Pueblos DD presiding.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
DEBUNKING THE HERETICAL TEACHING THAT MARY IS GOD AND IS THE INCARNATE DIVINE WISDOM!
Fr. Abe and Our Lady of the Most Holy Rosary
- Anonymous said...
-
I have read in the Mystical City of God by Ven. Mary of Agreda na sinabi
ni Jesus na pag-aralan maigi kung sino si Maria. Ito po ang nasasaad
doon:
" I (Jesus) have not revealed these mysteries in the primitive Church, because they are so great that the faithful would have been lost in the contemplation and admiration of them at a time when it was more necessary to establish firmly the law of grace and the Gospel. Many mysteries pertaining to My Mother...are still hidden, especially the interior secrets of her life and these I wish now to make known."....
so, Father Abe, maraming iniSEKRETO ang Diyos hinggil kay Maria at hindi ito ipinaalam noon sa mga Apostoles kaya namamangha kayo na may nagsasabi na, ang KARUNUNGAN ng Diyos ay nagkatawang tao bilang si Maria.
Hindi ba kayo nagtataka na maraming SECRET si Mary: The Secret of Mary; The Secret of Lasallette; The Secret of the Rosary; The Secret of Fatima; at iyong sinabi ng mga Saints: The Saints have said wonderful things about Mary, the holy City of God, and, as they themselves admit, they were never more eloquent and more pleased than when they spoke of her. And yet maintain that the heights of her merits rising up to the throne of the Godhead cannot be perceived; the breadth of her love which is wider than the earth cannot be measured; the greatness of the power which she wields over one who is God cannot be conceived; and the depths of her profound humility and all her virtues and graces cannot be sounded. What incomprehensible height! What indescribable breadth! What immeasurable greatness! What an impenetrable abyss! (Sirach 1:1-8)
This is what was written in The New World Dictionary -Concordance to the New American Bible: When God created, Wisdom was with him as his craftsman. Wisdom proceeds from God like the breath from his mouth holding sway over every people and nation. Of these he chose one for his dwelling place. In this expression converge the doctrines on Israel's election and on the dwelling of God among his people. Wisdom too comes to dwell among the people and distribute its gifts. Concentrates on one of these gifts and one aspect of Wisdom's activity: WISDOM: HAS BROUGHT WITH ITSELF THE LAW OF THE MOST HIGH (GOD'S WORD), WHICH IS THE DOCTRINE OF LIFE SO THAT HE WHO FOLLOWS IT WILL HAVE LIFE.
Is it then a divine person, together with and distinct from the Lord? Viewed from the full light that the N.T. throws on the O.T. through the Incarnation, this conclusion is legitimate. If however, we take the stance of the author of the Old Testament, it seems obvious that he did not think of Wisdom as SECOND DIVINE PERSON. Wisdom is rather the new face in which God wishes to be sought and found.
SO FATHER, NEVER EVER SAY NEVER EVER!!! ABOUT MARY. HEED THE EXHORTATION OF JESUS ABOUT THE MOTHER OF THE WORD. Otherwise, you will be accountable for the FIRST SATURDAY REPARATION TO THE IMMACULATE HEART MARY.
Reflect the Books of Proverbs; Wisdom; Sirach; Lamentation; Song of Songs; and see the similar features of these from the Books of Saints about Mary. - October 24, 2011 12:56 PM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[I have read in the Mystical City of God by Ven. Mary of Agreda na
sinabi ni Jesus na pag-aralan maigi kung sino si Maria. Ito po ang
nasasaad doon:
" I (Jesus) have not revealed these mysteries in the primitive Church, because they are so great that the faithful would have been lost in the contemplation and admiration of them at a time when it was more necessary to establish firmly the law of grace and the Gospel. Many mysteries pertaining to My Mother...are still hidden, especially the interior secrets of her life and these I wish now to make known."....]
PLEASE PUT YOURSELF INTO PROPER PERSPECTIVE. THAT BOOK OF VEN. MARY OF AGREDA EXPRESSES PRIVATE REVELATION. IT IS NOT REQUIRED FOR ALL OF US CATHOLICS TO BELIEVE THAT JESUS INDEED SAID THOSE WORDS. IT IS NOT THE DOGMA OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. IT IS NOT EQUAL TO THE GOSPELS.
IF YOU BELIEVE THAT STATEMENT OF THE LORD ITS UP TO YOU BUT YOU CANNOT REQUIRE ME TO BELIEVE IT ALSO. VEN. MARY OF AGREDA IS NOT YET EVEN CANONIZED AS SAINT EVEN SO DON'T IMPOSE THESE THINGS AS IF THEY ARE GOSPEL TRUTH. BESIDES NOTHING IS STATED THERE THAT MARY IS GOD OR THAT MARY IS THE DIVINE WISDOM.
[so, Father Abe, maraming iniSEKRETO ang Diyos hinggil kay Maria at hindi ito ipinaalam noon sa mga Apostoles kaya namamangha kayo na may nagsasabi na, ang KARUNUNGAN ng Diyos ay nagkatawang tao bilang si Maria.]
KATANGAHAN. ARAL NG DEMONIO IYANG PINAGPIPILIT MO. ANG KARUNUNGAN NG DIOS AY SI CRISTO NA NAGKATAWANG TAO AT ANG HOLY SPIRIT NA ESPIRITO NG KATOTOHANAN. HINDI SI MARIA. ANG KATOTOHANANG IPINAHAYAG NG DIOS AY NASA BIBLIA AT SA APOSTOLIC TRADITION. KAYA KUNG WALA SA BIBLIA AT APOSTOLIC TRADITION IYAN AY BUNGA LAMANG NG IYONG ILUSYON. ANG KAPAL NAMAN NG MUKA MONG SABIHIN NA ALAM MO ANG SECRETO NG DIOS AMA.
ANG IBIG SABIHIN NANG ISINEKRETO AY MYSTERIES OF FAITH. GOD REVEALED THE FULL TRUTH OF FAITH IN THE BIBLE AND APOSTOLIC TRADITION BUT WE CANNOT FULLY UNDERSTAND THEM. ANG DARATING LATER ON AY GREATER AND DEEPER UNDERSTANDING OF FAITH HINDI MGA ARAL NA TALIWAS SA BIBLIA AT SA APOSTOLIC TRADITION. ANG ARAL NA DIOS SI MARIA AY TALIWAS AT CONTRARY SA BIBLE AT APOSTOLIC TRADITION KAYA ITO AY ARAL NG DEMONIO.
[Hindi ba kayo nagtataka na maraming SECRET si Mary: The Secret of Mary; The Secret of Lasallette; The Secret of the Rosary; The Secret of Fatima;]
HA HA HA... TALAGANG HERETICO NA ITO. ANG TITLE NG MGA AKLAT NA IYON AY SECRET OF MARY PERO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE REVEALED E HINDI NA SECRET. BESIDES, WALANG NAKASULAT DUON NA SI MARIA AY ANG KARUNUNGAN NG DIOS NA NAGKATAWANG TAO. KAYA PWEDE BA WAG MO KAMING IDAMAY SA KADEMONYOHAN NG TURO MO. LUMAYO KA SATANAS.
-
[at iyong sinabi ng mga Saints: The Saints have said wonderful things
about Mary, the holy City of God, and, as they themselves admit, they
were never more eloquent and more pleased than when they spoke of her.]
NONE OF THE SAINTS SAID THAT MARY IS THE INCARNATE HOLY SPIRIT OR THE INCARNATE WISDOM OF GOD. YOUR TEACHING IS HERETICAL AND DIABOLICAL.
[And yet maintain that the heights of her merits rising up to the throne of the Godhead cannot be perceived; the breadth of her love which is wider than the earth cannot be measured; the greatness of the power which she wields over one who is God cannot be conceived; and the depths of her profound humility and all her virtues and graces cannot be sounded. What incomprehensible height! What indescribable breadth! What immeasurable greatness! What an impenetrable abyss! (Sirach 1:1-8)]
KATANGAHAN. INFINITY AND ETERNITY BELONGS TO GOD ALONE. MARY IS GREAT IN HOLINESS AND VIRTUE BUT SHE IS NOT INFINITE AND ETERNAL. THERE IS A LIMITATION IN MARY. SHE REACHED THE HIGHEST DEGREE OF SANCTITY FOR A CREATURE BECAUSE OF THE GRACE OF GOD BUT SHE IS NOT GOD. HINDI SI MARIA ANG TINUTUKOY NG SIRACH 1:1-8 KUNDI SI CRISTO AT ANG ESPIRITO SANTO.
[This is what was written in The New World Dictionary -Concordance to the New American Bible: When God created, Wisdom was with him as his craftsman. Wisdom proceeds from God like the breath from his mouth holding sway over every people and nation. Of these he chose one for his dwelling place. In this expression converge the doctrines on Israel's election and on the dwelling of God among his people.]
IT IS NOWHERE STATED THERE THAT MARY IS THE WISDOM OF GOD. THE WISDOM OF GOD IS THE LOGOS WHO IS JESUS NOT MARY. THE WISDOM OF GOD IS ALSO THE HOLY SPIRIT WHO IS NOT MARY.
GOD DWELT WITH HIS PEOPLE BECAUSE JESUS INCARNATED NOT BECAUSE OF MARY. THE EMMANUEL 'GOD WITH US' IS JESUS NOT MARY. SO YOUR INTERPRETATION IS DEMONIC AND HERETICAL.
[Wisdom too comes to dwell among the people and distribute its gifts.]
THAT IS JESUS AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. JESUS IS THE SOURCE OF SALVATION AND REDEMPTION SO HE DISTRIBUTED GIFTS EVEN IN WEDDING AT CANA IT WAS JESUS WHO GAVE THE GIFT OF WINE NOT MARY... HE IS THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE. THEN, VIRTUES COMES FROM THE HOLY SPIRIT THAT IS WHY FROM CHILDHOOD WE ARE TAUGHT OF THE GIFTS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT AND THE FRUITS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. MARY IS THE MEDIATRIX OF GRACES BECAUSE JESUS PASSED THROUGH HER BUT SHE IS NOT THE SOURCE OF THOSE GRACES. SHE IS NOT GOD.
-
[Concentrates on one of these gifts and one aspect of Wisdom's activity:
WISDOM: HAS BROUGHT WITH ITSELF THE LAW OF THE MOST HIGH (GOD'S WORD),
WHICH IS THE DOCTRINE OF LIFE SO THAT HE WHO FOLLOWS IT WILL HAVE LIFE.]
YOU ONLY SHOWED THAT MARY IS NOT THE WISDOM OF GOD. ONLY FOOLS WILL BELIEVE YOUR DEMONIC INTERPRETATION. THE ONE WHO BROUGHT THE INCARNATION OF THE WORD IS THE HOLY SPIRIT NOT MARY. MARY GAVE BIRTH TO THE WORD THROUGH THE POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. MARY WAS MERE INSTRUMENT BUT THE SOURCE AND ORIGIN OF THE INCARNATION IS THE FATHER AND THE HOLY SPIRIT.
[Is it then a divine person, together with and distinct from the Lord?]
IDIOTIC. IT IS THE LORD AND HIS ETERNAL SPIRIT WHO IS DIVINE AND DISTINCT. MARY IS NOT THE LORD AND MARY IS NOT THE HOLY SPIRIT AND MARY IS NOT DIVINE.
[Viewed from the full light that the N.T. throws on the O.T. through the Incarnation, this conclusion is legitimate. If however, we take the stance of the author of the Old Testament, it seems obvious that he did not think of Wisdom as SECOND DIVINE PERSON. Wisdom is rather the new face in which God wishes to be sought and found.]
IF YOU ARE NOT HERETICAL YOU WILL REALIZE THAT THE WISDOM REFERRED TO IN THE OLD TESTAMENT REFERS TO THE LORD JESUS AND IN SOME INSTANCE TO THE HOLY SPIRIT. MARY IS REFERRED TO AS THE MOTHER OF THE MESSIA, THE VIRGIN MOTHER BUT NOT THE DIVINE WISDOM. NO, NO, NO...
[SO FATHER, NEVER EVER SAY NEVER EVER!!! ABOUT MARY. HEED THE EXHORTATION OF JESUS ABOUT THE MOTHER OF THE WORD. Otherwise, you will be accountable for the FIRST SATURDAY REPARATION TO THE IMMACULATE HEART MARY.]
YOU WILL BE ACCOUNTABLE TO GOD FOR YOUR DEMONIC TEACHING. YOU ARE MAKING MARY DIVINE AND EQUAL TO GOD. YOU ARE A DEMON. HERETICAL. ONLY IDIOTS WILL ACCEPT YOUR STUPID EXPLANATIONS WITHOUT ANY IOTA OF PROOF THAT MARY IS THE WISDOM OF GOD INCARNATE.
[Reflect the Books of Proverbs; Wisdom; Sirach; Lamentation; Song of Songs; and see the similar features of these from the Books of Saints about Mary.]
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS REFLECTED ON THEM FOR 2 THOUSANDS OF YEARS YET THE CHURCH NEVER TAUGHT THAT MARY IS DIVINE OR THE DIVINE WISDOM. THAT TEACHING DIDN'T COME FROM SAINTS BUT FROM SATAN. REPENT FROM YOUR HERESY. GET AWAY FROM THE TEACHING OF SATAN.
- October 26, 2011 10:25 AM
-
Anonymous said...
- Father, sinabi nga ni Jesus na PAG-ARALAN ANG MOTHER OF THE WORD kasi nga hindi pa ito ipinahayag ng Diyos 2000 years ago. Mukhang hindi tama na sabihin mo akong tanga kasi parang bumalik yata iyon sa iyo. di po ba?
- October 26, 2011 10:49 AM
- Fr. Abe, CRS said...
-
[Father, sinabi nga ni Jesus na PAG-ARALAN ANG MOTHER OF THE WORD kasi nga hindi pa ito ipinahayag ng Diyos 2000 years ago.]
HA HA HA... TALAGANG NAGPAPAKATANGA KA. SAAN SINABI NI JESUS NA PAG-ARALAN ANG MOTHER OF THE WORD? ANG SALITA NG DIOS ANG PAG-ARALAN MO. DUON SA WORD OF GOD MO MAKIKITA NA SI MARY AY HINDI DIVINE AT HINDI GOD.
TATANGA-TANGA KA TALAGA KASI ANG FULLNESS OF TRUTH AND OF FAITH AY ALREADY REVEALED. JESUS CHRIST IS THE FULLNESS OF DIVINE REVELATION. AT WALANG SINABI SI JESUS NA DIOS SI MAMA MARY. WALANG WALA.
ANG KAPAL NG MUKHA MONG DEMONIO KA. ANO ANG TINGIN MO SA SARILI MO SANTO PAPA? SI MARIA AY HINDI DIOS AT HINDI DIVINE. YAN AY MALINAW. ANG MOTHER OF THE WORD AY HINDI 'WORD'. WAG MONG IPAGPILITAN ANG IYONG KAHIBANGAN SA AMIN.
[Mukhang hindi tama na sabihin mo akong tanga kasi parang bumalik yata iyon sa iyo. di po ba?]
WALANG BUMABALIK SA KIN DAHIL WALA KANG MAIPAKITANG EVIDENCIA NA SI MARIA AY DIOS. NASAAN ANG PROOF MO? SINONG DEMONIO ANG NAGSABI SA IYO NA NUON AY HINDI TINUTURO NA DIOS SI MARY AT NGAYON AY TINUTURO NA DIOS SIYA? SINO? SI SATANAS O SI LUCIFER? WALANG SANTO PAPA, WALANG APOSTOLES AT WALANG DOCTOR OF THE CHURCH O SANTO ANG NAGTURO NIYAN. IKAW AY KAMPON NG IYONG AMANG DIABLO.
WALANG DOCTRINA ANG SANTA IGLESIA NA SECRET. LAHAT IYAN ALAM NG MGA FAITHFUL. EVEN BEFORE ONE DOCTRINE IS DEFINED AS DOGMA ALAM NA IYAN: Immaculate Conception, Assumption, etc. WALANG SECRET DIYAN. ANG NAGTUTURO NG SECRET AY ANG MGA GNOSTICS NA KAAWAY NG SANTA IGLESIA AT KAMPON NG AMA MONG DIABLO.
PINAPATUNAYAN MO LANG SA MIN NA HERETICO KA. IMAGINE, DAHIL DAW SINABI NI JESUS NA PAG-ARALAN SI MARIA THEN ANG CONCLUSION MO E "DIOS SI MARIA".... NAKU, MALALA ANG SAYAD TALAGA. NAKAKAKUHA NG ARAL MULA SA WALA. HERETICO!!!
-
October 26, 2011 5:24 PM
Labels:
Heresies,
Mary is God Heresy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










.jpg)